[TheClimate.Vote] August 7, 2019 - Daily Global Warming News Digest

Richard Pauli richard at theclimate.vote
Wed Aug 7 09:00:21 EDT 2019


/August 7, 2019/

[in the Financial Times]
*Climate change: how the jet stream is changing your weather*
Northern Atlantic current is shifting course -- with implications for 
crops and sea levels

At the summit of the Greenland ice cap the temperature rarely rises 
above zero degrees centigrade -- the elevation is 3,200m and the ice 
below is more than a mile thick.

But last Friday, as the sun beat down, a small weather station laden 
with sensors captured something highly unusual: the temperature crept 
past zero and up to 3.6C -- the highest since records began three 
decades ago. As temperatures rose across the massive ice sheet, which 
blankets an area five times the size of Germany, around 60 per cent of 
the surface started to melt, one of the largest ever recorded.

Scientists know of only three prior occasions in the past 800 years when 
there has been melting at the very top of the ice cap, which is kept 
chilled by the large volume of ice beneath. But this seems to be getting 
more frequent -- it is now the second time this decade it has 
happened... [more]
https://www.ft.com/content/591395fe-b761-11e9-96bd-8e884d3ea203?accessToken=zwAAAWxor-5Akc9ZE5X-t2ER6dOWvY6ITT6iAw.MEUCIHlbBhSWg1qnrn1MT3Q-xIfEZP8TZRsBc7LqfMaTSpOsAiEAk4uwnrhfJv5dQamOFGOYUEArCqk7on01Fj40AMwyenM&sharetype=gift?token=9ad8d0b9-1312-480a-875e-e2d8be4c7bbb



[Congealing Climate Journalism]
*A new commitment to covering the climate story*
By Mark Hertsgaard and Kyle Pope
JULY 26, 2019
More than 60 news outlets sign on for #CoveringClimateNow
"CAN WE TELL THE STORY so people get it?"
That's the mission TV newsman Bill Moyers urged at the launch of 
Covering Climate Now, a project aimed at breaking the climate silence 
that has long prevailed within too much of the news media. Co-founded by 
The Nation and the Columbia Journalism Review, in partnership with The 
Guardian, Covering Climate Now aims  to convene and inform a 
conversation among journalists about how all news outlets--big and 
small, digital and print, TV and radio, US-based and abroad--can do 
justice to the defining story of our time.

Today, Covering Climate Now is proud to announce the first batch of news 
outlets participating in this effort. More than 60 outlets have signed 
on so far, with more on the way. There are TV networks (CBS News) and 
local TV stations; major newspapers in the US (The Philadelphia 
Inquirer, Minneapolis Star Tribune, San Francisco Chronicle, Seattle 
Times) and abroad (Asahi Shimbun and la Repubblica, the biggest 
newspapers in Japan and Italy, respectively); eminent specialist 
publications (Nature, Scientific American, InsideClimate News, Harvard 
Business Review); distinguished digital publications (HuffPost, Vox, The 
Intercept, Slate); regional outlets (The Texas Observer, Colorado 
Springs Gazette); public radio stations (in New York City; Washington, 
DC; Chicago; Philadelphia; Boston; New Orleans; Louisville; and San 
Francisco) and public-radio programs (Marketplace, Science Friday, The 
World); popular magazines (Maclean's of Canada, Newsweek Japan); leading 
individual and institutional voices (author Bill McKibben; the radio and 
TV program Democracy Now!; Channel 4 UK correspondent Alex Thomson; 
veteran TV meteorologists Dan Satterfield, Mike Nelson, and Paul Gross); 
and many more.

Each of these outlets has committed to running one week of focused 
climate coverage, to begin September 16 and culminate September 23, the 
day of the landmark international Climate Action Summit hosted by UN 
Secretary General Antonio Guterres in New York. We're not here to tell 
people what to write or broadcast. All that's required is for each 
outlet to make a good faith effort to increase the amount and the 
visibility of its climate coverage--to make it clear to their audiences 
that climate change is not just one more story but the overriding story 
of our time. The point is to give the climate story the attention and 
prominence that scientists have long said it demands so that the public 
and policymakers can make wise choices. Can we, in other words, tell the 
story so people get it?

