{news} Analysis of 2006 Election Finds Problems Nationwide

[Green Party-CT]

  electionline Weekly - November 30, 2006 
electionline.org 
  
  I. In Focus This Week
  
  Analysis of 2006 Election Finds Problems Nationwide
Lack of post-vote controversy masks widespread voting difficulties
  
  The nation's leading source for nonpartisan and non-advocacy news and information on election reform released its first comprehensive look at the 2006 election, finding widespread problems but no meltdowns at the nation's polling places.
  
  The 2006 Election, the 15th in a series of policy briefings by electionline.org, found widespread reports of voting system troubles, sporadic incidents of voter intimidation and/or poll worker confusion over voter identification requirements and some breakdowns at polling places because of problems with newly-mandated voter registration systems. 
  
  "The question most frequently asked after the election is whether it was a success," said Doug Chapin, the organization's director. "Success can be measured in a two ways. If success is measured through picking winners, then yes, there were few races in which polling-place problems could have affected the outcome. But, on the other hand, if it is measured through whether every voter who showed up at a polling place had an opportunity to cast their vote without problems or obstacles, then the answer is no."
  
  With more than a third of all voters casting ballots on new voting systems compared with just two years ago, human and machine errors were widespread. In a number of states, including Indiana, Pennsylvania, Alabama, Arkansas, and Illinois, inexperienced poll workers struggled to start, troubleshoot and close electronic voting machines. Voters in a number of states reported "vote flipping,' whereby machines indicated choices other than those made by the voter, either when the screen was touched or when the choices were revealed on a review screen. 
  
  Voting machine breakdowns throughout the day were common as well, slowing voting in parts of California, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, New Jersey and other states. 
  
  Precincts in both Massachusetts and New Mexico ran out of ballots, compelling police in the Bay State to race ballots to polling places with sirens blaring and lights flashing. "Overwhelming turnout" at some Boston polling places led some voters to get frustrated and walk away without voting rather than wait for new ballots to arrive. The state has since threatened to strip power from the city's election board for management failures. 
  
  A Congressional race in Florida's Sarasota County was plagued with high numbers of under votes, about 14 percent of all ballots cast recording no preference in a hotly contested race to replace Rep. Katherine Harris in the state's 13th District. 
  
  The post-election survey also found instances where new or recently-altered voter identification rules caused problems in some states where voters were asked to present photo ID when its use was not mandatory (Missouri and Wisconsin), were confused about whether they needed ID at all after a number of court decisions (Georgia) and poll workers had difficulty interpreting verification rules at the polling place (Ohio). Instances of voter intimidation were recorded elsewhere in the country, 
  
  The most serious election-day problems were found in Denver, Colorado, where the county's first use of vote centers and breakdowns in electronic poll books used to sign in voters when they arrived led to hours-long lines, late poll closings and irate citizens. 
  
  There were successes as well. Connecticut saw a smooth transition to optical-scan voting in a number of localities using the system for the first time. Maryland recovered from a chaotic primary to run a relatively trouble-free vote on electronic voting systems. Ohio's Cuyahoga County saw a similar improvement, though long lines persisted, Washington voters and election officials managed to cast ballots despite record rainfall and flooding while Virginia's election administration endured the scrutiny of an extremely close race for the U.S. Senate without any significant post-election controversies. 
  
  "As our only mechanism for ensuring representative government, we need to make voting work for all eligible voters by ensuring the accuracy and convenience of our elections," added Michael Caudell-Feagan, Senior Officer, State Policy Initiatives at The Pew Charitable Trusts, funder of electionline.org. "Building on electionline's valuable contribution to the field, it is time to move from cataloguing problems to rigorously testing and implementing solutions. America's voters deserve nothing less than state-of-the-art elections regardless of the jurisdiction where a vote is cast."
  
  "This is the beginning of the next phase of election reform," Chapin said. "The lesson of the 2006 election going forward is that it will no longer be enough to avoid past mistakes or address old problems; the key will be to prevent new ones and think creatively about how voting works in 2008 and beyond."
  
