<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+2"><font face="Calibri"><i><b>October 15</b></i></font></font><font
size="+2" face="Calibri"><i><b>, 2023</b></i></font><font
face="Calibri"><br>
</font> <br>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ data from Berkeley Earth, science must
inform ]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri">September 2023 Temperature Update<br>
Posted on October 11, 2023 by Robert Rohde<br>
<b>The following is a summary of global temperature conditions in
Berkeley Earth’s analysis of September 2023.<br>
</b></font>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li><font face="Calibri">Globally, September 2023 was the
warmest September — and the largest monthly anomaly of any
month — since records began in 1850.</font></li>
<li><font face="Calibri">The previous record for warmest
September was broken by 0.5 °C (0.9 °F), a staggeringly
large margin.</font></li>
<li><font face="Calibri">Both land and ocean individually also
set new records for the warmest September.</font></li>
<li><font face="Calibri">The extra warmth added since August
occurred primarily in polar regions, especially Antarctica.</font></li>
<li><font face="Calibri">Antarctic sea ice set a new record for
lowest seasonal maximum extent.</font></li>
<li><font face="Calibri">Record warmth in 2023 is primarily a
combined effect of global warming and a strengthening El
Niño, but natural variability and other factors have also
contributed.</font></li>
<li><font face="Calibri">Particularly warm conditions occurred
in the North Atlantic, Eastern Equatorial Pacific, South
America, Central America, Europe, parts of Africa and the
Middle East, Japan, and Antarctica.</font></li>
<li><font face="Calibri">77 countries, mostly in Europe and the
tropics, set new monthly average records for September.</font></li>
<li><font face="Calibri">El Niño continues to strengthen and is
expected to continue into next year.</font></li>
<li><font face="Calibri">2023 is now virtually certain to become
a new record warm year (>99% chance).</font></li>
<li><font face="Calibri">2023 is very likely (90% chance) to
average more than 1.5 °C above our 1850-1900 baseline.</font></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p><font face="Calibri"><b>Global Summary</b></font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">Globally, September 2023 was the warmest
September since directly measured instrumental records began in
1850, breaking the record previously set in September 2020. In
addition, this September exceeded the previous record by 0.50 °C
(0.90 °F), an enormous margin described by one climate scientist
as <b>“absolutely gobsmackingly bananas”</b>.</font></p>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://berkeleyearth.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Month_only_time_series_combined-1.png">https://berkeleyearth.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Month_only_time_series_combined-1.png</a><br>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://berkeleyearth.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/SeasonalWrap-Sep2023.png">https://berkeleyearth.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/SeasonalWrap-Sep2023.png</a></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://berkeleyearth.org/september-2023-temperature-update/">https://berkeleyearth.org/september-2023-temperature-update/</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri">- -<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">[OPINION GUEST ESSAY - see the graphics ]<br>
<b>I Study Climate Change. The Data Is Telling Us Something New.</b><br>
Oct. 13, 2023</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">By Zeke Hausfather<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">Staggering. Unnerving. Mind-boggling.
