<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+2"><font face="Calibri"><i><b>December 12</b></i></font></font><font
size="+2" face="Calibri"><i><b>, 2023</b></i></font><font
face="Calibri"><br>
</font><br>
<i>[ "Still talking" BBC report from COP28 ]<br>
</i><b>OP28: UN climate talks in jeopardy in fossil fuel backlash</b><br>
11th December 2023<br>
The UN climate talks in Dubai could be in jeopardy after some
nations reacted furiously to a draft deal on fossil fuels they call
"weak".<br>
<br>
The draft removed language included in a previous text suggesting
that fossil fuels could be "phased out".<br>
<br>
All 198 countries at the summit must agree or there is no deal.<br>
<br>
A new amended version of the text is expected to be issued on
Tuesday so that negotiations can continue.<br>
<br>
Humans burning fossil fuels is driving global warming, risking
millions of lives, but governments have never agreed how or when to
stop using them...<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-67679732">https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-67679732</a><br>
<br>
<p><i><br>
</i></p>
<i>[ NPR report: more climate-injured children filing suits... ]</i><br>
<b>18 California children are suing the EPA over climate change</b><br>
DECEMBER 11, 2023<br>
Jeff Brady<br>
Eighteen California children are suing the Environmental Protection
Agency, claiming it violated their constitutional rights by failing
to protect them from the effects of climate change. This is the
latest in a series of climate-related cases filed on behalf of
children.<br>
<br>
The federal lawsuit is called Genesis B. v. United States
Environmental Protection Agency. According to the lawsuit, the lead
plaintiff "Genesis B." is a 17-year-old Long Beach, California
resident whose parents can't afford air conditioning.<br>
<br>
As the number of extreme heat days increases, the lawsuit says
Genesis isn't able to stay cool in her home during the day. "On many
days, Genesis must wait until the evening to do schoolwork when
temperatures cool down enough for her to be able to focus,"
according to the lawsuit.<br>
The other plaintiffs range in age from eight to 17 and also are
identified by their first names and last initials because they are
minors. For each plaintiff, the lawsuit mentions ways that climate
change is affecting their lives now, such as wildfires and flooding
that have damaged landscapes near them and forced them to evacuate
their homes or cancel activities.<br>
<br>
"Time is slipping away, and the impact of the climate crisis is
already hitting us directly. We are running from wildfires, being
displaced by floods, panicking in hot classrooms during another heat
wave," 15-year-old plaintiff Noah said in a statement provided by
the non-profit, public interest law firm Our Children's Trust, which
filed the suit.<br>
<br>
The lawsuit comes on the heels of a legal victory in another suit
that Our Children's Trust filed on behalf of children. This summer,
a state judge in Montana handed Our Children's Trust an historic
win. The judge found the state violated 16 young plaintiffs' "right
to a clean and healthful environment." That case is being appealed.<br>
<br>
The California federal case claims the EPA violated the children's
constitutional rights by allowing carbon dioxide from burning fossil
fuels to warm the climate. It notes the agency's 2009 finding that
carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, is a public health threat, and
children are the most vulnerable.<br>
"There is one federal agency explicitly tasked with keeping the air
clean and controlling pollution to protect the health of every child
and the welfare of a nation—the EPA," said Julia Olson, chief legal
counsel for Our Children's Trust in the statement. "The agency has
done the opposite when it comes to climate pollution, and it's time
the EPA is held accountable by our courts for violating the U.S.