  The complete report is available at electionline.org.
  
  
  II. Election Reform News This Week 
  
    
   Internetnews.com reported this week that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is set to recommend that the 2007 version of the Voluntary Voting Systems Guidelines (VVSG) decertify DRE machines. The Web site obtained a copy of a paper, set to be discussed at NIST meetings on December 4 and 5, that says DRE vote totals cannot be audited because the machines are not software independent and that the machines currently in use are "more vulnerable to undetected programming errors or malicious code.." The paper recommends ".requiring SI [software independent] voting systems in VVSG 2007." According to the Web site, NIST is also going to recommend changes to the design of machines equipped with VVPATs.
  
    
   According to an article published in The Boston Globe, the U.S. Department of Justice has launched an investigation into a possible lack of accessible voting machines for disabled voters at polling places throughout Massachusetts. Brenda Wright, managing attorney at the Boston-based National Voting Rights Institute told the paper one attorney from the department will be investigating the state's failure to comply with the Help America Vote Act and Giovanna Negretti, executive director of the voting advocacy group ¿Oiste?, said an attorney also appeared to be interested in other election irregularities. 
  
    
   When Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., takes control of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee in January, she is planning a series of wide-ranging hearings on election reform reports the San Jose Mercury News. "It's imperative that Congress does everything it can to help ensure that votes cast are recorded accurately," she told the paper. "Serious questions have arisen about the accuracy and reliability of new electronic voting machines." In addition to issues about voting machines, the committee might also take up the issue of voter ID and the possibility of barring a state's top election official from participating in a campaign for a federal candidate.
  
    
   While many extol the virtues of vote-by-mail, Lindsey McWilliams, Humboldt County, Calif. Elections Officer detailed what some of the disadvantages are, namely the condition in which some of the ballots arrive in the elections office. Damage to ballots included spills on ballots (31); a hole burnt into a ballot (1); (unscannable) red ink used on ballot (2); and torn ballots (17).
  
    
   As the Monday morning quarterbacking continues in the weeks following the November 7 election, several states are already contemplating major changes to their election systems. In New Mexico, Secretary of State-elect Mary Herrera (D) said she is putting vote-by-mail on her "to look-into list." In Cuyahoga County, Ohio, some county commissioners are proposing the county scrap its $17 million electronic voting system in favor of an optical-scan system. And in Kentucky, Secretary of State Trey Grayson (R) is calling on the state legislature to approve and fund early voting programs and equipment that would create paper trails.
  
  
  IV. Opinion This Week
  
  National: Future of elections, II, national voting system, II, voter ID, electronic voting
Florida: 13th Congressional District, II, III, IV, V, VI, electronic voting
Idaho: Vote-by-mail
Ohio: Fraudulent voting
South Carolina: Recounts
Washington: Instant run-off voting
  
  Some sites require registration
  
  **********
  
  
---------------------------------
    electionline Weekly and electionline.org ALERTS are produced by the staff of electionline.org, a non-partisan, non-advocacy research effort supported by The Pew Charitable Trusts and administered by the University of Richmond . More information about the Project and up-to-the-minute news on election reform throughout the week can be found at electionline.org. 
  

   function rmvScroll( msg ) {  var delta = msg.offsetHeight - msg.clientHeight;  delta = ( isNaN( delta )? 1 : delta + 1 );  if ( msg.scrollHeight > msg.clientHeight ) {   msg.style.height = ( msg.scrollHeight + delta ) + "px";  }  delta = msg.offsetWidth - msg.clientWidth;  delta = ( isNaN( delta )? 1 : delta + 1 );  if ( msg.scrollWidth > msg.clientWidth ) {   msg.style.width = ( msg.scrollWidth + delta ) + "px";  }  msg.style.overflow = "hidden";  msg.style.visibility = "visible"; } var msg = document.getElementById( "message" ); if ( msg & "undefined" != typeof msg ) { rmvScroll( msg ); }        
   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/private/ctgp-news/attachments/20061130/02dc8c76/attachment.html>