Absolutely gobsmackingly bananas.<br>
<br>
As global temperatures shattered records and reached dangerous
new highs over and over the past few months, my climate
scientist colleagues and I have just about run out of adjectives
to describe what we have seen...<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/13/opinion/climate-change-excessive-heat-2023.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/13/opinion/climate-change-excessive-heat-2023.html</a><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/13/opinion/climate-change-excessive-heat-2023.html?unlocked_article_code=3rDdOANfj-VmB_HwY89rfehDbZfbf2w7QuDbc9Y0DOGzCeDbbKQ_cRNv-oY2bwlFHhZknizrK6oIlRCg0F_eRxSCGiQN8ismj8CsWWb9opoOde8a2DaCvZgT94qC3Oq6HVPyHrJxMang_1Wfc3YYPwGdTYm43NvaWaRO6D4fcZVjAGfkbGPrch4AOcV3ykMqlMHyb_UyoOK32FUiJgpGSO89eL-dO1rU2uPb-2gnl_tixZwNZ-Vs6z_UcjDb8nooZNau8VLZCs6ozMr77Tkd5m3s_XxFRk2xLbw9VKeghlLGE25UR7SQTqfu_gY7rWq06YI8o5a6Z-fFOSI6cjpoAv6VgogmWvMCAWw_Yg&smid=url-share">https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/13/opinion/climate-change-excessive-heat-2023.html?unlocked_article_code=3rDdOANfj-VmB_HwY89rfehDbZfbf2w7QuDbc9Y0DOGzCeDbbKQ_cRNv-oY2bwlFHhZknizrK6oIlRCg0F_eRxSCGiQN8ismj8CsWWb9opoOde8a2DaCvZgT94qC3Oq6HVPyHrJxMang_1Wfc3YYPwGdTYm43NvaWaRO6D4fcZVjAGfkbGPrch4AOcV3ykMqlMHyb_UyoOK32FUiJgpGSO89eL-dO1rU2uPb-2gnl_tixZwNZ-Vs6z_UcjDb8nooZNau8VLZCs6ozMr77Tkd5m3s_XxFRk2xLbw9VKeghlLGE25UR7SQTqfu_gY7rWq06YI8o5a6Z-fFOSI6cjpoAv6VgogmWvMCAWw_Yg&smid=url-share</a><i><br>
</i></font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><i><br>
</i></font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><i><br>
</i></font></p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ Suppression of protestation is not wise ]<br>
</i> </font><font face="Calibri"><b>Human rights experts warn
against European crackdown on climate protesters</b><br>
Damien Gayle, Matthew Taylor and Ajit Niranjan<br>
12 Oct 2023 </font><br>
<font face="Calibri">UK has led the way, with countries across the
continent making mass arrests, passing draconian new laws and
labelling activists as eco-terrorists<br>
</font>
<blockquote><font face="Calibri"> - How criminalisation is being
used to silence climate activists across the world</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> - Threats to Germany’s climate campaigners
fuelled by politicians’ rhetoric, says activist</font><br>
</blockquote>
<font face="Calibri">Human rights experts and campaigners have
warned against an intensifying crackdown on climate protests
across Europe, as Guardian research found countries across the
continent using repressive measures to silence activists.<br>
<br>
In Germany, France, Italy, Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK,
authorities have responded to climate protests with mass arrests,
the passing of draconian new laws, the imposing of severe
sentences for non-violent protests and the labelling of activists
as hooligans, saboteurs or eco-terrorists.<br>
<br>
The crackdowns have come in spite of calls by senior human rights
advocates and environmental campaigners to allow civic space for
the right to non-violent protest, after a summer of
record-breaking heat in southern Europe that is attributed to the
effects of climate breakdown.<br>
<br>
The UK has led the way in the crackdown, experts say, with judges
recently refusing an appeal against multi-year sentences for
climate activists who blocked a motorway bridge in east London.
The three-year jail terms for Marcus Decker and Morgan Trowland
earlier this year are thought to be the longest handed out by a
British judge for non-violent protest.<br>
<br>
The ruling came as protesters in the UK try to navigate a new
legal environment that includes significant limits on the right to
protest, including two wide-ranging new laws passed in the past
two years giving police the discretion to ban protests regarded as
“disruptive” and criminalising a host of protest tactics.<br>
<br>
Michel Forst, the UN rapporteur on environmental defenders since
June last year, described the situation in the UK as “terrifying”.
