<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="+2"><font face="Calibri"><i><b>May</b></i></font></font><font
size="+2" face="Calibri"><i><b> 12, 2023</b></i></font></p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ Internal displacement -- refugees that
don't cross a border -- Homeland Security News Wire ]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>All-Time Record: 71 Million People
Internally Displaced Worldwide</b><br>
Published 11 May 2023Share |<br>
The number of internally displaced people (IDPs) around the world
reached 71.1 million as of the end of 2022, an increase of 20 per
cent from the previous year. Internal displacement is a global
phenomenon, but nearly three-quarters of the world’s IDPs live in
just 10 countries.<br>
<br>
The number of internally displaced people (IDPs) around the world
reached 71.1 million as of the end of 2022, an increase of 20 per
cent from the previous year, according to the Internal
Displacement Monitoring Centre’s annual report.<br>
<br>
The number of movements in which people fled in search of safety
and shelter, sometimes more than once, was also unprecedented in
2022. The figure of 60.9 million was up 60 percent from the
previous year. The conflict in Ukraine triggered nearly 17 million
displacements as people fled repeatedly from rapidly shifting
frontlines, and monsoon floods in Pakistan triggered 8.2 million,
accounting for a quarter of the year’s global disaster
displacement.<br>
<br>
“Today’s displacement crises are growing in scale, complexity and
scope, and factors like food insecurity, climate change and
escalating and protracted conflicts are adding new layers to this
phenomenon,” said IDMC’s director, Alexandra Bilak. “Greater
resources and further research are essential to help understand
and better respond to IDPs’ needs”.<br>
<br>
Internal displacement is a global phenomenon, but nearly
three-quarters of the world’s IDPs live in just 10 countries -
Syria, Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC),
Ukraine, Colombia, Ethiopia, Yemen, Nigeria, Somalia and Sudan -
many as a result of unresolved conflicts that continued to trigger
significant displacement in 2022.<br>
<br>
Conflict and violence triggered 28.3 million internal
displacements worldwide, a figure three times higher than the
annual average over the past decade. Beyond Ukraine, nine million
or 32 per cent of the global total were recorded in sub-Saharan
Africa. DRC accounted for around four million and Ethiopia just
over two million.<br>
<br>
The number of disaster displacements rose by nearly 40 percent
compared to the previous year, reaching 32.6 million, largely the
result of the effects of La Niña which continued for a third
consecutive year. South Asia record- ed the highest regional
figure, surpassing East Asia and<br>
<br>
the Pacific for the first time in a decade. In the Horn of Africa,
the worst drought in 40 years triggered 2.1 million movements,
including 1.1 million in Somalia alone, while fueling acute food
insecurity across the region.<br>
<br>
The secretary general of the Norwegian Refugee Council, Jan
Egeland, described the overlapping crises around the world as a
“perfect storm”.<br>
<br>
“Conflict and disasters combined last year to aggravate people’s
pre-existing vulnerabilities and inequalities, triggering
displacement on a scale never seen before,” he said. “The war in
Ukraine also fueled a global food security crisis that hit the
internally displaced hardest. This perfect storm has undermined
years of progress made in reducing global hunger and
malnutrition.”<br>
<br>
Better data and analysis are still needed to improve understanding
of the relationship between food security and displacement, but
IDMC’s report shows that the former is often a consequence of the
latter and can have lasting impacts on both IDPs and host
communities. Three-quarters of the countries that face crisis
levels of food insecurity are also home to IDPs.<br>
<br>
Shining light on this connection is key to understanding how IDPs
are affected by disruptions to food systems, but also how future
investments in food security will be essential to reaching
solutions.<br>
<br>
“There is an increasing need for durable solutions to meet the
scale of the challenges facing displaced people,” Bilak said.
