[TheClimate.Vote] January 31, 2018 - Daily Global Warming News Digest

[Richard Pauli]

January 31, 2018

[Pew Research Center]
*State of the Union 2018: Americans' views on key issues facing the 
nation 
<http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/01/29/state-of-the-union-2018-americans-views-on-key-issues-facing-the-nation/?utm_source=Pew+Research+Center&utm_campaign=628c6c53ca-SOTU_2018_01_30&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3e953b9b70-628c6c53ca-399506473>*
#9 Environment: While partisans agree on some assessments of what Trump 
and Congress' top priorities are,climate change and the environment 
<http://www.people-press.org/2018/01/25/economic-issues-decline-among-publics-policy-priorities/>are 
among the most divisive. Nearly seven-in-ten Democrats (68%) say dealing 
with climate change should be a top policy priority, 50 percentage 
points higher than the share of Republicans who say so (18%). And while 
81% of Democrats say protecting the environment should be a top 
priority, just 37% of Republicans say the same.
There is also an increasingly wide partisan gap when it comes 
toenvironmental laws and regulations 
<http://www.people-press.org/2017/10/05/7-global-warming-and-environmental-regulation-personal-environmentalism/#wider-partisan-gap-in-views-of-stricter-environmental-regulations>. 
In July 2017, 77% of Democrats said stricter environmental laws and 
regulations are worth the cost, while 58% of Republicans say such 
regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy...
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/01/29/state-of-the-union-2018-americans-views-on-key-issues-facing-the-nation/


[Climate? Vote!]
*Are candidates ready to face climate change? Voters are. 
<https://www.houstonchronicle.com/local/gray-matters/article/Are-candidates-ready-to-face-climate-change-12533654.php>*
Houston Chronicle
A recent forum suggests that climate change will be a factor in the next 
election
Instead, we focused on the challenges of slowing global warming and 
adapting to the impacts it's causing locally in Houston and beyond. Only 
by accepting the science of climate change can we get to the more 
interesting discussions of what to do about it. The discussion revealed 
a lot of common ...
But recent surveys debunk the misperceptions of voter apathy on climate. 
A survey by Harvard and Politico showed that Democrats rank climate 
change neck-and-neck with healthcare and Trump-Russia allegations as the 
top issues motivating their vote in 2018. Another survey showed that 
even most Republicans wanted President Trump to remain in the Paris 
Climate Agreement. That's why I've asserted climate action could be an 
issue that motivates Democrats without alienating Republicans...
The discussion revealed a lot of common ground, but also distinctions. 
All the candidates want more federal funding to recover from Hurricane 
Harvey and prepare for storms to come. And there was general agreement 
on the need to accelerate the transition to wind and solar power, clean 
up air pollution and provide commuters with alternatives to driving 
alone in gas-guzzling cars...
But the true value of the event might come less from what the voters 
learned about the candidates than from what the candidates learned from 
the voters. Simply put: We care. That message rang through loud and 
clear, from the 400 voters who showed up on a rainy Saturday afternoon 
to the thousands more who have watched the Facebook Live video online...
Whoever is elected to Congress this November, they'll know there's a 
motivated contingent of voters eager to see a more vigorous federal 
response to climate. And if we've shown that to be true in the oil patch 
of a red state, perhaps similar events elsewhere could provide a wake-up 
call to other representatives as well.
Daniel Cohan is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and 
Environmental Engineering at Rice University.
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/local/gray-matters/article/Are-candidates-ready-to-face-climate-change-12533654.php


