<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="+2"><font face="Calibri"><i><b>June</b></i></font></font><font
size="+2" face="Calibri"><i><b> 21, 2023</b></i></font><font
face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><i>[ Groundbreaking youth-led climate trial
comes to an end in Montana ]</i><br>
<b>Ruling could take weeks to emerge in trial for Held v
Montana, which is the first constitutional climate trial in US
history </b></font><br>
</p>
<p>On Monday, Montana regulators who were called as expert witnesses
for the defendants said they merely enforce state laws – something
Montana assistant attorney general Michael Russel echoed in
closing arguments on Tuesday. “What we heard in the plaintiffs’
case is not justiciable controversy, but rather the long airing of
political grievances that properly belongs in the legislature, not
a court of law,” he said.<br>
<br>
But Montana’s constitution does not detail the meaning of a “clean
and healthful” environment, according to testimony last week from
Mae Nan Ellingson, the youngest delegate to the state’s 1972
constitutional convention which enshrined those environmental
rights when called as an expert witness for the plaintiffs.</p>
<p>“She guaranteed that the courts could tell us how to understand
and enforce this anticipatory and preventative provision,”
Bellinger noted in his closing arguments on Tuesday...<br>
</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/20/held-v-montana-climate-trial-youth-end">https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/20/held-v-montana-climate-trial-youth-end</a><br>
</p>
<p>- -</p>
<i>[ It might be "Good Old Boy-ism" ]</i><br>
<b>Groundbreaking youth-led climate trial comes to an end in Montana</b><b><br>
</b><b>Ruling could take weeks to emerge in trial for Held v
Montana, which is the first constitutional climate trial in US
history</b><br>
Dharna Noor<br>
Tue 20 Jun 2023<br>
A groundbreaking climate trial came to an early close on Tuesday as
lawyers on each side presented a very different picture of who can
be held responsible for the climate crisis.<br>
<br>
Attorneys representing the lawsuit’s young challengers said Montana
officials and agencies must be held accountable for exacerbating the
crisis, and thereby violating the plaintiffs’ state constitutional
rights. But the defense argued that climate change is a global
problem, and that if Montana is contributing to it, plaintiffs
should work to change that through the legislature.<br>
- -<br>
The trial for Held v Montana began in the state’s first judicial
district court in the capital city of Helena last week, marking the
first constitutional climate trial in US history.<br>
<br>
A ruling will now follow from Judge Kathy Seeley, who has been
hearing the case, with expectations that this could take several
weeks to emerge.<br>
<br>
The case was filed in March 2020 by sixteen young Montana residents,
then aged two through 18. They allege the state’s government’s
pro-fossil fuel policies contribute to climate change, and thereby
violate provisions in the state constitution that guarantee that the
“state and each person shall maintain and improve a clean and
healthful environment in Montana for present and future
generations”.<br>
<br>
“Plaintiffs are asking this court to declare that a stable climate
system is fundamental to the protection of their rights to clean and
healthful environment,” said Nate Bellinger, an attorney
representing the plaintiffs with non-profit law firm Our Children’s
Trust, in closing arguments on Tuesday.<br>
<br>
The lawsuit specifically targets a provision in the Montana
Environmental Policy Act which prevents the state from considering
how its energy economy may contribute to climate change. In 2011,
the legislature amended the law to prevent environmental reviews
from considering “regional, national or global” environmental
impacts – a provision the original complaint called the “climate
change exception”.<br>
<br>
Last month, Montana’s legislature amended the provision to
specifically ban the state from considering greenhouse gas emissions
in environmental reviews for new energy projects. The state’s
attorneys said that should have rendered the lawsuit moot, but
Seeley, of the first district court in Montanarejected them.<br>
<br>
On Monday, Montana regulators who were called as expert witnesses
for the defendants said they merely enforce state laws – something
Montana assistant attorney general Michael Russel echoed in closing