“This spans the expansion of cash assistance and livelihood
programs that improve IDPs’ eco- nomic security, through to
investments in risk reduction measures that strengthen their
communities’ resilience.”<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/dr20230511-alltime-record-71-million-people-internally-displaced-worldwide">https://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/dr20230511-alltime-record-71-million-people-internally-displaced-worldwide</a><i><br>
</i></font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><i>- -</i></font></p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre ]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>ALL-TIME HIGH OF 71 MILLION PEOPLE
INTERNALLY DISPLACED WORLDWIDE</b></font><br>
<font face="Calibri">11 May 2023, Geneva - The number of internally
displaced people (IDPs) around the world reached 71.1 million as
of the end of 2022, an increase of 20 per cent from the previous
year, according to the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre’s
flagship annual report.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.internal-displacement.org/media-centres/all-time-high-of-71-million-people-internally-displaced-worldwide">https://www.internal-displacement.org/media-centres/all-time-high-of-71-million-people-internally-displaced-worldwide</a></font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri"><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><i><br>
</i></font></p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ Seth Borenstein for Living on Earth --
audio and transcript - hazard is not a disaster ( humans make
hazards into a disaster ) ]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>U.S. Primed for Climate Troubles</b></font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Air Date: Week of May 5, 2023<br>
</font><font face="Calibri">Because of its unique geography, the
United States is particularly vulnerable to nearly every kind of
weather-related disaster: tornadoes, hurricanes, wildfires, and
more. And as Associated Press science writer Seth Borenstein
explains to Living on Earth’s Aynsley O’Neill, these natural
disasters are getting an unnatural boost with climate change.</font>
<blockquote><font face="Calibri"><b>Transcript</b></font><br>
<font face="Calibri">BASCOMB: It’s Living on Earth, I’m Bobby
Bascomb.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">DOERING: And I’m Jenni Doering</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">As we talked about before the break, a shift
towards an El Nino weather pattern and record high ocean
temperatures are troubling developments for much of the world,
especially the United States. Thanks to our unique geography,
the US is particularly vulnerable to nearly every kind of
natural disaster. We have more tornadoes each year than any
other country in the world. We are also prone to hurricanes,
wildfires, and blizzards. These natural disasters are getting an
unnatural boost with climate change and the US can expect to be
ground zero for more destruction in the coming decades. For
details we called up Seth Borenstein. He’s a science writer with
the climate and environment team at the Associated Press. He
spoke with Living on Earth’s Aynsley O’Neill.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">O'NEILL: So what geographical features make
the United States so uniquely susceptible to extreme weather?</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">BORENSTEIN: Well, you've got two oceans, the
Atlantic and the Pacific. And then you have the Gulf of Mexico,
which is a third coast. And then you have the Rocky Mountains
right through the middle of the United States going north south.
The United States is also in the mid latitudes, where you get
the difference between the cold in the polar regions, and the
hot in the tropics. And then you also have the Jetstream, which
comes whizzing through. And it's along that Jetstream that's the
instability. On one side of the Jetstream you have cold, and the
other side, you have hot. I mean, you just look at the United
States, it's almost like there's two weather patterns, one
country. West is dry and getting drier and the East is wet and
getting wetter. So all of those sort of combine in different
ways to cause various weather extremes. I mean, tornadoes,
hurricanes, wildfires, blizzards. You get nearly every possible
one in the United States. And in many of them like tornadoes,
you get it far more than anywhere else.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">O'NEILL: So lots of other countries will
certainly have coastlines and huge mountain ranges, you know,
the Himalayas or the Andes. And well, in places like Australia,
they're just completely surrounded by water. So how do the
weather hazards of these other countries compare to those of the
United States?</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">BORENSTEIN: Well, Australia does have some of
those issues. But if you think about it, much of these changes
also brew in the center. If you have hazards in the Australian
Outback, it doesn't affect many people, because there are a few
people. The other thing is Australia, it's not quite in the same
place where you have sort of the Jetstream plunging through.
