[TheClimate.Vote] April 18, 2018 - Daily Global Warming News Digest

Richard Pauli richard at theclimate.vote
Wed Apr 18 11:01:53 EDT 2018


/April 18, 2018/

[latest legal engagement]
*Colorado Communities File Climate Lawsuits Vs. Two Oil Companies 
<https://www.climateliabilitynews.org/2018/04/17/colorado-climate-lawsuits-exxon-suncor/>*
By Dana Drugmand

    Several Colorado communities have now joined the growing wave of
    municipalities taking legal action against fossil fuel companies and
    seeking compensation for the impacts of climate change.

    The city and county of Boulder and the county of San Miguel on
    Tuesday announced a new lawsuit against ExxonMobil and Suncor, two
    of the largest oil companies with active operations in Colorado.
    It's the first climate liability lawsuit filed by an interior,
    non-coastal community in the U.S.

    The Colorado communities - like coastal communities in California
    and New York City - are demanding that fossil fuel companies help
    pay for the costs associated with climate change impacts. They
    allege that these companies long knew about the danger of
    unrestrained fossil fuel burning and deliberately downplayed the
    risk to policymakers and the public. As a result, communities face
    severe climate impacts and rising costs.

    "Climate change impacts are already happening and they are only
    going to get worse," said Boulder County Commissioner Elise Jones.
    "In fact, Colorado is one of the fastest warming states in the
    nation. Climate change is not just about sea level rise. It affects
    all of us in the middle of the country as well."

    "Our communities and our taxpayers should not shoulder the cost of
    climate change adaptation alone. These oil companies need to pay
    their fair share," added Boulder Mayor Suzanne Jones.

    In Colorado, climate change affects fragile high-altitude ecosystems
    and hits at the heart of these communities' local economies,
    affecting roads and bridges, parks and forests, buildings, farming
    and agriculture, the ski industry, and public open space. Over the
    next few decades, Colorado communities are expected to spend more
    than $100 million to deal with those impacts.
    - - - - -
    "For over 50 years, Suncor and Exxon have known that fossil fuels
    would cause severe climate impacts," Simons said. "To enhance their
    own profits, they concealed this knowledge and spread doubt about
    science they knew to be correct. Now, communities all over this
    country are left to foot the bill."

    "This lawsuit challenges the reckless behavior of all fossil fuel
    companies," said Emma Bray of Earth Guardians and one of the youth
    plaintiffs in the case Martinez v. Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation
    Commission. "How does the oil and gas industry justify business that
    will make the Earth uninhabitable?"

https://www.climateliabilitynews.org/2018/04/17/colorado-climate-lawsuits-exxon-suncor/
- - - -
[E&E NEW$]
*E&E News: Boulder sues oil companies over damages due to warming 
<https://www.eenews.net/eenewspm/2018/04/17/stories/1060079323>*
The city of Boulder and two Colorado counties today sued Suncor Energy 
Inc. and Exxon Mobil Corp., joining a growing list of cities suing oil 
and gas companies for damages associated with climate change.
The lawsuit alleges that the companies are responsible for altering 
Colorado's climate by releasing greenhouse gas emissions into the 
atmosphere and that they "concealed and misrepresented" the dangers of 
fossil fuel use from the public.
The companies' actions have caused harm to residents and the state's 
high-altitude ecosystems, according to the lawsuit. Climate change, the 
suit says, has affected local economies, roads and bridges, parks, 
buildings, agriculture and the state's ski industry...
read more https://www.eenews.net/eenewspm/2018/04/17/stories/1060079323


[Yale Climate Connections}
AUDIO
*Children's health is disproportionately affected by climate change 
They're more vulnerable than adults 
<https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2018/04/how-climate-change-hurts-childrens-health/>*

    Rising temperatures, drought, and weather disasters can threaten
    people's health. Nobody is exempt. But …
    Perera: "The health of children is disproportionately affected by
    climate change."
    Frederica Perera is director of the Columbia Center for Children's
    Environmental Health. She says children are vulnerable because their
    immune systems are not mature. And, their rapidly growing bodies are
    more sensitive to damage from disease and environmental contaminants.
    In particular, children are more likely than adults to die from
    diarrheal disease, which is expected to become more common in some
    areas as the climate warms.
    And some children are at more risk than others.
    Perera: "It is the children living in low income countries and
    communities who are most affected."
    Low-income communities often lack the resources to effectively
    prevent and treat illness. What's more, climate change-related food
    shortages can lead to malnourishment, which puts children at greater
    risk of other health problems.
    To help protect children, Perera says we need to limit global
    warming by reducing fossil fuel emissions.
    Perera: "We know how to do this. Means are at hand now and the
    science supports action now."

