<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="+2"><font face="Calibri"><i><b>June</b></i></font></font><font
size="+2" face="Calibri"><i><b> 30, 2023</b></i></font><font
face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<i><font face="Calibri">[ video -- every global warming and climate
destabilization ]</font></i><br>
<b>“Climate Silence”: Corporate Media Failing to Link Wildfires,
Extreme Weather to Climate Crisis</b><br>
Democracy Now!<br>
Jun 29, 2023<br>
We speak with author Genevieve Guenther about “climate silence” and
how the corporate media routinely fails in reporting on worsening
extreme weather events. “You need to connect the dots from what
you’re reporting to the climate crisis, and from the climate crisis
to fossil fuels,” says Guenther, whose forthcoming book is titled
The Language of Climate Politics.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMV0wuJx75A">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMV0wuJx75A</a><br>
<p>- -</p>
<i>[ news media must report on the reality of the crisis ]</i><br>
<b>this is an emergency. climate silence is climate denial.
#EndClimateSilence now.</b><br>
climate change is not just a topic for the science or environment
section. it’s the essential context for stories about extreme
weather, energy, politics, business and finance, immigration, real
estate, travel, health, food, sports, and the arts.<br>
#EndClimateSilence<br>
here’s what you can do:<br>
<blockquote>1) follow and retweet us on twitter: @EndClimtSilence<br>
add your voice and say it LOUD!<br>
2) let us know about stories the media should have connected to
climate change. tweet us or email us here:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:tips@endclimatesilence.org">tips@endclimatesilence.org</a><br>
3) talk about climate breakdown with your friends, co-workers, and
acquaintances, especially when it seems most awkward to do so. <br>
let’s #EndClimateSilence once and for all!<br>
</blockquote>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.endclimatesilence.org/">https://www.endclimatesilence.org/</a>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ Clips from Newsweek opinion Rebecca Weston of the
ClimatePsychologyAlliance-US ]</i><br>
<b>You'll Never Guess Who Wants You to Be Anxious About Climate
Change | Opinion</b><br>
MIRANDA MASSIE AND REBECCA WESTON , CLIMATE CHANGE EXPERTS<br>
ON 6/29/23 <br>
- -<br>
We have bought into the fossil fuel PR trick of the individual
carbon footprint, brought to us by BP flacks in 2004. Far from
taking any responsibility for the enormous damage they've caused,
Big Oil has convinced us that our individual consumption causes
climate change, rather than their own exploitation of fossil fuels.
With astonishing success, the industry has succeeded in channeling
our escalating distress and our yearning for solutions into a
narrative that blames and thereby silences us...<br>
- - <br>
But even as intensifying catastrophes lead more and more people to
see that the problem goes well beyond what we do, or don't, buy in
aisle five of the supermarket, we live with a stomach-churning sense
of complicity and cognitive dissonance. Feeling both that it is our
fault and that our actions are too miniscule to matter, most of us
stay silent on climate.<br>
<br>
Because of this silence, we feel outnumbered and alone. Even
privately, most of us don't discuss climate with family or friends.
As a 2022 study demonstrates, Americans occupy a dangerous "false
social reality," consistently and dramatically underestimating
support for meaningful climate action and assuming their neighbors,
friends, and colleagues don't care..<br>
- -<br>
Imagine what could happen if the climate silence were broken and
the support for transformational action that is felt privately by a
U.S. supermajority were expressed publicly across our culture in
day-to-day life and in the civic sphere. Would the Biden
administration have approved the Willow Pipeline? Would Joe Manchin
be pertinent? The entire range of what's politically imaginable
would shift dramatically in a positive—in fact, necessary—direction.<br>
<br>
Beyond that, sustained and at the right scale, breaking the climate
silence will set in motion a cultural shift that supports the policy
changes we need and deserve—those that will stabilize the climate,
address the injustices embedded in the climate crisis, and alleviate
eco-anxiety at its source.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.newsweek.com/youll-never-guess-who-wants-you-anxious-about-climate-change-opinion-1810019">https://www.newsweek.com/youll-never-guess-who-wants-you-anxious-about-climate-change-opinion-1810019</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ Opinion in the Guardian ]</i><br>
<b>Canada is on fire, and big oil is the arsonist</b><br>
Tzeporah Berman<br>
Tue 20 Jun 2023<br>
Canada is on fire from coast to coast to coast. Thousands have been
evacuated, millions exposed to air pollution, New York a doom orange
and even the titans of Wall Street choking.<br>
<br>
Catastrophic flooding in Pakistan, back-to-back cyclones in the
Pacific islands and droughts in Africa haven’t been enough to create
a tipping point for action. Now that climate impacts have hit the
economic capital of western power, will it spur governments in the
