[TheClimate.Vote] June 19, 2019 - Daily Global Warming News Digest.

Richard Pauli richard at theclimate.vote
Wed Jun 19 07:43:41 EDT 2019


/June 19, 2019/

[on a single day]
*Rising Temperatures Precipitating Arctic Ice Melt, Threatening Sea Rise 
and Permafrost*
In climate news, Arctic monitors found that over 40% of Greenland 
experienced melting over a single day last week, with temperatures 
soaring 40 degrees higher than normal. Scientists say the extent of the 
melting is unusual for this time of year and will contribute to the 
worsening global sea level rise.

Meanwhile, a new study shows that climate change has led to the thawing 
of permafrost in the Canadian Arctic over 70 years earlier than 
expected. Thawing of the permafrost releases carbon dioxide and other 
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, causing temperatures to further rise.
https://www.democracynow.org/2019/6/18/headlines/rising_temperatures_precipitating_arctic_ice_melt_threatening_sea_rise_and_permafrost
- -
*Greenland Loses 2 Billion Tons of Ice in a Single Day*
- - -
The sudden spike in melting "is unusual, but not unprecedented," 
according to Thomas Mote, a research scientist at the University of 
Georgia who studies Greenland's climate.

"It is comparable to some spikes we saw in June of 2012," Mote told CNN, 
referring to the record-setting melt year of 2012 that saw almost the 
entire ice sheet experience melting for the first time in recorded history.

This much melting this early in the summer could be a bad sign, 
indicating 2019 could once again set records for the amount of Greenland 
ice loss...
- - -
Jason Box, an ice climatologist at the Geological Survey of Denmark and 
Greenland, predicted in late May that "2019 will be a big melt year for 
Greenland."

Box pointed out that this year had unusually early season melt days in 
April, and the melt season was "happening about three weeks earlier than 
average, and earlier than the record-setting melt year of 2012."

In addition to the early season melt, the snow cover is already lower 
than average in Western Greenland, and combining these factors "mean 
that 2019 is likely going to be a very big melt year, and even the 
potential to exceed the record melt year of 2012."...
https://ktla.com/2019/06/14/greenland-loses-2-billion-tons-of-ice-in-a-single-day/
- - -
[just the facts]
*Scientific Data for Research*
The number of surface melting days was well above the 1981 to 2010 
average for the beginning of the 2019 Greenland melt season, 
particularly along the southeastern coast. Surface melting was detected 
up to 26 out of the 61 days between April 1 to May 31. A narrow band of 
melting was also present along the western coast, from the southern tip 
of Greenland to the region around Thule in the northwest, exceeding 20 
days in some locations. This represents an early onset, but not an 
unprecedented extent or intensity relative to recent years.
http://nsidc.org



[activism]
*Leading the Public Into Emergency Mode*
Introducing the Climate Emergency Movement
- - -
The initial publication of Leading the Public into Emergency Mode in 
2016 suggested this approach as a "New Strategy for the Climate 
Movement." I am absolutely thrilled to report that in the 3 years since 
publication, this approach--both as a policy program and as a mode of 
campaigning and communicating, has been adopted by an extremely 
energized set of organizations. My claim that embracing the truth and 
campaigning for an emergency response to the climate crisis would be 
highly effective is proving true. The climate emergency movement has 
exploded onto the US and global political scene, and is growing all the 
time...
- - - -
We are all, at times, confronted with emergency situations. Children, 
and adults who are overwhelmed by the situation for whatever reason, 
enter either panic mode, in which they act without thinking, or are 
paralyzed and unable to act. Children, for example, will often hide 
during house fires. However, healthy adults respond to emergencies by 
entering emergency mode...
- - -
Bill McKibben reports that the question he is most often asked is "What 
can I do?" This is accurate to my experience as well--millions of 
Americans want to help fight the climate crisis, but don't know how to 
do so effectively. The more the climate movement can provide structures 
for people's engagement--providing directions and support for people who 
are ready to tackle the climate emergency--the more people will go into 
emergency mode. Effective, transparent leadership is also critical in 
enabling people to enter emergency mode. Confidence that leaders and 
decision makers are competently addressing questions of strategy and 
policy for the emergency mobilization allows participants to focus on 
their contribution.