Author Sarah Kennedy is a Philadelphia-based writer and editor. She is 
interested in how people think and talk about the connections between 
climate change and their individual lives, livelihoods, and communities.
https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2018/04/how-climate-change-hurts-childrens-health/


SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT KNOWLEDGE PLATFORM
*High Level Panel on Water - 4 min Video: Water's Promise: Making Every 
Drop Count <https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/HLPWater>*
Sustainable Development
Published on Mar 14, 2018
In April 2016 the United Nations Secretary-General and President of the 
World Bank Group convened a High Level Panel on Water (HLPW), consisting 
of 11 sitting Heads of State and Government and one Special Adviser, to 
provide the leadership required to champion a comprehensive, inclusive 
and collaborative way of developing and managing water resources, and 
improving water and sanitation related services.
The core focus of the Panel was the commitment to ensure availability 
and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all, Sustainable 
Development Goal (SDG) 6, as well as to contribute to the achievement of 
the other SDGs that rely on the development and management of water 
resources.
On 14 March 2018 the HLPW mandate ended with the release of their 
outcome package consisting of an open letter to fellow leaders, an 
outcome document, short summaries of key initiatives undertaken by the 
Panel and a "galvanizing" video.
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/HLPWater
- - - - -
[The World Bank]*
Water Making Every Drop Count <http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water>*
Water is at the center of economic and social development: it is vital 
to maintain health, grow food, generate energy, manage the environment, 
and create jobs. Water availability and management impacts whether poor 
girls are educated, whether cities are healthy places to live, and 
whether growing industries or poor villages can withstand the impacts of 
floods or droughts...
- - - - -
However, 4.5 billion people lack safely managed sanitation services and 
2.1 billion people lack access to safely managed drinking water 
services. And water-related hazards, including floods, storms, and 
droughts, are responsible for 9 out of 10 natural disasters. Climate 
change is expected to increase this risk, in addition to placing greater 
stress on water supplies....
- - - - -
Of the 2.1 billion people who do not have access to safely managed 
water, 844 million do not have even a basic drinking water service. Of 
the 4.5 billion people who do not have safely managed sanitation, 2.3 
billion still do not have basic sanitation services. As a result, every 
year, 361,000 children under 5 years of age die due to diarrhea related 
to poor sanitation and contaminated water, which are also linked to 
transmission of diseases such as cholera, dysentery, hepatitis A, and 
typhoid.

Water supply and sanitation is just one aspect of the broad­er water 
agenda. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) build on the success of 
the last 15 years, while challenging donors and gov­ernments to address 
issues of water quality and scarcity to balance the needs of households, 
agriculture, industry, energy, and the envi­ronment over the next 15 years.

