[TheClimate.Vote] January 30, 2019 - Daily Global Warming News Digest
Richard Pauli
richard at theclimate.vote
Wed Jan 30 09:50:43 EST 2019
/January 30, 2019/
[BBC understands the Arctic Vortex]
*US shivers in 'once-in-a-generation' polar vortex*
Deadly cold weather has brought what meteorologists call a
"once-in-a-generation" deep freeze to the US.
The extreme Arctic blasts, caused by a spinning pool of cold air known
as the polar vortex, could bring wind chill temperatures as low as -53C
(-64F)...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47047089
[Six months? That means in July-August heatwaves, a serious moratorium
more likely]
*King County Council approves 6-month moratorium on major fossil-fuel
facilities*
The King County Council on Monday approved a six-month moratorium on
building or expanding major fossil-fuel infrastructure, joining other
local governments in the Northwest with similar measures that aim to use
local zoning laws to restrict fossil-fuel pipelines, storage facilities
and other infrastructure.
The ordinance, introduced by Councilmember Dave Upthegrove, disallows
permitting for fossil-fuel projects in unincorporated King County. It
also directs the county executive's office to produce a survey of
existing facilities, study those facilities' impacts on communities,
analyze the existing regulations that apply to them, recommend changes
to regulations and permitting, and evaluate county-owned facilities for
health impacts. The ordinance also declares a state of emergency.
"Reducing the pollution that causes climate change is quite possibly the
greatest moral imperative facing my generation," said Upthegrove. "Our
action makes it clear, here in King County, our future is not fossil
fuels but a clean-energy future."
The moratorium is fairly limited. The ordinance does not apply to gas
stations or other fossil-fuel products sold directly to consumers. It
does not disallow existing infrastructure or directly address rail lines
or pipelines, which are regulated by the federal government. It excludes
fuel storage for airports, marine servicing facilities and railyards...
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/king-county-council-approves-6-month-moratorium-on-major-fossil-fuel-facilities/
- - -
[television coverage video]
*King County Council passes 6-month moratorium on fossil fuel facilities*
https://www.king5.com/video/tech/science/environment/king-county-council-passes-6-month-moratorium-on-fossil-fuel-facilities/281-24acb0c6-a0fd-4a75-94b0-5d13a8b1eb3b?jwsource=cl
[go figure]
*Americans are worried about climate change -- but don't want to pay
much to fix it*
The rhetoric around climate change is shifting, but it's not leading to
action.
https://www.vox.com/2019/1/28/18197262/climate-change-poll-public-opinion-carbon-tax
[Sierra Club points of Optimism]
*10 Reasons to Feel Hopeful About Climate Change in 2019*
Humanity's on the brink, but signs are emerging that we'll pull back
BY WENDY BECKTOLD | JAN 10 2019
In 2018, hurricanes, floods, fires, and droughts wreaked a level of
destruction on the planet that, according to scientists, is just a taste
of what is to come. In October, the International Panel on Climate
Change issued a report stating that we have about 12 years to avoid
catastrophic climate change. Meanwhile, global greenhouse gas emissions
reached a record high in 2018. So is it still reasonable to hope that we
can wean ourselves off fossil fuels in time to avert global calamity?
As David Roberts of Vox points out, that's the wrong question. Climate
change is happening now, and lots of change for the worse is already
locked into place. But, as Roberts puts it, "we have some choice in how
screwed we are." Climate change isn't a binary--safe or unsafe, screwed
or not screwed--but rather a spectrum. That will remain true no matter
how we respond to the task of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, or how
severe the weather gets. "Yes, it's going to get worse," Roberts writes,
"but nobody gets to give up hope or stop fighting." Exactly right. Here,
then, are 10 glimmers of hope that humanity will opt for less screwed
over more screwed in 2019. [titles listed ]:
*1. The Divestment Movement Keeps Growing...**
**2. The Paris Agreement Holds Steady...**
**3. The Rule of Law Still Rules...**
**4. Renewable Energy Is on the Rise...**
**5. Coal Is Going, Going... **
**6. Technology Is Advancing...**
**7. Transportation Is Headed in the Right Direction ...**
**8. The Scales of Justice Are Tipping ...**
**9. The Political Winds Are Shifting...**
**10. Youths Are on the March..*.
more at-
https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/10-reasons-feel-hopeful-about-climate-change-2019
[a little science]
*Climate change reshaping how heat moves around globe*
Shifts in ocean, atmosphere heat transfer important to watch,
researchers say
Date: January 28, 2019
Source: Ohio State University
Summary:
The Earth's atmosphere and oceans play important roles in moving heat
from one part of the world to another, and new research is illuminating
how those patterns are changing in the face of climate change...
- - -
Without heat transfer, the world's hottest spots would be sizzling and
the coolest spots would be even more frigid. Conditions in both hot and
cold climates are affected by the movement of heat from the equator
toward the poles in the atmosphere and oceans, He said.
As scientists look for a better understanding of all the factors
contributing to climate change -- and for ways to ameliorate the problem
-- these heat-transfer patterns are important to watch, He said.
This is the first study to examine current changes in heat transfer and
to conclude that warming temperatures are driving increased heat
transfer in the atmosphere, which is compensated by a reduced heat
transfer in the ocean. Additionally, the researchers concluded that the
excess oceanic heat is trapped in the Southern Ocean around the Antarctic...
- -
"For instance, if we didn't have heat transfer, Ohio would be 20 or 30
degrees colder than we are right now," Liu said. "Therefore, it is
important to predict how the heat transfer will be changed in the future."
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/01/190128125334.htm
["nothing personal, just business"]
*Ocasio-Cortez dings Facebook, Microsoft, Google for 'implicit' support
of climate change denial*
Facebook, Microsoft and Google were "high-level" sponsors of the
LibertyCon conference in Washington, D.C., earlier this month.
The conference was also sponsored by a group that denies climate change
and talks about the supposed benefits of CO2 emissions.
Democratic Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Chellie
Pingree of Maine are asking Facebook, Microsoft and Google to reaffirm
their commitment to a "more sustainable future."
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/28/ocasio-cortez-dings-tech-for-implicit-support-of-climate-change-denial.html
[activism: Extinction Rebellion report]
*Climate Change = Mass Murder. Rebel for Life*
Extinction Rebellion Protest and DIE-IN, NYC January 26, 2018
by Susan Spieler, PsyD
Note from Kathie MM: It is still January 2019, the month of resolutions,
and we should continue to celebrate all the New Year's resolutions made
by people working to make the environment great again-thereby trying to
ensure a future for life on earth. There will be no peace and social
justice without an enduring environment and no enduring environment
without worldwide citizen activism. Susan Spieler shares a great example
of a movement whose time had come decades ago. Join the Extinction
Rebellion! And Join Engaging Peace.
When people feel endangered, disputes intensify. When food and water
are increasingly scarce due to wildfires and droughts, people become
desperate and violence increases. Passivity regarding environmental
issues is giving way to climate activism. Of particular interest to
proponents of peace and social justice is a new non-violent activist
movement called Extinction Rebellion (XR) that seeks media attention by
organizing highly visible and well-orhestrated events.
This movement made its first appearance in London where the ER provoked
arrests by stopping traffic on the London Bridge. And, on Saturday
January 26, 2019, the first US XR event of the year began in NYC in
front of the Plaza Hotel and was followed by a march along Fifth Avenue
with brass band parade music.
I was there.
https://engagingpeace.com/?p=14316
[dire prognostications]
*The End of Ice & the Destruction of our Planet (w/ Dahl Jamail)*
Thom Hartmann Program
Published on Jan 21, 2019
Our Conversations with Great Minds series re-launches with a fascinating
discussion with author Dahl Jamail, author of "The End of Ice".
The world is melting; oceans are rising, yet most ignore the perils
ahead. Thom and Dahl's conversation covers the state of the Great
Barrier Reef in Australia, melting glaciers which could drown the planet
and whether it is too late to reverse climate change. Has humanity
destroyed itself?
