<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+2" face="Calibri"><i><b>April 7</b></i></font><font
size="+2" face="Calibri"><i><b>, 2024</b></i></font><font
face="Calibri"><br>
</font>
<p><br>
<i>[ Avoiding eggs and beef? Is this a great time to go Vegan?
]</i><br>
<b>Turning camels into cows: megafarms are being set up to produce
camel milk on industrial scales</b><br>
Published: April 5, 2024 <br>
</p>
<font face="Calibri"> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://theconversation.com/turning-camels-into-cows-megafarms-are-being-set-up-to-produce-camel-milk-on-industrial-scales-223485">https://theconversation.com/turning-camels-into-cows-megafarms-are-being-set-up-to-produce-camel-milk-on-industrial-scales-223485</a><br>
</font>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p></p>
<i>[ College professors reaching students ]</i><br>
<b>Faculty Discusses Effective Ways to Communicate With Climate
Change Skeptics</b><br>
Emery Furgason, Contributing Writer<br>
April 5, 2024<br>
Professors, staff and students gathered in the Pinchin Hall lobby on
Thursday, March 28, to discuss how to effectively communicate with
climate skeptics. The event was hosted by the Colgate University
Office of Sustainability and Dart Colegrove Commons. <br>
<br>
As part of the event, a panel consisting of staff and professors led
the discussion. Associate Professor of Music Seth Coluzzi introduced
the panelists. In attendance were Jennifer LeMesurier, associate
professor of writing and rhetoric, Rachel Dinero, visiting assistant
professor of psychological and brain sciences and John Pumilio,
director of sustainability at Colgate.<br>
<br>
The event aimed to answer the question of how to start a
conversation about climate change with someone who may not believe
the reality of it. LeMesurier emphasized recognizing who your
audience is and understanding what contributes to their mindset. She
explained that to understand your audience is to understand their
behaviors and beliefs without invalidating their character.<br>
<br>
According to LeMesurier, when talking with someone who has a
different belief, it is important to realize they may not have all
the same information that you are aware of and understand. In order
to have discussions without them turning into debates, LeMesurier
stressed it is necessary to find places where open dialogue is
supported.<br>
<br>
Dinero introduced whether or not the audience’s mind should be
changed. Understanding if an individual’s particular mindset is open
to changing their mind or hearing another perspective is key. In
fact, Dinero claimed sometimes the most important thing is to change
someone’s behaviors, rather than beliefs.<br>
<br>
“For me, it’s really about recognizing what are situations and
contacts in which this is an opportunity for dialogue and which are
situations [that are not] really an opportunity for dialogue,”
Dinero said.<br>
<br>
Dinero continued by wondering how we can communicate with people
with fundamentally different mindsets. She explained that high
emotional reactivity limits individuals from considering alternative
perspectives. Dinero finds that each conversation that involves some
discussion around climate change is one step closer to closing the
gap and finding common ground with skeptics. A staggered approach
aids in acclimating skeptics to these climate-centered discussions.<br>
<br>
In response to Dinero, Pumilio found that if people change their
minds, they will also change their behavior when making small and
large decisions. While Pumilio explained that changing minds and
behavior is the end goal, he recognized this change will not happen
overnight.<br>
<br>
“It takes some patience and persistence to do the things that we are
talking about today, and that is to change behavior and minds on an
issue,” Pumilio said. “It doesn’t happen in one conversation or one
debate or one set of facts. This takes time and it takes [many]
consistent approaches.”<br>
<br>
Dinero observed that consequential scenarios, such as climate
change, can scare people and make them not think about these
scenarios. Rational behavior would suggest we would respond to
consequential threats, but the opposite can happen with climate
change. It’s the very fact that climate change is so utterly
consequential which causes many people to not care about it; they
disengage, since the threat is overwhelming.<br>
<br>
First-year Sophie Wohlstadter found the methods used to incline
climate skeptics to change their behavior without necessarily
changing their minds eye-opening.<br>
<br>
“I thought the panel was very insightful and found the
results-oriented approach interesting. Encouraging sustainable
practices by bringing up benefits that climate skeptics might agree
with — like cost savings, for example — is an approach I had not
really thought about before,” Wohlstadter said.<br>
<br>
Pumilio reiterated the value of finding common ground with climate
skeptics or anyone with a differing belief. Continuing to have
conversations and finding points of agreement will produce more
results than arguing with others or dismissing them.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://thecolgatemaroonnews.com/50525/news/faculty-discusses-effective-ways-to-communicate-with-climate-change-skeptics/">https://thecolgatemaroonnews.com/50525/news/faculty-discusses-effective-ways-to-communicate-with-climate-change-skeptics/</a><i><br>
</i>
<p><i><br>
</i></p>
<p><i><br>
</i></p>
<i>[ Anytime is OK to look at clouds ]</i><br>
<b>People say clouds look different these days. It's not suspicious
— it's climate change.</b><br>
Here's the scoop on why you might be seeing more people talking
about clouds and conspiracies.<br>
Annie Reneau<br>
04.06.24<br>
Have you noticed that clouds are looking a bit different than you
remember them when you were younger? Less fluffy and more wispy?
