<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+2"><font face="Calibri"><i><b>April</b></i></font></font><font
size="+2" face="Calibri"><i><b> 19, 2023</b></i></font><font
face="Calibri"><br>
</font> <br>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ denial slowly evaporates ] <br>
</i></font><font face="Calibri"><b>Climate change: multi-country
media analysis shows scepticism of the basic science is dying
out</b><br>
Published: April 18, 2023<br>
</font><font face="Calibri">Any regular viewer of BBC’s Question
Time could be forgiven for thinking that old-fashioned climate
science denialism is alive and kicking. In a recent edition,
panellist Julia Hartley-Brewer called the IPCC’s climate models
“complete nonsense”, and dismissed the 2022 record UK heatwave and
the floods in Pakistan by saying: “It’s called weather.”<br>
<br>
But for some time now, researchers have suggested that the balance
of arguments propagated by climate sceptics or denialists has
shifted from denying or undermining climate science to challenging
policy solutions designed to reduce emissions.<br>
<br>
For example, computer-assisted methods applied to thousands of
contrarian blogs or websites have found that since the year 2000,
“evidence scepticism” which argues that climate change is not
happening, or is not caused by humans or the effects won’t be too
bad, has been on the decline, while “response” or “solutions
scepticism” has been on the rise.<br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://theconversation.com/climate-change-multi-country-media-analysis-shows-scepticism-of-the-basic-science-is-dying-out-198303">https://theconversation.com/climate-change-multi-country-media-analysis-shows-scepticism-of-the-basic-science-is-dying-out-198303</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ Shell sought shills down by the rising sea
shores...]</i><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><b>‘Bombshell’ 1989 Shell Memo Features
in New Court Filing Alleging Climate Deception</b><br>
Document warning that civilisation could prove a "fragile thing"
is used to bolster District of Columbia lawsuit against Big Oil.<br>
By Matthew Greenon</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Apr 13, 2023 <br>
</font><font face="Calibri">In October 1989, Shell researchers wrote
a confidential report warning that climate-fuelled migration could
swamp borders in the United States, Soviet Union, Europe, and
Australia. “Conflict would abound,” the document said.
“Civilisation could prove a fragile thing.” <br>
<br>
Now, that memo — first reported by DeSmog and Dutch investigative
journalism platform Follow The Money — features in a new court
brief alleging that Shell, ExxonMobil, Chevron, and BP knowingly
concealed the climate hazards of their fossil fuel products for
decades. <br>
A group of climate disinformation researchers and nonprofits filed
the brief on April 7 in support of a 2020 lawsuit brought by the
District of Columbia, part of a wave of litigation by at least 20
U.S. states and cities seeking to hold the oil industry to account
for climate damages. <br>
<br>
The 50-page brief cites academic studies and media reports to show
how the oil industry was warned about the risks posed by a
build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from burning fossil
fuels in the late 1950s. Companies such as Shell and ExxonMobil
went on to develop detailed internal knowledge of the problem,
while backing industry associations waging sophisticated campaigns
to cast doubt on climate science, the brief argues.<br>
<br>
“While their tactics have changed, Defendants’ overall strategy of
deception continues to this day,” the brief said. “Defendants now
acknowledge that the climate is changing and claim to be leaders
in efforts to combat climate change. However, they continue to run
marketing and lobbying campaigns intended to mislead policymakers
and the public about climate change and Defendants’ role in
causing it.”<br>
<br>
A Shell spokesperson said the company’s position on climate change
had been a matter of public record for decades, and that it was
reducing its own emissions, and working closely with customers to
help them reduce theirs.<br>
<br>
“We do not believe the courtroom is the right place to address
climate change as litigation does not enable the global
cooperation needed,” the spokesperson said. “It is for government
to determine the right trade-offs for society and put in place
smart policy to enable fundamental change in the way society
consumes energy.” <br>
<br>
BP, ExxonMobil, and Chevron did not immediately respond to
requests for comment.<br>
<br>
‘No Place To Go’<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">The brief marks the first time that documents
obtained through a 14-month congressional investigation into
allegations of climate misinformation by Shell, ExxonMobil,
Chevron, and BP have been cited in a climate accountability
lawsuit.<br>
<br>
The confidential Shell document is from a separate source,
however: a dossier of 201 company publications, official
correspondence, reports, academic studies, and other materials
compiled by Dutch researcher and climate activist Vatan Hüzeir.
