{news} U. S. Green Party Platform 2008

Green Party-CT greenpartyct at yahoo.com
Fri Oct 13 11:11:57 EDT 2006


Dear State Greens,
  
According to our schedule for updating (and upgrading) our National 
Platform in preparation for the 2008 election, it is time to alert and 
invite members to work on
proposals to amend the platform. (actually, the window should have 
opened 
on Oct. 1st)
Right now everyone is busy with November elections, still it's time to 
start thinking about submitting proposals to the Platcom.

Below is the list of our Platform members to assist you.  Howard 
Switzer 
and Jenefer Ellingston co-chair the committee and Mike Ewall is 
secretary. 
Not every state has a Platcom. member, but proposals don't require your 
Platcom. member to be submitted.  (see rules further down)

(USGP Platcom List)
Aram Falsavi/WA <aram at aramfalsavi.com>  206-723-6827
Art Rosen/NJ <arthurbrosen at msn.com> 201-342-6842
Budd Dickinson/CA -  <budd.dickinson at greens.org> 707-445-2890
Dan Raphael/WA <dravazed at w-link.net> 253-460-5097
David Rolde/MA <davidrolde at comcast.net> 781-642-7218
Dee Berry/MO <Dberry7 at sbcglobal.net>
Gregory Giacobe <ggiacobe at optonline.net>
Holly Hart/IA <hhart at blue.weeg.uiowa.edu>
Howard Switzer/TN  co-chair <h4howard at hughes.net>
Jenefer Ellingston/DC co-chair <jellingston at greens.org>
Justine McCabe <justinemccabe at earthlink.net>
Katrina Barbham/PA <baatty at verizon.net>
Leslie Bonett <lesliebe at greens.org>
Lou Novak/MI <lmn at lppals.com>
Marilyn Ditmanson/CA <mditmanson at sbcglobal.net>
Mike Ewall/PA  sec'y <catalyst at actionpa.org>
Peter LaVenia/NY <albanygreens at yahoo.com>
Robin Hahnel/MD <rhahnel at starpower.net>
Titus North/PA  <ctnst3 at pitt.edu>
Tom Munsey/WA <us016262 at mindspring.com>


Format for submitting a proposal (amendment) to 2004 Platform.
Full Name
Street Address,  City, State, Zip/Postal Code
Home Phone,  E-mail
Party affiliation, and statement that your Steering Com. has approved 
this 
submission.

The Platform Committee:
1)  May return a proposal for revision or correction.
2)  May send a proposal to your state party or state organization for 
review.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Steps to take for proper submission:
The starting point is the original text of the 2004 Platform.
-First, go to Chapter (in Roman numerals) and the Section (in Alphabet) 
and 
then paragraph or paragraphs, Number(s) of 2004 Platform that you wish 
to 
amend.
-  Identify where your amendment will fit or what it will replace by 
Roman 
numeral, Alphabet, and number(s).
- Indicate whether: to strike(delete), to add, to change wording or 
order, 
to strike a whole section, or whatever you wish to revise in original 
2004 
Platform.
- then write the text of the amendment(s)  you are submitting.

Examples: you may wish to delete and add an item to a section (such as 
Labor).
                or you may wish to strike a whole section and re-write 
it 
(such as Economics).
              or you may wish to shorten a text with no substitution, 
but a 
change in the language. (identify text to be deleted)

If you wish to submit several amendments that fit different chapters 
and 
sections, be sure that your SteerCom. approves each amendment.
Example: get approval to submit a plank on women's rights and another 
approval for a plank on nuclear weapons.


   GPUS PLATFORM SUBMISSONS TEMPLATE
Identify where your proposal best fits in the 2004 Platform text.
Section of the Platform being addressed:
  (I, II, III or IV...)

Letter of Plank being addressed
  (A thru M...)

Paragraph numbers (1....6 etc) to be amended.
If re-writing whole section or long list of paragraphs, indicate that 
fact.

Write the text of your amendment.
Additional Comments if further explanation is necessary

*Please note:  If you do not follow format given above, your amendment 
will 
be returned with request that you follow the format.
(these guidelines are somewhat repetitious - please be patient)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HERE IS THE SCHEDULE FOR SUBMITTING AMENDMENTS. (don't delay until last 
week of the schedule)

GPUS Platform 2008 Timeline/Process
I. Basic Timeline
- Submissions received starting in Fall of 2006 (after Nov. election, 
most 
convenient)
- First deadline for submissions: April 1, 2007
- First draft by May 31, 2007 (comparison draft, also let's assume a 
document
       which incorporated new text; may be rough, but will give an 
idea...)
- Second deadline for submissions:  December 31, 2007
- Second draft by January 30, 2008 (may still be rough, but less so 
than he
      first draft; will incorporate the rest of the new text)
- Final/near-final draft - ca. 2 months before convention.*  NOTE:  2 
mos. 
prior
      to the convention is something to aim for; depending on the exact 
date, we
      may get cut a week or two, if the convention is early.  If the 
convention
      is *very* early, we will need to go back and revisit this.
*ca. should = within a week of the convention date

***************************************************************************************************
The Platform Committee will track and organize submissions and place 
them 
parallel to the original text for review. Submissions which don't 
conform 
to submission guidelines will be returned with an explanation of 
corrections needed. Submissions that need debate and clarification may 
be 
recycled to the member's state parties/accredited caucuses if 
necessary.
To help ensure that all state Green parties are informed about the 
Platform 
process and can participate, we ask states that lack a platcom. member 
to 
designate a member to act as a platform contact.

