[TheClimate.Vote] March 7, 2017 - Daily Global Warming News for All -

Richard Pauli richard at theclimate.vote
Tue Mar 7 08:29:21 EST 2017


/March 7, 2017        5 Ways of Climate Change  - by Any Other Name//:  
Resilience & Wildfires /

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/climate-change/how-to-live-with-it/index.html
*5 Ways Climate Change Will Affect You  - National Geographic 
<http://www.nationalgeographic.com/climate-change/how-to-live-with-it/index.html>*

    Greater access to clean water, refined sanitation systems, and
    modern farming methods are just some ways innovation will save us.
    http://www.nationalgeographic.com/climate-change/how-to-live-with-it/water.html
    http://www.nationalgeographic.com/climate-change/how-to-live-with-it/crops.html
    http://www.nationalgeographic.com/climate-change/how-to-live-with-it/heat.html
    http://www.nationalgeographic.com/climate-change/how-to-live-with-it/weather.html
    http://www.nationalgeographic.com/climate-change/how-to-live-with-it/health.html
    "The annual mean air temperature of a city can be 4° to 11°F warmer
    than surrounding rural areas during the day, and 4° to 9°F warmer at
    night. Vegetation-rich green roofs can mitigate this urban
    heat-island effect, lowering the temperature by more than 5°F on the
    hottest days; plants also help manage excess storm water."


<http://www.slate.com/articles/business/metropolis/2017/03/cities_are_throwing_out_climate_change_in_favor_of_resilience.html> 



    A Threat by Any Other Name
    <http://www.slate.com/articles/business/metropolis/2017/03/cities_are_throwing_out_climate_change_in_favor_of_resilience.html>

Slate Magazine 	 -‎4 hours ago‎ 	

	
	
	

    Climate change is political. Should planners talk about something else?
    These changes are the result of climate change, after all, a
    phenomenon dismissed by the Republican Party as a political scheme
    of United Nations bureaucrats.
    The word they are using to do so, more and more, is resilience. Once
    seen as a kind of stopgap strategy, resilience has become the modus
    operandi of climate planning. To be resilient now means to encompass
    all previous climate change strategies: to resist, to mitigate, and
    to adapt. Its use in international climate research and U.S.
    academic papers has multiplied over the past few decades...
    The 2015 PREPARE Act, a bipartisan bill to help the federal
    government recover from extreme weather events, does not mention
    climate change or global warming. But it uses the term resilience 40
    times.
    "We see this word more and more, and the more we see it, the less we
    know what it means," added her colleague Gregor Schuurman.
    "Somewhere there is a danger of saying to the lay public,
    'Everything is going to be resilient.' "


http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/03/climate-change-global-warming-history-health/
*Past Disasters Reveal Terrifying Future of Climate Change 
<http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/03/climate-change-global-warming-history-health/>*

    Plagues, famines, heat waves—sudden changes in climate have been
    deadly for humans.
    Human activity is altering our climate. The vast majority of
    scientists agree on that. But there is disagreement about the rate
    at which it is happening and how it will impact us. Surprisingly,
    the answers to what our future holds with climate change may lie in
    the past, especially how it will affect our health. This is the path
    that Australian public health expert Anthony McMichael sought to
    pursue in Climate Change and the Health of Nations: Famines, Fevers,
    and the Fate of Populations.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/06/science/donald-trump-data-rescue-science.html
*Activists Rush to Save Government Science Data — If They Can Find It 
<https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/06/science/donald-trump-data-rescue-science.html?hpw&rref=science&_r=0>*

    "Destroying federal records is a crime," said Patrice McDermott, who
    heads a public advocacy organization called Open the Government.
    "Taking them off of the internet does not have the same penalty."

    "In a Trump administration that has made clear its disdain for the
    copious evidence that human activity is warming the planet,
    researchers feared a broad crusade against the scientific
    information provided to the public. Reports last week that the
    administration is proposing deep budget cuts for government agencies
    including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and
    the Environmental Protection Agency have fueled new fears of
    databases being axed, if only as a cost-saving measure.