global north to get serious?<br>
A lack of scientific knowledge about climate change is not the
barrier. Nor is a lack of cleaner, safer, cheaper energy
alternatives. The IPCC said as much last year – the barrier is
vested fossil fuel interests putting their profit above our safety.<br>
<br>
We know exactly which fossil fuel companies are robbing us of clean
air and a secure future. We can now measure which oil companies are
responsible for wildfires (13 operate in Canada), but oil executives
are still calling the shots.<br>
<br>
Internationally, big oil has been flooding the climate talks for
decades. The result? The Paris agreement doesn’t even include the
words fossil fuels, oil, gas or coal. And today we are on track to
produce 110% more oil, gas and coal by 2030 than the world can ever
burn, or it will burn us. If we are going to manage the decline of
fossil-fuel production in an equitable and fair way we need our
governments to stand up to big oil and start negotiating a new
international agreement on fossil fuels to complement the Paris
agreement.<br>
<br>
Back at home, as the smoke rolled in, the prime minister, Justin
Trudeau, promised to do whatever it takes to keep people safe. But
Ottawa just backed another loan guarantee for the Trans Mountain
Pipeline. “Whatever it takes” – except tackling the industries
stoking the flames.<br>
<br>
Trudeau is not alone in refusing to acknowledge the need to stop
expansion of oil and gas. That same attitude – “we must act on
climate change but my expansion of fossil fuels is OK” – is alive
and well south of our border where Biden has recently approved the
Willow project and more.<br>
<br>
These are scary times. Global leaders declare a climate emergency
while approving projects to expand oil and gas. In Canada and around
the world, fossil fuel proponents are still being elected. Alberta’s
premier, Danielle Smith, used her victory speech to rally her
constituents against the federal government’s plan to clean the grid
as her province burns.<br>
<br>
For more than five decades, oil and gas companies have muddled the
truth and blocked progress. They’ve spent millions on PR campaigns
to convince the public that expanding fossil fuels is safe,
reasonable and unavoidable and that the alternatives are problematic
and unreliable. It’s working. Canadians are alarmed about climate
change yet are largely unaware that most of Canada’s carbon
pollution comes from fossil fuels like oil and gas. Half of the
public say they’re unsure whether “solar panels emit more greenhouse
gases during manufacturing than they end up saving”.<br>
<br>
These messages and those who peddle them have an impact on politics.
Canada subsidises oil and gas more than any other G20 nation,
averaging $14bn annually between 2018 and 2020. Now big oil is
getting tax breaks for carbon capture and storage – an unproven
technology that won’t change the fact that Canada needs to phase out
fossil fuels. Funding the industry to continue is like giving
arsonists a tinderbox to play with...<br>
<br>
Fossil fuel companies and their executives don’t need our money. In
fact, they use it against us. Take the Koch brothers, who have
funded anti-climate and anti-clean energy campaigns. Or the fossil
fuel industry’s Pathway Alliance in Canada that is running “Let’s
Clear the Air” misinformation ads to an audience coughing and
choking on their product.<br>
<br>
Fossil fuel companies’ net-zero pledges are meaningless and we need
to stop pretending we can negotiate with them. We need to start
regulating them.<br>
<br>
John Valliant, homing in on the recent Alberta election, puts it
more provocatively: “Alberta politics is still a largely and wholly
owned subsidiary of the petroleum industry.” And: “The petroleum
industry is a wholly owned subsidiary of fire.”<br>
<br>
Governments need to represent us, not fossil-fuel profiteers. We
need plans to phase out fossil fuel production and emissions. Plans
that include protections and support for communities and workers
dependent on oil, gas and coal.<br>
<br>
But that’s not enough. Wealthy fossil-fuel producing countries like
Canada must support countries in the global south to be part of the
transition to clean energy so it can happen in a fast and fair way.<br>
<br>
Oil, gas and coal are burning us. Politically and now literally.
That’s why 101 Nobel laureates and over 3,000 scientists are calling
for a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty. Six countries and 84
subnational governments have already endorsed it. It’s time for
yours to get on board, too.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jun/20/canada-wildfires-big-oil">https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jun/20/canada-wildfires-big-oil</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ Global view of climate litigation
according to the London School of Economics ]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>Global Trends in Climate Litigation| LSE
Event</b><b><br>
</b></font><font face="Calibri">This event marks the launch of the
Grantham Research Institute’s (GRI) 2023 Global Trends in Climate
Change Litigation Policy Report, an annual report now in its fifth
year. This influential report presents an overview of climate
litigation, highlighting recent developments and future trends.
