[TheClimate.Vote] November 30, 2017 - Daily Global Warming News Digest

Richard Pauli richard at theclimate.vote
Thu Nov 30 07:33:57 EST 2017


/November 30, 2017
/
*Banks warned of 'regulatory action' as climate change bites global 
economy 
<https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/nov/29/banks-warned-of-regulatory-action-as-climate-change-bites-global-economy>*
Australia's financial regulator has stepped-up its warning to banks, 
lenders and insurers, saying climate change is already impacting the 
global economy, and flagged the possibility of "regulatory action".
Geoff Summerhayes from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority 
(Apra) revealed it had begun quizzing companies about their actions to 
assess climate risks, noting it would be demanding more in the future.
Apra also revealed it has established an internal working group to 
assess the financial risk from climate change and was coordinating an 
interagency initiative with the corporate watchdog Asic, the Reserve 
Bank of Australia (RBA) and federal Treasury to examine what risks 
climate change was posing to Australia's economy.
He said the inter-agency initiative created between Apra, Asic, the RBA 
and Treasury would investigate whether companies are taking steps to 
protect themselves and their customers from the physical, transitional 
and liability risks caused by climate change.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/nov/29/banks-warned-of-regulatory-action-as-climate-change-bites-global-economy


*New maps of climate opinions by political party, Partisan Opinion Maps 
2016 (Yale) 
<http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/partisan-maps-2016/>*
Today we are pleased to announce the publication of a new article: "The 
spatial distribution of U.S. Republican and Democratic climate opinions 
at state and local scales" in the journal /Climatic Change Letters/, as 
well as the launch of a new interactive set of maps. 
<https://yale.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=78464048a89f4b58b97123336&id=cff92a10e7&e=8595955670>
The paper and maps describe the distribution of both Democratic and 
Republican opinions on climate change across all US states and 
congressional districts. The maps illustrate, for example, that 69% of 
Democrats in Alabama believe climate change is happening, but that is 
the lowest percentage of any states; in Oregon and California 88% of 
Democrats believe it is happening, and in Texas, it's 82%.
Republicans are less convinced overall, but there is substantial spatial 
variability in their beliefs as well - for example, 62% of New York 
Republicans believe global warming is happening, while only 48% of 
Republicans in Nebraska and Kansas agree. And at the congressional 
district level, Republican views of climate change are even more 
heterogeneous, as the map below illustrates:
The new results build on our prior work (e.g., Howe et al. 2013, and 
Mildenberger et al., 2015) that estimated climate change opinions at 
state and local scales among the general population. This project, 
however, for the first time, maps spatial variations in opinion within 
the populations of Democrats and Republicans respectively. The article 
and the maps should provide new insights into the political dynamics of 
climate change opinion and suggest new opportunities for bipartisan 
conversations about how to best address this critical challenge.
Mildenberger, M., Howe, P., Marlon, J., & Leiserowitz, A. (2017) The 
spatial distribution of Republican and Democratic climate and energy 
opinions at state and local scales. /Climatic Change Letters/. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2103-0 
<https://yale.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=78464048a89f4b58b97123336&id=e85d0deb48&e=8595955670>.
Please visit the online interactive maps 
<https://yale.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=78464048a89f4b58b97123336&id=b3b00512c9&e=8595955670> 
to explore these partisan climate change opinions where you live and 
across the nation. The article is available here 
<https://yale.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=78464048a89f4b58b97123336&id=a18a17ba15&e=8595955670> 
to those with a subscription to /Climatic Change Letters/. If you would 
like to request a copy, please send an email to climatechange at yale.edu 
<mailto:climatechange at yale.edu>, with the Subject Line: Request 
Political Maps Paper.
http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/partisan-maps-2016/


*New study uncovers the 'keystone domino' strategy of climate denial 
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/nov/29/new-study-uncovers-the-keystone-domino-strategy-of-climate-denial>*
How climate denial blogs misinform so many people with such poor 
scientific arguments.
Dana Nuccitelli
The body of evidence supporting human-caused global warmingis vast 
<https://skepticalscience.com/big-picture.html>- too vast for climate 
denial blogs to attack it all. Instead they focus on whata new study 
<https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/advance-article/doi/10.1093/biosci/bix133/4644513>published 
in the journal Bioscience calls "keystone dominoes." These are 
individual pieces of evidence that capture peoples' attention, like 
polar bears. The authors write:

    "These topics are used as "proxies" for AGW [human-caused global
    warming] in general; in other words, they represent keystone
    dominoes that are strategically placed in front of many hundreds of
    others, each representing a separate line of evidence for AGW. By
    appearing to knock over the keystone domino, audiences targeted by
    the communication may assume all other dominoes are toppled in a
    form of "dismissal by association."