Constitution."<br>
<br>
An EPA spokesperson said because of the pending litigation, the
agency could not comment on the lawsuit.<br>
<br>
The lawsuit does not specifically seek financial compensation, other
than plaintiff costs and attorneys' fees. It asks instead for
various declarations about the environmental rights of children and
the EPA's responsibility to protect them.<br>
<br>
Our Children's Trust filed a different federal lawsuit in 2015,
Juliana v. United States, against the entire government. It was
dismissed in 2020 and revived by an Oregon judge this summer. The
group also has legal actions pending in Florida, Hawaii, Utah and
Virginia.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.npr.org/2023/12/11/1218499186/18-california-children-are-suing-the-epa-over-climate-change">https://www.npr.org/2023/12/11/1218499186/18-california-children-are-suing-the-epa-over-climate-change</a><br>
<p>- -</p>
<i>[ Filed 12/10/23 ]</i><br>
<b>UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA</b><br>
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND FURTHER RELIEF AS WARRANTED<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/655a2d016eb74e41dc292ed5/t/6576829a565cc6227e10b682/1702265500795/Doc+1+Complaint+2023.12.10.pdf">https://static1.squarespace.com/static/655a2d016eb74e41dc292ed5/t/6576829a565cc6227e10b682/1702265500795/Doc+1+Complaint+2023.12.10.pdf</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ Jason Box is one of our great cryologists ]</i><br>
<b>Arctic climate insights and low fidelity climate models</b><br>
Jason Box<br>
Dec 11, 2023<br>
video for COP28 in support of AMAP.no<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpbpbm_1Qss">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpbpbm_1Qss</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ Climate change is symptom, not cause - audio 90 mins ]</i><br>
<b>William Rees | Confronting Overshoot: Changing the Story of Human
Exceptionalism</b><br>
The Overpopulation Podcast<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MVmkIYy9aI">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MVmkIYy9aI</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ study says atmosphere is primed and changes are up ]</i><br>
<b>Atmospheric Instability has Increased Greatly (up to 32%) over
last 40 Years from Global Warming</b><br>
Paul Beckwith<br>
Dec 10, 2023<br>
Our Atmosphere is Unstable 8% - 32% More Often Now than it was 40
years ago Thanks to Global Warming. <br>
<br>
Times when the atmosphere is stable are becoming much rarer.<br>
<br>
Not only that, but the energy in the atmosphere is much greater now
(higher Convective Available Potential Energy or CAPE, making the
positive buoyancy of the air much greater) and higher Convective
Inhibition (CIN) or cap means that when the storms are triggered
they are much more intense.<br>
<br>
Press article:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.albany.edu/news-center/news/2023-study-climate-change-has-increased-atmospheric-instability-over-past-40-years">https://www.albany.edu/news-center/news/2023-study-climate-change-has-increased-atmospheric-instability-over-past-40-years</a><br>
<br>
Peer-reviewed open source scientific paper:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GL106125">https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GL106125</a><br>
<br>
Title: “The Atmosphere Has Become Increasingly Unstable During
1979–2020 Over the Northern Hemisphere”<br>
<br>
This paper looks at newly homogenized data (cleaned up to account
for different upgrades to radiosondes, etc) from weather instruments
(radiosondes) on weather balloons that are launched twice daily
around the world at 00Z and 012Z (6 am and 6 pm in EST). <br>
<br>
The radiosondes send real-time data on temperature, atmospheric
pressure (hence altitude) and humidity to ground-based computers for
the several hours that the balloon rises and drifts in the
atmosphere, going as high as 30 km and as far as several hundred km.
<br>
<br>
The radiosondes weather balloon collection of atmospheric data has
been ongoing twice daily from 1979 to present day; the new paper
looks at the global data from 1979 to 2000.<br>
<br>
Basically, periods of time when the atmosphere are unstable has
increased by between 2% and 8% per decade, for each of the last four
decades, for a total increase of between 8% and 32% depending on the
location.<br>
<br>
“For example, summer frequency of the unstable conditions increased
from ∼54%, 56%, and 50% (of time) in 1979 to ∼72%, 71%, and 63% in
2020 over EA (East Asia), NA (North America), and EU (Europe),
respectively. These changes represent a percentage increase of
26%–33%. Although we mainly show the results in JJA and DJF, the
increasing (decreasing) trends for the unstable (stable) conditions
are consistent among different seasons.”<br>
<br>
Not only do we have slowing meandering jet streams becoming much
wavier leading to much worse extreme weather events, the actual
atmosphere itself is much more unstable and prone to much more
intense, much higher frequency, and much longer duration storms.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ze-ciTnkU90">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ze-ciTnkU90</a><br>
<p>- -</p>
<i>[ Related posting POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH ]</i><br>
<b>Future floods: Global warming intensifies heavy rain – even more
than expected</b><br>
11/27/2023 - The intensity and frequency of extreme rainfall
increases exponentially with global warming, a new study finds. The
analysis by researchers from the Potsdam Institute of Climate Impact
Research (PIK) shows that state-of-the-art climate models
significantly underestimate how much extreme rainfall increases
under global warming – meaning that extreme rainfall could increase
quicker than climate models suggest.<br>
“Our study confirms that the intensity and frequency of heavy
rainfall extremes are increasing exponentially with every increment
of global warming,” explains Max Kotz, lead-author of the study
published in the ‘Journal of Climate’. These changes follow the
physical theory of the classic Clausius-Clapeyron relation of 1834,
which established that warmer air can hold more water vapor.
