<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+2"><font face="Calibri"><i><b>June</b></i></font></font><font
size="+2" face="Calibri"><i><b> 7, 2023</b></i></font><font
face="Calibri"><br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"> </font> <br>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ A wonderful interview about the economics
of global warming -- Putting a price on carbon, </i></font><font
face="Calibri"><i>Environmental P&L, Environmental costs. </i></font><font
face="Calibri"><i>. YouTube 18 mins with Paula DiPerna - author of
"Pricing the Priceless" ] </i><br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b>Pricing the Planet: How Valuing
Natural Assets Might Solve the Climate Crisis | Amanpour and
Company</b><br>
Amanpour and Company</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Jun 6, 2023 #amanpourpbs<br>
From wildfires to record-breaking heatwaves, the climate crisis is
dealing devastating blows to humans and wildlife. Paula DiPerna’s
new book "Pricing the Priceless" explores how capitalism can be
used to fight the climate crisis and protect the planet’s
essential assets. DiPerna talks to Hari Sreenivasan about
attaching monetary value to commodities like water and fresh air
in order to incentivize people and businesses in the fight against
climate change. <br>
Originally aired on June 6, 2023<br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afpMLp0zY0s">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afpMLp0zY0s</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><i><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></i> </p>
<i> </i><font face="Calibri"><i> [ Clips from long, important
text ]</i></font><br>
<b>What Is The “Global Stocktake” & How Can It Accelerate
Climate Action?</b><br>
By World Resources Institute<br>
Published June 5, 2023<br>
<b>This year is a critical moment for climate action</b>.<br>
<br>
The mounting impacts of climate change, from floods and droughts to
hurricanes and heat waves, are taking a major toll on human lives
and economies globally — particularly in vulnerable developing
nations with the fewest resources to protect themselves.<br>
<br>
Current climate actions are not nearly enough to keep global warming
below 1.5 degrees C (2.7 degrees F) and avoid the worst of these
climate impacts, and countries must accelerate efforts to get on
track. The latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
report tells us that actions taken this decade will have impacts
“for thousands of years.”..<br>
- -<br>
The Global Stocktake, happening in 2023 for the first time ever,
offers a pivotal opportunity to correct course.<br>
<br>
The Paris Agreement’s Global Stocktake process is designed to assess
the global response to the climate crisis every five years. It
evaluates the world’s progress on slashing greenhouse gas emissions,
building resilience to climate impacts, and securing finance and
support to address the climate crisis.<br>
<br>
But this cannot be just another global assessment showing how far
off track we are. The Stocktake process should also serve as a
global accelerator, driving nations to step up their climate action
and pursue the transformational change needed to secure a
zero-carbon, climate-resilient and equitable future.<br>
<br>
The Stocktake will conclude by the end of the UN climate summit in
December 2023 (COP28). Countries must then agree on how they will
leverage its findings to keep the global goal of limiting
temperature rise to 1.5 degrees C alive and address the impacts of
climate change...<br>
- -<br>
<b>What Is the Purpose of the Global Stocktake?</b><br>
Established under Article 14 of the Paris Agreement, the Global
Stocktake is designed “to assess the collective progress towards
achieving the purpose of [the Paris] Agreement and its long-term
goals.” Those goals include: cutting greenhouse gas emissions to
limit global temperature rise to well below 2 degrees C (3.6 degrees
F) and ideally 1.5 degrees C (2.7 degrees F); building resilience to
climate impacts; and aligning financial support with the scale and
scope needed to tackle the climate crisis<br>
<br>
Extreme flooding in Sylhet, Bangladesh in 2022 led to a shortage of
clean drinking water. The Global Stocktake will assess the world’s
progress on addressing the climate crisis and its escalating
impacts...<br>
- -<br>
A summary report is developed after each dialogue. At the conclusion
of the technical phase, an overarching synthesis report will
summarize key technical findings and inform the final political
phase of the Global Stocktake. This report will likely be released
in September 2023; it is expected to reveal how far off the world is
from achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement and provide concrete
guidance on actions needed to close these gaps...<br>
- -<br>
How Should Countries Respond to the Global Stocktake Findings at
COP28?<br>
While the Global Stocktake synthesis report won’t be released until
September 2023, we already know it will show us that the world is
far off track from achieving its climate goals. But it will also
provide the world with a roadmap for transformation. At COP28, it’s
essential that governments respond assertively to the Stocktake’s