Fewer billowing clouds against a bold, blue sky and more washed out
skies with see-through cloud patterns?<br>
<br>
There have always been different kinds of clouds, of course, but
people are remarking that something seems to have changed, which has
led to all kinds of conspiracy theories. Combined with the debunked
theories about contrails being "chemtrails," a whole new wave of
suspicions about our skies is taking hold. Some people say it's all
in their heads, but others are insistent that the sky just isn't the
same.<br>
<br>
There is a scientific explanation for why clouds might actually be
changing, but not one that conspiracy-minded folks are going to
like. It's most likely due to climate change, as climate scientists
predicted that these cloud changes would be coming years ago.<br>
First, let's look at the different kinds of clouds and where they
form in the atmosphere. Those billowy, cartoon-like cumulus clouds
we all enjoy are formed at lower altitudes, while the wispy cirrus
or spotty cirrocumulus clouds that make the sky look washed out or
mottled are formed higher up in the stratosphere. In reality, all
different cloud types are common, but climate change is making those
higher, wispier ones more common.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy81MTkyMjA5My9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTc0ODczMjQ4M30.MIrIZ-nYTHtq6m44RMOGOQGL1-G0Jym6xNHlniDkTV4/img.png?width=1280&quality=85">https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy81MTkyMjA5My9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTc0ODczMjQ4M30.MIrIZ-nYTHtq6m44RMOGOQGL1-G0Jym6xNHlniDkTV4/img.png?width=1280&quality=85</a><br>
In 2016, Dr. Ilissa Ocko explained that models had predicted that
climate change would push clouds higher in the sky and scientists
were starting to see evidence of it happening. Ocko, who earned her
Ph.D. and M.A. in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences at Princeton
University, wrote, "A warmer Earth elevates clouds because the
troposphere, the lowest layer of our atmosphere where weather
occurs, can extend higher with a hotter surface." As the<br>
Not only are higher cloud formations an effect of climate change,
but they also contribute to it. While clouds reflect the sun's
light, higher clouds also trap heat, potentially accelerating the
warming of the planet's surface. As Ocko explained:<br>
<br>
"Anything that absorbs energy must also re-emit energy. How much is
released depends on the temperature of the object.<br>
<br>
Heat absorbed and then re-emitted by low clouds that are close to
the ground is similar to the heat emitted by the surface because the
temperature of the ground and the cloud are similar.<br>
<br>
But the higher the cloud is in the sky, the colder it is. So when
these high clouds absorb Earth’s heat, they re-emit it at a much
lower temperature, forming a blanket that traps heat in the climate
system similar to how greenhouse gases trap heat."<br>
So what we end up with, in theory, is a self-perpetuating issue of
higher cloud formation both being propelled by and amplifying
climate change.<br>
<br>
However, the science is still very much in flux when it comes to
clouds and climate change. Predictive models aren't perfect, and
some phenomena scientists expected have played out differently in
real life, both for better and for worse. For instance, more recent
research shows that trade cumulus clouds, which help cool the Earth,
are affected less than expected by a warming atmosphere. That's good
news. On the other hand, scientists have also found that mixed-phase
clouds, which were predicted to have a dampening effect on climate
change, don't help as much as they thought, especially when
temperature rise accelerates. That's not good news.<br>
There are a lot of cloud-climate change connections and scientists
are continuously looking for clues and possibilities for how clouds
can help or hinder our efforts to battle the climate crisis.<br>
<br>
But what about the contrails that some folks erroneously call
"chemtrails"? Despite being a well-known phenomenon of clouds formed
from the condensation of a jet's exhaust, they too play a role in
climate change. Contrails form when the humidity and temperature the
plane is flying through are right (cold and humid), and the
troposphere where modern planes fly provide tend to provide those
conditions.<br>
<br>
While contrails aren't some big government conspiracy to drop toxic
chemicals on the unsuspecting populous, they aren't harmless. Some
contrails dissipate quickly, but under certain atmospheric
conditions, they can linger and spread out to create those wispy
clouds that trap heat in the atmosphere. Some estimates cite
contrails as being responsible for more than a third of the total
aviation contribution to climate change.<br>
Thankfully, the aviation industry is testing ways to best reduce
contrails, including flying at different altitudes. There are