”State-of-the-art climate models vary on how strongly extreme
rainfall scales with global warming and that they underestimate it
compared to historical observations.”<br>
<br>
“Climate impacts on society have been calculated using climate
models. Now our findings suggest that these impacts could be much
worse than we thought. Extreme rainfall will be heavier and more
frequent. Society needs to be prepared for this,” says PIK
department head and author of the study Anders Levermann. Changes in
the frequency and intensity of daily rainfall extremes over land can
impact social welfare, the economy and social stability, given their
link to flooding but also ground-water availability, which can cause
considerable loss of life and financial losses.<br>
<br>
The researchers at PIK analysed the intensity and frequency of daily
precipitation extremes over land in 21 state-of-the-art climate
simulations (CMIP-6) and compared the changes projected by CMIP-6
models to those observed historically. The method they applied draws
on pattern-filtering techniques, allowing them to separate which
changes in the climate system are forced by human emissions, and
which are not. <br>
<br>
While most land-areas exhibit increases in both the intensity and
frequency of extremes, stronger increases are typically found across
tropical regions, according to the study. Significant changes most
often occur across the tropics and high-latitudes, like in Southeast
Asia or Northern Canada. The fact that these changes follow the
Clausius-Clapeyron relation underpins the fact that thermodynamics,
i.e. temperature and not dynamics, i.e. winds, dominate the global
change of extreme rainfall events. “The good news is that this makes
it easier to predict the future of extreme rainfall. The bad news
is: It will get worse, if we keep pushing up global temperatures by
emitting greenhouse gases,” Anders Levermann adds<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.pik-potsdam.de/en/news/latest-news/future-floods-global-warming-intensifies-heavy-rain-2013-even-more-than-expected">https://www.pik-potsdam.de/en/news/latest-news/future-floods-global-warming-intensifies-heavy-rain-2013-even-more-than-expected</a>
<p>- -<br>
</p>
<i>[ Article - ]</i><br>
<b>Constraining the Pattern and Magnitude of Projected Extreme
Precipitation Change in a Multimodel Ensemble</b><br>
Maximilian Kotz , Stefan Lange, Leonie Wenz, and Anders Levermann<br>
online Publication: 11 Dec 2023<br>
Print Publication: 01 Jan 2024<br>
DOI: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0492.1">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0492.1</a><br>
<blockquote>Abstract<br>
Projections of precipitation extremes over land are crucial for
socioeconomic risk assessments, yet model discrepancies limit
their application. Here we use a pattern-filtering technique to
identify low-frequency changes in individual members of a
multimodel ensemble to assess discrepancies across models in the
projected pattern and magnitude of change. Specifically, we apply
low-frequency component analysis (LFCA) to the intensity and
frequency of daily precipitation extremes over land in 21 CMIP-6
models. LFCA brings modest but statistically significant
improvements in the agreement between models in the spatial
pattern of projected change, particularly in scenarios with weak
greenhouse forcing. Moreover, we show that LFCA facilitates a
robust identification of the rates at which increasing
precipitation extremes scale with global temperature change within
individual ensemble members. While these rates approximately match
expectations from the Clausius-Clapeyron relation on average
across models, individual models exhibit considerable and
significant differences. Monte Carlo simulations indicate that
these differences contribute to uncertainty in the magnitude of
projected change at least as much as differences in the climate
sensitivity. Last, we compare these scaling rates with those
identified from observational products, demonstrating that
virtually all climate models significantly underestimate the rates
at which increases in precipitation extremes have scaled with
global temperatures historically. Constraining projections with
observations therefore amplifies the projected intensification of
precipitation extremes as well as reducing the relative error of
their distribution.<br>
© 2023 American Meteorological Society...consult the AMS Copyright
Policy (<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses">www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses</a>).<br>
</blockquote>
(pdf version)
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.pik-potsdam.de/~anders/publications/kotz_lange23.pdf">https://www.pik-potsdam.de/~anders/publications/kotz_lange23.pdf</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0492.1">https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0492.1</a> <br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ Related paper about major new understandings ]</i><br>
<b>The Atmosphere Has Become Increasingly Unstable During 1979–2020
Over the Northern Hemisphere</b><br>
Jiao Chen, Aiguo Dai<br>
First published: 21 October 2023
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106125">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106125</a><br>
<blockquote><b>Abstract</b><br>
Atmospheric instability affects the formation of convective
storms, but how it has changed during recent decades is unknown.