Essential to long emergencies is the human capacity for dedication and 
commitment--the mind state that brings a person back, over and over, to 
the emergency issue despite inevitable interruptions and temptation to 
avoid the issue. It also takes a good deal of courage, and ability to 
stay calm under intense stress. The famous "Keep Calm and Carry On" 
posters from wartime United Kingdom addressed this challenge. We could 
translate them into this framework as meaning, "Don't Panic and Stay in 
Emergency Mode."
https://medium.com/@margaretkleinsalamon/leading-the-public-into-emergency-mode-b96740475b8f


[Climate Fiction]
*The Climate Crisis Is Mind-Boggling. That's Why We Need Science Fiction.*
Only 29% of Americans report being "very worried" about the climate 
crisis. Climate fiction writers can help change that.
BY Amy Brady
Cli-fi is leading the charge to envision new, sustainable and 
compassionate social structures.

Climate fiction, or "cli-fi " as it's sometimes called, has officially 
exploded onto the literary scene. The genre has been around since at 
least the 1960s, with such writers as Margaret Atwood, Octavia Butler 
and J.G. Ballard giving early narrative shape to the climate crisis. 
Those classic works helped inspire waves of cli-fi over the past 60 
years, ranging from futuristic sci-fi to literary fiction set in the 
present day, and even mainstream movies. George Washington University 
writing professor Michael Svoboda recently listed a bevy of 
climate-themed films that hit theaters in 2018, including the dystopian 
films Downsizing starring Matt Damon and First Reformed starring Ethan 
Hawke...
- - -
Why do Americans have such a hard time grasping the dire threat posed by 
climate change? In his 2015 nonfiction book, What We Think About When We 
Try Not To Think About Global Warming: Toward a New Psychology of 
Climate Action, psychologist Per Espen Stoknes argues it's because 
politicians and the media tend to present climate change as a series of 
abstract facts and cold statistics, which do little to appeal to the 
human heart.
- - -
Matthew Schneider-Mayerson, assistant professor of environmental studies 
at Yale-NUS College, surveyed more than 100 U.S.-based readers and found 
that works of climate fiction "nudge [their] audience in a slightly more 
progressive direction" and that "most readers attested to the value of 
cli-fi as a tool for enabling the imagination of potential climate 
futures." One reader, an IT administrator from Tennessee, was 
particularly struck by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway's fictional 
history, The Collapse of Western Civilization: A View From the Future, a 
harrowing tale in which humans barely survive the widespread catastrophe 
of global warming. The reader reported that climate change "was more 
theoretical before. Now, while fiction, the book has made me more aware 
of what our planet could become." The reader also reported "subsequently 
[sharing] the book with his wife and son, among others." Other readers 
also reported sharing their favorite cli-fi stories with loved ones, a 
pattern that suggests climate fiction might be a useful tool to open 
dialogues about the crisis with those closest to us.

But dystopian narratives can also have a paralyzing effect on readers, 
despite climate fiction's ability to drive home the gravity of the 
crisis. In the same study, Schneider-Mayerson writes, "From the emotions 
these readers described, it is clear that their affective responses were 
not only negative but demobilizing. While some negative emotions (such 
as anger) can be fuel for personal or political action, others (such as 
guilt, shame, helplessness and sadness) are much less likely to lead to 
active responses."

In other words, the dystopian framing of cli-fi narratives might 
actually be undermining their potential to spur political and social 
change.Schneider-
Mayerson goes on, "In place of doom, psychologists suggest that climate 
communications be framed positively," which "might include …' values and 
a common cause' and'opportunities for innovation and job growth.' "...
- - -
The mainstream film industry has yet to catch on to this "positive 
framing." In a recent article in Literary Hub, Rebecca Solnit critiques 
the typical storyline of recent climate disaster movies: "The standard 
action movie narrative requires one exceptional person in the 
foreground, which requires the rest of the characters to be on the 
spectrum from useless to clueless to wicked, plus a few moderately 
helpful auxiliary characters. There are not a lot of movies about 
magnificent collective action." Downsizing, First Reformed and Marvel 
Studios' Infinity War and Endgame all feature environmental concerns, 
but these movies still focus on singular individuals trying to save the 
planet, often through superhuman means, when in reality no one person 
can stop climate change.
- - -
Of course, reading climate fiction won't change the world alone, nor 
will simply imagining climate catastrophe and its potential solutions. 
Creating real social change requires real political action, such as the 
massive, youth-led Sunrise Movement, which advocates for the Green New 
Deal. To achieve a livable future in a climate-changed world, we need 
policy reforms on a global scale.