    "'We'll probably be saying goodbye to much of the invaluable data
    housed at the NCEI,' Anne Jefferson, a water hydrology professor at
    Kent State University, wrote on Twitter Saturday, referring to the
    National Centers for Environmental Information. "Hope it gets
    rescued in time."
    It is illegal to destroy government data, but agencies can make it
    more difficult to find by revising websites and creating other
    barriers to the underlying information.

    "Already there have been a handful of changes to the websites of
    federal science agencies, according to the Environmental Data and
    Governance Initiative, a new organization with researchers
    monitoring the content. On the E.P.A.'s website, for instance, the
    science and technology office had described as its mission the
    development of 'scientific and technological foundations to achieve
    clean water.' Now the office says the goal is to develop
    'economically and technologically achievable performance standards.'

    "Pie charts on a Department of Energy website illustrating the link
    between coal and greenhouse gas emissions also have disappeared. So
    has the description on an Interior Department page of the potential
    environmental effects of hydraulic fracturing on federal land.

    "Changes like these appear only to reflect the publicly stated
    priorities of the new administration and there have been few signs
    as yet that federal databases are being systematically manipulated
    or restricted.

    "But concern about the vulnerability of scientific information has
    also focused attention on a nonpartisan problem of digital-age
    government: Much of the scientific information so painstakingly
    collected over the decades, at a cost of hundreds of billions of
    dollars, remains held only by the government, scattered on thousands
    of servers in hundreds of departments where it may not be backed up
    and could be impossible to find."

    In a recent letter to the federal Office of Management and Budget,
    Ms. McDermott's group cited a clause in the 1995 Paperwork Reduction
    Act that requires agencies to "provide adequate notice when
    initiating, substantially modifying, or terminating significant
    information dissemination products."

    But what that means for the age of big data has not been defined.

    To make secure copies of government research that researchers can
    trust is no easy task, librarians say. But many of those who have
    been trying for years to find funding and a system to do it reliably
    hope to harness the current wave of interest.

    "At the moment, more people than ever are aware of the risk of
    relying solely on the government to preserve its own information,''
    two government document librarians, James A. Jacobs, of the
    University of California, San Diego, and James R. Jacobs of Stanford
    University, wrote in an essay circulated online last week. "This was
    not true even six months ago.''

    At the archiving events, participants are typically divided into
    groups. One uses a web browser extension to flag government web
    addresses for the Internet Archive, an existing service that
    operates an automated "web crawler" that can make copies of federal
    websites but typically not the databases that store information in
    more exotic formats.

    Another group is tasked with scrutinizing data sets that researchers
    have identified as particularly useful or vulnerable. Those are
    "tagged" with a description of where they came from and what they are.

    At one of last month's events, at New York University, many marveled
    at the breadth and depth of the research they were sorting through,
    even as they worried about its future.

    "Look, you can get temperature and salinity readings from any one of
    these buoys,'' said Barbara Thiers, the vice president for science
    at the New York Botanical Garden, another participant. "This is the
    raw data for tracking ocean warming.''                   thanks D.R.
    Tucker



    Harvard disburses $1 million for*climate change*research
    <http://harvardmagazine.com/2017/03/harvard-climate-change-solutions-grant>

Harvard Magazine 	 -‎3 hours ago‎ 	

	
	
	

The*Climate Change*Solutions Fund has awarded $1 million in grants to 
multidisciplinary research programs across five different schools at 
Harvard.


    *Global Warming's*Threat to Trump's Mar-a-Lago
    <https://consortiumnews.com/2017/03/05/global-warmings-threat-to-trumps-mar-a-largo/>

Consortium News 	 -‎20 hours ago‎ 	

	
	
	

Methane is an exceptionally potent greenhouse gas, capable of trapping 
84 times more heat than comparable quantities of carbon dioxide.

http://carboncounter.com/
*An App to Help Save Emissions (and Maybe Money) When Buying a Car 
<http://carboncounter.com/>*