findings and make concrete, ambitious commitments that can
accelerate transformative action to cut emissions, build resilience
and boost climate finance.<br>
<br>
The success of the first Global Stocktake hinges on whether
countries — along with companies, cities, and others — use it as an
opportunity to turn findings into action and set us on a path to a
safer world.<br>
<br>
Some of the key actions to include could be:<br>
<blockquote><b>1. Accelerating emissions reductions</b><br>
Current national climate plans fall significantly short of the
ambition required to limit global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees
C, creating a clear emissions gap. Moreover, countries’ current
actions are inadequate to fulfill their own commitments. In
response to the Global Stocktake, countries can send a clear
signal at COP28 that they will put forward more ambitious national
climate plans (NDCs) by 2025.<br>
<br>
These updated NDCs — which will set emissions reduction targets
for 2035, and can strengthen them for 2030 — should align with the
best available climate science, aiming for a collective emissions
reduction of 43% by 2030 and 60% by 2035, relative to 2019 levels.
Additionally, countries can agree to incorporate targets for
sectoral action and other issues (such as methane emissions) in
their NDCs, accelerating the systemwide transformations needed to
limit global temperature rise and avoid the worst climate impacts.<br>
<br>
<b>2. Driving transformative change across systems</b><br>
In addition to informing stronger national climate commitments,
the Global Stocktake will reveal opportunities for targeted action
across sectors and systems that contribute the most to the climate
crisis. A response plan to the Global Stocktake findings can
catalyze action in these key areas. For example:<br>
<br>
The world needs to address the most fundamental cause of the
problem: burning and financing fossil fuels. Agreeing to rapidly
and equitably transition away from all fossil fuels, improve
efficiency and productivity of energy use, and scale up
zero-carbon energy, particularly renewables, would mark a turning
point in the fight against climate change. Countries can also
commit to shifting finance from dirty energy to clean energy
infrastructure.<br>
The Global Stocktake’s political process can also address
transforming food systems, which account for roughly one-third of
global greenhouse gas emissions. Actions should not only help
mitigate climate change but also enhance the resilience of food
systems in the face of climate-related impacts. This can include
scaling up sustainable agricultural practices to boost yields on
existing farmland, while lowering emissions, reducing food loss
and waste, and encouraging healthier, more sustainable diets.<br>
Other crucial commitments that can be driven by the Global
Stocktake outcome at COP28 include: ending deforestation and the
degradation of important carbon-rich ecosystems and advancing
efforts to restore and sustainably manage them; reducing emissions
from the transport sector, both through zero-carbon vehicles and
shifting modes of transport; promoting sustainable consumption and
circular economy approaches; and accelerating fundamental shifts
in industry, infrastructure, cities and health.<br>
Across these sectors and systems, many cost-effective climate
solutions already exist; decision-makers must now make firm
commitments and take large-scale action to implement them. If
these changes are implemented with a focus on inclusivity, equity
and a just transition, they can yield significant social and
economic benefits, from creating job opportunities to improving
health and increasing energy access.<br>
<br>
<b>3. Tackling the intensifying impacts of climate change</b><br>
The Global Stocktake also provides an important opportunity to
advance global resilience-building efforts and address
climate-related losses and damages. It can uncover woefully
inadequate funding for adaptation and the persistent lag in
action. Furthermore, it can expose the alarming reality of
intensifying climate impacts and the level of support needed to
protect vulnerable communities. In response to the Stocktake’s
findings, developed and wealthier nations must assure developing
countries that they will follow through on doubling accessible
adaptation finance by 2025 to assist those who have contributed
the least to the climate crisis but bear the greatest burden.<br>
<br>
And it’s not just the amount of money available — it’s where it
ends up, how quickly it gets there and who controls it. Local
actors require more accessible, high-quality funding, more
quickly, as well as greater decision-making authority over
expenditures. As part of the Stocktake’s political response,
developed nations can agree to increase technical and
capacity-building assistance for developing nations — in addition
to increased finance — to support their shift from adaptation
planning to implementation and tracking.<br>
<br>
With the expectation that loss and damage funding arrangements
will be operationalized at COP28, countries can also use the
Stocktake as an opportunity to prioritize the need for new,
innovative and additional grant-based finance for the Loss and