China's another good one, I kept asking when I talked to
scientists in terms of comparisons. But what China has is just
the one major coast, and it doesn't get the mixing or clashing
of air that the US gets. I mean, it's not to say that there
aren't natural hazards anywhere else. It's just we get a wide
variety.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">O'NEILL: Well, geography handed us a
combination of dangerous ingredients. But our choices are also
playing a role here. How are we exacerbating the situation?</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">BORENSTEIN: The key here is these are not
disasters in themselves. Meteorologists and disaster experts
emphasize that all these weather extremes are hazards, but
they're not disasters. What makes them disasters is the human
factor. If you have a tornado ripping through the Kansas wheat
fields, and there's no one there and no buildings, it's not
really a big deal. It's not a disaster. It is just nature. But
it's when there's people and buildings in the way that it
becomes a disaster. And we are putting people in places that are
a little more dangerous. Think of all the construction along the
US Eastern and Gulf Coast, which are hurricane prone. People
build on areas where they have had total losses. And then they
get hurricane insurance, federally funded usually. And then they
build again in the same place. And some of the scientists said,
you know, we don't do building codes as well as we should. For
example, in hurricane areas, you can buy hurricane clips, which
are like $20 or so, $10 to $20. These are these metal clips you
put on your roof beams to help attach and keep your roof during
a hurricane. And many places don't require that. It's such a
cheap thing. In Tornado Alley, some places cannot build
basements, but basements are crucial, or some kind of tornado
shelter. A little bit under 50% of deaths they find in
tornadoes, are in mobile homes or manufactured houses. If you're
going to have mobile homes, maybe mobile home parks should all
come with tornado shelters for people to go to. I mean, nature
has dealt us a really lousy hand in terms of geography, but then
we have made it so much worse.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">O'NEILL: Well, the science tells us that
climate change will be making storms worse, there'll be making
them more common, more intense, but how exactly will they start
changing in the case of something like a tornado or a hurricane?</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">BORENSTEIN: So first, tornadoes, it's more of
an issue of movement. So in the Great Plains, sort of considered
Tornado Alley, computer models show tornadoes decreasing in
frequency there but dramatically increasing eastward like
Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky. And
scientists have seen these trends starting to happen already.
And eastward means more people, more poverty, more density, more
trees. So you don't see the tornadoes coming. Like in Kansas or
Oklahoma, you see them coming from miles away on, along the
prairie. You know, if it's coming through Little Rock, there are
trees in the way, you don't see a storm. And the scientists have
found when there's tornado warnings, one of the first things
people do is they go outside to take a look to see, ooh, is it
dangerous looking. And then, and then if it looks dangerous,
then they will go in the basement and take shelter. So if you
can't see it because of trees and buildings, or if it's
nighttime, and in the mid south, we're getting more tornadoes
later at night, it's more dangerous. Then with hurricanes, most
scientists are now saying more of the stronger hurricanes, and
definitely wetter hurricanes. So wetter, slower, makes them more
damaging. So it's not quite as easy as things being worse. It's
just how they're getting worse.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">O'NEILL: Sometimes it feels like those of us
who live in the United States are experiencing these extreme
weather events, if you'll allow me to use hyperbole, every five
minutes. What kind of toll do you think that has on the American
people or the American psyche?</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">BORENSTEIN: I think there's all sorts of
possible tolls. But for a while, you say oh my god, this is
happening every five minutes. And then after a while, oh, it's
just another tornado killing just another 10, 15 people. There's
a history in the US public of being shocked that stuff that
happens, and then accepting lots of deaths as normal. School
shootings. COVID. You know, it's shocking, it's shocking, and
then suddenly, it's part of our daily lives. And in many ways,
you know, if you think about it, weather disasters have become
like that.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">O'NEILL: Well, what kind of progress if any,
have we made in preparing for these disasters?</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">BORENSTEIN: There are still some good news.
For example, lightning deaths the last few years have been at
record lows. It's, you know, 10, 12 deaths a year. And in the
50s, and 40s, there were hundreds of deaths a year. And that's
because of warning and education. And you know, everyone now
knows if there's lightning, get off the golf course, get out of
the water. One, people weren't educated in that before. And two,
the warnings are so much better. So we're getting so much better
about weather forecasts and warnings. The trouble is, there's a
disconnect between the warnings out there and how people receive
it, and what they do. And also, you know, at some point, there's
only so much you can do.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">DOERING: Seth Borenstein is a science writer
with the Climate and Environment Team at the Associated Press.