[CNN]
*FEMA ending food and water shipments to Puerto Rico, official says 
<https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/30/us/fema-puerto-rico-food-water-shipments-end/index.html>*
By Ray Sanchez, Khushbu Shah, and Leyla Santiago
30 January 2018
(CNN) – More than four months after Hurricane Maria battered Puerto 
Rico, the Federal Emergency Management Agency is halting new shipments 
of food and water to the island, an agency official with direct 
knowledge of the plan told CNN on Tuesday.
The island government appeared blindsided by the decision, saying it was 
still in talks with FEMA on a timetable for assuming control of food and 
water distribution.
FEMA has called the island's emergency operation the longest sustained 
distribution of food, fuel and water in agency history, including more 
than $1.6 billion worth of food and more than $361 million worth of water.
New shipments of food and water will officially stop Wednesday to the US 
territory in the Caribbean, though FEMA said it has more than 46 million 
liters of water, 2 million Meals Ready to Eat and 2 million snack packs 
on the ground for distribution if needed.
"The commercial supply chain for food and water is re-established and 
private suppliers are sufficiently available that FEMA-provided 
commodities are no longer needed for emergency operations," the agency 
said in a statement.
Héctor M. Pesquera, the government's public safety secretary and state 
coordinating officer, said the transition period for local authorities 
to take over distribution should last at least two weeks.
"The Government … is waiting for critical data provided by FEMA in order 
to determine when the responsibilities should be transferred from FEMA 
to the Government of Puerto Rico," Pesquera said in a statement.
"This has not happened yet and we were not informed that supplies would 
stop arriving, nor did the Government of Puerto Rico authorize this 
action."
San Juan Mayor Carmen Yulin Cruz, a frequent critic of the federal 
response to the devastating September hurricane, reacted to the decision 
on Twitter, asking in Spanish, "Seriously, are they leaving?"
"This is the kind of indifference that must be stopped.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/30/us/fema-puerto-rico-food-water-shipments-end/index.html


*Bill Nye's State of the Union attendance draws ire 
<https://www.seattlepi.com/local/seattlenews/article/Bill-Nye-s-State-of-the-Union-attendance-draws-ire-12537321.php>*
Bill Nye the Science Guy is headed to the State of the Uniom – er, 
Union. And folks are not happy...
  He'll be attending as a guest of Rep. Jim Bridenstine, R-Okla., the 
congressman nominated to take over NASA.
As with most Trump nominees, Bridenstine comes with some baggage: 
Historically a staunch denier of climate change, he has reversed course 
and acknowledged that it has contributed to global warming (although he 
has yet to admit that it's a primary cause)...
"President Donald Trump is a bigoted climate denier. So is Congressman 
Jim Bridenstine," the petition, which surpassed its goal of 35,000 
signatures, reads. "So why is Bill Nye "very pleased" to be 
Bridenstine's guest at Trump's first State of the Union address? ...
Nye, however, has stuck to his guns on attending, making it explicit 
that his intention was to further the agenda of The Planetary Society, 
which was founded by Carl Sagan to promote human exploration of the 
cosmos, and not as an endorsement of climate change denial, tacit or 
otherwise.
https://www.seattlepi.com/local/seattlenews/article/Bill-Nye-s-State-of-the-Union-attendance-draws-ire-12537321.php


[NYT video CLIMATE CHANGE]
*Billion-Dollar Storms: Is This the New Normal? 
<https://youtu.be/_HbNPqBX9nw>*
By DEBORAH ACOSTA
In 2017 the U.S. saw some of the strongest and most expensive storms in 
history. As global temperatures continue to rise, things will get worse 
and more costly.
https://youtu.be/_HbNPqBX9nw