    How much is your car contributing to climate change? A new study can
    tell you.
    The research looks at 125 cars on today's roads and measures not
    just their mileage and the type of fuel they use, but also the
    greenhouse gases generated in making the cars and, if they are
    electric vehicles, the greenhouse gases produced by the power plants
    that provide their juice.
    Our results show that you don't have to pay more for a
    low-carbon-emitting vehicle. Many electric vehicles are the same
    price, or cheaper, than similar gasoline cars. The average
    greenhouse gas emissions of all cars shown here are more than 50%
    higher than the 2030 climate target, with no internal combustion
    vehicles meeting the target. Most hybrid and electric vehicles, on
    the other hand, already meet the 2030 goal today.


http://www.news9.com/story/34679760/wildfires-burn-nw-ok-into-kansas-prompt-evacuations
*Wildfires Burn NW OK Into Kansas, Prompt Evacuations* 
<http://www.news9.com/story/34679760/wildfires-burn-nw-ok-into-kansas-prompt-evacuations>

    Woodward, Oklahoma - Multiple wildfires in northwest Oklahoma are
    prompting evacuations of multiple towns, authorities told News 9
    StormTracker Marty Logan.
    The Woodward County emergency manager said the residents in Buffalo,
    Laverne and north central Woodward County are being evacuated. The
    City of Woodward is currently safe but residents are asked to
    monitor conditions in case there is a change of wind direction...
    About 7:30 p.m., an evacuation warning was issued for the town of
    Fort Supply. Residents are asked to go to a shelter at the Pioneer
    Room, 1212 9th Street, in Woodward...
    The prison at Fort Supply was not included in the evacuation warning
    but the department of corrections said they are monitoring the
    situation...
    Multiple fires were reported near Laverne and Buffalo, the Harper
    County emergency manager reported. The Laverne fire moved into
    Woodward County, and the fire line is about 25 miles in length. The
    Freedom, Dacoma and Greenleaf fire departments from Woods County
    responded to the fire. Major and Custer counties also sent task
    forces to assist with Harper and Woodward county fires...
    A fire in Beaver County east of Forgan has reportedly burned more
    than 10,000 acres in Oklahoma and more than 40,000 acres in Kansas,
    the the state emergency management department reported. ..
    At least nine homes were lost due to the fire in Laverne and
    Woodward County, Logan said. At least 200 heads of cattle were lost
    as well.

/http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/03/07/study-how-broadcast-networks-covered-climate-ch/208881//
*This Day in Climate History March 7, 2016 
<http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/03/07/study-how-broadcast-networks-covered-climate-ch/208881> 
-  from D.R. Tucker
*/MediaMatters.org reports:

    "ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox collectively spent five percent less time
    covering climate change in 2015, even though there were more
    newsworthy climate-related events than ever before, including the
    EPA finalizing the Clean Power Plan, Pope Francis issuing a climate
    change encyclical, President Obama rejecting the Keystone XL
    pipeline, and 195 countries around the world reaching a historic
    climate agreement in Paris. The decline was primarily driven by ABC,
    whose climate coverage dropped by 59 percent; the only network to
    dramatically increase its climate coverage was Fox, but that
    increase largely consisted of criticism of efforts to address
    climate change. When the networks did discuss climate change, they
    rarely addressed its impacts on national security, the economy, or
    public health, yet most still found time to provide a forum for
    climate science denial. On a more positive note, CBS and NBC -- and
    PBS, which was assessed separately -- aired many segments that
    explored the state of scientific research or detailed how climate
    change is affecting extreme weather, plants, and wildlife."

/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  S//tay well-informed &  forward this email./

        To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote with subject: 
        subscribe,  To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe
        Also youmay subscribe/unsubscribe at
        https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
        Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Paulifor
        http://TheClimate.Vote delivering succinct information for
        citizens and responsible governments of all levels.   List
        membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
        restricted to this mailing list.
        . *** Privacy and Security: * We do NOT collect IP addresses. 
        This is a text-only mailing. It carries no graphics or images
        which may originate from remote servers that routinely track and
        identify IP address. Text-only messages provide greater privacy
        to the receiver and sender.  If you receive a version of this
        document in an email  with a graphics image - even a
        one-pixel-sized image, for optimal privacy from tracking, you
        should not open it. **
        By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
        democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
        commercial purposes. .

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20170307/0f6e2352/attachment.html>


More information about the TheClimate.Vote mailing list