He added that other countries were “looking at the UK examples
with a view to passing similar laws in their own countries, which
will have a devastating effect for Europe”.<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">“Since my appointment I have been travelling to
many countries in Europe and there is a clear trend,” Forst told
the Guardian. “We can see an increasing number of cases by which
these climate activists are brought to court more and more often
and more and more severe laws being passed to facilitate these
attacks on defenders.”<br>
<br>
He added: “I’m sure that there is European cooperation among the
police forces against these kinds of activities. My concern is
that when [governments] are calling these people eco-terrorists,
or are using new forms of vilifications and defamation … it has a
huge impact on how the population may perceive them and the cause
for which these people are fighting. It is a huge concern for me.”<br>
<br>
Amnesty International said it was investigating a continent-wide
crackdown on protest. Catrinel Motoc, the organisation’s senior
campaigner on civil space and right to protest in Europe, said:
“People all around the world are bravely raising their voices to
call for urgent actions on the climate crisis but many face dire
consequences for their peaceful activism.<br>
<br>
“Peaceful protesters are left with no choice but to stage public
protests and non-violent direct actions because European countries
are not doing enough to tackle the climate crisis.<br>
<br>
“There’s alarming evidence of criminalisation, harassment,
stigmatisation and negative rhetoric towards environmental
defenders.”<br>
<br>
Motoc said that instead of demonising and restricting peaceful
environmental defenders, “European governments should put [their]
energy into open dialogue with activists and organisations to fix
the problems of climate crisis. Climate protesters are not a
nuisance, and they should not be silenced or crushed.”<br>
<br>
In June, Dunja Mijatović, the Council of Europe’s commissioner for
human rights, also called for an end to crackdowns on
environmental activists. Last December, Volker Türk, the UN’s high
commissioner for human rights, appealed to governments to protect
the “civic space” for young environmental activists, and “not
crack down in a way that we have seen in many parts of the world”.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">There was widespread outrage this summer when
France’s interior minister, Gérald Darmanin, used one of the
state’s most-powerful tools to order the banning of one of the
country’s leading environmental protest groups.<br>
<br>
Les Soulévements de la Terre, a collective of local environmental
campaigns, had staged a series of protests, with tactics including
sabotage, that ended with violent confrontations with police, and
Darmanin denouncing the activists as “far left” and
“ecoterrorists”.<br>
<br>
In the Netherlands, one of a series of roadblock protests on the
A12 highway in The Hague in May was dispersed by police using
water cannon, with more than 1,500 arrested. Seven climate
activists were convicted of sedition – a charge that had never
before been levelled against climate protesters – in relation to
online posts calling for people to join an earlier demonstration.<br>
<br>
In Sweden, about two dozen members of the Återställ Våtmarker
[Restore Wetlands] group were convicted of sabotage for blocking
highways in the capital, Stockholm. Others were held on remand for
up to four weeks for taking part in protests.<br>
<br>
n Germany in May, police staged nationwide raids against the
Letzte Generation (Last Generation) group, whose supporters had
glued themselves to roads on a near-weekly basis for months, as
well as targeting art galleries and other cultural spaces. On a
police directive, the homepage of the group was shut down and
possessions belonging to members were seized.<br>
<br>
At the most recent count, supplied by the activists, police had
made more than 4,000 arrests of supporters of Last Generation
taking part in road blocks in Berlin alone.<br>
<br>
Authorities in Italy have used anti-organised crime laws to crack
down on protests, where the Ultima Generazione (also Last
Generation) group has staged road blocks since last year. The
Digos police unit, which specialises in counter-terrorism, in
April justified the use of anti-Mafia laws to target the group by
saying its civil disobedience actions had not taken place
spontaneously, but were organised, discussed and weighed up by an
internal hierarchy. This came along with new, stiffer penalties
for protests, with activists facing fines of up to €40,000 for
actions targeting artworks and other cultural heritage.<br>
<br>
Richard Pearshouse, director of the environment division at Human
Rights Watch, said: “These restrictions on environmental protest
across Europe and the UK are incredibly short-sighted. These
governments haven’t grasped that we all have a huge interest in
more people taking to the streets to demand better environmental
protection and more climate action.<br>
<br>
“Governments need to respect the rights to assembly and
expression, and ramp up their own environmental protections and
climate ambitions. That’s the only way we have a chance to get out
of this climate crisis with our democratic institutions intact.”<br>
<br>
A spokesperson for the UK Home Office said: “The right to protest
is a fundamental part of our democracy but we must also protect
the law-abiding majority’s right to go about their daily lives.<br>
<br>
“The Public Order Act brings in new criminal offences and proper
penalties for selfish, guerrilla protest tactics.”<br>
<br>
The French interior ministry said local officials had the right to
ban demonstrations with a serious risk of disturbing public order.