arguments on Tuesday. “What we heard in the plaintiffs’ case is not
justiciable controversy, but rather the long airing of political
grievances that properly belongs in the legislature, not a court of
law,” he said.<br>
<br>
But Montana’s constitution does not detail the meaning of a “clean
and healthful” environment, according to testimony last week from
Mae Nan Ellingson, the youngest delegate to the state’s 1972
constitutional convention which enshrined those environmental rights
when called as an expert witness for the plaintiffs.<br>
<br>
“She guaranteed that the courts could tell us how to understand and
enforce this anticipatory and preventative provision,” Bellinger
noted in his closing arguments on Tuesday.<br>
<br>
A favorable verdict for the plaintiffs could have implications for
Montana’s legislature. Seeley has said in previous court orders that
she would not directly order officials to create a new approach to
addressing climate change, but that if the challengers successfully
make their case, she would issue a “declaratory judgment,” saying
officials violated the state constitution.<br>
<br>
Throughout last week, expert witnesses for the plaintiffs, including
climate scientists and ecologists, explained that to ensure a stable
climate system and livable future, the concentration of carbon
dioxide in the atmosphere must be reduced to no more than 350 parts
per million by 2100 – something the defendants have not argued
against.<br>
<br>
“This court should declare 350 parts per million is the
constitutional standard necessary to protect a stable climate
system,” said Bellinger.<br>
<br>
Many who packed the courtroom for the closely-watched Held v Montana
trial have staunchly supported the plaintiffs. The 16 young
challengers were met by supporters outside the courthouse each day,
and on Tuesday, when Bellinger wrapped his closing arguments, he was
met with cheers.<br>
<br>
This support has not gone unnoticed by the defense.<br>
<br>
Montana: Youth Climate Lawsuit, Helena, USA - 13 Jun 2023.<br>
‘I’m a prisoner in my own home,’ asthma sufferer, 15, tells landmark
US climate trial<br>
<br>
“This case has received national attention in part because it has
been billed or at least received as a sort of referendum on climate
change generally,” said Russel in his closing arguments. “This is
not supposed to be a town hall meeting or popularity contest; it’s a
court of law in which basic principles like causation and redress
clearly still apply.<br>
<br>
He argued that though the defense understands that fossil fuels emit
greenhouse gases, Montana cannot by itself have an effect on climate
change.<br>
<br>
“What we heard from every single expert who testified about fossil
fuels … is that it’s a global issue,” he said<br>
<br>
But Bellinger said that doesn’t mean Montana should not be held
accountable for its role in perpetuating the problem.<br>
<br>
“The defendants argue that Montana’s greenhouse gas emissions don’t
matter, but irrefutable expert testimony affirms that Montana’s
emissions are substantial,” he added. “Montana’s contribution to
anthropogenic climate change harms plaintiffs. The impacts of
Montana’s emissions are both local and immediate as well as global
and long lasting.”<br>
<br>
In other words, he said, when it comes to planet-warming pollution,
“every ton matters.”<br>
<br>
The trial’s conclusion came unexpectedly early. The plaintiffs and
their expert witnesses testified over the course of five days last
week, but the state rested its case after just one.<br>
<br>
On Monday, two representatives from the Montana Department of
Environmental Quality, which is named as a defendant in the
complaint, testified. The agency’s director, Chris Dorrington, said
he “admired” the plaintiffs and invited them to apply for jobs in
his department.<br>
<br>
Before the trial began, he said, he was unfamiliar with the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world’s leading
climate body.<br>
<br>
Sonja Nowakowski, the state’s air, energy and mining division
administrator, testified that it is possible to analyze the local
climate impacts of Montana’s greenhouse gas emissions, but the law
prohibits doing so for energy permits. Asked if emissions degrade
Montana’s natural resources, she said she is “not a scientist”.<br>
<br>
The state called just one expert witness to the stand on Monday:
Terry Anderson, a climate economist with ties to the tobacco
industry who touts the benefits of “free market environmentalism”.