Damage Fund. And they can take other steps to address loss and
damage; these include demonstrating support for early warning
systems and post-disaster recovery efforts that improve
infrastructure reconstruction and community resilience, and
finding ways to address non-economic losses and damages such as
loss of culture and heritage.<br>
<br>
<b>4. Realigning financial and technical resources with climate
priorities</b><br>
The transition to a low-carbon and resilient future will require
significant investment — though not as much as the expense from
the failure to take action — and shifting financial and technical
resources toward climate-resilient development is critical. The
Global Stocktake will likely reveal misalignment between global
finance and the efforts required to combat climate change. To
address this yawning gap in alignment, countries can commit at
COP28 to shift finance and investment globally, as well as to
provide increased support and technical resources to developing
countries to address climate challenges.<br>
<br>
For instance, countries can commit at COP28 to reallocate
misaligned finance, such as funds currently directed toward
subsidies and other forms of support for fossil fuels, to finance
cleaner energy sources like renewables. Governments can also
commit to pursue innovative financing mechanisms such as levies on
sectors like aviation and shipping and fair corporate taxes to
help raise budgets for investment in zero-carbon solutions.
Additionally, countries can send strong signals through the
Stocktake outcome to reform international financial institutions
and multilateral development banks and enhance their climate
funding.<br>
<br>
To ensure that all countries are able to take the climate action
needed, the political outcome of the Global Stocktake should
highlight the gap in finance and investment needed by many
developing countries. It should then prioritize a collective
commitment by wealthy countries to increased climate support that
responds to those countries’ urgent needs and strengthens their
long-term institutional capacity-building.<br>
<br>
<b>5. Laying the groundwork for increased implementation</b><br>
Finally, the Global Stocktake will address existing roadblocks to
climate action and suggest improvements to help ensure these
commitments are more than mere promises on paper. For instance,
the Global Stocktake political outcome can include provisions to:<br>
<blockquote>Encourage governments to arrange national and regional
stocktakes in 2024 that can drive forward outcomes from the
Global Stocktake and assist countries in developing their 2025
NDCs.Enhance international cooperation for climate action. For
example, it can call for dialogues and initiatives to strengthen
intergovernmental coordination, including in key sectors, and
improve cooperation between UNFCCC processes, UN entities and
other international organizations.<br>
<br>
Prioritize inclusive participation, just transition and equity
considerations both at the global and domestic levels, and
integrate them into all thematic areas. This can be guided by
essential principles such as common but differentiated
responsibilities and respective capabilities, right to
sustainable development and human rights.<br>
<br>
Encourage a comprehensive collection of reliable and actionable
data to enhance transparency, including addressing gaps in the
quality and quantity of data on finance, adaptation, loss and
damage, and just transition. Without this reliable data, climate
action risks becoming a blindfolded endeavor.<br>
Strengthen processes for working with non-state actors to
advance transparency and accountability of their action. Such
processes are crucial for building trust among stakeholders and
providing information on the progress (and gaps) in
implementation.<br>
<br>
Integrate with other UNFCCC dialogues and processes, such as
those focused on the Global Goal for Adaptation, just
transition, loss and damage, mitigation and the new finance
goal. Leveraging existing processes can energize a cohesive and
strengthened implementation for climate action and support in
this decade...<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<b>What’s Next on the Road to COP28?</b><br>
After the technical phase of the Global Stocktake concludes in June
2023 in Bonn, focus will shift to the political phase. During the
Bonn meetings, countries will begin to deliberate on political
outputs from the Global Stocktake at COP28, including how to focus
and structure them. A key milestone will be the Climate Ambition
summit, to be convened by the UN Secretary-General during the UN
General Assembly in September 2023. The summit will expect
countries, business, cities and regions, civil society and financial
institutions to come forward with new, tangible and concrete climate
actions and commitments that support the objectives of the Global
Stocktake...<br>
- -<br>
Ultimately, the success of the first Global Stocktake hinges on
whether governments adequately respond to its findings by the
conclusion of COP28 — not with vague platitudes but with commitments
to real action. Success depends on countries’ commitment to
significantly scaling up their climate actions and support, putting
forward ambitious national climate plans in 2025, and accelerating