Books mentioned:
The End of Ice (Dahr Jamail) https://amzn.to/2DogCMH
Threshold (Thom Hartmann) http://amzn.to/2hwoGSt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjOA8qR0-AA&t=3s
[we suffer from solution aversion]
*Many Americans think that climate-change deniers 'get what they
deserve' when disasters strike*
- -
Shot through with schadenfreude
More than a third of people who believe that climate change is primarily
caused by humans agree at least somewhat with the idea that natural
disaster victims who do not accept climate science get what they deserve
when they're hit by climate-caused disasters. The overwhelming majority
(68 percent) of these people were Democrats, although some Republicans
(22 percent) and independents (10 percent) held these feelings as well.
Further, we find evidence consistent with the idea that this
schadenfreude is fueled by partisan teamsmanship.
The biggest politically motivated predictor of thinking that climate
deniers deserve to be hit by natural disasters was whether someone
identifies as an ideological liberal. In fact, among Democrats,
identifying as a liberal is associated with approximately a 38 percent
greater likelihood of believing that climate-change deniers get what
they deserve if their region is devastated by a hurricane.
- - -
It's not enough to win; the other side must suffer
Our findings reveal just how deeply Americans have come to dislike
members of the other political team: deeply enough to believe that
others should suffer physical harm as suitable retribution for holding
differing opinions about contentious issues.
Whatever the cause of this animosity, it's unlikely to be useful in
political debate. Previous research suggests that people are more
receptive to changing their minds about climate and other
science-related issues when others make an effort to recognize and
validate their values and concerns. Wishing ill on opponents is unlikely
to persuade them to change their minds.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2019/01/24/many-americans-think-that-climate-change-deniers-get-what-they-deserve-when-disasters-strike/?utm_term=.2a1b8540c414
[Not surprising]
DAILY NEWS 25 January 2019
*Carbon dioxide levels will soar past the 410 ppm milestone in 2019*
- -
Clear trend
While the long term trend is remorselessly clear, the annual rise varies
greatly from year to year depending on how the weather affects the
balance between plants taking up CO2 as they grow and releasing it as
they decay or burn. During El Nino years, for instance, there can be
extensive droughts and wildfires, leading to big jumps in CO2 levels.
The biggest ever annual rise, of 3.4 ppm, occurred in 2016 during a
strong El Nino. The forecast rise of 2.8 would also be one of the
largest rises on record.
CO2 concentrations at any one place also vary over the year, peaking at
the end of the winter and falling as plants grow in summer. Betts'
forecast is for the monthly average at Mauna Loa in Hawaii to peak at
415 ppm in May and drop back to 408 ppm in September before rising even
higher in 2020.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2191881-carbon-dioxide-levels-will-soar-past-the-410-ppm-milestone-in-2019/
[China Earth Sciences]
December 2018, Volume 61, Issue 12, pp 1714-1727 | Cite as
*Climate tipping-point potential and paradoxical production of methane
in a changing ocean*
Abstract
The global warming potential of methane (CH4) is about 30 times stronger
than that of carbon dioxide (CO2) over a century timescale. Methane
emission is hypothesized to have contributed to global climate change
events and mass extinctions during Earth's history. Therefore, the study
of CH4 production processes is critically important to the understanding
of global climate change. It has been a dogma that biogenic CH4
detectable in the oceans originates exclusively from the anaerobic
metabolic activity of methanogenic archaea in hypoxic and anoxic
environments, despite reports that many oxic surface and near-surface
waters of the world's oceans are CH4-supersaturated, thereby rendering
net sea-to-air emissions of CH4. The phenomenon of CH4 production in
oxic marine waters is referred to as the "ocean methane paradox".
