<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+2"><font face="Calibri"><i><b>July</b></i></font></font><font
size="+2" face="Calibri"><i><b> 25, 2023</b></i></font><font
face="Calibri"><br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"> </font> <br>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ Not so much a wave as it is a rising tide
] </i><br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b>Heatwave in US Southwest region to
expand east</b><br>
</font><font face="Calibri">By Sam Cabral<br>
BBC News<br>
</font><font face="Calibri">A heatwave baking the US Southwest for
weeks is set to expand into central and eastern regions.<br>
<br>
Beginning in the Midwest, the hot weather will extend east as far
as the southern tip of Florida by Wednesday, say meteorologists.<br>
<br>
Temperature records were surpassed in several major cities over
the weekend, and some 59 million Americans began Monday under
extreme heat advisories.<br>
<br>
July is now expected to be the Earth's hottest month since records
began.<br>
<br>
On Sunday, the city of Phoenix, Arizona, extended its streak of
temperatures above 43C (110F) into a 24th day, well past the
previous record of 18 days set in 1974.<br>
<br>
It is on course to be the first major US city to average over 100F
(38C) for an entire month, according to NOAA statistics and a
Washington Post analysis.<br>
<br>
At least 18 heat-related deaths have occurred in surrounding
Maricopa County since April, with 69 more deaths under
investigation.<br>
<br>
Meanwhile, in the border town of El Paso, Texas, residents
experienced a 38th consecutive day at temperatures above 38C
(100F).<br>
<br>
The National Park Service has also reported at least four deaths
among visitors to its parks in the southwest region.<br>
<br>
Two female hikers were found dead in the Valley of Fire State Park
in Nevada on Sunday, amid temperatures as high as 45C (114F).
Police have not yet released their identities or a possible cause
of death.<br>
<br>
Extreme heat is the number one weather-related killer in the US.<br>
<br>
Ocean temperatures in South Florida and the Keys could reach
unprecedented highs as the heatwave extends east in the coming
days.<br>
<br>
According to BBC Weather, the heatwave has been caused by a "heat
dome", a large area of high pressure.<br>
<br>
Within this dome, air is heated from the surface and trapped in
place by sinking hot air from above.<br>
<br>
"Through this week, the heat dome will expand, bringing hotter
weather and above average temperatures to pretty much the whole of
continental US," said meteorologist Simon King of BBC Weather.<br>
<br>
The National Weather Service's Climate Prediction Center says this
latest heatwave will last another two weeks.<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>Data from the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration</b> shows the US has this year set or
tied more than 13,000 high temperature records, as well as 16,000
low temperature records.<br>
<br>
Experts say heatwaves have become more frequent, more intense, and
last longer because of human-induced climate change.<br>
<br>
Washington state's Democratic governor Jay Inslee told ABC News
Sunday the heatwaves reported around the world are evidence that
"the Earth is screaming at us".<br>
<br>
"The fuse has been burning for decades, and now the climate change
bomb has gone off," he said.<br>
<br>
"The scientists are telling us that this is the new age. This is
the age of consequences."<br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66290589">https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66290589</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ Maine expert on wildfires - text and
audio ]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>An expert explains how climate change is
worsening wildfires in North America</b><br>
Maine Public | By Irwin Gratz<br>
July 24, 2023</font><br>
Wildfires are not unusual in Canada, as is the case in the American
West. But what is setting this fire season apart?<br>
<p><font face="Calibri">Michael Flannigan is an expert on forest
fires and Canada's efforts to deal with them. A one-time
meteorologist, Flanagan worked with the Canadian Forest Service.
He currently studies wildland fires at Thompson Rivers
University in Kamloops, British Columbia.<br>
<br>
He spoke with Maine Public's Irwin Gratz about the growing
danger of wildfires in Canada and the U.S. from human-caused
climate change.<br>
This interview has been lightly edited for clarity.<br>
Gratz: First of all, an update, can you tell us where some of
the worst fires are now burning in Canada?<br>
<br>
Flannigan: Right now the most active areas are Alberta, British
Columbia, Northwest territories -- in our West, and they're
burning actively and probably will continue to burn for the next
six, eight, 12 weeks. It's hot and dry.<br>
<br>
Wildfires are not unusual in Canada, as is the case in the
American West. But what is setting this fire season apart?</font></p>
So first off, it's a record-breaking year. We're kind of in
uncharted territory. The amount of area burned is larger than the
state of Maine. And that's much larger than our previous record,
which was from 1989.<br>
<br>
It started off with a bang in the West. There was record-breaking
heat in the spring. And where you get warm temperatures, you often
see fire because our fire seasons are longer, warmer weather brings
more lightning, and warmer weather generally dries out the fuels
very effectively. That's important for fire. So it started in the
West. And then it came to the East, with Nova Scotia catching fire.