tradeoffs with fuel consumption, so a balance has to be struck, but
as we learn more there will surely be more innovations that help.<br>
<br>
The bottom line is that yes, clouds may actually be different from
what we remember in our youth, but it's not because of anything
nefarious or suspicious. It's most likely what scientists have seen
coming for years and we are now seeing the effects of—climate
change. All the more reason for us to take action to slow it down
now.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.upworthy.com/people-say-clouds-look-different-these-days-it-s-not-suspicious-its-climate-change">https://www.upworthy.com/people-say-clouds-look-different-these-days-it-s-not-suspicious-its-climate-change</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<i>[</i><i> interview with Elizabeth Kolbert - her book "H is for
Hope"]</i><br>
<b>Elizabeth Kolbert: H Is for Hope</b><br>
Climate One<br>
Elizabeth Kolbert began reporting on the increasingly devastating
effects of climate change in the early 2000s – before Al Gore’s
breakthrough documentary “An Inconvenient Truth.” Kolbert’s
reporting became the foundation of her book “Field Notes from a
Catastrophe,” which sounded the alarm on the causes and effects of
global warming. In the two decades since then, the frequency and
intensity of climate-induced disasters has only intensified. And
yet, Kolbert’s latest book is titled “H Is for Hope: Climate Change
from A to Z.” So where does she see cause for hope? What is the
world finally doing right? And what work still needs to be done?<br>
<br>
Join Climate One Co-Host Ariana Brocious for a live-streamed
conversation with Pulitzer Prize-winning author and journalist
Elizabeth Kolbert as we unpack the state of the world’s climate and
on-going efforts to mitigate future disaster.<br>
<br>
Guest: <br>
Elizabeth Kolbert, Journalist and Author<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01smszR6Gnk">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01smszR6Gnk</a><br>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ Report from the Disinformation battleground- from DeSmog blog
]</i><br>
<b>IEA Think Tank Contributes to Climate Science Denial Documentary</b><br>
The group, which received money from BP for at least 50 years, is
“cementing its role as a major mouthpiece for climate change
scepticism”, campaigners say.<br>
<br>
By Sam Brighton<br>
Apr 5, 2024 <br>
A senior figure at the influential Institute of Economic Affairs
(IEA) think tank contributed to a new documentary that spread
numerous myths about climate change. <br>
<br>
Stephen Davies, an academic who has worked in educational outreach
roles at the IEA since 2010, appeared several times in Climate The
Movie: The Cold Truth – a new film directed by climate science
denier Martin Durkin. <br>
<br>
In the documentary, Davies claims that climate activists want to
impose an “austere” life on ordinary people. “Behind all the talk
about a climate emergency, climate crisis” is “an animus and
hostility towards” working-class people, “their lifestyle, their
beliefs and a desire to change it by force if necessary,” he says.<br>
<br>
According to the website Skeptical Science, which debunks climate
misinformation, Climate The Movie contains more than two dozen myths
about climate change. The film suggests that we shouldn’t be worried
about greenhouse gas emissions, because plants need carbon dioxide.
“We’re in a CO2 famine,” one interviewee claims.<br>
<br>
The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the
world’s foremost climate science body, has stated that carbon
dioxide “is responsible for most of global warming” since the late
19th century, which has increased the “severity and frequency of
weather and climate extremes, like heat waves, heavy rains, and
drought”.<br>
<br>
Climate The Movie producer Thomas Nelson told DeSmog that “I see the
misguided fight against carbon dioxide as being as crazy as fighting
against oxygen or water vapour, and I think scaring innocent
children about this is deeply evil”.<br>
<br>
The IEA said that “Steve firmly believes that climate change is
happening and carbon emissions are having an impact. His view that
climate policy imposes costs, particularly on working-class
communities, is entirely mainstream. IEA publications and
spokespeople have supported action on climate change, including
carbon pricing.”<br>
<br>
In 2018, Greenpeace’s investigative journalism unit Unearthed
revealed that the IEA had received funding from oil major BP every
year since 1967. In response to the story, an IEA spokeswoman said:
“It is surely uncontroversial that the IEA’s principles coincide
with the interests of our donors.” <br>
<br>
The IEA also received a £21,000 grant from U.S. oil major ExxonMobil
in 2005.<br>
<br>
The IEA has extensive influence in politics and the media. It was
pivotal to Liz Truss’s short-lived premiership as prime minister,
and has boasted of its access to Conservative ministers and MPs.