“These one-off bans, of which there are very few in absolute
terms, are not imposed because of the reason for the
demonstration.”<br>
<br>
The Italian interior ministry referred to a statement from the
culture minister Gennaro Sangiuliano in April, who said attacks on
monuments cause economic damage to the community that is is
expensive to clean up. “Those who cause damage must pay
personally.”<br>
<br>
The German interior ministry declined to comment. The Bavarian
interior ministry referred the Guardian to the public prosecutor’s
office in Munich, which provided a statement from June in which it
confirmed it had authorised the tapping of phones for six of seven
Last Generation members under criminal investigation.<br>
<br>
The Swedish interior ministry declined to comment. The Dutch
ministry of justice did not respond to requests for comment.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/oct/12/human-rights-experts-warn-against-european-crackdown-on-climate-protesters">https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/oct/12/human-rights-experts-warn-against-european-crackdown-on-climate-protesters</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><i><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></i> </p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ A positive, calm, and excellent discussion
of our predicament and our way forward. video ]</i><br>
<b>Debating the Energy Transition | Simon Michaux & Nafeez
Ahmed</b><br>
Planet: Critical<br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri">Jul 12, 2023 #energycrisis
#energytransition<br>
So do we have enough materials for a renewable economy or not?<br>
<br>
A few months ago, the energy-Twittersphere exploded into debate
over Simon Michaux’s report detailing how we lack enough
materials and minerals for a renewable economy. I interviewed
Simon, a researcher at GTK Finland, about this report, in which
he laid out the lack of raw materials and the ecological cost of
mining which will impede a renewable energy future.<br>
<br>
The report was divisive, with anyone and everyone weighing in on
the debate, and more than some name-calling online. Nafeez
Ahmed, a systems researcher and investigative journalist who has
been reporting on the environment for 20 years, published a
detailed piece “debunking” Simon’s report. It caused another
stir online, with calls for a debate between the two tweeted
from around the world. <br>
<br>
Watching this unfold, I was concerned by how those on the same
side of the fight can end up at odds, and bemused by the vitriol
I witnessed on Twitter in both Simon and Nafeez’s name. Simply,
if we can’t learn to speak with one another, what’s the point?<br>
<br>
They were both quick to agree to a debate, and had already been
engaging over email on the topic. We go into the technical
details of the report but also discuss the polarisation of
science, the processing of information, the politics and
tribalism driving conversation, before exploring the benefits of
how an energy transformation can truly transform society.<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-Ga3UNp3vE">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-Ga3UNp3vE</a><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font> </p>
<i><font face="Calibri">[ </font></i><font face="Calibri"><i>The
great, former NASA climate science chief James Hansen: "If this
El Nino peak is as high as we project it will be, the 1.5°C
global warming level will have been reached, for all practical
purposes. There will be no need to ruminate for 20 years about
whether the 1.5°C level has been reached, as IPCC proposes." ]</i><br>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>El Nino Fizzles. Planet Earth Sizzles. Why?</b><br>
13 October 2023<br>
James Hansen, Makiko Sato, Reto Ruedy, and Leon Simons<br>
</font>
<blockquote><font face="Calibri">Abstract. </font><br>
<font face="Calibri">September 2023 smashed the prior global
temperature record. Hand-wringing about the magnitude of the
temperature jump in September is not inappropriate, but it is
more important to investigate the role of aerosol climate
forcing – which we chose to leave unmeasured – in global climate
change. Global temperature during the current El Nino provides a
potential indirect assessment of change of the aerosol forcing.