Basically, if these bloggers can create the perception that the science 
underlying polar bear or Arctic sea ice vulnerability to climate change 
is incorrect, their readers will assume that all of climate science is 
fatally flawed. And blogs can be relatively influential - surveys have 
shown that blog readers trust them more than traditional news and 
information sources.
Indeed, the scientific research is quite clear that Arctic sea ice is in 
the midst of a rapid declinedue primarily to human-caused global warming 
<https://www.skepticalscience.com/Arctic-sea-ice-melt-natural-or-man-made-intermediate.htm>. 
Because polar bears rely on sea ice to hunt seals, global warming also 
threatens their species. While some polar bear sub-populations are 
stable thus far,others are declining 
<http://pbsg.npolar.no/en/status/population-map.html>, andthat trend 
will only accelerate as sea ice continues to disappear 
<https://www.skepticalscience.com/polar-bears-global-warming.htm>...
Nevertheless, climate denial can be influential, andclimate scientists 
remain trusted sources 
<http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/04/public-views-on-climate-change-and-climate-scientists/>. 
Their responses to scientific misinformation can be powerful. For 
example,Climate Feedback <https://climatefeedback.org/>(which enlists 
climate scientists to review news articles related to climate change) is 
a highly respected and influential resource...
It's also important that we not lose sight of the forest for the trees. 
Although it may be interesting to debate whether polar bears will be 
able to adapt to their rapidly-changing environment, that single climate 
change impact does not alter the overwhelming body of scientific 
evidence supporting human-caused global warming and the threats it 
poses. Climate science isn't a set of dominoes or a house of cards; it's 
a towering structure built on a strong scientific foundation.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/nov/29/new-study-uncovers-the-keystone-domino-strategy-of-climate-denial


*Weatherwatch: climate change means lots of birdsong, even in November 
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/nov/28/weatherwatch-climate-change-means-lots-of-birdsong-even-in-november>*
Unlike other birds, robins have always sung throughout the season, but 
now other species are joining them due to their warming environment
Thanks to the effects of climate change, combined with the 
"urban-heat-island effect" - in which cities are several degrees warmer 
than the surrounding countryside - London is now a hotspot for 
unseasonal birdsong. Visit any of the capital's parks, especially at 
dawn when the sound of commuter traffic has yet to reach its peak, and 
you'll hear a wide range of songbirds.
Listen out for the impossibly loud song of the wren - with the trill my 
fellow writer Dominic Couzens calls "the twiddle in the middle" - as 
this tiny bird signals its presence from deep inside hedgerows and 
shrubberies. Joining the chorus are the great tit, which sings its 
"tea-cher, tea-cher" song from a prominent twig, the scolding, frantic 
sound of the blue tit, and the rather monotonous song of the dunnock.
For something a little more exotic, pay a visit to the WWT's London 
Wetland Centre <https://www.wwt.org.uk/wetland-centres/london/>or the 
RSPB's Rainham Marshes 
<https://www.rspb.org.uk/reserves-and-events/find-a-reserve/reserves-a-z/reserves-by-name/r/rainhammarshes/> 
reserve, where you can hear the explosive sound of a relatively recent 
colonist, Cetti's warbler, more or less all year round.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/nov/28/weatherwatch-climate-change-means-lots-of-birdsong-even-in-november
-
*Cettis Warbler and its call  :18 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jn3_NKp32dE>*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jn3_NKp32dE