Documents from the collection, reviewed by DeSmog, can be viewed
at Climate Files, a project of the nonprofit Climate
Investigations Center.<br>
<br>
Titled “SCENARIOS 1989 – 2010,” the Shell memo outlines a
high-emissions “global mercantilism” scenario in which average
global temperatures rise by “considerably more” than 1.5 degrees
Celsius.<br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23735737-1989-oct-confidential-shell-group-planning-scenarios-1989-2010-challenge-and-response-disc-climate-refugees-and-shift-to-non-fossil-fuels">https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23735737-1989-oct-confidential-shell-group-planning-scenarios-1989-2010-challenge-and-response-disc-climate-refugees-and-shift-to-non-fossil-fuels</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<i><font face="Calibri">[ Permafrost Ice melting into muddy ground ]</font></i><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>Thawing permafrost may release industrial
pollutants at Arctic sites: study</b></font><br>
<font face="Calibri">There are thousands of contaminated sites in
the Arctic, and as permafrost thaws, increased pollutants from
these areas could be released, says a recent study.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Eye on the Arctic </font><br>
<font face="Calibri">April 09, 2023</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">By Eilís Quinn </font><br>
<font face="Calibri">“Traditionally, [permafrost has] also been
considered a natural barrier that prevents the spread of
pollutants,” said Moritz Langer, one of the authors and a
researcher at the Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for
Polar and Marine Research (AWI), said. </font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">“Consequently, industrial waste from defunct or
active facilities was often simply left on-site, instead of
investing the considerable effort and expense needed to remove
it.”</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">The paper, “Thawing permafrost poses
environmental threat to thousands of sites with legacy industrial
contamination” appeared in the journal Nature Communications. </font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Climate affecting permafrost barriers </font><br>
<font face="Calibri">During the Cold War, industrial expansion took
place across the Arctic, the researchers said.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Matter left behind ranged from mining debris to
old military installations to toxic sludge from oil and gas
exploration. </font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Some of this was poured into lakes, the authors
said. </font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Permafrost was seen as both a stable and
reliable foundation to build infrastructure as well as an
effective bulwark against toxins and pollution from spreading.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">“In many cases, the assumption was that the
permafrost would reliably and permanently seal off these toxic
substances, which meant there was no need for costly disposal
efforts,” Guido Grosse, and author and researcher who also heads
the AWI’s Permafrost Research Section, said in a news release...</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">- -</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">But as the climate warms in the North, and
permafrost melts threatening both the integrity of the
infrastructure and its ability to contain pollutants. </font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">To do their paper, the researchers examined
data from OpenStreetMap and from the Atlas of Population, Society
and Economy in the Arctic. Using those sources, they identified
4,500 industrial sites either using or storing potentially harmful
pollutants. </font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Outside of North America, the researchers were
unable to access detailed information on the types of facilities
or potential severity of environmental pollution they could
create...</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">- -</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">As international commercial interest in the
North continues to increase, the researchers recommend more data
collection and the development of a monitoring system for
industrial activities in the Arctic. </font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">“As a result, more and more industrial
facilities are being constructed, which could also release toxic
substances into nearby ecosystems,” the news release said. </font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">“ Further, this is happening at a time when
removing such environmental hazards is getting harder and harder –
after all, doing so often requires vehicles and heavy gear, which
can hardly be used on vulnerable tundra soils that are
increasingly affected by thaw.”</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Grosse says the unpredictability ahead requires
a definitive strategy. </font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">“In a nutshell, what we’re seeing here is a
serious environmental problem that is sure to get worse,” he
said.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/climate-crisis/2023/04/thawing-permafrost-may-release-industrial-pollutants-arctic-sites-study">https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/climate-crisis/2023/04/thawing-permafrost-may-release-industrial-pollutants-arctic-sites-study</a></font><br>
<p><font face="Calibri">- -</font></p>
<i><font face="Calibri">[ see the research paper ]</font></i><br>
<font face="Calibri">28 March 2023<br>
<b>Thawing permafrost poses environmental threat to thousands of
sites with legacy industrial contamination</b><br>
</font><font face="Calibri">Abstract<br>
</font>
<blockquote><font face="Calibri">Industrial contaminants accumulated
in Arctic permafrost regions have been largely neglected in
existing climate impact analyses. Here we identify about 4500
industrial sites where potentially hazardous substances are
actively handled or stored in the permafrost-dominated regions
of the Arctic. Furthermore, we estimate that between 13,000 and
20,000 contaminated sites are related to these industrial sites.