He spoke with Living on Earth’s Aynsley O’Neill.</font><br>
</blockquote>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://loe.org/shows/segments.html?programID=23-P13-00018&segmentID=2&mc_cid=fb4e072dce&mc_eid=c0e3fd9032">https://loe.org/shows/segments.html?programID=23-P13-00018&segmentID=2&mc_cid=fb4e072dce&mc_eid=c0e3fd9032</a></font><br>
<p><font face="Calibri"><i><br>
</i></font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><i> </i></font><br>
</p>
<i><font face="Calibri"> [ fears as from a grade B movie -- possible
but implausible - requires optimism ]</font></i><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>Can Climate Change spark "The Last of Us"
Zombie Pandemic? feat @MarenHunsberger</b><br>
ClimateAdam<br>
</font>May 11, 2023 #ClimateChange #zombiesurvival #thelastofus<br>
The Last of Us tells the story of a fungal zombie apocalypse...
triggered by climate change. So could this kind of pandemic actually
happen? Could global warming see Pedro Pascal running for his life
from the undead? And what are the other disease threats that climate
change could trigger? From malaria, to new pandemics, to zombie
viruses - the truth is worth a hard-hitting TV series of its own....<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2ZAncRzEkQ">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2ZAncRzEkQ</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ standardized thermometer invented in </i><i>1850 </i><i>]</i><br>
<b>This iconic graph tracks how rapidly our planet is warming</b>.
Yet every time it's shared on Twitter, someone always asks, "Why
does it begin in 1850?"<br>
The answer is simple: it's when we first had enough thermometers to
compute a truly representative global temperature average.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://twitter.com/KHayhoe/status/1656809512756715520">https://twitter.com/KHayhoe/status/1656809512756715520</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<font face="Calibri"><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"> <i>[The news archive - a famous
opinion about fossil-fueled dementia ]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> <font size="+2"><i><b>May 12, 2014</b></i></font>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> May 12, 2014:</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">• New York Times columnist Paul Krugman
condemns the fossil-fueled dementia of the political right on
climate, while Washington Post columnist Robert Samuelson sounds a
note of extreme pessimism regarding our ability to address the
climate crisis.</font><br>
<blockquote><font face="Calibri">Opinion</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>Crazy Climate Economics</b></font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Paul Krugman</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">By Paul Krugman</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">May 11, 2014</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Everywhere you look these days, you see
Marxism on the rise. Well, O.K., maybe you don’t — but
conservatives do. If you so much as mention income inequality,
you’ll be denounced as the second coming of Joseph Stalin; Rick
Santorum has declared that any use of the word “class” is
“Marxism talk.” In the right’s eyes, sinister motives lurk
everywhere — for example, George Will says the only reason
progressives favor trains is their goal of “diminishing
Americans’ individualism in order to make them more amenable to
collectivism.”</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">So it goes without saying that Obamacare,
based on ideas originally developed at the Heritage Foundation,
is a Marxist scheme — why, requiring that people purchase
insurance is practically the same as sending them to gulags.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">And just wait until the Environmental
Protection Agency announces rules intended to slow the pace of
climate change.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Until now, the right’s climate craziness has
mainly been focused on attacking the science. And it has been
quite a spectacle: At this point almost all card-carrying
conservatives endorse the view that climate change is a gigantic
hoax, that thousands of research papers showing a warming planet
— 97 percent of the literature — are the product of a vast
international conspiracy. But as the Obama administration moves
toward actually doing something based on that science, crazy
climate economics will come into its own.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">You can already get a taste of what’s coming
in the dissenting opinions from a recent Supreme Court ruling on
power-plant pollution. A majority of the justices agreed that
the E.P.A. has the right to regulate smog from coal-fired power
plants, which drifts across state lines. But Justice Scalia
didn’t just dissent; he suggested that the E.P.A.’s proposed
rule — which would tie the size of required smog reductions to
cost — reflected the Marxist concept of “from each according to
his ability.” Taking cost into consideration is Marxist? Who
knew?</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">And you can just imagine what will happen
when the E.P.A., buoyed by the smog ruling, moves on to
regulation of greenhouse gas emissions.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">What do I mean by crazy climate economics?</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">First, we’ll see any effort to limit
pollution denounced as a tyrannical act. Pollution wasn’t always
