[TheClimate.Vote] June 14, 2017 - Daily Global Warming News
Richard Pauli
richard at theclimate.vote
Wed Jun 14 10:23:49 EDT 2017
/June 14, 2017/
Don't ignore young people - we're key to fighting climate change
<https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2017/jun/13/dont-ignore-young-people-were-key-to-fighting-climate-change>
The news should be a starting gun for a new wave of activism, action and
change. Because...the real change is going to come from us. Call us
millennials or Gen Z or Net Gen, we're the consumers, employees,
employers and future leaders who will see the devastating effects of
climate change.
We are also the most connected generation in history, with the capacity
to arrange coordinated global protests ...
And yet, many of the NGOs, charities and global campaigns are failing to
mobilise us.
...recent research shows that only 11% of the globe's NGOs employ a
designated full-time or part-time social media manager.
That means they're losing the 28% of young people that use social media
as their primary news source. It means they're missing out on the 43% of
millennials that are driven to make financial donations through social
channels, the one in two who'll share ideas with their friends online,
or most importantly the one in three willing to donate their time.
Recent research demonstrates that one in seven millennials around the
world identify as "activists" and half of those recognise their activism
as an important part of who they are. It's one of the many reasons the
likes of Apple, Facebook and Goldman Sachs are prioritising their
environmental focus despite Trump's actions – they know it matters to
their future customers and workforce.
My generation was born into a world where climate change is an immutable
fact, ...a global threat, ... We've got to make this the issue we tackle
and overcome.
Daisy Kendrick is a 23-year old environmental campaigner and founder of
We Are The Oceans
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2017/jun/13/dont-ignore-young-people-were-key-to-fighting-climate-change
*Three-minute story of 800,000 years of climate change with a sting in
the tail*
<https://theconversation.com/the-three-minute-story-of-800-000-years-of-climate-change-with-a-sting-in-the-tail-73368>
There are those who say the climate has always changed, and that carbon
dioxide levels have always fluctuated. That's true. But it's also true
that since the industrial revolution, CO₂ levels in the atmosphere have
climbed to levels that are unprecedented over hundreds of millennia.
So here's a short video we made, to put recent climate change and carbon
dioxide emissions into the context of the past 800,000 years.
video 3 minutes: <https://youtu.be/rivf479bW8Q>
Why reducing our carbon emissions matters (a little story about climate
change) <https://youtu.be/rivf479bW8Q>
While it's true that Earth's temperatures and carbon dioxide levels have
always fluctuated, the reality is that humans' greenhouse emissions
since the industrial revolution have put us in uncharted territory.
*https://youtu.be/rivf479bW8Q*
The fundamental science is very well understood. The evidence that
climate change is happening is abundant and clear. The difficult part
is: what do we do next? More than ever, we need strong, cooperative and
accountable leadership from politicians of all nations. Only then will
we avoid the worst of climate change and adapt to the impacts we can't halt.
The authors acknowledge the contributions of Wes Mountain (multimedia),
Alicia Egan (editing) and Andrew King (model projection data).
https://theconversation.com/the-three-minute-story-of-800-000-years-of-climate-change-with-a-sting-in-the-tail-73368
The Trump administration is doing everything it can to keep a
huge*climate*lawsuit from going to trial
<http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-landmark-climate-change-lawsuit-2017-6>
(Dana Varinsky) The Trump administration is seeking a rare review of a
preliminary decision in a landmark climate change lawsuit - before the
case has even gone to trial.
The plaintiffs in the case are 21 kids who range in age from 9 to 21.
They argue that the federal government is violating their constitutional
rights to life, liberty, and property by engaging in actions that
contribute to climate change despite long-held knowledge of its
dangerous consequences.
In November 2016, a federal judge denied all motions to dismiss the
case, paving the way for it to go to trial. The Trump administration
tried to appeal that decision (the plaintiffs named President Trump as a
defendant instead of Barack Obama in February, under the federal rules),
but the judge denied that request.
Now, the administration's lawyers are petitioning for a rare legal
procedure - a writ of mandamus - in which a higher court would step
in and review the lower court's decision to let the case proceed.
The youth plaintiffs aren't seeking financial compensation for the
damage climate change is causing, though many have filed statements
about how global warming has specifically impacted their lives. Instead,
they're asking the court to compel federal agencies to end policies that
directly hurt the environment (like permitting and subsidizing fossil
fuel extraction) and move to phase out excess carbon dioxide emissions.
"At its heart, this lawsuit asks this Court to determine whether
defendants have violated plaintiffs' constitutional rights," Judge Aiken
wrote. "That question is squarely within the purview of the judiciary."