And then those large fires in Quebec.<br>
<br>
And I know you folks in Maine have been seeing some of that smoke.
Some of these fires are huge, bigger than Prince Edward Island, and
they're going to burn through the summer, into the fall, maybe even
through winter, 'cause they can smolder underground in deeper layers
of organic material. Peat, for example.<br>
<br>
What kind of firefighting effort has Canada been able to mount?<br>
<br>
So fire management's the responsibility of the landowners. So we
have 10 provinces in Canada. Two of the three territories fight
fire, and also a federal agency called Parks Canada fights fire. So
they all have some common features, but they all do things a little
bit differently. But right now we have over 550 fires under control.<br>
<br>
But some of these are really in far northern remote areas. And
they're basically monitored, they're allowed to burn because our
boreal forests, the forest survives and thrives in the stream of
semi-regular stand-replacing, stand-renewing, high-intensity fire.
And these are such high-intensity that they're
difficult-to-impossible to extinguish through direct attack. It's
just Mother Nature doing her thing. So when and where possible, many
fire management agencies allow Mother Nature to do her thing.<br>
<br>
Farther south, where people are, well, they're fought vigorously,
just like in the United States. You hit 'em hard, you hit 'em fast.
If the fire is small, it's easy to put out. Once the fire gets
bigger than a football field, and it's hot, dry and windy, and the
fields are dry, you now have a real problem. So initial attacks are
critical for those unwanted fires.<br>
<br>
Firefighters from United States have helped out a great deal because
your fire season has been relatively quiet, it's starting to pick up
now with the heat out west. But you've sent a lot of resources to
Canada. And we're very grateful that just about 12 countries have
been sending resources. And if you had an active fire season, we
wouldn't have access to some of your crews.<br>
<br>
The latest report from scientists at the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change found that the conditions that make it more likely
for fires to take hold is a growing problem in many parts of the
world. And as a result, we're going to see this more and more
frequently. Is that the case, you think, in Canada?<br>
<br>
Yeah, our area of burn in Canada has doubled since the 1970s. And my
colleagues and I attribute this largely -- not solely -- to
human-caused climate change. It's even more dramatic in western
United States where area of burn has quadrupled.<br>
<br>
These greenhouse gases are building up and creating this warming.
And as I mentioned, the warmer it is, the longer our fire seasons
are, especially for places like Canada, where historically our fire
season has been short and now they're getting longer. More
lightning. Lightning burns most of our area of burn, 80-90% of the
area burned. Our human-caused fires are going down, which is great.
But lightning has more than compensated for it.<br>
<br>
And warmer temperatures lead to drier fuels, unless we get more
rain. And most of the models suggest we're not going to get more
rain to compensate for the dry. The drier the fuels, the easier for
fires to start. Easier for fire to spread. And it means more fuels
available to burn, which leads to these high-intensity fires that
are difficult-to-impossible to extinguish.<br>
<br>
I've also read that about 25,000 Indigenous people have had to be
evacuated because of fire. Is this taking a bigger toll on First
Nations lands and wildlife in Canada?<br>
<br>
Absolutely. You know, many of these communities are remote
communities, and many of them are First Nations or Indigenous
communities. So they are much more impacted by increased fire
activity than the rest of the population.<br>
<br>
Is there anything that, in particular, Canada should be doing
differently to deal with the threat from these wildfires?<br>
<br>
We can't do much about hot, dry, windy weather until we do something
about human-caused climate change. We can't do anything about
lightning.<br>
<br>
But we can do something about human-caused fires. They're all
preventable. In Canada, we have about 3,000 a year. And that pales
in comparison to the United States where it's probably closer to
60,000 human-caused fires a year.<br>
<br>
But that number can be reduced and things like fire bans, forest
closures are very effective. Very unpopular because it means no
industrial activity, no recreational activity, but very effective at
stopping human-caused fires.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.mainepublic.org/environment-and-outdoors/2023-07-24/an-expert-explains-how-climate-change-is-worsening-wildfires-and-how-they-might-be-mitigated">https://www.mainepublic.org/environment-and-outdoors/2023-07-24/an-expert-explains-how-climate-change-is-worsening-wildfires-and-how-they-might-be-mitigated</a><br>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ Reports from the misinformation
battleground. A dangerous and immoral communicator ]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>Tucker Carlson Spread Lots of Climate
Misinformation. His Replacement Isn’t Much Better</b><br>
Jesse Watters, the Fox News host who replaced Carlson, debuted his
new primetime show Monday. Like his predecessor, he downplayed the
climate crisis and stoked culture-war outrage.<br>