a deeply partisan issue: Economists in the George W. Bush
administration wrote paeans to “market based” pollution
controls, and in 2008 John McCain made proposals for
cap-and-trade limits on greenhouse gases part of his
presidential campaign. But when House Democrats actually passed
a cap-and-trade bill in 2009, it was attacked as, you guessed
it, Marxist. And these days Republicans come out in force to
oppose even the most obviously needed regulations, like the plan
to reduce the pollution that’s killing Chesapeake Bay.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Second, we’ll see claims that any effort to
limit emissions will have what Senator Marco Rubio is already
calling “a devastating impact on our economy.”</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Why is this crazy? Normally, conservatives
extol the magic of markets and the adaptability of the private
sector, which is supposedly able to transcend with ease any
constraints posed by, say, limited supplies of natural
resources. But as soon as anyone proposes adding a few limits to
reflect environmental issues — such as a cap on carbon emissions
— those all-capable corporations supposedly lose any ability to
cope with change.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Now, the rules the E.P.A. is likely to impose
won’t give the private sector as much flexibility as it would
have had in dealing with an economywide carbon cap or emissions
tax. But Republicans have only themselves to blame: Their
scorched-earth opposition to any kind of climate policy has left
executive action by the White House as the only route forward.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Furthermore, it turns out that focusing
climate policy on coal-fired power plants isn’t bad as a first
step. Such plants aren’t the only source of greenhouse gas
emissions, but they’re a large part of the problem — and the
best estimates we have of the path forward suggest that reducing
power-plant emissions will be a large part of any solution.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">What about the argument that unilateral U.S.
action won’t work, because China is the real problem? It’s true
that we’re no longer No. 1 in greenhouse gases — but we’re still
a strong No. 2. Furthermore, U.S. action on climate is a
necessary first step toward a broader international agreement,
which will surely include sanctions on countries that don’t
participate.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">So the coming firestorm over new power-plant
regulations won’t be a genuine debate — just as there isn’t a
genuine debate about climate science. Instead, the airwaves will
be filled with conspiracy theories and wild claims about costs,
all of which should be ignored. Climate policy may finally be
getting somewhere; let’s not let crazy climate economics get in
the way.</font><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<font face="Calibri"> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/12/opinion/krugman-crazy-climate-economics.html?smid=tw-share&smv2">http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/12/opinion/krugman-crazy-climate-economics.html?smid=tw-share&smv2</a></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/robert-samuelson-on-climate-change-we-have-no-solution/2014/05/11/24d767c6-d77d-11e3-95d3-3bcd77cd4e11_story.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/robert-samuelson-on-climate-change-we-have-no-solution/2014/05/11/24d767c6-d77d-11e3-95d3-3bcd77cd4e11_story.html</a></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> <br>
<br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri">======================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*Mass media is lacking, many </span>daily
summaries<span class="moz-txt-tag"> deliver global warming
news - a few are email delivered*</span></b> <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><br>
=========================================================<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b>*Inside Climate News</b><br>
Newsletters<br>
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every
day or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s
top headlines deliver the full story, for free.<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/">https://insideclimatenews.org/</a><br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
*<b>Climate Nexus</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*</a>
<br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the
day, delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant
reporting. It also provides original reporting and commentary on
climate denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise
remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday <br>
================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Carbon Brief Daily </b><span
class="moz-txt-star"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a></span><b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> <br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
================================== <br>
*T<b>he Daily Climate </b>Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days.
Better than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
<br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri">
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
/ to explore the archive <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender. This is a personal hobby production curated
by Richard Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</font>
</body>
</html>