The report is widely read and cited by civil society
organisations, policymakers, the legal community, judges,
financiers, scholars and media all around the world.<br>
<br>
Over the past year, the climate litigation field has seen novel
case strategies deployed against a broad array of government and
corporate actors. Notable examples in the private sector include a
world-first case brought against Shell's Board of Directors, as
well as against a commercial bank. Three new cases have also been
brought against Russia, Finland and Sweden, to challenge the
inadequacy of their national climate plans more Increasingly a
broad range of actors is compelled to understand how the
litigation landscape is evolving and what risks litigation poses
to their activities in the public and private spheres.<br>
<br>
Speaker(s):<br>
Maria Antonia Tigre<br>
David Gaukrodger<br>
Sophie Marjanac<br>
Dr Birsha Ohdedar<br>
Catherine Higham & Dr Joana Setzer (Report Authors)<br>
Chair: Professor Elizabeth Robinson</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.lse.ac.uk/Events/2023/06/202306291830/climate">https://www.lse.ac.uk/Events/2023/06/202306291830/climate</a></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"></font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<i><font face="Calibri">[ From the Guardian ]</font></i><br>
<font face="Calibri"> <b>‘It’s absolutely guaranteed’: the best and
worst case scenarios for sea level rise</b></font><br>
Karen McVeigh @karenmcveigh1<br>
Mon 26 Jun 2023<br>
Even if the world stopped emitting greenhouse gases tomorrow, ocean
levels would continue to rise<br>
<br>
Not only is dangerous sea level rise “absolutely guaranteed”, but it
will keep rising for centuries or millennia even if the world
stopped emitting greenhouse gases tomorrow, experts say.<br>
<br>
Rising seas are one of the most severe consequences of a heating
climate that are already being felt.<br>
<br>
Since the 1880s, mean sea level globally has already risen by 16cm
to 21cm (6-8in). Half of that rise has happened over the past three
decades.<br>
<br>
It is accelerating, too: the ocean rose more than twice as fast
(4.62mm a year) in the most recent decade (2013-22) than it did in
1993-2002, the first decade of satellite measurements, when the rate
was 2.77mm a year. Last year was a new high, according to the World
Meteorological Organization. It is no coincidence that the past
eight years were the warmest on record.<br>
<br>
The numbers might seem small. Even 4.62mm is just half a centimetre
a year. So why did the UN secretary general, António Guterres, warn
in February that the increase in the pace of sea level rise
threatens a “mass exodus” of entire populations on a biblical
scale?..<br>
- -<br>
Part of the problem is the that even if the world stopped emitting
greenhouse gases immediately – which it will not – sea levels would
continue to rise. Even in the best-case scenario, it’s too late to
hold back the ocean...<br>
<br>
The reason for this is not widely known, outside the science
community, but is crucial. The systems causing sea level rise –
specifically, the thermal expansion of the ocean and the melting of
glaciers and ice sheets due to global heating – have a
centuries-long time lag.<br>
“The atmosphere changes quite rapidly but deep ocean circulation
takes centuries,” says Prof Jonathan Bamber, director of the Bristol
Glaciology Centre at the University of Bristol.<br>
<br>
“As the heat sinks into the deep ocean, it takes centuries to be
moved around and for a new equilibrium to be reached. Ice sheets
also have a response time, so that if you change the thermometer
tomorrow, it can take hundreds to thousands of years to reach an
equilibrium.<br>
<br>
“Taken together, you’re talking multiple centuries to reach an
equilibrium with the new temperature we’ve established.”<br>
<br>
To stop the acceleration of sea level rise over the past century,
Bamber says, we would have to go back to pre-industrial
temperatures.<br>
<br>
But under any temperature rise scenario, countries from Bangladesh
to China, India and the Netherlands, all with large coastal
populations, will be at risk. Megacities on every continent will
face serious impacts, including Lagos, Bangkok, Mumbai, Shanghai,
London, Buenos Aires and New York.<br>
The climate crisis has many other hazards, of course: blistering
heatwaves, droughts, floods and more extreme weather events. But
there is a certain apocalyptic inevitability to a rising ocean.<br>
<br>
“The thing about sea level rise is that it is absolutely
guaranteed,” Bamber says. “If you warm the planet, sea level is
going to go up, period, no caveats. The oceans warm up and the ice
melts. It’s an absolute given of global heating.”<br>
<br>
So far, the ocean has acted as a buffer against global heating.