Here we analyze the occurrence frequency of stable and unstable
atmospheric conditions over land using homogenized radiosonde data
from 1979 to 2020. We show that atmospheric stable (unstable)
conditions have decreased (increased) significantly by ∼8%–32% (of
time) from 1979 to 2020 over most land areas. In boreal summer,
the mean positive buoyancy (i.e., convective available potential
energy [CAPE]) also increases over East Asia while mean negative
buoyancy (i.e., convective inhibition [CIN]) strengthens over
Europe and North America from midnight-dawn for unstable cases.
The increased unstable cases and mean CAPE result from increased
low-level specific humidity and air temperature, which increase
the buoyancy of a lifted parcel. The stronger CIN results from
decreased near-surface relatively humidity and decreased lapse
rate in the lower troposphere. Our results suggest that the
atmosphere has become increasingly unstable, which could lead to
more convective storms.<br>
</blockquote>
<b>Key Points</b><br>
<blockquote>Newly homogenized radiosonde humidity and temperature
data allow quantitative assessment of historical changes in
atmospheric instability<br>
<br>
There are increasingly more unstable conditions with positive
buoyancy in all seasons over most land areas from 1979 to 2020<br>
<br>
The increased unstable conditions mainly result from increased
low-level moisture content and warmer air temperature<br>
</blockquote>
<b>Plain Language Summary</b><br>
Severe weather events such as tornados and intense thunderstorms
often cause significant loss of life and property. Their formation
requires instability or unstable conditions in the atmosphere.
Climate models project increased unstable conditions under
greenhouse gas-induced global warming, but how atmospheric
instability has changed during recent decades is unclear. Through
analysis of newly homogenized radiosonde data, here we show that the
atmosphere has become increasingly unstable over most land areas
over the Northern Hemisphere from 1979 to 2020, with an increasing
number of unstable conditions (i.e., with positive buoyancy) but a
decreasing number of stable conditions (i.e., with zero or negative
buoyancy). These changes result mainly from increased low-level
moisture content and warmer air temperature. Such instability
changes favor increased occurrence of convective storms.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GL106125">https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GL106125</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<font face="Calibri"><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"> <i>[The news archive - report release
on scientific meddling by the Bush Administration - it would be
a different world today if that had not happened, or maybe not.
]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> <font size="+2"><i><b>December 12, 2007</b></i></font>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font> December 12, 2007: <br>
• The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform releases
the report <br>
"Political Interference with Climate Change Science under the Bush
Administration."<br>
<b>EXECUTIVE SUMMARY</b><br>
For the past 16 months, the House Oversight and Government Reform
Committee has<br>
been investigating allegations of political interference with
government climate change<br>
science under the Bush Administration. During the course of this
investigation, the<br>
Committee obtained over 27,000 pages of documents from the White
House Council on<br>
Environmental Quality (CEQ) and the Commerce Department, held two
investigative<br>
hearings, and deposed or interviewed key officials. Much of the
information made<br>
available to the Committee has never been publicly disclosed.