During the year ending March 2023, the IEA appeared in the media on
5,265 occasions, a figure 43 percent higher than its previous peak
in 2019.<br>
<br>
The group has also received donations from a number of philanthropic
trusts accused of channelling funds from the fossil fuel industry
and helping to support climate science denial groups. The IEA is a
member of the Atlas Network – an international collaboration of
“extreme” free market groups that have been accused of promoting the
interests of fossil fuel companies and other large corporations.<br>
<br>
It’s not known if the IEA has received funding from BP since 2018.<br>
<br>
The IEA is a prominent supporter of the continued and extended use
of fossil fuels. The group has advocated for the ban to be lifted on
fracking for shale gas, calling it the “moral and economic choice”.
The IEA has also said that a ban on new North Sea oil and gas would
be “madness”, has criticised the windfall tax imposed on North Sea
oil and gas firms, and said that the government’s commitment to “max
out” the UK’s fossil fuel reserves is a “welcome step”.<br>
<br>
The IEA is part of the Tufton Street network – a cluster of
libertarian think tanks and pressure groups that are in favour of
more fossil fuel extraction and are opposed to state-led climate
action. These groups are characterised by a lack of transparency
over their sources of funding. The IEA does not publicly declare the
names of its donors. <br>
<br>
“From Brexit to Trussonomics, the IEA has consistently peddled and
promoted destructive and damaging policies,” Green Party MP Caroline
Lucas told DeSmog. “Yet perhaps nothing will prove more dangerous
long term than the stream of climate denialism and calls to delay
action that have been pouring out of Tufton Street for many years.<br>
<br>
“Clearly the IEA is now ramping up its climate culture war and the
Conservative Party has been following suit. The cross-party
consensus on climate action we used to have in Parliament is under
strain like never before.”<br>
<br>
The IEA and Stephen Davies were approached for comment. <br>
<p><i> [ Climate The Movie: The Cold Truth – may have been
taken down from YouTube - it should be available on the web
archive at:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20240318183052/https://www.eventbrite.com/e/climate-the-movie-film-premiere-tickets-858133358977">https://web.archive.org/web/20240318183052/https://www.eventbrite.com/e/climate-the-movie-film-premiere-tickets-858133358977</a>
<br>
</i></p>
<b>Climate The Movie</b><br>
During the documentary, Davies suggests that action to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions is being used to limit the freedom of
individuals. He claims that climate activists want to impose “a much
more austere simple kind of lifestyle” on people “in which the
consumption choices of the great bulk of the population are
controlled or even prohibited.”<br>
<br>
Davies adds that: “What you have here is a classic example of class
hypocrisy and self-interest masquerading as public spirited concern.
You could take these kinds of green socialist more seriously if they
lived off grid, they cut their own consumption down to the minimum,
they never flew. Instead you get constant talk about how human
consumption is destroying the planet but the people making all this
talk show absolutely no signs of reducing their own.”<br>
<br>
The documentary also features an interview with Benny Peiser, the
director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) – the UK’s
leading climate science denial group. Peiser has previously claimed
that it would be “extraordinary anyone should think there is a
climate crisis”, while the GWPF has expressed the view that carbon
dioxide has been mischaracterised as pollution, when in fact it is a
“benefit to the planet”. <br>
<br>
The film was favourably reviewed by commentator Toby Young in The
Spectator magazine, who described it as “a phenomenon”. Young has
previously said that he’s sceptical about the idea of human-caused
climate change. <br>
<br>
The IPCC has stated it is “unequivocal that human influence has
warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land”, while scientists at NASA
have found that the last 10 years were the hottest on record.
Earth’s average surface temperature in 2023 was the warmest since
records began in 1880. <br>
<br>
The IPCC has also warned that false and misleading information
“undermines climate science and disregards risk and urgency” of
climate action.<br>
<br>
The documentary also features Claire Fox, a member of the House of
Lords who was nominated for a peerage by former prime minister Boris
Johnson in 2020. <br>
<br>
Fox used the documentary to claim that, by tackling climate change,
people will be forced to pay more “to simply live the lives that
they were leading”.<br>
<br>
She suggests that supporters of climate action are trying to “take
away what we consider to be not luxuries but necessities.”<br>
<br>
The UK’s Climate Change Committee, which advises the government on
measures to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, estimates that the
combined policies will cost less than one percent of the country’s
national output.<br>
<br>
The Office for Budget Responsibility, the UK’s independent economic
forecaster, has also said that “the costs of failing to get climate
change under control would be much larger than those of bringing
emissions down to net zero”.<br>
<br>
Those suffering during the cost of living crisis have seen their
energy bills increase by nearly £2.5 billion, in turn reducing their
disposable incomes, due to successive governments failing to
implement green reforms. <br>
<br>
Claire Fox and the GWPF were approached for comment. <br>
<br>
<b>A Charitable Cause?</b><br>
The IEA is a registered charity, meaning that it receives generous
tax breaks. <br>
<br>
The group justifies this charitable status partly on the basis of
its educational outreach programme, which aims to “equip tomorrow’s
leaders with a deep understanding of free market economics”.<br>
<br>
The IEA claims that: “Our aim is to change the climate of opinion in
the long term and our work with students is a key part of this.”<br>
<br>
In the year ending March 2023, the group claimed to have engaged
with 3,500 students and 1,200 teachers via its seminars, internships
and summer schools.<br>
<br>
Formerly the IEA’s head of education and now a senior education
fellow, Davies is a senior member of the group’s outreach programme.