By Kristoffer Tigue<br>
July 21, 2023<br>
</font>
<p>Tucker Carlson may be gone from Fox News, but his spirit of
climate denialism lives on in his replacement, Jesse Watters.<br>
<br>
On Monday, Fox debuted Watters’ show—Jesse Watters Primetime—at 8
p.m. That’s the old timeslot of Carlson, whom Fox fired back in
April after a defamation lawsuit relating to Carlson’s coverage of
the 2020 presidential election resulted in a staggering $787
million settlement for the conservative media giant. Watters will
be just the third person in the network’s 26-year history to host
the much-coveted 8 p.m. weeknight slot.<br>
<br>
Once Fox’s most popular news host, Carlson has been one of the
world’s most prolific peddlers of climate misinformation. But
Watters has an equally problematic history of embracing conspiracy
theories about the climate crisis and downplaying its threat to
the public, according to a new report by Media Matters America, a
progressive think tank and media watchdog. <br>
<br>
“Watters’ unrelenting posture of condescension falsely brands
climate change mitigation as a corruption-laced grift to leech
money from unsuspecting Americans,” the report said. “While
Watters uses similar climate denial talking points as numerous
other Fox News hosts, he has been able to wield them in a
particularly damaging way that resonates with Fox’s audience and
builds out the channel’s dangerous brand of misinformation.”<br>
<br>
That’s because Watters “excels at stoking right-wing culture war
outrage,” the report’s authors wrote, while going “out of his way
to push climate change denial during extreme weather events, at
the moments when the reality of climate change is most evident.”<br>
<br>
When several major American cities, including New York City and
Washington, D.C., were blanketed by thick wildfire smoke from
Canada last month, Watters called the situation “normal” and
accused climate scientists of “preying on ignorance” when they
linked the increase of Canadian wildfires to climate change.<br>
<br>
It’s one of dozens of misleading or false claims about global
warming and climate science that Watters has made over the years
while working for different Fox programs, the report found. Just
this year, it said, Watters called global warming “corporate
propaganda” and “a ruse,” said efforts to reduce emissions were
“just a ploy” to get people “to buy more stuff the Democrats are
selling,” and claimed that “certain parts of the world will get a
tiny bit warmer, but the United States will do just fine.”<br>
<br>
Watters has also fueled several conspiracy theories, the report
noted, including by suggesting on air that environmental groups
advocating for increased investment in renewable energy “are
taking dirty Russian money … to scare Americans out of fracking
and energy exploration.” He also helped to fuel unsubstantiated
rumors being pushed by Republican lawmakers who say that offshore
wind farms along the U.S. East Coast—none of which have actually
been built yet—are responsible for an uptick of recent whale
deaths.<br>
<br>
“Watters was seemingly the first major TV news network host to
parrot misinformation peddled by a partially fossil fuel-funded
campaign against offshore wind projects on the East Coast,” the
Media Matters report said. “In the following weeks, Fox News
followed Watters’ lead and aired numerous segments insinuating
that the recent deaths of whales across New York and New Jersey
beaches were caused by the development of offshore wind turbines.”<br>
<br>
Federal scientists have repeatedly said there’s no evidence that
offshore wind development has played any role in the whale deaths,
which appear to be more likely tied to climate change and
collisions with boats. In fact, several whale species have been
increasingly dying off since 2016—long before any of the offshore
wind farms along the East Coast were in development. Evidence also
suggests campaigns to halt offshore wind development in order to
“save the whales” have in part been funded by fossil fuel
companies and industry advocacy groups.<br>
<br>
In many ways, Fox News has played a central role in fueling
climate misinformation. Reports from a coalition of environmental
and disinformation advocacy groups have identified Fox as a major
spreader of inaccurate climate information. Those experts now fear
that such misconceptions, often spread on social media, pose a
fundamental hurdle to the global effort to curb climate change,
largely because they fuel political divisions and exacerbate
Western culture wars.<br>
<br>
But stoking outrage, especially through the lens of America’s
culture wars, has long been the format of Fox’s 8 p.m. primetime
show, no matter who hosts it. Bill O’Reilly, who hosted Fox’s
primetime spot before Carlson, and was fired in 2017 over sexual
harassment allegations, once said, “Nobody can control the climate
except God.” Watters, in that sense, is merely carrying the torch.<br>
<br>
During his Monday debut, Watters leaned into his familiar
culture-war rhetoric as he segued to a story about the
record-breaking July heat waves. “It’s been a hot July,” Watters
said with a smirk to the 2.5 million viewers who tuned in to
watch. “Some call it ‘global warming,’ some call it ‘summer.’”<br>
<br>
Watters’ own mother, however, called into the show to offer a
warning. “Congratulations, honeybun. We are so proud of you and
your accomplishments … Now let’s aim to have you keep your job.