During cross examination by plaintiffs’ lawyer Phil Gregory,
Anderson said he is billing the state $500 per hour and that he has
“perhaps” worked for 25 hours or more.<br>
<br>
Gregory attacked Anderson’s credibility, citing multiple errors in
Anderson’s expert report which the economist admitted he was later
forced to revise. The attorney asked Seeley to strike Anderson’s
testimony from the record; she refused but said he had “definitely
raised some questions about the numbers”.<br>
<br>
Anderson made additional errors during his Monday testimony, Gregory
said Tuesday.<br>
<br>
The state was originally expected to ask for expert testimony from
climate-crisis denying climatologist Judith Curry, who has charged
the state of Montana more than $30,000 for her preparation, DeSmog
reported.<br>
<br>
Defendants also declined to invite expert testimony from Debra
Sheppard, a neuropsychologist who said in her deposition that she
has no expertise in how the climate crisis impacts youth mental
health, according to the Flathead Beacon.<br>
<br>
Similar lawsuits are pending in four other states, and a federal
suit, Juliana v United States, is also pending. Climate advocates
say the Held v Montana trial could inspire more litigation.<br>
<br>
“The fossil fuel industry should be terrified because fights like
this are going to pop up across the country as Gen Z and a growing
Gen Alpha fight to protect their futures from climate disaster,”
Varshini Prakash, executive director of Sunrise Movement, wrote in
an email.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/20/held-v-montana-climate-trial-youth-end">https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/20/held-v-montana-climate-trial-youth-end</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ Visualizing our CO2 pollution --
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://youtu.be/zAG3-t-fHbY">https://youtu.be/zAG3-t-fHbY</a> ] </i><br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b>Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Tagged
by Source: The Americas</b><br>
NASA Scientific Visualization Studio<br>
</font><font face="Calibri">Jun 7, 2023<br>
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the most prevalent greenhouse gas driving
global climate change. However, its increase in the atmosphere
would be even more rapid without land and ocean carbon sinks,
which collectively absorb about half of human emissions every
year. Advanced computer modeling techniques in NASA's Global
Modeling and Assimilation Office allow us to disentangle the
influences of sources and sinks and to better understand where
carbon is coming from and going to.<br>
<br>
This visualization shows the CO2 being added to Earth's atmosphere
over the course of the year 2021, split into four major
contributors: fossil fuels in orange, burning biomass in red, land
ecosystems in green, and the ocean in blue. The dots on the
surface also show how atmospheric carbon dioxide is also being
absorbed by land ecosystems in green and the ocean in blue. <br>
<br>
This view highlighting North America and South America, during the
growing season plants absorb CO2 through photosynthesis, but
release much of this carbon through respiration during winter
months. Some interesting features include fossil fuel emissions
from the northeastern urban corridor that extends from Washington
D.C. to Boston in the United States. The fast oscillation over the
Amazon rainforest shows the impact of plants absorbing carbon
while the sun is shining and then releasing it during nighttime
hours.<br>
For additional details visit the SVS page:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/5110">https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/5110</a></font><br>
<p><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAG3-t-fHbY">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAG3-t-fHbY</a></font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">- -</font></p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ Visualizing CO2 Pollution African
continent <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://youtu.be/Q_93pLMA4pM">https://youtu.be/Q_93pLMA4pM</a> ]</i><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><b>Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Tagged by
Source: Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.</b><br>
NASA Scientific Visualization Studio<br>
</font><font face="Calibri">Jun 7, 2023<br>
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the most prevalent greenhouse gas driving
global climate change. However, its increase in the atmosphere
would be even more rapid without land and ocean carbon sinks,
which collectively absorb about half of human emissions every
year. Advanced computer modeling techniques in NASA's Global
Modeling and Assimilation Office allow us to disentangle the
influences of sources and sinks and to better understand where
carbon is coming from and going to.<br>
<br>
This visualization shows the CO2 being added to Earth's atmosphere
over the course of the year 2021, split into four major
contributors: fossil fuels in orange, burning biomass in red, land
ecosystems in green, and the ocean in blue. The dots on the