Ongoing climate warming will increase the risk of contamination
and mobilization of toxic substances since about 1100 industrial
sites and 3500 to 5200 contaminated sites located in regions of
stable permafrost will start to thaw before the end of this
century. This poses a serious environmental threat, which is
exacerbated by climate change in the near future. To avoid
future environmental hazards, reliable long-term planning
strategies for industrial and contaminated sites are needed that
take into account the impacts of cimate change..</font><br>
</blockquote>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-37276-4">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-37276-4</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri"> <i>[ Michael Dowd reads article from GQ
magazine (UK edition)]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>Jem Bendell - The Doom Seer Of Climate Chaos
- GQ April - May 2023</b></font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Apr-May 2023 GQ (UK) article on Jem Bendell,
"The doom seer of climate chaos"<b><br>
</b></font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://soundcloud.com/michael-dowd-grace-limits/jem-bendell-the-doom-seer-of-climate-chaos-gq-april-may-2023">https://soundcloud.com/michael-dowd-grace-limits/jem-bendell-the-doom-seer-of-climate-chaos-gq-april-may-2023</a></font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><b>- -</b></font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">[ inevitable ]<b><br>
</b></font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">Professor Jem Bendell Strategist &
educator on social change, focused on Deep Adaptation to
societal breakdown<b><br>
</b></font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><b>I was wrong to conclude collapse is
inevitable…</b><br>
Posted on April 17, 2023by jembendell<br>
I was wrong to conclude collapse is inevitable… because when I
was concluding that, it had already begun.<br>
<br>
When I concluded that societal collapse is inevitable, nearly 5
years ago, it may have been one of the reasons my Deep
Adaptation paper attracted unusual attention. Many people agreed
and thanked me for expressing that conclusion publicly. They
said it helped validate what they already felt, and so enabled
their emotional processing and to change their lives
accordingly. Other people chose a variety of ways to disagree.
Some claimed I was not being scientific to claim an inevitable
outcome, and instead language like “near certain” or “very
likely” would be more appropriate. Others preferred to regard
societal collapse as a possibility, as they wanted to hope for a
managed transition to a new form of society. Unfortunately,
other people misrepresented what I wrote. To recap: in the paper
I did not claim that we faced inevitable near-term human
extinction and did not claim that the inevitable collapse would
happen by 2028. Instead, in that paper in 2018 I wrote: “Recent
research suggests that human societies will experience
disruptions to their basic functioning within less than ten
years due to climate stress. Such disruptions include increased
levels of malnutrition, starvation, disease, civil conflict and
war – and will not avoid affluent nations.” In 2023 many experts
and UN officials are saying similar.<br>
<br>
I summarised my position thus: “Currently, I have chosen to
interpret the information as indicating inevitable collapse,
probable catastrophe and possible extinction.” I then warned
against the trap of concluding inevitable human extinction: “I
have witnessed how people who doubt extinction is either
inevitable or coming soon are disparaged by some participants
for being weak and deluded. This could reflect how some of us
may find it easier to believe in a certain than uncertain story,
especially when the uncertain future would be so different to
today that it is difficult to comprehend.”<br>
<br>
Unfortunately, the misrepresentations of the original Deep
Adaptation paper within mainstream publications and by
participants in environmental professions and movements has
distorted understanding, even for people who welcomed the
analysis and concept in the first instance. Such
misrepresentation has been helpful for those people who wanted
to side-line a discussion of collapse or, perhaps, to own the
agenda for themselves. It is an open question how much crucial
time and public money has been lost due to people pursuing such
tactics.<br>
<br>
The valid criticisms were that I had not sufficiently defined
either collapse or what would be collapsing. I was new to the
topic of societal collapse at that time. So when in early 2021 I
embarked on a couple of years of research on the topic, with an
interdisciplinary team, I was open to finding analysis that
would nuance my conclusions. The result of that process is
contained in my new book, Breaking Together. What I discovered
is that the breakdown of societies had already begun when I was
researching the Deep Adaptation paper in 2017/18. Collapse is a
process, not an event, and because the changes already observed
appear to be irreversible, collapse is a reasonable term to
describe that process.<br>
<br>
In the book I go into great depth on the evidence base for this
perspective. I also explain why it is not one that we hear so
often from experts. Chapter 1 is available for free as an audio
file on soundcloud. In it I describe some of the socio-economic
evidence and theory for the view that the collapse of industrial
consumer societies has already begun. Chapter 4 on global food
system breakdown is also available as an Occasional Paper from
my University. Commenting on it, Dr Katja Hujo from the UN
Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) notes:<br>
<br>
“Jem Bendell’s paper (and forthcoming book) is a wake-up call
that our global food systems are approaching global breakdown
due to a number of interlinked hard trends, from biophysical
limits of food production and climate change to growing demand