Water security is among the top global risks in terms of development 
impact. It is also an integral part to the achievement of the 
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The world will not be able to meet 
the sustainable development challenges of the 21st century  - human 
development, livable cities, climate change, food security, and energy 
security  -  without improving management of water resources and 
ensuring access to reliable water and sanitation services.
- - - - - -
Estimates show that with current population growth and water management 
practices, the world will face a 40% shortfall between forecast demand 
and available supply of water by 2030.
Today, 70% of global water withdrawals are for agriculture. Feeding 9 
billion people by 2050 will require a 60% increase in agricultural 
production and a 15% increase in water withdrawals.
The world will need more water for energy generation but already today, 
over 1.3 billion people still lack access to electricity.
More than half of the world's population now lives in urban areas. And 
the number is growing fast.
Groundwater is being depleted at a rate faster than it is being 
replenished. By 2025, about 1.8 billion people will be living in regions 
or countries with absolute water scarcity. A World Bank report published 
in May 2016 suggests that water scarcity, exacerbated by climate change, 
could cost some regions up to 6% of their GDP, spur migration, and spark 
conflict.
The combined effects of growing populations, rising incomes, and 
expanding cities will see demand for water rising exponentially, while 
supply becomes more erratic and uncertain.
Last Updated: Apr 11, 2018
http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water
- - - - - -
[Acequia is a community water course for irrigation  ]
*Effects of climate change on communally managed water systems softened 
by shared effort 
<https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180416142503.htm>*
Science Daily
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180416142503.htm
definition: Acequia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acequia>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acequia
- - - - - -
Studying the resilience of acequias
The researchers used a model based on the northern New Mexico town of 
Valdez, which is the farthest upriver of 11 acequia systems along the 
Rio Hondo. An acequia is a ditch that diverts water for farming and 
agricultural use from upland streams by using gravity and head gates. 
Acequia also refers to the community that uses and governs the ditch. 
There are about 800 acequias in northern New Mexico and southern 
Colorado. Some were originally built by Spanish colonists more than 
three centuries ago.
"These acequias have gone through multiple changes in government, from 
colonial times to modern day, and survived throughout all those social 
changes," Gunda said. "Now they are facing natural changes from climate 
change and increasing demands from downstream users."
- - - -
The research team used the two models to simulate three different 
conditions. The three scenarios compare 30-year historical stream 
outputs from 1969 to 1998 to 30-year periods in the near future (2019 to 
2048) and the far future (2069 to 2098).

In the first scenario, the acequia experiences decreased water levels 
and an earlier peak flow - the month when the acequia receives the 
greatest amount of water. The community diverts water the same amount of 
time as before, and closes its gate to let water continue downstream 
about 25 percent of the time. An acequia will close its gate to ensure 
downstream communities have sufficient access to the water based on 
standing agreements.

In the second and third scenarios, the acequia still experiences 
decreased water levels and earlier peak flows, but also faces increased 
gate closures throughout the year, amounting to 50 percent of the year 
in the second scenario, and 75 percent of the year in the third 
scenario. This is based on the likely increased pressure from downstream 
users asking their upstream neighbors to divert less water.
- - - - -
The results of the study were surprising, in the sense that agricultural 
profitability actually increased during the first scenario," Gunda said. 
"With the shift in peak stream flows to earlier in the season due to 
climate change, the acequia members were able to use that earlier water 
more productively, and it created this feedback cycle where because they 
had more access to that water, they were able to grow more crops, 
including more profitable crops, and that incentivized them to invest in 
agriculture, and that time spent in agriculture strengthened the community."

In the second and third scenarios, Gunda says agricultural profitability 
tanked, but the size of the community grew, because landowners were more 
likely to sell pieces of their parcels so new members could enter the 
community.

"We can look at the history of acequias and see that they are not very 
sensitive to shock, otherwise they wouldn't have the capacity to stay 
together for as long as they have," Gunda said. "When newcomers enter 
the community and engage in agricultural work and help maintain the 
acequia, that reinforces the bonds of the community. It gives them the 
buffer to be able to stay together long enough to adapt to the new 
conditions."

The findings show the mechanisms that strengthen community cohesion in 
acequias -- time spent doing agricultural work and maintaining the ditch 
together -- helped reinforce individual connections with the community, 
which softened the impacts of climate change and helped the acequia stay 
together.

"By taking this sociological look at the system, it helped us see some 
behaviors and how these social systems might mitigate factors that would 
otherwise pose challenges that could cause these systems to disappear," 
said Vince Tidwell, Sandia engineer and co-author of the paper.

While the study focused on acequias because of their historical 
resilience, Gunda said the findings have broader implications for 
communally-managed water systems worldwide.

    "In Sri Lanka, community cohesion is focused on kinship and passing
    down parcels of the land to your children, which perpetuates the
    connection of families to the land," Gunda said. "In Bali, the
    cohesion is focused around water temples and religious figures. All
    these different modes of community cohesion exist, and our modeling
    work shows that we really need to understand how these mechanisms
    for community cohesion can lend themselves to increased resilience
    in times of pressure. We need to understand the social structure as
    well as the physical environment."