<p>This report presents the findings of the Committee’s
investigation. The evidence before<br>
the Committee leads to one inescapable conclusion: the Bush
Administration has<br>
engaged in a systematic effort to manipulate climate change
science and mislead<br>
policymakers and the public about the dangers of global warming.</p>
<p>In 1998, the American Petroleum Institute developed an internal
“Communications<br>
Action Plan” that stated: “Victory will be achieved when … average
citizens<br>
‘understand’ uncertainties in climate science … [and] recognition
of uncertainties<br>
becomes part of the ‘conventional wisdom.’” The Bush
Administration has acted as if<br>
the oil industry’s communications plan were its mission statement.
White House officials<br>
and political appointees in the agencies censored congressional
testimony on the causes<br>
and impacts of global warming, controlled media access to
government climate scientists,<br>
and edited federal scientific reports to inject unwarranted
uncertainty into discussions of<br>
climate change and to minimize the threat to the environment and
the economy.</p>
<p><b>The White House Censored Climate Change Scientists</b><br>
The White House exerted unusual control over the public statements
of federal scientists<br>
on climate change issues. It was standard practice for media
requests to speak with<br>
federal scientists on climate change matters to be sent to CEQ for
White House approval.<br>
By controlling which government scientists could respond to media
inquiries, the White<br>
House suppressed dissemination of scientific views that could
conflict with<br>
Administration policies. The White House also edited congressional
testimony regarding<br>
the science of climate change.</p>
<p><b>Former CEQ Chief of Staff Philip Cooney told the Committee: </b>“Our
communications<br>
people would render a view as to whether someone should give an
interview or not and<br>
who it should be.” According to Kent Laborde, a career public
affairs officer at the<br>
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, media requests
related to climate<br>
change issues were handled differently from other requests because
“I would have to<br>
route media inquires through CEQ.” This practice was particularly
evident after<br>
Hurricane Katrina. Mr. Laborde was asked, “Did the White House and
the Department<br>
of Commerce not want scientists who believed that climate change
was increasing<br>
hurricane activity talking with the press?” He responded: “There
was a consistent<br>
approach that might have indicated that.” <br>
</p>
<p><b>White House officials and agency political appointees also
altered congressional<br>
testimony regarding the science of climate change. </b>The
changes to the recent climate<br>
change testimony of Dr. Julie Gerberding, the Director of the
Centers for Disease Control<br>
and Prevention, have received considerable attention. A year
earlier, when Dr. Thomas<br>
Karl, the Director of National Climatic Data Center, appeared
before the House Oversight<br>
Committee, his testimony was also heavily edited by both White
House officials and<br>
political appointees at the Commerce Department. He was not
allowed to say in his<br>
written testimony that “modern climate change is dominated by
human influences,” that<br>
“we are venturing into the unknown territory with changes in
climate,” or that “it is very<br>
likely (>95 percent probability) that humans are largely
responsible for many of the<br>
observed changes in climate.” His assertion that global warming
“is playing” a role in<br>
increased hurricane intensity became “may play.”</p>
<p><b>The White House Extensively Edited Climate Change Reports</b><br>
There was a systematic White House effort to minimize the
significance of climate<br>
change by editing climate change reports. CEQ Chief of Staff Phil
Cooney and other<br>
CEQ officials made at least 294 edits to the Administration’s
Strategic Plan of the<br>
Climate Change Science Program to exaggerate or emphasize
scientific uncertainties or<br>
to deemphasize or diminish the importance of the human role in
global warming.</p>
<p>The White House insisted on edits to EPA’s draft Report on the
Environment that were so<br>
extreme that the EPA Administrator opted to eliminate the climate
change section of the<br>
report. One such edit was the inclusion of a reference to a
discredited, industry-funded<br>
paper. In a memo to the Vice President’s office, Mr. Cooney
explained: “We plan to<br>
begin to refer to this study in Administration communications on
the science of global<br>
climate change” because it “contradicts a dogmatic view held by
many in the climate<br>
science community that the past century was the warmest in the
past millennium and<br>
signals of human induced ‘global warming.’”</p>
<p>In the case of EPA’s Air Trends Report, CEQ went beyond editing
and simply vetoed the<br>
entire climate change section of the report.</p>
<p><b>Other White House Actions</b><br>
The White House played a major role in crafting the August 2003
EPA legal opinion<br>
disavowing authority to regulate greenhouse gases. CEQ Chairman
James Connaughton<br>
personally edited the draft legal opinion. When an EPA draft
quoted the National<br>
Academy of Science conclusion that “the changes observed over the
last several decades<br>
are likely mostly due to human activities,” CEQ objected because
“the above quotes are<br>
unnecessary and extremely harmful to the legal case being made.”