And to that end, I do have some suggestions,” she told her son on
air. “Do not tumble into any conspiracy rabbit holes. We do not
want to lose you and we want no lawsuits, OK?”<br>
</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/21072023/tucker-carlson-jesse-watters-fox-news-climate-misinformation/">https://insideclimatenews.org/news/21072023/tucker-carlson-jesse-watters-fox-news-climate-misinformation/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[The news archive - looking back at NYT
front page news on this day-]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> <font size="+2"><i><b>July 25, 1977</b></i></font>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">July 25, 1977: The New York Times runs a
front-page story entitled:<b> "Scientists Fear Heavy Use of Coal
May Bring Adverse Shift in Climate."</b></font><br>
<blockquote><font face="Calibri">“Highly adverse consequences” may
follow if the world, as now seems likely, depends increasingly
on coal for energy over the next two centuries, according to a
blue‐ribbon panel of scientists.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">In a report to the National Academy of
Sciences on their two‐and‐a‐half‐year study, the scientists
foresee serious climate changes beginning in the next century.
By the latter part of the 22d century a global warming of 10
degrees Fahrenheit is indicated, with triple that rise in high
latitudes.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">This, it is feared, could radically disrupt
food production, lead to a 20‐foot rise in sea level and
seriously lower productivity of the oceans.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">The focus of concern is the addition of
carbon dioxide to the atmosphere by fuel burning. While that gas
represents less than one‐tenth of 1 percent of the atmosphere,
it acts like glass in a greenhouse. That is, it permits passage
of sunlight to heat the earth but absorbs infrared radiation
that would otherwise return some of that heat to space.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">In recent months several scientists have
warned of the consequences of increasing, long‐term dependence
on fossil fuels, notably coal, as the chief energy source
because of what could be disastrous effects on climate. The
argument has been seized on by advocates of nuclear energy.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">The new study does not deal with alternative
energy sources. Nor does it call for early curtailment of coal
burning. Heavy use of such fuel is being promoted by the Carter
Administration as a means of avoiding excessive dependence on
nuclear energy.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">The central recommendation of the report,
prepared with help from a number of Government agencies,
laboratories and computer facilities, is initiation of far
reaching studies on a national and international basis to narrow
the many uncertainties that affect assessment of the threat.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">To this end, it proposes creation by the
Federal Government of a climatic council to coordinate American
efforts and to participate in the development of international
studies. Representatives of the White House and Government
agencies that would be involved in such an effort were at the
academy on Friday to hear presentations on the 281‐page report.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">These were offered by Roger R. Revelle,
chairman of the 15‐member panel, and by Philip H. Abelson and
Thomas F. Malone, co‐chairmen of the academy's geophysics study
committee, which initiated the project.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Dr. Revelle heads the Center for Population
Studies at Harvard University and was formerly director of the
Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, Calif. Dr.
Abelson heads the Carnegie Institution of Washington. Dr.
Malone, who directs the Holcomb Research Institute at Butler
University in Indianapolis, has for many years been a leader in
weather research.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Dr. Malone said that the report was not a red
light on coal use, nor a green light, but rather a “flashing
yellow light” saying, “Watch out.” Dr. Revelle, in a summary of
the findings, said that early action was needed because it would
take decades to narrow the uncertainties and then a full
generation to shift to new energy sources if that, as expected,
proves necessary.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>Problem of Change Stressed</b></font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">“An interdisciplinary effort of an almost
unique kind” is needed, he said, bringing together specialists
from such fields as mathematics, chemistry, meteorology and the
social sciences. A major challenge would be to find ways to
bring about the needed institutional changes, persuading
governments and people to act before it was too late.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">By the end of this century, Dr. Revelle said,
it is expected that the carbon dioxide content of the air will
have risen 25 percent above its level before the Industrial
Revolution. By the end of the next century, it will have
doubled, based on predicted increases in population and fuel
consumption.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">By the middle of the 22d Century, he added,
it should have increased from four to eight times and, even if
fuel burning diminishes then, it will remain that high “at least
1,000 years thereafter.”</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">It is estimated that in the last 110 years
127 billion tons of carbon derived from fuel and from limestone
used to make cement have been introduced into the atmosphere.