We see Covering Climate Now as a fulfillment of journalism's most sacred 
responsibilities, which are to inform people and foster constructive 
debate about common challenges and opportunities. Arguably, no problem 
in today's world is more challenging, or offers brighter opportunities. 
In a report last October, scientists with the UN's Intergovernmental 
Panel on Climate Change warned that humanity had just 12 years to slash 
heat-trapping emissions in half or else face catastrophic temperature 
rise and the record-breaking extreme weather it unleashes. Meanwhile, 
spectacular advances in solar, wind and energy efficiency illustrate how 
doing right by the climate can make our societies better, not worse, if 
we're smart about it.

To elevate climate coverage is no more of a value judgment than it is to 
sideline such coverage. For many years now, most of the news media, at 
least in the US, has done the latter. The major TV networks devoted more 
air time in a week this spring to a new royal baby in Britain than they 
did in the entire year to the climatestory. When last October's IPCC 
report was released, 28 of the 50 biggest newspapers in the US didn't 
bother to tell their readers about it.

Here are the names of the journalistic leaders that have signed on to 
the Covering Climate Now initiative. If you don't see your favorite news 
outlets among them, ask those outlets to get in touch with us. We would 
welcome their participation.

We can be reached at coveringclimatenow at cjr.org

List (as of July 25, 2019)
*Print & Online Newspapers and Magazines:*

    The Columbia Journalism Review
    The Nation
    The Guardian
    The Philadelphia Inquirer/Philly.com
    HuffPost
    The Minneapolis Star Tribune
    Nature (UK)
    Scientific American
    The Conversation (UK)
    Asahi Shimbun (Japan)
    la Repubblica (Italy)
    Newsweek Japan (Japan)
    The Seattle Times
    Vox
    Slate
    The Intercept
    The Texas Observer
    The Coast (Canada)
    Harvard Business Review
    The (Colorado Springs) Gazette
    The Nepali Times (Nepal)
    CQ & Roll Call
    Mongabay
    Maclean's (Canada)
    National Catholic Reporter
    Yale Climate Connections
    Clean Energy Wire (Germany)
    IEEE Spectrum
    Talking Points Memo
    The Alpinist
    Rock and Ice
    La Tercera (Chile)
    Stuff (New Zealand)
    Newsroom (New Zealand)
    The Spinoff (New Zealand)
    Literary Hub
    Ecosystem Marketplace
    Renewable Energy World
    Ensia
    Jolon Indian Media
    Croakey Health Media (Australia)
    Planet Friendly News (Canada)
    San Francisco Chronicle
    Bay Nature
    Sludge
    The Shoestring
    The Junction (Australia)
    The Tyee
    InsideClimateNews
    Nexus Media

*TV & Radio*:

    CBS News (national)
    WNYC (public radio station for New York City area)
    WHYY (public radio station for Philadelphia area)
    WAMU (public radio station for Washington, DC, area)
    WBEZ (public radio station for Chicago area)
    WBUR (public radio station for Boston area)
    WFPL (public radio station for Louisville, KY area)
    WWNO (public radio station for New Orleans area)
    KQED (public radio station for San Francisco Bay area)
    Marketplace, daily business show of American Public Media
    The World, daily global news show of PRI and BBC
    Science Friday, public radio news program distributed by WNYC Studios
    Dan Satterfield, chief meteorologist, WBOC-TV, CBS affiliate in
    Salisbury, Maryland
    Mike Nelson, chief meteorologist, Channel 7 Denver, ABC affiliate in
    Denver
    Paul Gross, chief meteorologist, WDIV, NBC affiliate in Detroit
    The Years Project/Years Of Living Dangerously
    Politically Aweh, TV news show (South Africa)
    Elemental: Covering Sustainability (regional collaborative of PBS
    and NPR stations in Denver, Phoenix and Los Angeles)
    Democracy Now! (national radio and TV show)
    The Global GoalsCast