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180416142503.htm


[from Dana Nuccitelli in TheGuardian]
*The courts are deciding who's to blame for climate change 
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/apr/16/the-courts-are-deciding-whos-to-blame-for-climate-change>*
Oil companies? The government? The public? All of the above share the blame.

    The oil companies do make a valid point that consumers share the
    blame for causing climate change. The public has been aware of the
    climate threat for over a decade – the subject was popularized in An
    Inconvenient Truth in 2006. Yet 12 years later, Americans are still
    buying gas guzzling trucks and SUVs, while hybrid and electric
    vehicles account for just 3% of new car sales.

    While the electrical grid has become cleaner due to the falling
    costs of wind, solar, and natural gas displacing coal power plants,
    Americans haven't done much to demand or spark that sort of change
    in other energy sectors. That would take climate policy, which most
    Americans (including Trump voters) support, but their support is
    shallow. It's not an issue that decides votes, so policymakers
    aren't pressured to take action.

    The fossil fuel industry certainly bears some responsibility for
    having funneled tens of millions of dollars to climate-denying think
    tanks that have worked hard to misinform the American public.
    Republican Party politicians and conservative media outlets have
    followed their lead in helping to convey that climate
    misinformation. A recent study found evidence that "Americans may
    have formed their attitudes [on climate change] by using party elite
    cues" delivered via the media. The history books will not reflect
    well on today's American conservatives.

    However, when hybrid cars have been mass produced for over 20 years
    and yet 97% of new cars sold in America are still powered
    exclusively by inefficient, polluting, 19th Century internal
    combustion engine technology, Americans as a whole are also failing
    to do their part to curb climate change.

    There's plenty of blame to go around for the mounting climate costs,
    but so far, taxpayers are footing the whole bill. There may
    eventually be a court case in which the fossil fuel industry, like
    the tobacco industry before it, is held responsible for its role in
    deceiving the American public about the dangers of carbon pollution.
    And American voters will eventually punish the Republican Party for
    its decades of climate denial and policy obstruction. Accountability
    is coming.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/apr/16/the-courts-are-deciding-whos-to-blame-for-climate-change


[video - nice explanation, very current]
*How a warmer Arctic could intensify extreme weather 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQliow4ghtU>*
Vox - Published on Apr 17, 2018
Is there a link between the vanishing Arctic sea ice and extreme weather?
Some prominent climate researchers think so. That's because warming 
temperatures in the Arctic are altering the behavior of the polar jet 
stream, a high-altitude river of air that drives weather patterns across 
the globe. As the winds that propel the jet stream weaken, storms, 
droughts, and extreme heat and cold move over continents at slower 
rates, meaning bad weather can stick around for longer.
Eli Kintisch reports aboard the Norwegian research vessel Helmer Hanssen 
about how changing conditions at the top of the world could be impacting 
weather far away.
  This video is part of a three-part series on the changing Arctic.
Part 1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msD4agiRTxM
Thanks to the Pulitzer Center for Crisis Reporting for supporting Thaw. 
You can find this video and all of Vox's videos on YouTube. Subscribe 
and stay tuned for more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQliow4ghtU
- - - - -
[Six minute video, well produced and current]
*What melting sea ice means for life in the Arctic 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msD4agiRTxM>*
Vox - Published on Apr 9, 2018
Light is flooding into the Arctic. There will be winners and losers.
That's what brought an international group of scientists to the Barents 
Sea to investigate how plant and animal life will adapt to the new normal.
Two key factors that govern the arctic ecosystem are rapidly changing: 
ice and light. The Arctic is the fastest warming place on earth, and ice 
that used to form on the surface of the ocean is vanishing. That's 
threatening species large and small that rely on it, but it's also 
created an opportunity. Less ice means more light reaches the underwater 
ecosystem, benefiting the algae that anchors it as well as apex 
predators like whales and seals.
  This video is part of a three-part series on the changing Arctic. 
Thanks to the Pulitzer Center for Crisis Reporting for supporting Thaw. 
Subscribe and stay tuned for more.
Footage and story made possible by Interdependent Pictures' documentary 
film, "Into the Dark," coming 2019. (Learn more: 
https://www.interdependentpictures.or...)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msD4agiRTxM


*In China – Solar Roads 
<https://climatecrocks.com/2018/04/17/in-china-solar-roads/>*
April 17, 2018
People get really indignant about the possibility of solar roads, but I 
think, frankly, if China decides there will be solar roads, there will 
be solar roads. - Peter Sinclair
Bloomberg:

    The road to China's autonomous-driving future is paved with solar
    panels, mapping sensors and electric-battery rechargers as the
    nation tests an "intelligent highway" that could speed the
    transformation of the global transportation industry.