Cement manufacture accounted for 2 percent of that amount and
burning for the rest.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">A considerable part of the carbon dioxide
increase is attributed to clearing land for agriculture. This
added 70 billion tons, according to an estimate that Dr.
Revelle, however, described as “very uncertain.” He noted that
one acre of a tropical forest removes 100 tons of carbon from
the atmosphere. When the land is cleared that carbon, through
burning or decay, returns to the air. More than half of land
clearing for agriculture has occurred since the mid‐19th
Century, he said.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Dr. Revelle termed the predicted worldwide
rise of 11 degrees in the 22d century “a very shaky conclusion”
based on inadequate knowledge. But, he added, it is “a
possibility that must be taken seriously.” Part of the
uncertainty concerns the amount of added atmospheric carbon
dioxide that would be absorbed by the oceans and plant growth.
He predicted that a research program to achieve more reliable
estimates would cost $20 million to $100 million.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>Shift in Corn Belt Seen</b></font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Much of the report deals with expected
effects of a global warming. Agricultural zones would be
transferred to higher latitudes. The corn belt, for example,
would shift from fertile Iowa to a Canadian region where the
soil is far less fertile, Dr. Revelle said.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Particularly vulnerable, he added, would be
the fringes of arid regions, where a large part of the world
population derives its sustenance, though the effect is
difficult to predict. Marine life would suffer from lack of
nutrients because a “lid” of warm water would impede circulation
that normally brings nutrients to the surface.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">On the other hand, plant productivity, Dr.
Revelle noted, could rise 50 percent because plants would be
“fertilized” by the higher carbon dioxide content of the air.
The warmer climate could melt the floating pack ice of the
Arctic Ocean, leading to radical changes in the Northern
climate.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">The report suggests that increased snowfall
on Antarctica could overload the West Antarctic ice sheet,
sending large sections of it into the sea. This would raise
global sea levels 16 feet. The oceans would swell from being
warmed to make the total rise 20 feet.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">The study assumed a world population of 10
billion by late in the next century and a fivefold increase over
present ener‐i gy consumption. The direct effect of heat from
such energy use would be insignificant except locally, the
report says.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">It also assumed that for public health
reasons the release of particles into the atmosphere would be
sufficiently curtailed for their role to be a minor one so far
as climate is concerned.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">A number of research strategies are proposed
to reduce uncertainties. The most ambiguous estimates concern
the role of plants. It is estimated that land plants annually
remove 55 billion tons of carbon from the atmosphere, and that
oceanic plants take up another 25 billion tons.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">One of the firmer estimates concerns the
current rise in carbon dioxide content of the air because of
measurements conducted largely by Dr. Charles D. Keeling of the
University of California at San Diego. These have been made atop
Mauna Loa, the Hawaiian volcano, and at the South Pole, both
sites being far removed from local sources of pollution. They
show a 5 percent rise in the last 15 years. The total rise to
date has been 11.5 to 13.5 percent.</font><br>
</blockquote>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FB0F11F8395E137B93C7AB178CD85F438785F9">http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FB0F11F8395E137B93C7AB178CD85F438785F9</a></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri">======================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*Mass media is lacking, many </span>daily
summaries<span class="moz-txt-tag"> deliver global warming
news - a few are email delivered*</span></b> <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><br>
=========================================================<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b>*Inside Climate News</b><br>
Newsletters<br>
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every
day or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s
top headlines deliver the full story, for free.<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/">https://insideclimatenews.org/</a><br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
*<b>Climate Nexus</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*</a>
<br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the
day, delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant
reporting. It also provides original reporting and commentary on
climate denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise
remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday <br>
================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Carbon Brief Daily </b><span
class="moz-txt-star"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a></span><b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> <br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
================================== <br>
*T<b>he Daily Climate </b>Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days.
Better than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
<br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri">
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender. This is a personal hobby production curated
by Richard Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. </font><font
face="Calibri"><br>
</font>
</body>
</html>