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-landmark-climate-change-lawsuit-2017-6
(Snopes) Did 58 Scientific Papers Published in 2017 Say *Global
Warming*is a Myth?
<http://www.snopes.com/scientific-papers-global-warming-myth/>
An article on Breitbart News used flawed interpretations from a climate
skeptic blog to amplify a grossly inaccurate understanding of
climatological research.
*CLAIM* A total of 58 peer-reviewed papers published in the first
half of 2017 conclude that global warming is a myth.
*RATING* False
*ORIGIN * On 6 June 2017, Breitbart News ran an article titled
"'Global Warming' Is a Myth, Say 58 Scientific Papers in 2017". This
article, which is in essence merely a link to a post from a blog that
goes by the name "No Tricks Zone" and some added musings on
"grant-troughing scientists," "huxter politicians," "scaremongering
green activists," and "brainwashed mainstream media environmental
correspondents," claims that this ragtag collection of studies proves
that the long-standing scientific consensus on climate change is nothing
but a myth.
The blog post Breitbart linked to is a list of 80 graphs (so many
graphs!) taken from 58 studies. The analysis of the findings presented
by No Tricks Zone is crude, misinformed, and riddled with errors. ...
...We rank the claims made by both Breitbart and No Tricks Zone as
false, because they dramatically misrepresent the findings of the
scientists who conducted the research and utilize poorly-articulated
straw man arguments to further misrepresent the significance of the work
of those scientists. These studies were local in nature, narrow in
scope, meant to address how the climate system functioned in the past,
and pose no threat to the tenets of anthropogenic climate change.
http://www.snopes.com/scientific-papers-global-warming-myth/
Understanding multi-decadal*global warming*rate changes
<https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2017-06/ioap-umg061317.php>
...the globally-averaged surface temperature has shown distinct
multi-decadal fluctuations since 1900,
...It is the net impact of multiple ocean surface temperature changes,
rather than a single ocean basin change, that plays a main driver for
the multi-decadal global warming accelerations and slowdowns.
The new finding of the importance of multiple ocean surface temperature
changes to the multi-decadal global warming accelerations and slowdowns
is supported by a set of computer modeling experiments, in which
observed sea surface temperature changes are specified in individual
ocean basins, separately. The results are published in "Distinct global
warming rates tied to multiple ocean surface temperature changes", in
the June 12 online issue of Nature Climate Change.
"It reveals a fact that we need to explore climate change in a more
global perspective. This could stimulate an integrated strategy and
coordinated effort toward understanding the causes of regional ocean
changes."
"While the tropical Pacific was generally regarded as a key
contributor to the multi-decadal global warming rate changes, other
ocean basins, including the Indian Ocean, the Atlantic and the Southern
Ocean, also exert important effects. "
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2017-06/ioap-umg061317.php
*Book: Rising Tides*
<http://www.iupress.indiana.edu/product_info.php?products_id=808356>*Climate
Refugees in the Twenty-First Century*
John R. Wennersten and Denise Robbins
Global climate change is undeniable. Over the next few decades, as sea
levels rise, storms intensify, and drought and desertification run
rampant, hundreds of millions of civilians will abandon their homes,
cities, and even entire countries. What will happen to these massive
numbers of environmental refugees? Where will they go, what rights will
they have, and who will take care of them?
Over 200 million people in Asian countries live on land that will be
affected by rising seas. Picture Pakistan, India, and China - all
nuclear powers - skirmishing at their borders over access to shared
rivers and farmable land with former coastal areas now submerged.
Imagine tens of thousands of Pacific and Indian Ocean islanders cast
adrift by waves that have drowned their nations, and more than 100,000
Caribbean islanders forced to leave submerged towns. Consider the
complete abandonment of Miami Beach and other coastal communities up and
down the Americas. At the same time, hundreds of millions will be
desperate for water and a secure life in drought-ravaged Africa and the
Middle East.
Rising Tides sounds an urgent wakeup call to the growing crisis of
climate refugees, and offers an essential, continent-by-continent look
at these dangers. The crisis is everywhere and it is imminent. Detailing
a number of solutions, John R. Wennersten and Denise Robbins argue that
no nation can tackle this universal problem alone. The crisis of climate
refugees requires global, concerted solutions beyond the strategic,
fiscal, and legal capability of a single country or agency.
http://www.iupress.indiana.edu/product_info.php?products_id=808356
Merkel urges bigger fight against*climate change*after US move
<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-climatechange-germany-idUSKBN1942OO>
(Reuters) Germany and the rest of Europe should redouble their efforts
to fight climate change after the withdrawal of the United States from
the Paris climate pact, Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Tuesday.