Global temperature in the current El Nino, to date, implies a
strong acceleration of global warming for which the most likely
explanation is a decrease of human-made aerosols as a result of
reductions in China and from ship emissions. The current El Nino
will probably be weaker than the 1997-98 and 2015-16 El Ninos,
making current warming even more significant. The current
near-maximum solar irradiance adds a small amount to the major
“forcing” mechanisms (GHGs, aerosols, and El Nino), but with no
long-term effect. More important, the long dormant Southern
Hemisphere polar amplification is probably coming into play.</font></blockquote>
<font face="Calibri"> A PDF of this Communication is available on my
webpage <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/">https://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/</a><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://mailchi.mp/caa/el-nino-fizzles-planet-earth-sizzles-why?e=3763203384">https://mailchi.mp/caa/el-nino-fizzles-planet-earth-sizzles-why?e=3763203384</a><br>
</font>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<font face="Calibri"> <i>[The archive - at Al Gore misinformation
and attention from years ago. ]</i><br>
<font size="+2"><i><b>October 15, 2007 </b></i></font> <br>
October 15, 2007: New York Times columnist Paul Krugman ridicules
right-wing outrage over Al Gore's Nobel Prize win.<br>
</font>
<blockquote>
<p><b>Gore Derangement Syndrome</b><br>
Paul Krugman<br>
By Paul Krugman<br>
Oct. 15, 2007<br>
<br>
On the day after Al Gore shared the Nobel Peace Prize, The Wall
Street Journal’s editors couldn’t even bring themselves to
mention Mr. Gore’s name. Instead, they devoted their editorial
to a long list of people they thought deserved the prize more.<br>
<br>
And at National Review Online, Iain Murray suggested that the
prize should have been shared with “that well-known peace
campaigner Osama bin Laden, who implicitly endorsed Gore’s
stance.” You see, bin Laden once said something about climate
change — therefore, anyone who talks about climate change is a
friend of the terrorists.<br>
<br>
What is it about Mr. Gore that drives right-wingers insane?<br>
<br>
Partly it’s a reaction to what happened in 2000, when the
American people chose Mr. Gore but his opponent somehow ended up
in the White House. Both the personality cult the right tried to
build around President Bush and the often hysterical denigration
of Mr. Gore were, I believe, largely motivated by the desire to
expunge the stain of illegitimacy from the Bush administration.<br>
<br>
And now that Mr. Bush has proved himself utterly the wrong man
for the job — to be, in fact, the best president Al Qaeda’s
recruiters could have hoped for — the symptoms of Gore
derangement syndrome have grown even more extreme.<br>
<br>
The worst thing about Mr. Gore, from the conservative point of
view, is that he keeps being right. In 1992, George H. W. Bush
mocked him as the “ozone man,” but three years later the
scientists who discovered the threat to the ozone layer won the
Nobel Prize in Chemistry. In 2002 he warned that if we invaded
Iraq, “the resulting chaos could easily pose a far greater
danger to the United States than we presently face from Saddam.”
And so it has proved.<br>
<br>
But Gore hatred is more than personal. When National Review
decided to name its anti-environmental blog Planet Gore, it was
trying to discredit the message as well as the messenger. For
the truth Mr. Gore has been telling about how human activities
are changing the climate isn’t just inconvenient. For
conservatives, it’s deeply threatening.<br>
<br>
Consider the policy implications of taking climate change
seriously.<br>
<br>
“We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad
morals,” said F.D.R. “We know now that it is bad economics.”
These words apply perfectly to climate change. It’s in the
interest of most people (and especially their descendants) that
somebody do something to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and
other greenhouse gases, but each individual would like that
somebody to be somebody else. Leave it up to the free market,
and in a few generations Florida will be underwater.<br>
<br>
The solution to such conflicts between self-interest and the
common good is to provide individuals with an incentive to do
the right thing. In this case, people have to be given a reason
to cut back on greenhouse gas emissions, either by requiring
that they pay a tax on emissions or by requiring that they buy
emission permits, which has pretty much the same effects as an
emissions tax. We know that such policies work: the U.S. “cap
and trade” system of emission permits on sulfur dioxide has been
highly successful at reducing acid rain.<br>
<br>
Climate change is, however, harder to deal with than acid rain,
because the causes are global. The sulfuric acid in America’s
lakes mainly comes from coal burned in U.S. power plants, but
the carbon dioxide in America’s air comes from coal and oil
burned around the planet — and a ton of coal burned in China has
the same effect on the future climate as a ton of coal burned
here. So dealing with climate change not only requires new taxes
or their equivalent; it also requires international negotiations
in which the United States will have to give as well as
get.Everything I’ve just said should be uncontroversial — but
imagine the reception a Republican candidate for president would
receive if he acknowledged these truths at the next debate.