But cli-fi has the potential to inspire us to get started. Rather than 
be discouraged by bleak scientific reports or the doom and gloom of 
today's popular climate-related films, novels like Robinson's--and 
others, like Richard Powers' 2018 The Overstory, a Pulitzer Prize winner 
that features an anti-logging protest camp--are leading the charge to 
envision new, more sustainable and compassionate social structures. 
Americans already know climate change is happening; now we need to 
believe we can band together to stop it.
Amy Brady is the deputy publisher of Guernica Magazine and the editorial 
director of the Chicago Review of Books. Her writing on art, literature 
and climate change has appeared in the New Republic, O magazine, Pacific 
Standard, the L.A. Times and elsewhere.
http://inthesetimes.com/article/21907/climate-change-science-fiction-collective-action




Opinion [near sighted]
*Where the Climate Change Action Is*
*Hint: It's not Washington.**
*By The Editorial Board
The editorial board represents the opinions of the board, its editor and 
the publisher. It is separate from the newsroom and the Op-Ed section.
June 14, 2019

With time running out on the legislative session in Albany, Gov. Andrew 
Cuomo, the State Senate and the Assembly should set aside their 
differences and find common ground on a climate bill that would greatly 
reduce the state's greenhouse gas emissions. This would be enormously 
beneficial to the country and to the planet, and would ensure that, as 
the federal government slides backward, New York remains in the 
forefront of increasingly aggressive efforts by state governments to 
address the dangers of global warming.

At issue are two bills. One is the Climate and Community Protection Act, 
much favored by environmental activists. It passed the Assembly three 
years in a row but never the Senate, which until this year was dominated 
by Republicans. The other is the governor's Climate Leadership Act, 
introduced early this year. As is often the case in Albany, the argument 
has not been helpful, and suggests that the sides are miles apart. On 
Tuesday, protesters invaded the State Capitol, demanding that Mr. Cuomo 
sign the first bill and suggesting that he simply didn't care about 
climate change. Mr. Cuomo sniffed that he had already put in place a 
host of regulatory measures reducing power plant emissions, promoting 
energy efficiency and building out wind and solar power. He said he had 
no intention of playing politics.

Both sides agree on one major point: Some form of legislation is 
necessary to codify existing regulations, to encourage new ones and to 
give the new regulations the force of law. And both bills point in the 
same direction, toward a steady reduction in fossil fuel use in New 
York's power sector and in its economy as a whole. The governor's bill 
would ramp up renewable energy sources somewhat more quickly. The 
Assembly bill sets a more ambitious target of eliminating all statewide 
greenhouse gas emissions by midcentury, which would require the 
electrification of the entire transportation sector. The Assembly bill 
also includes a provision similar in spirit to the Green New Deal 
requiring that 40 percent of the funds collected from ratepayers for 
energy efficiency and renewables be invested in "disadvantaged 
communities." Mr. Cuomo says this is too rigid and could restrict 
investments in other emissions-reducing strategies, like new technologies.

These are not insurmountable differences. Action to combat climate 
change is taking place in the states right now, and New York should get 
in on it. Despite all the talk about the Green New Deal in Washington, 
the odds of major national climate legislation passing before the next 
election are vanishingly small, given Republican control of the Senate, 
the Trump administration's denial that a problem even exists and its 
relentless work to undo all of President Barack Obama's efforts to 
address the issue.

It's a different story out in the country. Twenty-three states and 
Puerto Rico have now joined the United States Climate Alliance, which 
pledges to uphold the Paris climate agreement and to try to meet its 
goals despite President Trump's disavowal of the accord. The alliance, 
which includes New York, now covers more than half the nation's 
population and more than one-third of its greenhouse gas emissions. 
Meanwhile, in the last year, five states have enacted mandates that, 
with slightly different deadlines, require a transition to carbon-free 
or carbon-neutral electricity. California last September was the first 
to move ahead with a clean electricity standard, with a target of 2045. 
New Mexico, Nevada, Washington State and Colorado have followed. Several 
others are in the wings, including New York: Mr. Cuomo's bill would 
require that all of the state's electricity come from carbon-free 
sources by 2040.

Key in all these plans are the words "carbon free" or, in the case of 
Washington State, "carbon neutral." They are technologically agnostic. 
They do not rely exclusively on renewable energy sources, like wind and 
solar, but allow for a host of strategies. Those strategies include 
renewables, efficiencies on the consumer side (weatherization of houses, 
for instance), programs to capture and store emissions and, not least, 
nuclear power.