and the destructive implications of our profit-oriented
capitalist system. The application of interdisciplinary
integrative analysis and the emphasis on economic, social,
technological and ecological dimensions of the challenge ahead
helps to grapple with the complexity of the issue and to avoid
simplistic solutions. It is an analysis that motivates the
reader to act at multiple fronts and critically engage with a
topic that has a huge bearing on the future of humanity.”<br>
<br>
I spoke with GQ Magazine about the process of writing the book
(one image from their article is shown above). The research
process was not fun for any of us involved, due to the fact we
were analysing so many interconnecting problems and discovering
the limitations of so many proposed solutions. However, the
second half of the book offers a positive way of making sense of
this situation and celebrates the people who are responding
creatively and courageously. I am hoping it will help more
people to move into a ‘post-doom’ mindset and experiment with
different ways of living as a result.<br>
<br>
I will launch the paperback of Breaking Together in the UK in
Glastonbury Town Hall on June 18th. Then on July 10th 2023, the
book will become free as an epub download on the website of the
Schumacher Institute. That is the 50th anniversary of the
publication of Small is Beautiful by EF Schumacher. I now regard
that classic text as offering a coherent analysis that the
environmental movement and profession became better at ignoring
as it became more compromised and self-serving. That day I will
participate in an online Q&A with participants from the Deep
Adaptation Leadership group on LinkedIn. You could sign up here.
To be updated on my presentations in other locations over the
next 12 months, subscribe to my blog.<br>
<br>
You can read more about the book, including a range of
endorsements, from people including Charles Eisenstein, Clare
Farrell and Satish Kumar, on my blog. The obtain the book on
kindle on May 9th 2023, you can pre-order here.<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://jembendell.com/2023/04/17/i-was-wrong-to-conclude-collapse-is-inevitable/">https://jembendell.com/2023/04/17/i-was-wrong-to-conclude-collapse-is-inevitable/</a></font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">- -</font></p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ His book can be pre-ordered ]</i><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><b>Breaking Together: A freedom-loving
response to collapse Kindle Edition</b><br>
by Jem Bendell (Author) Format: Kindle Edition<br>
#1 New Release in Political Freedom<br>
See all formats and editions<br>
Kindle $8.88<br>
Read with Our Free App<br>
“This is a prophetic book” Satish Kumar, founder, Schumacher
College<br>
<br>
The collapse of modern societies has begun. That is the conclusion
of two years of research by the interdisciplinary team behind
Breaking Together. How did it come to this? Because monetary
systems caused us to harm each other & nature to such an
extent it broke the foundations of our societies. So what should
we do? This book describes people allowing the full pain of our
predicament to liberate them into living more courageously &
creatively. They demonstrate we can be breaking together, not
apart, in this era of collapse. Jem Bendell argues that reclaiming
our freedoms is essential to soften the fall & regenerate the
natural world. Escaping the efforts of panicking elites, we can
advance an ecolibertarian agenda for both politics & practical
action in a broken world.<br>
<br>
"This book is part of a healing movement that extends beyond what
we normally think of as ecological" Charles Eisenstein, author,
Climate: A New Story<br>
<br>
"This book shows that instead of imposing elitist schemes and
scams, regenerating nature and culture together is the only way
forward" Dr Stella Nyambura Mbau, Loabowa Kenya<br>
<br>
"A signpost for people made politically homeless by the craziness
of the last few years" Aaron Vandiver, author, Under a Poacher's
Moon<br>
<br>
“The mother of all 'mic drops' on the myth of sustainable
development” Katie Carr, Deep Adaptation Forum<br>
<br>
"A new compass for navigating collapse” Pablo Servigne &
Raphael Stevens, authors, Another End of the World is Possible<br>
<br>
"If you want to save some of the world but hate being told what to
do, this book is for you.” Clare Farrell, co-founder, Extinction
Rebellion<br>
</font>
<blockquote><font face="Calibri">Contents</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Introduction</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">1 Economic collapse</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">2 Monetary collapse</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">3 Energy collapse</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">4 Biosphere collapse</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">5 Climate collapse</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">6 Food collapse</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">7 Societal collapse</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">8 Freedom to know</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">9 Freedom from progress</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">10 Freedom from banking</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">11 Freedom in nature</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">12 Freedom to collapse & grow</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">13 Freedom from fake green globalists</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Conclusion</font><br>
</blockquote>
<font face="Calibri">"Breaking Together constructs a comprehensive,
compelling yet nuanced argument that societal collapse is well
underway. Professor Bendell skillfully and seamlessly integrates
personal reflection and hard data from virtually every domain to