surface also show how atmospheric carbon dioxide is also being
absorbed by land ecosystems in green and the ocean in blue. Though
the land and oceans are each carbon sinks in a global sense,
individual locations can be sources at different times.<br>
<br>
This view highlights Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. European
fossil fuel emissions are visible as red representing emissions
from fires over central Africa that are used to clear crop
residue. Fires represent a much smaller source of CO2 to the
atmosphere than fossil fuel emissions, but are significant because
they can alter the ability of an ecosystem to sequester carbon in
the future. Scientists are carefully monitoring how CO2 emissions
from fires are altered by climate change, which is bringing longer
and more severe fire seasons to many areas.<br>
For additional details visit the SVS page:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/5110">https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/5110</a><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_93pLMA4pM">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_93pLMA4pM</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri">- -</font></p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ See more from NASA visualizations ]</i><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><b>NASA Scientific Visualization Studio</b></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><i>@nasascientificvisualizatio</i><br>
</font><font face="Calibri">NASA’s Scientific Visualization Studio
(SVS) works closely with scientists to create visualizations of
NASA data in order to promote a greater understanding of Earth and
space science research activities at NASA and its collaborators.
We are creating more and more of our content in 4K resolution and
are starting to experiment in 360-degree visuals, so releasing
material through YouTube will allow users greater ease and
flexibility in using our visualizations. Starting in 2017, we
plan on releasing all our new material here as well as on our
website, <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov">https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov</a> .<br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/@nasascientificvisualizatio5842/featured">https://www.youtube.com/@nasascientificvisualizatio5842/featured</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ an excellent conversation about our
predicament ]</i><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><b>Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway Discuss
'The Big Myth'</b><br>
The Climate Pod<br>
May 7, 2023<br>
How did Americans come to believe that markets were the answer to
everything? Why don't people trust the government to efficiently
allocate resources in a way that creates the greatest good? Who
orchestrated this century-long con of the American people?<br>
<br>
Dr. Naomi Oreskes and Dr. Erik Conway, co-authors of the
eye-opening book "Merchants of Doubt", join the show to discuss
their new book "The Big Myth: How American Business Taught Us to
Loathe Government and Love the Free Market." Our conversation only
scratches the surface of everything they uncovered while trying to
get to the origin of the market fundamentalism myth that has
dominated American popular culture for the last 100 years, and how
that myth has led to the climate crisis we're facing today.<br>
<br>
Be sure to subscribe to The Climate Pod YouTube channel! <br>
<br>
Listen to the full episode of The Climate Pod featuring Dr. Naomi
Oreskes and Dr. Erik Conway here:<br>
iTunes: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bit.ly/3mANzij">https://bit.ly/3mANzij</a><br>
Spotify: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bit.ly/3IXF08J">https://bit.ly/3IXF08J</a><br>
<br>
The Climate Pod is a weekly conversation on the latest climate
issues with the journalists, activists, academics, and artists at
the center of the story.<br>
Follow us on social media!<br>
<br>
Twitter: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://twitter.com/climatepod">https://twitter.com/climatepod</a><br>
Facebook: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.facebook.com/climatepod/">https://www.facebook.com/climatepod/</a><br>
Instagram: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.instagram.com/climatepod/">https://www.instagram.com/climatepod/</a><br>
Subscribe to our new Substack newsletter "The Climate Weekly":
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://theclimateweekly.substack.com/">https://theclimateweekly.substack.com/</a><br>
<br>
Website: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.theclimatepod.com">www.theclimatepod.com</a><br>
</font><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFeyOxicyyI">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFeyOxicyyI</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ </i><i>$5.89 to </i><i>see the movie online -- about climate
activism and AOC ]</i><br>
<b>To The End | Trailer | Available Now</b><br>
Journeyman Pictures<br>
Jun 20, 2023<br>
<blockquote>Apple TV.<br>
Amazon.<br>
Google Play.<br>
Microsoft.<br>
Redbox.<br>
ROW8.<br>
Vudu.<br>
YouTube.<br>