3 - First draft by 5/31/2007.  Submissions will be accepted until 
5/25/2007. Submissions, possible comparison draft, {and/or} early draft 
will be posted on the web.
Reminders will go out periodically to all members urging them to read 
the 
draft and send in feed back.  Qualitative and quantitative feedback 
will be 
actively sought from all states/caucuses.  Opportunity to submit 
feedback 
via web should be available.  Feedback will be posted on the website.

4 - Second deadline: 12/31/2007.  Second draft by 1/30/2008.  Based on 
feedback from first round of proposals, the committee will create a 
second 
draft and facilitate work with material for which further work is 
needed.  To assist in assessing the level of support for platform 
submissions, the committee will ask each affiliated state party and 
accredited caucus to obtain feedback from their membership and use a 
simple 
rating system to indicate the type of support, along with comments, 
concerns and suggestions.  Non-responses will not be counted when 
evaluating support or opposition to a proposed amendment.  Feedback 
from a 
state/caucus that is qualitative, but lacking quantitative ratings will 
be 
interpreted by the Platform Committee when evaluating quantitative 
support 
for an amendment. **SEE RATING FORMULA, BELOW.

5 - Final draft by two months prior to 2008 convention.  There should 
only 
be a few, if any, unresolved issues at this point.  Unresolved 
amendments 
will be circulated back to states/caucuses at least two months prior to 
the 
convention for last-minute feedback, informing them that they could be 
voting on these at the final platform hearings, to be scheduled as 
close as 
possible to the day preceding the presidential nominating convention.  
Any 
items and language that remain to be determined at the final hearings, 
will 
be available to all convention delegates as part of the convention 
packets 
(as well as available online).

6 - Copies of the nearly final platform (with an addendum listing 
unresolved issues) would be made before the convention and would be 
available at the convention.  Platform hearings would be held to refine 
the 
unresolved issues in an effort to make them acceptable to Greens at 
large.  Platform hearings would be open to all, but only those chosen 
specifically to represent their state or caucus on the matter of these 
unresolved amendments would be entitled to vote, {if such is needed; 
however, consensus is the goal, so material not gaining obvious overall 
support will not be included}.  States/caucuses can caucus at the 
convention and choose who will represent them in these hearings (it's 
up to 
the state/caucus chair or co-chairs to inform the PlatCom about who was 
chosen to represent them).

States/caucuses can choose more than one representative, but votes will 
be 
counted in such a way that each state/caucus will be represented 
proportionally, with voting weight equal to the number of voting 
delegates 
they're entitled to have at the convention. No single person may carry 
more 
than three votes. If consensus cannot be reached in the hearings, the 
voting representatives shall vote on proposed amendments. Those 
amendments 
pass only if they obtain the support of 90% or more of the weighted 
vote of 
the representatives in attendance.

7 - Final copies of any amendments approved on the floor of the 
convention 
will be printed and available, as a final addendum to the printed "near 
final" draft that the delegates will already have.  This will prevent a 
frantic, last-minute printing adventure.

**************************

**RATING FORMULA
A rating of 1 = 3 points
A rating of 2 = 2
A rating of 3 = 1
A rating of 4 = 0, and
A rating of 5 = -1

1 - Approval.  Material meets with general approval of membership, a 
strong
majority or consensus.

2 - Approval, with minor revisions.  Overall approval, but minor 
revisions
such as corrected or updated information may be needed, or minor 
revisions to
meet concerns are suggested.

3 - General support, but with more substantial concerns to be addressed 
(this
could involve more substantial working out of material, possibly 
referring
content to those with particular expertise or background)

4 - General lack of support.  This might be more acceptable if (...), 
but
overall, members find it unnecessary/unacceptable/doesn't really fit.
(Unlikely that material garnering this type of rating will make it into
the 2004 platform, but worth looking into.)

5 - Reject.  Members do not support inclusion in the Green Platform

TO SUBMIT AN AMENDMENT,  PLEASE E-MAIL IT TO: <PLATFORM at GP.ORG>  This 
address will reach Howard Switzer, Jenefer Ellingston and Mike Ewall 
(all 
3) and reply may come from any one of us. Or you may e-mail your 
Platcom. 
member if you have one in your state.

I hope the guidelines above are direct and simple. I hope they serve as 
conduits to participation rather than obstacles that discourage 
members.
Thank you,
Jenefer  Ellingston  DC


------------------------------

Message: 3

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/private/ctgp-news/attachments/20061013/d984e7b8/attachment.html>


More information about the Ctgp-news mailing list