Today, being a good Republican means believing that taxes should
always be cut, never raised. It also means believing that we
should bomb and bully foreigners, not negotiate with them.<br>
<br>
So if science says that we have a big problem that can’t be
solved with tax cuts or bombs — well, the science must be
rejected, and the scientists must be slimed. For example,
Investor’s Business Daily recently declared that the prominence
of James Hansen, the NASA researcher who first made climate
change a national issue two decades ago, is actually due to the
nefarious schemes of — who else? — George Soros.<br>
<br>
Which brings us to the biggest reason the right hates Mr. Gore:
in his case the smear campaign has failed. He’s taken everything
they could throw at him, and emerged more respected, and more
credible, than ever. And it drives them crazy.<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/15/opinion/15krugman.html?unlocked_article_code=RqOdvoH8_h4hfFNRzOSlY0kwHc2UnOgZMgzkpz4FfFJ7tSRGnlq2GnGHeAaC965mFgKFXTARttX-GmnKpGCGPL-mF53vblx3yhlut-PyMmsB8q4vVgM-r0U-Ys_MOqnY2M2kfuZrFxc1JkXflwWZoGFqkO-Ovg9YSI1W0oGNavT8eBodgbiCA-vz67_QxH1KdQAi4NkODNh5yO9AIupxVJIrBJdkpDBI_iRMAMK7aVzmPEHAVT_CMv7A1aQRj43s6q2uv1qIenR_U2kJWeJkfvRzQI6AJ_rBM0ahh13ManrMDPOeGjyk3q-CUoWXItGoSJwo&smid=url-share">https://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/15/opinion/15krugman.html?unlocked_article_code=RqOdvoH8_h4hfFNRzOSlY0kwHc2UnOgZMgzkpz4FfFJ7tSRGnlq2GnGHeAaC965mFgKFXTARttX-GmnKpGCGPL-mF53vblx3yhlut-PyMmsB8q4vVgM-r0U-Ys_MOqnY2M2kfuZrFxc1JkXflwWZoGFqkO-Ovg9YSI1W0oGNavT8eBodgbiCA-vz67_QxH1KdQAi4NkODNh5yO9AIupxVJIrBJdkpDBI_iRMAMK7aVzmPEHAVT_CMv7A1aQRj43s6q2uv1qIenR_U2kJWeJkfvRzQI6AJ_rBM0ahh13ManrMDPOeGjyk3q-CUoWXItGoSJwo&smid=url-share</a><br>
</p>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/15/opinion/15krugman.html?_r=0">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/15/opinion/15krugman.html?_r=0</a><br>
<br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"> <br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><br>
=== Other climate news sources
===========================================<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b>*Inside Climate News</b><br>
Newsletters<br>
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every
day or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s
top headlines deliver the full story, for free.<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/">https://insideclimatenews.org/</a><br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
*<b>Climate Nexus</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*</a>
<br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the
day, delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant
reporting. It also provides original reporting and commentary on
climate denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise
remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday <br>
================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Carbon Brief Daily </b><span
class="moz-txt-star"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a></span><b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> <br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
================================== <br>
*T<b>he Daily Climate </b>Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days.
Better than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
<br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri">
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only -- and carries no
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers.
Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender. This is a personal hobby production curated by Richard
Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. </font><font
face="Calibri"><br>
</font>
</body>
</html>