*(video) Report: Extreme climate events virtually certain to increase - 
YouTube <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tadMXSl7cQU>*
Video for Dr. Radley Horton report
Nov 3, 2017 - Uploaded by PBS NewsHour
We are now in the warmest period in modern civilization. That's 
according to an extensive report - authored by 13 federal agencies, 
experts and scientists - that directly contradicts the Trump 
administration's position on climate change. Hari Sreenivasan speaks 
with Radley Horton of Columbia University about the dire assessment of 
the state of the climate and its impact on the U.S.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tadMXSl7cQU
-
Read online the Full Climate Science Special Report 
<https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/11/03/climate/document-Climate-Science-Special-Report-2017.html>
"This assessment concludes, based on extensive evidence, that it is 
extremely likely that human activities, especially emissions of 
greenhouse gases, are the dominant cause of the observed warming since 
the mid-20th century," the report states.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/11/03/climate/document-Climate-Science-Special-Report-2017.html
-
Download the Original report PDF from Document Cloud 
<https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4174364/Climate-Science-Special-Report-2017.pdf>
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4174364/Climate-Science-Special-Report-2017.pdf
-*
(video) Dangerous Climate Change is Here and Worse to Come, Major Report 
Warns <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UT-7mVz8HJU>*
Contributing author to the report for the US Congress, Columbia 
University climate scientist, Dr. Radley Horton says more extreme 
weather events will be more common if U.S. doesn't curb use of fossil fuel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UT-7mVz8HJU


*Millions of Yemenis on verge of losing clean running water 
<http://www.sixdegreesnews.org/archives/20969/millions-of-yemenis-on-verge-of-losing-clean-running-water>*
SIXDEGREES on 11/29/2017 at 4:48 am
THERE IS A MAJOR DANGER OF CHOLERA COMEBACK AS FOUR IN FIVE PEOPLE WILL 
BE WITHOUT STEADY WATER SUPPLY.
Eight million people in Yemen will be without running water within days 
as fuel runs out due to the Saudi-led coalition blockade of the 
country's northern ports, Oxfam warned.
They will join the almost 16 million people in Yemen who already cannot 
get clean piped water, leaving more than four in five people without a 
steady supply of clean water.
A disruption to fuel supplies on this scale could trigger a fresh spike 
in a cholera epidemic which has seen nearly 950,000 suspected cases 
since April this year, but which had begun to ease in recent weeks.
Water scarcity in Yemen is amongst the worst in the world and the 
country mostly depends on ground water for its water supply.
Oxfam's work providing water has already been hit by fuel shortages. In 
Khamer district of Amran governorate in Western central Yemen - where 
there have been 174 deaths due to cholera since April - 31,000 people 
have already been cut off as parts of the water network have run out or 
are close to running out of fuel.
Stevenson said: "The longer the blockade continues, the more people need 
our help but the less help we are able to offer. The international 
community cannot be allowed to turn its backs on the suffering in Yemen. 
All those with influence over the Saudi-led coalition are complicit in 
Yemen's suffering unless they do all they can to push them to lift the 
blockade."
http://www.sixdegreesnews.org/archives/20969/millions-of-yemenis-on-verge-of-losing-clean-running-water


(video) Addiction to Growth - Root Cause of Climate Change 
<https://youtu.be/2Pg4R1WKN8I?t=1m22s>
UPFSI .org https://youtu.be/2Pg4R1WKN8I?t=1m22s
Climate Matters welcomes Dr. Philip Lawn, from the International Society 
for Ecological Economics (http://isecoeco.org) and Binzagr Institute for 
Sustainable Prosperity, to today's show. We discuss the root cause of 
climate change, and so many other ills of society and the ecosphere, our 
global Addiction to Growth.
https://youtu.be/2Pg4R1WKN8I?t=1m22s


/Checking the facts:/*
Grist article on an "Ice Apocalypse" mostly accurate, but doesn't make 
the likelihood of that apocalypse clear enough to readers 
<https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/antarctica-doomsday-glaciers-could-flood-coastal-cities-grist-eric-holthaus/>*
Analysis of "Ice Apocalypse" Published in Grist, by Eric Holthaus on 21 
Nov. 2017 
<http://grist.org/article/antarctica-doomsday-glaciers-could-flood-coastal-cities/>
Six scientists analyzed the article and estimate its overall scientific 
credibility to be 'high'.
A majority of reviewers tagged the article as: Accurate, Alarmist, 
Insightful, Sound reasoning.
SCIENTISTS' FEEDBACK:
SUMMARY
This article at Grist by Eric Holthaus examines the risk of greater sea 
level rise caused by a more rapid loss of glacial ice. It focuses on a 
process recently added to one ice sheet model (ice cliff instability), 
which greatly accelerated the simulated loss of Antarctic ice in a 
warming climate, suggesting that we could see more sea level rise by 
2100 than previously projected.
Scientists who reviewed the article found that while it accurately 
described recent research on these processes, it should have provided 
more accurate context on the timescale of these sea level rise scenarios 
and the scientific uncertainty about how likely these scenarios are to 
come to pass.