About 90% of the energy trapped in the climate system by greenhouse
gases goes into the ocean as heat – keeping the planet cooler than
it otherwise would be, but threatening marine life. Even though the
world has been experiencing a cooler period over the past few years
(known as La Niña conditions), more than half – 58% – of the ocean
surface last year experienced at least one marine heatwave.<br>
<br>
But heat is just one factor in the rising sea. Thermal expansion
explained about 50% of sea level rise during 1971-2018 – the other
components are glacier melt (22%), ice-sheet melt (20%) and changes
in land water storage.<br>
<br>
The impact is hard to gauge because the ocean does not rise at the
same speed uniformly, it’s not like a bath. For one thing, Earth is
not a perfect sphere; temperatures are also different across the
planet, and are affected by ocean currents. The impact of sea level
rise are boosted by storm surges and tidal variation, as happened
during Hurricane Sandy in New York and Cyclone Idai in Mozambique.<br>
<br>
What we do know, of course, is that the first impact of rising seas
will be on coastal communities worldwide, especially densely
populated, low-lying urban areas. Major cities on all continents are
at risk and it is an existential threat for countries such as Tuvalu
and other small island developing states.<br>
<br>
Making predictions over populations at risk, however, is not
straightforward either. While the Netherlands, which has one of the
lowest elevations in the world, is at risk from sea level rise, it
also has gone to great lengths to build defences to protect itself.<br>
<br>
“A headline that says, for example, more than a quarter of the
Netherlands will be underwater by 2100 – that sounds very dramatic,”
says Prof Gerd Masselink, an expert in coastal geomorphology at the
University of Plymouth. “But at the moment, people in the
Netherlands are walking around and riding their bikes below sea
level. There are coastal defence structures in place. And if you say
200 million people are going to be affected by rising sea level:
well, anyone who lives on the coast is affected in some way, but it
doesn’t actually mean that they’re going to lose their house right
away.”<br>
<b>Best and worst case scenarios by 2100</b><br>
So how bad could things get? Again, it’s hard to predict exactly,
but the IPCC has tried its hand at modelling different scenarios for
how high sea levels will rise by 2100, based on how well humanity
succeeds in mitigating the climate crisis. Each scenario is the
result of complex calculations (“shared socioeconomic pathways”, or
SSPs, which get expressed as a number) that take into account likely
emissions, but also consider potential socioeconomic changes such as
population, urban density, education, land use and wealth – which
also affect fossil fuel use.<br>
<br>
<b>Most optimistic: 1.5C heating = 28-55cm sea level rise</b><br>
If the world shifts towards a more sustainable future, sticks to
development targets and meets the Paris climate goal of keeping
global heating to 1.5C by 2050, in the near term – ie, over the next
century – the likely global mean sea level is predicted to rise by
0.28-0.55m. The IPCC calls this its “sustainability” scenario (an
SSP rating of 1-1.9).<br>
<b>Middle of the road: 1.8C = 32-62cm</b><br>
Assuming socioeconomic and technology trends do not shift markedly,
inequality persists but we can meet a “low” emissions target (SSP
1-2.6) that keeps global heating to within 1.8C by the end of the
century, sea levels are predicted to rise 0.32–0.62m.<br>
<b>Regional rivalry: 2.7C = 44-76cm</b><br>
An intermediate greenhouse gas emission scenario (SSP 2-4.5) where
net zero is not reached by 2100, this scenario assumes a resurgent
nationalism that makes environmental concerns a low international
priority as states seek development over sustainability.<br>
<b>Inequality: 3.6C = 55-90cm</b><br>
A very high emission scenario where CO2 doubles from current levels
until 2100 (SSP3-7) because of highly unequal investment in human
capital, increasing inequalities across and within countries, and
more investment in coal.<br>
<b>Fossil duel development: 4.4C = 63-101cm+</b><br>
Social and economic development is coupled with exploitation of
fossil fuel resources to run energy-intensive lifestyles around the
world. The IPCC also warns of a “low-likelihood high impact”
scenario (SSP5-8.5) in which ice sheet instability drives sea levels
above 2 metres by the end of this century alone.<br>
The worst case we’re looking at is something like more than 2 metres
in a century,” Bamber says.<br>
<br>
“To put that in context, 2 metres of sea level rise would displace,
or would affect or flood on an annual basis, approximately a 10th of
the planet’s population, so about 790 million people.” (In 2020, 896
million people lived within the “low elevation coastal zone – a
figure probably rising to 1 billion people by 2050.)<br>
<br>
<b>The end of the beginning</b><br>
In all of these cases, it’s important to remember that sea levels
won’t stop there – they’ll keep rising long beyond 2100.<br>
<br>
These estimates are just the IPCC’s immediate threat assessment for
where the world might be by the end of this century.<br>
What’s more, the different emission scenarios actually have a
relatively small impact over sea level rise in the short term – but
they begin to diverge dramatically in the longer term. Over the next
200 years, global mean sea level will rise by about 2-3 metres if
warming is limited to 1.5C, but it could double to 2-6 metres if the