[Pruitt testimony]
*Oversight Hearing to Receive Testimony from Environmental Protection 
Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt 
<https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings?ID=8E3E883C-477F-4A6A-9F1E-1DDAADBDAF32>*
January 30, 2018 10:00 AM (EST)
The Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works will hold a full 
committee hearing entitled, "Oversight Hearing to Receive Testimony from 
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt."
https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings?ID=8E3E883C-477F-4A6A-9F1E-1DDAADBDAF32
-
*Scott Pruitt Closely Monitored Scrubbing of EPA Climate Websites, 
Emails Show 
<https://insideclimatenews.org/news/29012018/scott-pruitt-epa-climate-websites-erased-emails-reveal-close-involvement-clean-power-plan>*
Documents show Pruitt targeted information about the Clean Power Plan 
while preparing to rescind it. Environment groups are now calling for 
him to recuse himself.
By Neela Banerjee
Shortly after arriving at the Environmental Protection Agency, 
Administrator Scott Pruitt took a personal interest in and closely 
monitored the removal of extensive information from his agency's website 
that explained to the public the federal effort to cut greenhouse gas 
emissions under the Clean Power Plan, according to newly released EPA 
documents.
The scrubbing of the information from EPA's website on April 28, 2017, 
preceded by six months Pruitt's formal proposal to rescind the rule, 
which had been issued by the Obama administration. The Clean Power Plan 
(CPP) <https://insideclimatenews.org/tags/clean-power-plan>information 
from the previous administration is in an archived EPA website 
<https://archive.epa.gov/epa/cleanpowerplan.html>....
"People should be able to go to the EPA website and look for the Clean 
Power Plan and for EPA's own information about it, and most people 
wouldn't realize the extent of what has been removed," Levitan said. 
"This regulation is still on the books, and the agency is simultaneously 
soliciting public comment on its repeal and obscuring the information 
people would need to make informed comments."..
On Monday, the Environmental Defense Fund and 11 other environmental and 
legal groups called for Pruitt to recuse himself 
<http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/files/2018/01/Comments-on-Proposed-Repeal-of-Clean-Power-Plan-with-Appendix-2.pdf>from 
the final decision on the CPP on the grounds that his comments and 
actions in office indicated that he had already decided to scrap the 
rule, regardless of what the public would say...
The newly released internal documents 
<https://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/2017.12.08-partial-production.pdf> 
consist of emails among EPA's communications team, including staff and 
contractors responsible for the website...
Pruitt isscheduled to testify 
<https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings?ID=8E3E883C-477F-4A6A-9F1E-1DDAADBDAF32>before 
the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee at 10 a.m. Eastern 
Time on Tuesday, Jan. 30, his first appearance before the committee 
since his confirmation in 2017. He testified 
<https://insideclimatenews.org/news/07122017/scott-pruitt-epa-testimony-congress-hearing-climate-clean-power-plan-red-team-fossil-fuel-lobby> 
before a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee in December and was 
pressed about the growing influence within the EPA of the industries the 
agency is tasked with regulating.
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/29012018/scott-pruitt-epa-climate-websites-erased-emails-reveal-close-involvement-clean-power-plan


[Climate Liability News]
*Colorado Fracking Case Could Force State to Protect Climate 
<https://www.climateliabilitynews.org/2018/01/30/colorado-court-climate-appeal-fracking-rules/>*
The Colorado Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal in a case that 
could force the oil and gas industry to prove that new drilling and 
fracking in the state won't contribute to climate change, harm the 
environment or endanger public health.
The appeal arises from a dispute between a group of teenagers and the 
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC). The teens proposed 
a rule to the commission in 2013 that would require companies to prove 
that new drilling won't "impair Colorado's atmosphere, water, wildlife, 
and land resources, adversely impact human health and does not 
contribute to climate change."
In its response to the petition, the COGCC said it did not have the 
authority to approve the proposal. It said much of what was proposed 
involved air quality and falls outside its jurisdiction. It also said 
"such a rule is beyond the Commission's limited statutory authority 
under the Oil and Gas Conservation Act."
The young people say the commission has the authority, but is lacking 
the will...
https://www.climateliabilitynews.org/2018/01/30/colorado-court-climate-appeal-fracking-rules/


[Communications Handbook for IPCC scientists] 
<https://climateoutreach.org/resources/ipcc-communications-handbook/>
*Climate's Not Going to Communicate itself. Tips for Effective Comms 
<https://climatecrocks.com/2018/01/30/climates-not-going-to-communicate-itself-tips-for-effective-comms/>*
New handbook on climate communication from the IPCC has been released.
It follows the basic principles that those on the front lines have 
worked out over the past few decades.

    Be Confident – people will trust you more if you use an authentic
    voice...
    Talk about the real world, not abstractions...
    Connect with what matters to your audience...
    Tell a human scale story – show the human face of science – your own
    story, perhaps...
    Lead with the knowns, not the uncertainty...
    Use effective visual communication – focus on the human side of the
    equation...