provide a unique vision of catagenesis - the creative renewal of
post collapse society. He advocates for an ecolibertarian rather
than the ecoauthoritarian world that is beginning to emerge. While
It’s often a cliché if the reader has but one book to choose to
read this year, it should be Breaking Together. That said, please
center yourself as you engage with this brilliant, heartfelt,
disturbing and often heartbreaking story of the possible futures
that will touch everyone of the 8 billion of us." Herb Simmens,
author, A Climate Vocabulary of the Future<br>
<br>
“Our societies are breaking because of damage to the living
systems of our planet. It's time to face this reality and this
book helps us do just that. As further collapse unfolds we need a
practical alternative to global panic. Jem Bendell has got one -
restoring community self-reliance as a global effort." Pooran
Desai OBE, CEO, OnePlanet<br>
<br>
"Breaking Together provides an impressive and sobering analysis of
what is happening in societies and the biosphere, why ‘we’ (in
modern cultures) didn’t know sooner, and what realistic choices
remain, both individually and collectively. Jem and his team
didn't just stare into the abyss - they spent two years mapping it
for us. This book provides essential wisdom on the necessity of
staying engaged politically and socially, whilst attending to the
toxic psycho-social patterns that need healing if we are to retain
dignity and justice in the coming years." Katie Carr, Deep
Adaptation Forum<br>
Epub from 17/6/2023<br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C1JLL45V?ref_=pe_3052080_276849420">https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C1JLL45V?ref_=pe_3052080_276849420</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<font face="Calibri"> <i>[ "first use of "tipping point" in an
academic paper" 2008 ]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font> <font face="Calibri"><b>The scariest
climate science paper I've ever read?</b><br>
Simon Clark<br>
Sep 19, 2022<br>
Learn more about how the natural world works with Brilliant: <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.brilliant.org/simonclark">https://www.brilliant.org/simonclark</a><br>
<br>
This month a paper came out that honestly chilled me. It was about
tipping points in climate - a well-known concept that the climate
can change abruptly if certain conditions are met in certain
elements of the climate system, such as excess melting of the
Greenland ice sheet. That wasn't new. What was new was the
threshold these tipping elements could flip - according to this
research, we could be triggering some tipping elements already -
and if we warm the planet by just 1.5°C then we are likely to do
so.<br>
<br>
The climate is still within our control. But if we keep emitting
as we are, that isn't always going to be the case.<br>
Every. Tenth. Of. A. Degree. Counts.<br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxoyaCSWFGs&">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxoyaCSWFGs&</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ all this is right on schedule ... ]</i><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><b>The rotten core of the new IPCC
report</b><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOd-Jgly9Us">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOd-Jgly9Us</a><br>
</font><br>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri"> <i>[The news archive - looking back at a
bumbling Boehner -- he forgot to read the memos - from
Greenman3610 ]</i><br>
<font size="+2"><i><b>April 19, 2009</b></i></font> <br>
April 19, 2009: House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) stumbles
through an interview with George Stephanopoulos on ABC's "This
Week," shamelessly attempting to dismiss concerns about carbon
pollution.<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://youtu.be/tAHSm6Wt1W8">http://youtu.be/tAHSm6Wt1W8</a><br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://youtu.be/WPA-8A4zf2c">http://youtu.be/WPA-8A4zf2c</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri">======================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*Mass media is lacking, many </span>daily
summaries<span class="moz-txt-tag"> deliver global warming
news - a few are email delivered*</span></b> <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><br>
=========================================================<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b>*Inside Climate News</b><br>
Newsletters<br>
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every
day or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s
top headlines deliver the full story, for free.<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/">https://insideclimatenews.org/</a><br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
*<b>Climate Nexus</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*</a>
<br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the
day, delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant
reporting. It also provides original reporting and commentary on
climate denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise
remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday <br>
================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Carbon Brief Daily </b><span
class="moz-txt-star"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a></span><b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> <br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
================================== <br>
*T<b>he Daily Climate </b>Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days.
Better than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
<br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri">
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender. This is a personal hobby production curated
by Richard Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</font>
</body>
</html>