*Independent Journalists (outlets listed for identification purposes only):*

    Bill McKibben, writer
    David Biello, TED Talks
    Alex Thomson, chief correspondent, Channel 4 News (UK)
    Yereth Rosen, formerly Anchorage Daily News
    Rex Dalton, formerly Nature
    Isabel Seta (Brazil)
    Michael Tatarski (Vietnam)
    Sean Holman (Canada)
    Nivedita Khandekar (India)
    Preti Jha (Singapore)
    Don Paul, contributing meteorologist, The Buffalo News
    Peter Schwartzstein, freelance Middle East environment correspondent

*Institutions:*

    Climate Matters (Climate Central, George Mason University Center for
    Climate Communications, and Climate Communications)
    Solutions Journalism Network
    Boston University
    The Lancet Countdown On Climate Change and Health

Mark Hertsgaard and Kyle Pope are the authors. Mark Hertsgaard, The 
Nation's environment correspondent, has covered climate change since 
1989. His books include On Bended Knee: The Press And The Reagan 
Presidency, Earth Odyssey: Around The World In Search Of Our 
Environmental Future, and HOT: Living Through The Next Fifty Years On 
Earth. Kyle Pope is the editor and publisher of Columbia Journalism Review.
https://www.cjr.org/covering_climate_now/covering-climate-partnerships.php



[audio and text ]
*Critics challenge insurance companies over contributions to climate change*
The industry has invested hundreds of billions of dollars in fossil fuel 
companies.
As seas rise and weather becomes more extreme, insurance companies are 
raising premiums for some customers in vulnerable areas. But paradoxically …

Sulakshana: "While they're acknowledging these impacts, they're also 
fueling the climate crisis."

Elana Sulakshana of the Rainforest Action Network says the industry 
provides insurance that protects fossil fuel projects, for example, 
pipelines and coal-fired power plants.

And their involvement does not end there. Many insurers also invest in 
fossil fuels.

Sulakshana: "These companies collect premiums and they put that money 
into the stock market. They invest it. And it's estimated that they have 
more than $500 billion dollars invested in coal, oil, and gas companies. 
So it's really a massive scale of investment in the fossil fuel industry 
as well."

So the Rainforest Action Network is part of the Insure Our Future 
campaign. It calls on insurers to stop insuring or investing in coal or 
tar sands projects.

Sulakshana says the campaign is gaining support.

Sulakshana: "Cities, universities, foundations, nonprofits are 
increasingly saying to their insurers: are you investing in or insuring 
fossil fuels? We want to be working with a company that isn't.'"
Reporting credit: Stephanie Manuzak/ChavoBart Digital Media
https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2019/08/critics-challenge-insurance-companies-over-contributions-to-climate-change/


[Video discussion 27 min]
*Dr. Peter Wadhams: Arctic Research & the Methane Risk*
UPFSI
Published on Jul 21, 2019
Peter Wadhams is back on ScientistsWarning.TV with a comprehensive 
analysis of the reticent approach that part of the scientific community 
has been taking toward the potentially very dangerous methane hydrate 
situation in shallow Arctic sea waters, in this conversation recorded in 
March of 2019.

I brought to his attention a video that had been put together by Yale 
Climate Connections in January 2019, which took the position that there 
really wasn't too much to worry about in terms of a potential Arctic 
methane release.  Not fully trusting the video's assertions, I wanted 
Dr. Wadhams' take on it.  The conversation touched upon several areas 
where science and scientists are not as objective as they should be.

Apparently the situation with methane in the Arctic permafrost, both 
land based, and in this case sub-sea in the Arctic Ocean, is such an 
immense potential game-changer that it is provoking willful ignorance 
among many scientists and policy makers.

Dr. Wadhams also notes that a proper risk analysis of methane outbreak 
at various levels has been missing so far, but should be conducted now 
as a high priority task.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3L0R6LzEUE

- -

[YouTube Channel]
*CLimateMatter.TV and Scientist Warning .TV*
Description
Faith and science are two of the most influential forces in global 
society. The United Planet Faith & Science Initiative unites prominent 
religious figures and leading scientists to speak out together and 
mobilize action for ecological sustainability.