    *Twila Moon, Lecturer (Assistant Professor), University of Bristol:*
    The major failure of the article is that it incorrectly presents the
    scientifically published timeline for worst case sea level rise.
    This is unfortunate, because the overall information in the article
    about marine ice-cliff instability potentially causing sea levels to
    rise much sooner than previously thought is correct and important to
    communicate, and the quoted scientists' statements are accurate.
    There are many important science questions, but it is true that
    understanding the rate of ice loss at Pine Island and Thwaites
    Glaciers is very important for understanding how quickly future sea
    level rise will happen. Understanding Thwaites is arguably more
    important than Pine Island, though they are part of a connect region
    of ice. A recent peer-reviewed science article that takes a closer
    look at the question and explains the importance of understanding
    changes is Scambos et al, 2017*.

    *Richard Alley, Professor, Penn State University:*
    The basic idea is I believe correct—if Thwaites Glacier in West
    Antarctica in the future begins to behave the way Greenland's ice
    sheet is now behaving at Jakobshavn, Helheim and some other outlets,
    the resulting future sea level rise is likely to be notably higher
    and faster than currently projected by the IPCC. Iceberg calving
    from non-floating (tidewater) fronts is a widespread and well-known
    process (passengers on cruise ships to Alaska have been observing it
    routinely, for example), and the rate of calving is generally
    accepted to increase in deeper water and to be favored by reduced
    friction from the sides, for robust physical reasons. The Greenland
    outlets are in ~1 km deep fjords that are only a few km wide;
    furthermore, retreat out of these relatively narrow and short fjords
    would not greatly raise global sea level (most of Greenland's ice
    rests on bedrock that is near or above sea level). Retreat of
    Thwaites Glacier could reach much deeper water with a much wider
    calving front, and beyond some threshold of retreat is generally
    modeled as triggering the full deglaciation of the marine basins
    with ~3 meters of globally averaged sea-level rise, because so much
    of West Antarctica's ice rests on interconnected deep beds.

    The DeConto-Pollard numbers (and earlier, the Pollard-DeConto-Alley
    numbers, so note that I was involved with earlier parts of this
    research) assumed that if triggered, the retreat in West Antarctica
    would not be as fast as the fastest rates already observed in
    Greenland (a maximum retreat rate was set in the model); the notably
    greater sea-level contribution of West Antarctica in the new
    modeling arises from the much broader calving front that would be
    activated. But, the greater depth and width of West Antarctica's
    deep marine basins than in Greenland could produce much faster
    calving than in Greenland. Hence, the DeConto-Pollard simulations
    are not a worst-case scenario.

    The uncertainties remain very large, especially regarding the amount
    of warming to that threshold. But, because tidewater calving is such
    a widespread process, it is highly likely that warming beyond some
    threshold will cause tidewater processes to occur in West
    Antarctica, consistent with the paleo-observations in deglaciated
    marine areas off Pine Island Bay. Current physical understanding
    then leads to the expectation of quite rapid sea-level rise. Much
    work remains to be done to narrow the uncertainties, including
    analyses of the "melange" of broken-up icebergs mentioned by Ted
    Scambos—but note that such a melange is present in the narrow fjord
    of Jakobshavn, providing a backstress that has still allowed the
    rapid retreat observed there. I believe DeConto and Pollard have
    taken a well-justified path in estimating the warming threshold, but
    much additional work can be done. Many other models that project
    smaller future sea-level rise from West Antarctica also lack the
    transition to tidewater calving. If warming becomes large enough to
    trigger tidewater processes in West Antarctica (or East Antarctica),
    then models lacking those processes are not useful for providing
    either most-likely or worst-case scenarios for sea-level rise.

See all the scientists' annotations in context 
<https://via.hypothes.is/https://grist.org/article/antarctica-doomsday-glaciers-could-flood-coastal-cities/>
https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/antarctica-doomsday-glaciers-could-flood-coastal-cities-grist-eric-holthaus/
-
*How much, how fast?: A science review and outlook for research on the 
instability of Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier in the 21st century 
<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092181811630491X>*
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.04.008Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license open access
Highlights:
Thwaites Glacier is a likely site of greatly increased Antarctic ice 
sheet mass loss.
Changes in the atmosphere and ocean and their interaction with the 
glacier are the cause.
A coordinated multi-disciplinary research plan to study Thwaites Glacier 
is outlined.