key transformative actions over the next decade.<br>
<br>
Following the conclusion of COP28, everyone — from countries and
CEOs to cities and governors — must seize the moment to reevaluate
their own targets and action, ensuring their alignment with a
zero-carbon future that increases resilience and boosts support for
the countries and communities that need it most. The Global
Stocktake at COP28 should not just be a catalog of our failures, but
a global springboard to keep 1.5 degrees C and climate-resilient
development pathways within reach.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://cleantechnica.com/2023/06/05/what-is-the-global-stocktake-how-can-it-accelerate-climate-action/">https://cleantechnica.com/2023/06/05/what-is-the-global-stocktake-how-can-it-accelerate-climate-action/</a><br>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri"> <i>[ Must-read history - this is disruptive,
difficult record. ]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font> <font face="Calibri"><b>We Now Know
the Full Extent of Obama’s Disastrous Apathy Toward The Climate
Crisis</b><br>
Barack Obama’s official oral history contains new evidence of his
indifference and foot-dragging on the most important issue of our
time.<br>
Nathan J. Robinson</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Columbia University’s oral history of the Obama
presidency consists of interviews with 470 people ranging from
administration officials to activists who tried to shape Obama era
public policy. It’s the “official” oral history, conducted with
funding from the Obama Foundation, which I would argue makes the
entire project unethical at its core. Academia has a duty to
pursue truth uncorrupted by financial influence, which you can
hardly do if your project is funded by the personal foundation of
the controversial figure you’re supposed to be studying.
Nevertheless, any giant repository of interview data will contain
some revealing information, and there’s much to be learned about
Obama by reading official accounts, like memoirs by sycophants or
his own gargantuan self-exonerative autobiography. <br>
<br>
The official oral history is mostly still unreleased, but Columbia
has just put out a special preview of 17 interviews related to
climate and the environment. And even though, predictably, it’s
full of people praising Obama’s statesmanship and humility and
wisdom and so forth, it also reinforces what critics have said for
years: Obama mostly did not take the climate crisis seriously
until far too late in his presidency, and activists had to fight
him tooth and nail on issues where anyone who cared about the fate
of the planet should have been on their side to begin with. Bill
McKibben, in an interview for the project, has a damning verdict:
“No matter how much I liked him, it was very clear he could care
less about any of this stuff at some deep level, and wasn’t
willing to sacrifice—suffer any political pain in order to raise
the issue.”<br>
<br>
It became clear early on in Obama’s presidency, McKibben says,
that the administration felt it only had enough “political
capital” to deal with healthcare, and so climate change fell by
the wayside. “I don’t think there was any real hope that we were
going to see significant climate action out of at least the
first-term Obama administration,” McKibben says. Frances Beinecke
of the National Resources Defense Council says that “We wanted
climate to be on a par, and it wasn’t,” citing a relative lack of
White House effort on even weak clean energy legislation. In his
interview for the project, former Energy Secretary Steven Chu
confirms that “a decision was made in the first year to
concentrate on healthcare. At which the president took me aside
and said, ‘Look, I know I said energy and healthcare, but next
year; energy is next.’” McKibben explains why this approach of
kicking the can down the road on climate was so infuriating to
those who understood the nature of the problem: <br>
<br>
</font><font face="Calibri">“The thing to remember about climate
change, and the reason that Obama’s failures on it and things are
important, is because climate change, unlike every other political
issue we’ve ever faced, is a timed test. … [O]nce you’ve melted
the Arctic, no one’s got a plan for how to freeze it again. So
that was always in my mind, and my impatience with Obama and many
others on this front is that I think they tended to group it with
other problems that they faced, and think about it in the same way
that they thought about other things, as one item on a checklist.”</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><br>
Chu, whose opinion of Obama is positive throughout, nevertheless
quietly admits that Obama didn’t put much effort into trying to
mobilize political support on climate:<br>
<br>
I think, in terms of talking and dealing with Congress on the
energy side, the president was more hands off—in my opinion. I’m
not a historian. But looking back at how people deal with
Congress, I would say, LBJ [Lyndon B. Johnson] is probably the
most effective person. He was not afraid of browbeating people
with a very strong will. And I think President Obama was almost
the opposite, very gentlemanly: “Okay, I told you the facts.