The UPFSI is a project that holds low-impact, web-based meetings of 
eminent scientists and faith leaders from across the globe.  Lately our 
focus has been mostly on the 'science' part since governments too easily 
brush aside the words of spiritual conscience.

Our conversations are edited into short, powerful videos and shared 
through social media and news outlets to promote public awareness, 
political will, policy, and action.  Nobel Laureate Archbishop Desmond 
Tutu and prominent climatologist Dr. James Hansen are among the founding 
members of this Initiative.
Read more about us here:
http://www.upfsi.org/ United Faith & Science Initiative
https://www.youtube.com/c/UPFSI


*This Day in Climate History - August 7, 2009 - from D.R. Tucker*
August 7, 2009: The New York Times reports:
*Climate Bill Is Threatened by Senators*

    By JOHN M. BRODERAUG. 6, 2009
    WASHINGTON -- Ten moderate Senate Democrats from states dependent on
    coal and manufacturing sent a letter to President Obama on Thursday
    saying they would not support any climate change bill that did not
    protect American industries from competition from countries that did
    not impose similar restraints on climate-altering gases.

    The letter warned that strong actions to limit emissions of carbon
    dioxide and other heat-trapping gases would add to the cost of goods
    like steel, cement, paper and aluminum. Unless other countries adopt
    similar emission limits, the senators warned, jobs will migrate
    overseas and foreign manufacturers will have a decided cost advantage.

    "As Congress considers energy and climate legislation," the senators
    wrote, "it is important that such a bill include provisions to
    maintain a level playing field for American manufacturing."

    "It is essential that any clean energy legislation not only address
    the crisis of climate change, but include strong provisions to
    ensure the strength and viability of domestic manufacturing," the
    letter said.

    The 10 senators are seen as crucial undecided votes in the Senate
    debate on climate legislation. The House narrowly passed a climate
    bill in late June, but the Senate is moving slowly, in part because
    it is preoccupied with health care legislation.

    The senators represent Midwestern and coal-producing states from
    which many of the 44 Democrats who voted against the measure in the
    House come from. Without their support, it is unlikely that the
    Senate can pass a major climate change bill.

    Get what you need to know to start your day in the United States,
    Canada and the Americas, delivered to your inbox.
    You will receive emails containing news content, updates and
    promotions from The New York Times. You may opt-out at any time.

    The 10 senators were Evan Bayh of Indiana; Sherrod Brown of Ohio;
    Robert C. Byrd and John D. Rockefeller IV of West Virginia; Bob
    Casey and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania; Russ Feingold of Wisconsin;
    Al Franken of Minnesota; and Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow of Michigan.

    They called for transition aid for energy-intensive manufacturers in
    the form of rebates on their energy costs; negotiation of a strong
    international agreement on emissions; programs to monitor emissions
    in other countries; and significant financing for clean energy
    technology.

    The authors also proposed "border adjustments," tariffs, on goods
    from countries that do not agree to an international program for
    carbon dioxide reductions. The House bill gives the president the
    power to impose such penalties on goods from countries that do not
    adhere to an international climate change regime.

    "Climate change is a reality and the world cannot afford inaction,"
    the senators wrote. "However, we must not engage in a self-defeating
    effort that displaces greenhouse gas emissions rather than reducing
    them and displaces U.S. jobs rather than bolstering them."

    In an interview shortly after the House vote, President Obama said
    he was concerned about the tariff provision of the House bill,
    calling it potentially protectionist.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/07/us/politics/07climate.html
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/

/Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html> 
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote

/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe 
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request> 
to news digest./

*** Privacy and Security:*This is a text-only mailing that carries no 
images which may originate from remote servers. Text-only messages 
provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for democratic 
and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial purposes.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote 
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, 
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at 
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for 
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct 
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List 
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to 
this mailing list.



More information about the TheClimate.Vote mailing list