    The technologies will be embedded underneath transparent concrete
    used to build a 1,080-meter-long (3,540-foot-long) stretch of road
    in the eastern city of Jinan. About 45,000 vehicles barrel over the
    section every day, and the solar panels inside generate enough
    electricity to power highway lights and 800 homes, according to
    builder Qilu Transportation Development Group Co.

    Yet Qilu Transportation wants to do more than supply juice to the
    grid: it wants the road to be just as smart as the vehicles of the
    future. The government says 10 percent of all cars should be fully
    self-driving by 2030, and Qilu considers that an opportunity to
    deliver better traffic updates, more accurate mapping and on-the-go
    recharging of electric-vehicle batteries - all from the ground up.

    "The highways we have been using can only carry vehicles passing by,
    and they are like the 1.0-generation product," said Zhou Yong, the
    company's general manager. "We're working on the 2.0 and 3.0
    generations by transplanting brains and a nervous system."

    The construction comes as President Xi Jinping's government pushes
    ahead with a "Made in China 2025" plan to help the nation become an
    advanced manufacturing power and not just a supplier of sneakers,
    clothes and toys for export. The 10 sectors highlighted include
    new-energy vehicles, information technology and robotics.

https://climatecrocks.com/2018/04/17/in-china-solar-roads/


[Opinion - audio podcast]
*Earth Is on the Verge of Collapse - Is Eco-Socialism the Only Answer? 
<https://whowhatwhy.org/2018/04/09/earth-is-on-the-verge-of-collapse-is-eco-socialism-the-only-answer/>*
A Radical View of the Existential Crisis Facing Our Environment
We are facing planet-wide extinction, a climate emergency  -  and our 
current course is suicidal.
That is the underlying belief of author and scientist Richard Smith, who 
is Jeff Schechtman's guest on this week's WhoWhatWhy podcast.
Smith believes that our current model of capitalism, with virtually 
unlimited growth and consumption, cannot sustain a planetary population 
of nine billion people. He tells Schechtman that we do not need most of 
what we consume, and that our current behavior must stop. But Smith's 
Jeremiad goes even further.
He talks about the need to stop building planes and cars, to ration air 
travel and fishing, to nationalize and take public control of the fossil 
fuel industry, to close down oil companies and many manufacturers of 
disposable consumer goods, and to make less stuff. He understands that 
this may mean putting whole industries out of business and people out of 
work, but he thinks it's the only way to keep the planet habitable for 
humans.
As just one solution, Smith talks about the need for global agreements 
on everything. That nation-states should no longer make many of the 
decisions they do now. That we need global plebiscites, a contraction or 
elimination of capitalism, and more global equality. Anything short of 
this, he argues, will bring the collapse of civilization.
It's a radical set of views, but powerful food for thought.
Smith is the author of Green Capitalism: The God That Failed (College 
Publications, 2016).
https://whowhatwhy.org/2018/04/09/earth-is-on-the-verge-of-collapse-is-eco-socialism-the-only-answer/


*This Day in Climate History - April 18, 1977 
<http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=7369>   -  from D.R. 
Tucker*
April 18, 1977: President Carter declares that the effort needed to 
avert an energy crisis is the "moral equivalent of war."
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=7369

/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
//Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html> 
//
/https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote//
///
///To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe 
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request> 
/to news digest. /

        *** Privacy and Security: * This is a text-only mailing that
        carries no images which may originate from remote servers.
        Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and
        sender.
        By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
        democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
        commercial purposes.
        To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote with subject: 
        subscribe,  To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe
        Also youmay subscribe/unsubscribe at
        https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
        Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Paulifor
        http://TheClimate.Vote delivering succinct information for
        citizens and responsible governments of all levels.   List
        membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
        restricted to this mailing list.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20180418/9ce910d7/attachment.html>


More information about the TheClimate.Vote mailing list