You’re reasonable people. You’re going to come to some
conclusion.” … He was less connected with Congress than I would
have hoped. … I remember this line in [the Spielberg film] Lincoln
where Abraham Lincoln says, “I am cloaked in the immense authority
of the president.” He wasn’t above shaking down people. He wasn’t
above offering patron jobs, postmaster jobs, things like that, to
get the Thirteenth Amendment. … [T]o shake down and use the power
of the presidency to really garner votes was something I wish
[Obama] had done more of. He was too much of a gentleman, too
standoffish about that.<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.currentaffairs.org/2023/06/we-now-know-the-full-extent-of-obamas-disastrous-apathy-toward-the-climate-crisis">https://www.currentaffairs.org/2023/06/we-now-know-the-full-extent-of-obamas-disastrous-apathy-toward-the-climate-crisis</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font> </p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><i>[ some academic economics history- later topics to include
global warming ]</i></p>
<p><b>The Rhodes Center Podcast: Nazi Billionaires, Capitalist
Ethics, and Other Notable Contradictions</b><b><br>
</b>Watson Institute for International<br>
</p>
<p>May 15, 2023 Rhodes Center Podcast<br>
On this episode Mark Blyth talks with this year’s invited speaker
at the Rhodes Center’s annual 'Ethics of Capitalism’ lecture
series, journalist David de Jong. <br>
<br>
David’s groundbreaking book “Nazi Billionaires: The Dark History
of Germany's Wealthiest Dynasties”, looks at the individuals and
companies that accumulated unimaginable wealth under the Third
Reich. Through his incredible investigative work, he exposes how
these companies – including iconic German businesses like
Volkswagen, BMW, and Allianz – thrived under the Nazi regime. He
also looks at how, despite their dark history, most have never
fully reconciled with their past – and how the families that
founded such enterprises have only grown more wealthy in the
decades since. <br>
<br>
David and Mark discuss this dark history, and explore the
questions it poses about the nature of capitalism: how can
businesses operate responsibly in a world where it’s so easy to
profit off the suffering of others? And what do private companies
owe the rest of us, above their bottom line? <br>
<br>
Learn more about and purchase “Nazi Billionaires: The Dark History
of Germany's Wealthiest Dynasties”<br>
</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMXZtdkREWs">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMXZtdkREWs</a><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<font face="Calibri"> <i>[The news archive - looking back]</i><br>
<font size="+2"><i><b>June 7, 2010</b></i></font> <br>
June 7, 2010: Washington Post writer Ezra Klein condemns Sen. Lisa
Murkowski (R-AK) for her proposal to strip the EPA of its
authority to regulate carbon emissions.<br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/06/with_friends_like_lisa_murkows.html">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/06/with_friends_like_lisa_murkows.html</a></font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><font face="Calibri">=======================================
</font><br>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font> <font face="Calibri"><b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*Mass media is
lacking, many </span>daily summaries<span
class="moz-txt-tag"> deliver global warming news - a few are
email delivered*</span></b> <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><br>
=========================================================<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b>*Inside Climate News</b><br>
Newsletters<br>
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every
day or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s
top headlines deliver the full story, for free.<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/">https://insideclimatenews.org/</a><br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
*<b>Climate Nexus</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*</a>
<br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the
day, delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant
reporting. It also provides original reporting and commentary on
climate denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise
remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday <br>
================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Carbon Brief Daily </b><span
class="moz-txt-star"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a></span><b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> <br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
================================== <br>
*T<b>he Daily Climate </b>Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days.
Better than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
<br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri">
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender. This is a personal hobby production curated
by Richard Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</font>
</body>
</html>