</blockquote>
Storyline. Stopping the climate crisis is a question of political
courage, and the clock is ticking. Over three years of turbulence
and crisis, four young women fight for a Green New Deal, and ignite
a historic shift in U.S. climate politics.<br>
<br>
Over four years of turbulence and crisis, four remarkable young
women (Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, activist Varshini Prakash,
climate policy writer Rhiana Gunn-Wright, and political strategist
Alexandra Rojas) work together to defend their generation's right to
a future and lead the movement behind the most sweeping climate
change legislation in U.S. history.<br>
<br>
Following four women of colour who are key players in the rise of
the Green New Deal, a new plan to address climate change, economic
justice and racial justice.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ojXheqWW_M">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ojXheqWW_M</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri"> [ Next stop is Winter solstice ]</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font> <font face="Calibri"><b>Solstice is
Wed, Jun 21, 2023 7:57 AM</b><br>
America/Los_Angeles<br>
</font>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[ Oddly comforting to hear of astronomical risks rather than those
we can directly blame on humans. ] <br>
<b>Richard Wilman: Apocalyptic Cosmic Threats and our
Post-Apocalyptic Future in Space</b><br>
Centre for Apocalyptic & Post-Apocalyptic Studies<br>
Richard Wilman: Apocalyptic Cosmic Threats and our Post-Apocalyptic
Future in Space<br>
CAPAS - Lecture Series Summer 2023<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgYL__WrOMs&t=478s">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgYL__WrOMs&t=478s</a>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<font face="Calibri"> <i>[The news archive - looking back]</i><br>
<font size="+2"><i><b>June 21, 2011</b></i></font> <br>
June 21, 2011: NPR reports:<br>
<br>
"The American public is less likely to believe in global warming
than it was just five years ago. Yet, paradoxically, scientists
are more confident than ever that climate change is real and
caused largely by human activities.<br>
<br>
"Something a bit strange is happening with public opinion and
climate change.<br>
<br>
"Anthony Leiserowitz, who directs the Yale University Project on
Climate Change Communication, delved into this in a recent poll.
He not only asked citizens what they thought of climate change, he
also asked them to estimate how climate scientists feel about
global warming.<br>
<br>
"'Only 13 percent of Americans got the correct answer, which is
that in fact about 97 percent of American scientists say that
climate change is happening, and about a third of Americans just
simply say they don't know,' he said.<br>
<br>
"Most Americans are unaware that the National Academy of Sciences,
known for its cautious and even-handed reviews of the state of
science, is firmly on board with climate change. It has been for
years."<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.npr.org/2011/06/21/137309964/climate-change-public-skeptical-scientists-sure">http://www.npr.org/2011/06/21/137309964/climate-change-public-skeptical-scientists-sure</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri">======================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*Mass media is lacking, many </span>daily
summaries<span class="moz-txt-tag"> deliver global warming
news - a few are email delivered*</span></b> <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><br>
=========================================================<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b>*Inside Climate News</b><br>
Newsletters<br>
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every
day or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s
top headlines deliver the full story, for free.<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/">https://insideclimatenews.org/</a><br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
*<b>Climate Nexus</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*</a>
<br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the
day, delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant
reporting. It also provides original reporting and commentary on
climate denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise
remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday <br>
================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Carbon Brief Daily </b><span
class="moz-txt-star"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a></span><b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> <br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
================================== <br>
*T<b>he Daily Climate </b>Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days.
Better than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
<br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri">
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender. This is a personal hobby production curated
by Richard Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</font>
</body>
</html>