The greatest advances have not been on the science, but on how we get 
the mass of people to understand it –
https://climateoutreach.org/resources/ipcc-communications-handbook/
https://climatecrocks.com/2018/01/30/climates-not-going-to-communicate-itself-tips-for-effective-comms/
-
[Webinar]
*Webinar: The IPCC and the science of climate change communication 
<https://records.climateoutreach.org.uk/civicrm/event/info?reset=1&id=104>*
REGISTER NOW
Climate Outreach was commissioned by the Intergovernmental Panel on 
Climate Change Working Group I Technical Support Unit to produce a 
communications Handbook. This is the first time such guidance has been 
produced for the world's leading authority on climate change science.
With a wealth of research on the science of climate change communication 
and a focus on practical tips and case studies, this Handbook serves as 
a valuable resource for IPCC authors - as well as the wider scientific 
community - to engage audiences with climate change.
The Handbook sets out 6 evidence-based, practical principles for 
effective public engagement.
In this webinar, Dr Adam Corner (Research Director, Climate Outreach) 
will present key insight from the Handbook, following an introduction by 
Dr Roz Pidcock (Head of Communication, IPCC WG1). There will also be 
time for a discussion with participants.
When  5 February 2018 15:00   to   16:00 (gmt?)
https://records.climateoutreach.org.uk/civicrm/event/info?reset=1&id=104