warming is limited to even a slightly higher figure of 2C.<br>
<br>
At sustained warming levels of 2-3C, the Greenland and West
Antarctic ice sheets will be irreversibly gone. The collapse of
major Antarctic ice shelves at the end of the century, followed by
increased discharge of ice, could lead to catastrophic sea level
rise by 2300 of 9-15 metres, under strong warming. And if global
heating advances to 5C, the planet could expect 19-22 metres of sea
level rise, wiping out entire cities and countries by the year 2300.<br>
<br>
Masselink says he is struck by the timescale of global heating
impact – the delay between our actions now and future repercussions.<br>
<br>
“What I’ve always found remarkable is that, while the difference
between ‘no more greenhouse gas emissions’ and ‘keep burning’ is
significant, it is not going to make that big an impact in the next
few decades,” he says.<br>
<br>
“[Where] it’s going to make a huge difference [is] not for us, but
for our children’s children. That’s the difficult thing to get your
head around.”<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jun/26/its-absolutely-guaranteed-the-best-and-worst-case-scenarios-for-sea-level-rise">https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jun/26/its-absolutely-guaranteed-the-best-and-worst-case-scenarios-for-sea-level-rise</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><i><br>
</i></p>
<i><font face="Calibri">[ Covering Climate Now ]</font></i><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>The Heat Will Come… and Come</b><br>
Record temperatures in China and beyond refute the notion that
fossil fuels are key to economic prosperity<br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://coveringclimatenow.org/climate-beat-story/the-heat-will-come-and-come/">https://coveringclimatenow.org/climate-beat-story/the-heat-will-come-and-come/</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><i>[ Cough, cough ]</i><br>
<b>The Best Air Purifier - A Buying Guid</b>e<br>
Consumer Analysis<br>
24.3K subscribers<br>
Feb 24, 2020<br>
Current list of top rated air purifiers overall:<br>
1. Winix 5500-2 - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://amzn.to/2Pwp1Dx">https://amzn.to/2Pwp1Dx</a><br>
2. Coway Mighty - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://amzn.to/2TjOy3O">https://amzn.to/2TjOy3O</a><br>
3. Austin Air HealthMate - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://amzn.to/2TaVXny">https://amzn.to/2TaVXny</a><br>
The latest updated list of top rated air purifiers overall: <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.consumeranalysis.com/guid">https://www.consumeranalysis.com/guid</a>...
<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://youtu.be/Cgn-K5wbh2A">https://youtu.be/Cgn-K5wbh2A</a><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri"> <br>
<i>[The news archive - looking back]</i><br>
<font size="+2"><i><b>June 30, 2011</b></i></font> <br>
June 30, 2011: US District Judge Emmet Sullivan upholds the 2008
decision by the Bush administration to declare polar bears
"threatened" under the Endangered Species Act.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/06/30/30greenwire-judge-upholds-threatened-listing-for-polar-bea-13044.html">http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/06/30/30greenwire-judge-upholds-threatened-listing-for-polar-bea-13044.html</a>
<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/mammals/polar_bear/pdfs/268_ORDER.pdf">http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/mammals/polar_bear/pdfs/268_ORDER.pdf</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri">======================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*Mass media is lacking, many </span>daily
summaries<span class="moz-txt-tag"> deliver global warming
news - a few are email delivered*</span></b> <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><br>
=========================================================<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b>*Inside Climate News</b><br>
Newsletters<br>
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every
day or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s
top headlines deliver the full story, for free.<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/">https://insideclimatenews.org/</a><br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
*<b>Climate Nexus</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*</a>
<br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the
day, delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant
reporting. It also provides original reporting and commentary on
climate denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise
remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday <br>
================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Carbon Brief Daily </b><span
class="moz-txt-star"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a></span><b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> <br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
================================== <br>
*T<b>he Daily Climate </b>Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days.
Better than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
<br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri">
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender. This is a personal hobby production curated
by Richard Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</font>
</body>
</html>