    Abstract
    Constraining how much and how fast the West Antarctic Ice Sheet
    (WAIS) will change in the coming decades has recently been
    identified as the highest priority in Antarctic research (National
    Academies, 2015). Here we review recent research on WAIS and outline
    further scientific objectives for the area now identified as the
    most likely to undergo near-term significant change: Thwaites
    Glacier and the adjacent Amundsen Sea. Multiple lines of evidence
    point to an ongoing rapid loss of ice in this region in response to
    changing atmospheric and oceanic conditions. Models of the ice
    sheet's dynamic behavior indicate a potential for greatly
    accelerated ice loss as ocean-driven melting at the Thwaites Glacier
    grounding zone and nearby areas leads to thinning, faster flow, and
    retreat. A complete retreat of the Thwaites Glacier basin would
    raise global sea level by more than three meters by entraining ice
    from adjacent catchments. This scenario could occur over the next
    few centuries, and faster ice loss could occur through processes
    omitted from most ice flow models such as hydrofracture and ice
    cliff failure, which have been observed in recent rapid ice retreats
    elsewhere. Increased basal melt at the grounding zone and increased
    potential for hydrofracture due to enhanced surface melt could
    initiate a more rapid collapse of Thwaites Glacier within the next
    few decades.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092181811630491X


*Climate Change: 'Like a cancer before onset of symptoms' 
<http://www.irishexaminer.com/viewpoints/analysis/climate-change-like-a-cancer-before-onset-of-symptoms-463693.html>*
Thursday, November 30, 2017
The gradual progression of climate change and delayed effects of 
emissions can give a sense of unreality; denial is a great psychological 
defence, write Liam Quaide and Roisin Cuddihy.
What is it we are facing? If harmful emissions are not drastically 
reduced in the near future climate change will lead, over the course of 
our daughter's life, to more erratic and extreme weather, and to 
increasingly intense heat-waves, floods and storms.
There will be widespread damage to property and infrastructure, and 
crops are likely to suffer on a large scale. Parts of Asia and Africa 
will become uninhabitable, resulting in mass migrations of climate 
refugees. As resources become scarcer, political and social tensions 
will escalate...
Crucially, there must be significant reform of agricultural practices. 
At this moment in history we require courage from a Taoiseach who can 
reckon with vested interests and put our country on the road to a 
sustainable future as part of an international trend led by Norway, 
Sweden and the state of California.
The gains for our economy, not to mention our health and quality of 
life, would be immense. The losses, if we do not act, are unthinkable.
http://www.irishexaminer.com/viewpoints/analysis/climate-change-like-a-cancer-before-onset-of-symptoms-463693.html


*This Day in Climate History November 30, 2010 
<http://youtu.be/NTx2QD-XYt8>  -  from D.R. Tucker*
November 30, 2010: Katie Couric, in her CBSNews.com "Notebook"
segment, observes:
"The debate over global warming is once again heating up in
Washington. Roughly half of the newly elected Republican
congressmembers are climate change skeptics, according to one survey,
and some want to roll back environmental regulations.
"Their position was bolstered by the Climategate scandal, in which a
handful of scientists were accused of manipulating data to support
climate change. The scientists were later cleared, but the damage was
done. Less than 60 percent of Americans now believe in global warming,
down from 80 percent in 2006.
"Still, the vast majority of scientists - 97 percent - say man-made
climate change is real. 700 climate experts have joined a media
project to educate the public, and UN talks are underway in Cancun on
a treaty to curb greenhouse gases.
"Time is ticking. Global warming may have become a political football,
but scientists say it's one we can't afford to punt."
http://youtu.be/NTx2QD-XYt8

/------------------------------------------
//Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html> 
//
/https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote//
///
Send email to subscribe <a%20href=%22mailto:contact at theClimate.Vote%22> 
to this mailing. /

        *** Privacy and Security: * This is a text-only mailing that
        carries no images which may originate from remote servers.
        Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and
        sender.
        By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
        democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
        commercial purposes.
        To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote with subject: 
        subscribe,  To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe
        Also youmay subscribe/unsubscribe at
        https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
        Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Paulifor
        http://TheClimate.Vote delivering succinct information for
        citizens and responsible governments of all levels.   List
        membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
        restricted to this mailing list.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20171130/dd4b59a9/attachment.html>


More information about the TheClimate.Vote mailing list