[Monbiot, in the Guardian]
*System Failure <http://www.monbiot.com/2018/01/29/system-failure/>*
Is complex society on the brink of collapse? 
<http://www.monbiot.com/2018/01/29/system-failure/>
By George Monbiot, published in the Guardian 24th January 2018
It's a good question, but it seems too narrow. "Is Western civilisation 
on the brink of collapse?",the lead article in this week's New Scientist 
<https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23731610-300-end-of-days-is-western-civilisation-on-the-brink-of-collapse/>asks. 
The answer is probably. But why just Western?
Yes, certain Western governments are engaged in a frenzy of 
self-destruction. In an age of phenomenal complexity and interlocking 
crises, the Trump administration has embarked on a mass deskilling and 
simplification of the state. Donald Trump might have sacked his 
strategist Steve Bannon, but Bannon's professed intention,"the 
deconstruction of the administrative state" 
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/top-wh-strategist-vows-a-daily-fight-for-deconstruction-of-the-administrative-state/2017/02/23/03f6b8da-f9ea-11e6-bf01-d47f8cf9b643_story.html?utm_term=.60d8f057b737>, 
remains the central – perhaps the only – policy.
Defunding departments, disbanding the teams and dismissing the experts 
they rely on, shutting down research programmes, maligning the civil 
servants who remain in post, the self-hating state isripping down the 
very apparatus of government 
<https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/nov/07/donald-trump-dismantling-american-administrative-state>. 
At the same time, it is destroying the public protections that defend us 
from disaster.
A series of studies published in the past few months have started to 
explore the wider impact of pollutants. One,published in the British 
Medical Journal <http://www.bmj.com/content/359/bmj.j5299>, suggests 
that the exposure of unborn children to air pollution in cities is 
causing "something approaching a public health catastrophe 
<http://www.bmj.com/content/359/bmj.j5511>". Pollution in the womb is 
now linked to low birth weight, disruption of the baby's lung and brain 
development, and a series of debilitating and fatal diseases in later life.
Another report,published in the Lancet 
<http://www.thelancet.com/commissions/pollution-and-health>, suggests 
that three times as many deaths are caused by pollution as by AIDS, 
malaria and tuberculosis combined. Pollution, the authors note, 
now"threatens the continuing survival of human societies." 
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/oct/19/global-pollution-kills-millions-threatens-survival-human-societies>Acollection 
of articles in the journal PLOS Biology 
<http://collections.plos.org/challenges-in-environmental-health>reveals 
that there is no reliable safety data on most of the 85,000 synthetic 
chemicals to which we may be exposed. While hundreds of these chemicals 
"contaminate the blood and urine of nearly every person tested 
<http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2004814>", 
and the volume of materials containing them rises every year, we have no 
idea what the likely impacts may be, either singly or in combination.
As if in response to such findings, the Trump government has 
systematicallydestroyed the integrity of the Environmental Protection 
Agency 
<https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/10/us/politics/pollution-epa-regulations.html>,ripped 
up the Clean Power Plan 
<https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trump-administration-is-repealing-obamas-clean-power-plan/>,vitiated 
environmental standards for motor vehicles 
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jan/01/vehicles-climate-change-emissions-trump-administration>,reversed 
the ban on chlorpyrifos 
<http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2003671>(a 
pesticide now linked to the impairment of cognitive and behavioural 
function in children), and rescindeda remarkable list of similar public 
protections 
<https://www.brookings.edu/interactives/tracking-deregulation-in-the-trump-era/>.
_I_n the UK, successive governments have also curtailed their ability to 
respond to crises. One of David Cameron's first acts on taking office 
was to shut down the government's early warning systems: the Royal 
Commission on Environmental Pollution and the Sustainable Development 
Commission. He did not want to hear what they were telling him. Sack the 
impartial advisers and replace them with toadies: this has preceded the 
fall of empires many times before. Now, as we detach ourselves from the 
European Union, we degrade our capacity to solve the problems that 
transcend our borders.
But these pathologies are not confined to "the West". The rise of 
demagoguery (the pursuit of simplistic solutions to complex problems, 
accompanied by the dismantling of the protective state) is everywhere 
apparent. Environmental breakdown is accelerating worldwide. 
Theannihilation of vertebrate populations 
<http://m.pnas.org/content/114/30/E6089.full>,Insectageddon 
<https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/20/insectageddon-farming-catastrophe-climate-breakdown-insect-populations>,the 
erasure of rainforests 
<https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2017/jan/23/destroying-rainforests-quickly-gone-100-years-deforestation>, 
mangroves,soil 
<https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/25/treating-soil-like-dirt-fatal-mistake-human-life>, 
aquifers, the degradation of entire Earth systems, such as the 
atmosphere and the oceans, proceed at astonishing rates. These 
interlocking crises will affect everyone, but the poorer nations are hit 
first and worst.
The forces that threaten to destroy our well-being are also everywhere 
the same: primarily the lobbying power of big business and big money, 
that perceive the administrative state as an impediment to their 
immediate interests. Amplified by the persuasive power of campaign 
finance,covertly-funded thinktanks 
<http://www.transparify.org/publications-main/>, embedded journalists 
and tame academics, these forces threaten to overwhelm democracy. If you 
want to know how they work, readJane Mayer's book Dark Money 
<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/17/dark-money-review-nazi-oil-the-koch-brothers-and-a-rightwing-revolution>.
Up to a certain point, connectivity increases resilience. For example, 
if local food supplies fail, regional or global markets allow us to draw 
on production elsewhere. But beyond a certain level, connectivity and 
complexitythreaten to become unmanageable 
<https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/The_Collapse_of_Complex_Societies.html?id=M4H-02d9oE0C&redir_esc=y>. 
The emergent properties of the system, combined with the inability of 
the human brain to encompass it, could spread crises rather than contain 
them. We are in danger of pulling each other down. New Scientist should 
have asked "is complex society on the brink of collapse?".
Complex societies have collapsed many times before. We live in a sort of 
civilisational interglacial, a brief respite from social entropy. It has 
always been a question of when, not if. But "when" is beginning to look 
like "soon".
The collapse of states and social complexity has not always been a bad 
thing. As James C Scott points out inhis fascinating book Against the 
Grain 
<https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/nov/25/against-the-grain-by-james-c-scott-review>, 
the dissolution of the earliest states, that were founded on slavery and 
coercion, is likely to have been experienced by many people as an 
emancipation. When centralised power began to collapse, through 
epidemics, crop failure, floods, soil erosion or the self-destructive 
perversities of government, its corralled subjects would take the chance 
to flee. In many cases they joined the "barbarians".
This so-called "secondary primitivism", Scott notes, "may well have been 
experienced as a marked improvement in safety, nutrition and social 
order. Becoming a barbarian was often a bid to improve one's lot." The 
dark ages that inexorably followed the glory and grandeur of the state 
may, in that era, have been the best times to be alive.
But today there is nowhere to turn. The wild lands and rich ecosystems 
that once supported hunter gatherers, nomads and the refugees from 
imploding early states who joined themnow scarcely exist 
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/21/losing-the-wilderness-a-tenth-has-gone-since-1992-and-gone-for-good>. 
Only a tiny fraction of the current population could survive a return to 
the barbarian life. (Consider that, according to one estimate, the 
maximum population of Britain during the Mesolithic, when people 
survived by hunting and gathering, was 5000). In the nominally 
democratic era, the complex state is now, for all its flaws, all that 
stands between us and disaster.
So what we do? Next week, barring upsets, I will propose a new way 
forward. The path we now follow is not the path we have to take.
http://www.monbiot.com/2018/01/29/system-failure/