He is the first person listed in the IEA’s student speakers
brochure, which advertises the IEA staff members who are available
to speak at schools or universities. <br>
<br>
The brochure also lists the IEA’s chief operating officer Andy
Mayer, who has said that the government should “get rid of” its
target of achieving net zero emissions by 2050, which he called a
“very hard left, socialist, central-planning model”.<br>
<br>
The non-profit Good Law Project recently made a complaint to the
Charity Commission about the IEA, claiming that the libertarian
group had breached charity rules. Namely, the Good Law Project
claims that the IEA is in breach of rules stating that charities
must avoid presenting “biased and selective information in support
of a preconceived point of view”.<br>
<br>
The Charity Commission rejected this complaint, stating that: “We
have assessed the concerns raised and have not identified concerns
that the charity is acting outside of its objects or the
Commission’s published guidance.” <br>
<br>
Good Law Project campaigns manager Hannah Greer told DeSmog: “It
won’t be a surprise to anyone that the IEA is cementing its role as
a major mouthpiece for climate change scepticism. It’s a huge
scandal that the IEA is still allowed to peddle fringe views under
the guise of being an ‘educational charity’ while benefiting from
taxpayer subsidies.<br>
<br>
“This has been allowed to happen because we have seen alarming and
unambiguous regulatory failure from the Charity Commission – who
have been presented with evidence of how the IEA is flouting charity
law, but have chosen to look the other way.”<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.desmog.com/2024/04/05/institute-of-economic-affairs-iea-think-tank-climate-the-movie-science-denial-documentary/">https://www.desmog.com/2024/04/05/institute-of-economic-affairs-iea-think-tank-climate-the-movie-science-denial-documentary/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ journalism -- powerful video documentary of heat and bushfires
]</i><br>
<b>Life at 122 °F: Surviving in the Hottest Places on Earth | Free
Documentary</b><br>
Free Documentary<br>
Apr 5, 2024 #FreeDocumentary #Documentary #heatwaves<br>
Life at 122 °F: Surviving in the Hottest Places on Earth<br>
<br>
Heatwaves - Most Powerful Forces on Earth:| Fatal Forecast | Free
Documentary <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEpSfYMGUyQ">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEpSfYMGUyQ</a> <br>
<br>
As the world gets hotter, survival gets harder. One of the most
deadly results of the climate crisis is extreme heat. How do the
millions of people who have to live with increasingly high
temperatures survive? This BBC investigation explores the impact of
global warming on different communities across the globe and their
struggle to adapt. From Nigeria to Pakistan, this is a timely deep
dive into how our lives are being permanently changed by the earth
heating up.<br>
Subscribe Free Documentary Channel for free: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bit.ly/2YJ4XzQ">https://bit.ly/2YJ4XzQ</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YS7XXimRB2I">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YS7XXimRB2I</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<font face="Calibri"><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"> <i>[The news archive - ]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><font size="+2"><i><b>April 7, 2009 Georgie
Porgie, G.F. Will <br>
</b></i></font></font><font face="Calibri">April 7, 2009: In a
story entitled "New Data Show Rapid Arctic Ice Decline," the
Washington Post observes: "The new evidence -- including satellite
data showing that the average multiyear wintertime sea ice cover
in the Arctic in 2005 and 2006 was nine feet thick, a significant
decline from the 1980s -- contradicts data cited in widely
circulated reports by Washington Post columnist George F. Will
that sea ice in the Arctic has not significantly declined since
1979."<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/06/AR2009040601634.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/06/AR2009040601634.html</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<p>/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
</p>
Privacy and Security: *This mailing is text-only -- and carries no
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers.
Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender. This is a personal hobby production curated by Richard Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
<p> Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. </p>
<font face="monospace">
=== </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font>
</body>
</html>