The first line of<br>
another internal CEQ document transmitting comments on the draft
EPA legal opinion<br>
reads: “Vulnerability: science.” The final opinion incorporating
the White House edits<br>
was rejected by the Supreme Court in April 2007 in Massachusetts
v. EPA.</p>
The White House also edited a 2002 op-ed by EPA Administrator
Christine Todd<br>
Whitman to ensure that it followed the White House line on climate
change. Despite <br>
objections from EPA, CEQ insisted on repeating an unsupported
assertion that millions<br>
of American jobs would be lost if the Kyoto Protocol were ratified.
<br>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.google.com/search?q=UNITED+STATES+HOUSE+OF+REPRESENTATIVES+COMMITTEE+ON+OVERSIGHT+AND+GOVERNMENT+REFORM+DECEMBER+2007+POLITICAL+INTERFERENCE+WITH+CLIMATE+CHANGE+SCIENCE+UNDER+THE+BUSH+ADMINISTRATION&rlz=1C1SQJL_enUS792US792&oq=UNITED+STATES+HOUSE+OF+REPRESENTATIVES+COMMITTEE+ON+OVERSIGHT+AND+GOVERNMENT+REFORM+DECEMBER+2007+POLITICAL+INTERFERENCE+WITH+CLIMATE+CHANGE+SCIENCE+UNDER+THE+BUSH+ADMINISTRATION&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBBzk3NGowajeoAgCwAgA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8">https://www.google.com/search?q=UNITED+STATES+HOUSE+OF+REPRESENTATIVES+COMMITTEE+ON+OVERSIGHT+AND+GOVERNMENT+REFORM+DECEMBER+2007+POLITICAL+INTERFERENCE+WITH+CLIMATE+CHANGE+SCIENCE+UNDER+THE+BUSH+ADMINISTRATION&rlz=1C1SQJL_enUS792US792&oq=UNITED+STATES+HOUSE+OF+REPRESENTATIVES+COMMITTEE+ON+OVERSIGHT+AND+GOVERNMENT+REFORM+DECEMBER+2007+POLITICAL+INTERFERENCE+WITH+CLIMATE+CHANGE+SCIENCE+UNDER+THE+BUSH+ADMINISTRATION&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBBzk3NGowajeoAgCwAgA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8</a><br>
</p>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-110hhrg34913/html/CHRG-110hhrg34913.htm">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-110hhrg34913/html/CHRG-110hhrg34913.htm</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mark-bowen.com/images/downloads/house_oversight_committee-rept_1207.pdf">http://mark-bowen.com/images/downloads/house_oversight_committee-rept_1207.pdf</a>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<font face="Calibri">=== Other climate news sources
===========================================</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font> <font face="Calibri"><b>*Inside
Climate News</b><br>
Newsletters<br>
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every
day or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s
top headlines deliver the full story, for free.<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/">https://insideclimatenews.org/</a><br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
*<b>Climate Nexus</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*</a>
<br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the
day, delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant
reporting. It also provides original reporting and commentary on
climate denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise
remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday <br>
================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Carbon Brief Daily </b><span
class="moz-txt-star"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a></span><b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> <br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
================================== <br>
*T<b>he Daily Climate </b>Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days.
Better than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
<br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri">
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only -- and carries no
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers.
Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender. This is a personal hobby production curated by Richard
Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. </font><font
face="Calibri"><br>
</font>
</body>
</html>