*Trump's Top Environment Pick, a Fossil Fuels Evangelist, May Be in 
Trouble 
<https://insideclimatenews.org/news/29012018/kathleen-hartnett-white-climate-denial-nomination-trump-ceq-trouble>*
<https://insideclimatenews.org/news/29012018/kathleen-hartnett-white-climate-denial-nomination-trump-ceq-trouble>Kathleen 
Hartnett White's past actions in Texas involving radiation in drinking 
water and opposition to ethanol could turn Republicans against her.
(T)he former Texas regulator who has extolled the social benefits of 
carbon dioxide and asserted that coal helped end slavery, faces a 
difficult road to Senate confirmation as top White House environmental 
adviser, according to lobbyists and Capitol Hill sources.
They say that White, still awaiting a committee vote that has yet to be 
scheduled, is the most endangered of President Donald Trump's 
environmental nominees. Her embattled bid to chair the Council on 
Environmental Quality underscores larger problems for the White House in 
filling key roles throughout the federal government...
But the most memorable exchange of the hearing was her halting parry of 
a series of ocean science questions lobbed by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse 
(D-R.I.). She said she didn't know about ocean absorption of heat or 
carbon or even whether the law of thermodynamics applied to 
seawater(starting at 4:50 in the video below and at 9:40). 
<https://youtu.be/-nieQU8J_S8> "I do not have any kind of expertise or 
even much layman study of the ocean dynamics and climate change issues," 
she said.
YouTube Whitehouse Remarks in EPW Hearing on Harnett White and Wheeler 
EPA Nominations <https://youtu.be/-nieQU8J_S8>
https://youtu.be/-nieQU8J_S8
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/29012018/kathleen-hartnett-white-climate-denial-nomination-trump-ceq-trouble


[video humor]
*Stephen Colbert Lie-Checks Trump's Climate Change Claim 
<https://youtu.be/RQRL2kHygIs?t=2m12s>*
Fun fact, nothing he said there is a fact.
All of it, all lies, right, all lies.
Climates first of all, climate change is a term made up by lobbyists to 
make global warming sound less bad.
And second it's not getting too cold all over the place.
Last year was again one of the hottest on record.
The ice caps are not only setting records for "most least ice cap",
but now because he's president the ice caps are suddenly growing again?.
"Yes under me, everything white is doing great."
https://youtu.be/RQRL2kHygIs?t=2m12s


*This Day in Climate History January 31, 2001 
<http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/government/whitman-bio.html> 
-  from D.R. Tucker*
January 31, 2001: Christine Todd Whitman is sworn in as President
George W. Bush's first EPA Administrator, beginning a short and
controversial tenure that would end in June 2003. In her 2005 book
"It's My Party, Too," Whitman chronicles her conflicts with other Bush
administration officials (most notably Vice President Dick Cheney),
and notes that the administration paid little if any attention to the
problem of climate change.
http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/government/whitman-bio.html
/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
//Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html> 
//
/https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote//
///
Send email to subscribe <a%20href=%22mailto:contact at theClimate.Vote%22> 
to news clippings. /

        *** Privacy and Security: * This is a text-only mailing that
        carries no images which may originate from remote servers.
        Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and
        sender.
        By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
        democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
        commercial purposes.
        To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote with subject: 
        subscribe,  To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe
        Also youmay subscribe/unsubscribe at
        https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
        Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Paulifor
        http://TheClimate.Vote delivering succinct information for
        citizens and responsible governments of all levels.   List
        membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
        restricted to this mailing list.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20180131/c0aa1119/attachment.html>