Merkel told members of her conservative party in the German town of
Erfurt that the U.S. decision would not stop those committed to
protecting the earth from continuing their efforts.
"For us, it is clear that the Paris agreement is a cornerstone for
cooperation in the world," she told the event, which was livestreamed on
Facebook. "I believe we must take even more decisive action in Germany
and Europe to join forces to combat climate change."
Merkel said the efforts would pay off for humanity and would also spur
economic growth.
The German leader, who is seeking a fourth term in September national
elections, said she had been involved in the issue for nearly her entire
political career. She served as German Environment Minister from 1994 to
1998.
Climate change is likely to be a contentious issue when U.S. President
Donald Trump visits Germany next month for a summit of the Group of 20
industrialized countries.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-climatechange-germany-idUSKBN1942OO
*US cities face growing flood risks
<http://climatenewsnetwork.net/22423-2/>*
As the seas rise, US cities can expect varied flood risks: some will
have more of the worst floods, others more frequent familiar inundations.
By Tim Radford
LONDON, 13 June, 2017 – Sea level rise – driven by global warming and
climate change – will bring new flood risks to America's coastal cities.
Paradoxically, those conurbations already at risk of catastrophic floods
driven by hurricanes can expect a greater number of "moderate" floods.
And those cities that have little or no history of severe flooding can
expect a greater level of risk from historically unprecedented
inundation, according to a new study in the journal Environmental
Research L.etters
http://climatenewsnetwork.net/22423-2/
*Editor of New 'Sham Journal' Is Climate Science Denier With Ties to
Heartland Institute
<https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/06/11/new-sham-journal-OMICS-climate-science-denier-ties-heartland-institute>*
Graham Readfearn <https://www.desmogblog.com/user/7036>• Sunday, June
11, 2017 -
The title alone of the scientific paper could have suggested one of two
things - either the author deserved a Nobel prize in science, or
something very odd was going on.
Professor Steve Sherwood knew it was not the former.
The paper's title was grandiose but sincere - "The Refutation of the
Climate Greenhouse Theory and a Proposal for a Hopeful Alternative" -
and appeared in a publication with a name that sounded like a legitimate
scientific journal. But appearances don't always stack up, and neither
did this paper.
"The paper is laughable," Sherwood told DeSmog.
"It is so riddled with unsupported, fantastic and … or … unintelligible
claims, arranged in a disorderly fashion and sprinkled liberally with
innuendo,
Climate scientists have told DeSmog that anyone considering publishing
in the "pseudo journal" should steer clear or risk damaging their
reputation.
After just two issues, the journal has published six papers claiming to
refute the science linking human activity to dangerous climate change
- claims that run counter to the conclusions of all the world's major
science academies.
Climate scientists have described the papers as "garbage" and
"ridiculous."...
Two scientists listed as editorial board members at Environment
Pollution and Climate Change told DeSmog they had not been aware of the
nature of the climate articles being published at the journal.
One scientist, Manolis Tyllianakis, an environmental economist working
at a UK government agency, had accepted an email invitation to be on the
editorial board before the first issue had been published. He told
DeSmog he had not read, written, or reviewed any articles.
He said he was "very sorry I was included in such a journal" and said
his own research showed he was "completely against" the views being
expressed.
He added: "From this market failure arose the predatory open-access
publication, where marginal academics can get stuff published that would
never get published in legitimate journals.
"Climate skeptics have simply taken advantage of this to get their
particular brand of bullshit published. Ultimately, though, most people
know a fourth-rate journal when they see it and I don't think these faux
peer-reviewed papers are taken seriously by anyone. At least I hope not."
https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/06/11/new-sham-journal-OMICS-climate-science-denier-ties-heartland-institute
*Will Adani's coal mine kill 500,000 people?
<http://www.climatecodered.org/2017/06/will-adanis-coal-mine-kill-500000-people.html>*
If all goes as Adani plans, coal from its proposed mine in Queensland
will produce enough air pollution to kill hundreds of thousands of
Indians. Given that this risk is not only known but avoidable, would it
be fair to say that the businessmen and politicians developing this mine
will be guilty of premeditated mass murder? Here are the facts and the
competing arguments: you make the call.