Although still not totally resolved, recent studies have generated
several hypotheses regarding the sources of CH4 production in oxic
seawater. This review will summarize our current understanding of the
importance of CH4 in the global climate and analyze the biological
processes and their underpinning mechanisms that lead to the production
of CH4 in oxic seawater environments. We will also tentatively explore
the relationships of these microbial metabolic processes with global
changes in climate and environment.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11430-017-9265-y
[more ice core science]
*Antarctic-wide array of high-resolution ice core records reveals
pervasive lead pollution began in 1889 and persists today*
Scientific Reports volume 4, Article number: 5848 (2014)
*Abstract*
Interior Antarctica is among the most remote places on Earth and was
thought to be beyond the reach of human impacts when Amundsen and
Scott raced to the South Pole in 1911. Here we show detailed
measurements from an extensive array of 16 ice cores quantifying
substantial toxic heavy metal lead pollution at South Pole and
throughout Antarctica by 1889 - beating polar explorers by more than
22 years. Unlike the Arctic where lead pollution peaked in the
1970s, lead pollution in Antarctica was as high in the early 20th
century as at any time since industrialization. The similar timing
and magnitude of changes in lead deposition across Antarctica, as
well as the characteristic isotopic signature of Broken Hill lead
found throughout the continent, suggest that this single emission
source in southern Australia was responsible for the introduction of
lead pollution into Antarctica at the end of the 19th century and
remains a significant source today. An estimated 660 t of industrial
lead have been deposited over Antarctica during the past 130 years
as a result of mid-latitude industrial emissions, with
regional-to-global scale circulation likely modulating aerosol
concentrations. Despite abatement efforts, significant lead
pollution in Antarctica persists into the 21st century.
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep05848
[psychological resilience]
*CONSCIENTIOUS PROTECTORS*
Written by Lise Van Susteren Published: 20 January 2019
As an increasing number of activists are prepared to risk arrest in
order to defend the Earth against fossil fuel capitalism. What role
might climate psychology play in their defence?
*The Duress or Necessity Defence*
Activists threatened with prosecution are making increasing use of the
"Duress Defense" (by Circumstance) in the UK and the "Necessity Defense"
in the U.S. Is there a role for mental health professionals to play?
*The 'valve turners': Activists faced jail time to briefly stop the flow
of ...*
As fear mounts and the consequences of harmful actions against human
life and nature from dangerous policies and actions becomes ever more
apparent, outrage at expanding, unchecked threats that increase our
peril can be expected to rise as well. In the effort to protect society,
and seeing it as the lesser of two evils, a growing number of
individuals will be willing to break the law - risking arrest and even
incarceration. Like the Conscientious Objectors, from whom they get
their name, these Conscientious Protectors, will be acting on deeply
held principle: at this time of accelerating danger to the planet they
have no choice: either they take action to protect life, or by their
inaction they will be complicit in its destruction.
*The Legal Case for the Defence*
The legal profession is the first line of defense for Conscientious
Protectors - offering an increasingly used option:
in the UK Conscientious Protectors may plead the "Duress by
Circumstance" defense.
In the US Conscientious Protectors may plead the "Necessity Defense".
The criteria needed to mount the defense revolve around key concepts:
the danger is objective, the threat to bodily or other harm is serious,
the response was proportional, and the act was one a reasonable person
could be expected to take.
For details:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duress_in_English_law
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Necessity+defense
In the US the defense is grounded in both common law (based on
precedent) and in many jurisdictions by statutory law (the policy is
spelled out). No statutory Federal law exists....
- -
more at --
https://www.climatepsychologyalliance.org/explorations/papers/313-conscientious-protectors
*This Day in Climate History - January 30, 1976 - from D.R. Tucker*
January 30, 1976: The US Supreme Court issues the Buckley v. Valeo
ruling, one of several controversial rulings that effectively allow
polluters to interfere with the US political process.
http://www.fec.gov/law/litigation/Buckley.pdf
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html>
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
*** Privacy and Security:*This is a text-only mailing that carries no
images which may originate from remote servers. Text-only messages
provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for democratic
and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial purposes.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
More information about the TheClimate.Vote
mailing list