Scientists found that air pollution from coal burnt to generate
electricity in India causes the premature deaths of 80,000 to 115,000
people per year from chronic lung conditions, respiratory infections,
heart diseases, strokes, bronchitis and trachea and lung cancers. 10,000
of these victims are children under the age of 5. In addition every year
tens of millions of cases of asthma and other respiratory ailments are
linked to coal pollution including 21 million asthma attacks.
http://www.climatecodered.org/2017/06/will-adanis-coal-mine-kill-500000-people.html
Growing Concern Over*Climate Change*Is Creating Interfaith Dialogue
<https://psmag.com/social-justice/growing-concern-over-climate-change-is-creating-interfaith-dialogue>
Two years after Pope Francis launched Laudato Si, the Vatican's plea to
save the Earth, Trump rejected its tenets and the Paris Agreement. But
people of all faiths are unified globally to beat climate change.
JUSTIN CATANOSO
Two years after the release of Laudato Si - and long after its intense
global attention has faded - it's worth asking: is the uncompromising
and unprecedented Catholic teaching document fulfilling Vatican
expectations by uniting leaders of all faiths, along with their billions
of congregants, to take decisive climate action "in care for our common
home"?
The answer is a qualified "yes" - based on evidence from interviews with
a range of faith leaders, recent conferences, signed pledges, and a host
a concrete actions, large and small, in congregations and seminaries
around the world.
"There is an assumption that if religious leaders let the pope talk
about [environmental protection], it will usher in rapid, large-scale
change," said Fletcher Harper, executive director of GreenFaith, a
U.S.-based interfaith environmental activism organization with an
international reach.
On May 10th, nine large Catholic organizations - one global, five from
Italy, two from the U.S., and one from the United Kingdom - announced
their divestment from coal, oil, and gas stocks in what was deemed "the
largest Catholic fossil fuel divestment to date," by the Global Catholic
Climate Movement.
https://psmag.com/social-justice/growing-concern-over-climate-change-is-creating-interfaith-dialogue
/
/*This Day in Climate History June 14, 2001
<http://www.chron.com/opinion/editorials/article/Novak-President-not-giving-in-to-his-greens-2025433.php>
- from D.R. Tucker
*In his nationally syndicated column, Robert Novak writes:
"For weeks, a contingent of greens inside the administration has been
pressing the president to look more and more like Al Gore. Bush has been
forced to fight his own advisers in order to maintain his rejection of
the Kyoto treaty and his call for more science to determine the true
causes of climate change.
"The last such encounter was over substantial government spending to
combat global warming, proposed in his [June 11] speech. According to
administration sources, Deputy National Security Adviser Gary Edson
inserted the money figures on his own initiative. A veteran of the
Reagan and first Bush administrations, Edson, under the new president,
has established himself as a formidable bureaucratic infighter and a
leading proponent of a forward position on global warming.
"His ally has been John Bridgeland, deputy domestic policy adviser in
the White House, who has coordinated the task force on global warming.
In private meetings, Bridgeland has argued that giant industrial
concerns are enthusiastic about plans to voluntarily reduce carbon
dioxide emissions in tacit fulfillment of the Kyoto accord.
"Edson and Bridgeland are not alone as middle-level staffers confronting
solid opposition from on high. Environmental Protection Administrator
Christie Whitman has pressed for control of CO2 emissions from her first
day in office, and she is supported by Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill
(called 'Mr. Global Warming' by dismissive congressional conservatives)
and Bridgeland's boss, domestic policy chief Josh Bolten.
"Behind closed doors of the task force, they urged Bush to embrace the
global warmers and come out for caps on CO2 emissions. An e-mail
floating around the capital last week listed a proposed schedule that
would finally eliminate these emissions by the year 2050. White House
aides, with some passion, denounced this report as a fantasy. However,
other administration officials contend that at one point, a draft of the
president's speech did call for voluntary CO2 emission controls as the
message he would carry to Europe.
"The Bush greens ultimately failed. In task force meetings so restricted
that the senior staffers of Cabinet members were not permitted to
attend, the CO2 caps were removed after considerable debate. That
retained the president's renouncing of the Kyoto accord, contending that
its emission targets are 'arbitrary and not based on science.'"
In his 2003 book "The Right Man: The Surprise Presidency of George W.
Bush," former Bush administration speechwriter David Frum notes that
"bureaucratic rivals" of Edson and Bridgeland leaked the story of their
defeat to Novak out of spite.
http://www.chron.com/opinion/editorials/article/Novak-President-not-giving-in-to-his-greens-2025433.php
*
* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
///You are encouraged to forward this email /
. *** Privacy and Security: * This is a text-only mailing that
carries no images which may originate from remote servers.
Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote with subject:
subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe
Also youmay subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Paulifor
http://TheClimate.Vote delivering succinct information for
citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20170614/f9d310b2/attachment.html>
More information about the TheClimate.Vote
mailing list