Nuclear power is hugely important. Nearly every major authority on 
climate change, including the International Energy Agency, has said that 
carbon-free nuclear energy must be part of the solution if, as the 
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has warned, the world is to be 
on a clean energy diet by midcentury and escape the worst consequences 
of global warming.

But nuclear plants are in grave danger in this country, and it's up to 
the states to save them. Owners are threatening to close nearly a dozen 
of the nation's nearly 100 reactors. That's equal to more than all the 
solar generation in the country. To meet their own emissions reduction 
goals, three states--Illinois, New York and New Jersey -- have wisely 
agreed to provide financial support to keep their reactors going. In 
March, Connecticut found a way to save two reactors in Waterford.

In time, federal officials may figure out a way to rejuvenate the 
nuclear power industry. In time, they may figure out how to do a lot of 
things -- rebuild the grid, devise a national clean energy standard, 
pour billions into new technologies. But right now, Washington is 
paralyzed, with Republicans frozen in place and Democrats offering 
competing climate plans (some big, like the one from former Vice 
President Joe Biden, some very big, like the one from Gov. Jay Inslee of 
Washington). The prospects for national action are sure to improve if 
any Democrat wins the presidency, and without national action America 
cannot hope to be the world leader on climate change, as it aspired to 
be at the end of Mr. Obama's tenure. The states can do only so much. But 
what they are doing is heartening. It will be even more so if New York's 
leaders can agree on a strategy that is in plain sight.


[Courts are awake to some things]
*Michael E. Mann took climate change deniers to court. They apologized.*
In 2011, renowned scientist Michael E. Mann sued a Canadian think tank 
that published an interview suggesting his work on climate change was fraud.

Eight years later, the Winnipeg-based Frontier Center for Public 
Policy--which often promotes climate change denial -- apologized Friday 
and wiped the inflammatory interview from its website.

"(The apology) gives me faith in our legal system that truth can still 
win out, even in an era of'fake news' and'alternative facts,'" Mann said 
in an email to National Observer.

In the fight against climate disinformation, experts like Mann, an 
atmospheric scientist at Pennsylvania State University, are turning to 
new arenas.

Mann is best known as the lead researcher on a landmark 1998 paper on 
climate change. He and three colleagues reconstructed global 
temperatures going back about 500 years, producing a now-infamous 
sideways-hockey-stick-like graph of global temperatures that showed a 
sharp upswing beginning in the 1900s.

Mann has spent the two decades since the paper's publication defending 
it and his reputation against climate change deniers--sometimes in 
court. He settled with the Frontier Center on Friday, but a related case 
in British Columbia and a similar one in the United States are ongoing.

In a message posted to its website, the Frontier Center apologized for 
publishing "untrue and disparaging" comments about Mann...

"Although the Frontier Center for Public Policy still does not see eye 
to eye with Mr. Mann on the subject of global warming and climate 
change, we now accept that it was wrong to publish allegations by others 
that Mr. Mann did not comply with ethical standards," the think tank 
wrote in part...
https://grist.org/article/michael-e-mann-took-climate-change-deniers-to-court-they-apologized/



[Boaty Lives!]
*Boaty McBoatface makes major climate change discovery on maiden outing*
aty McBoatface's maiden outing has made a major discovery about how 
climate change is causing rising sea levels. Scientists say that data 
collected from the yellow submarines's first expedition will help them 
build more accurate predictions in order to combat the problem.

The mission has uncovered a key process linking increasing Antarctic 
winds to higher sea temperatures, which in turn is fuelling increasing 
levels.

Researchers found that the increasing winds are cooling water on the 
bottom of the ocean, forcing it to travel faster, creating turbulance as 
it mixed with warmer waters above.

Experts said the mechanism has not been factored into current models for 
predicting the impact of increasing global temperatures on our oceans,
Boaty McBoatface - the publicly named robotic submersible carried on the 
research vessel RRS Sir David Attenborough - took its first expedition 
in April 2017, studying the bottom of the Southern Ocean

The three-day mission saw Boaty travel 112 miles (180 kilometres) 
through mountainous underwater valleys measuring the temperature, 
saltiness and turbulence of the water at the bottom of the ocean, at 
depths of up to 4,000 metres.

In recent decades, winds blowing over the Southern Ocean have been 
getting stronger due to the hole in the ozone layer above Antarctica and 
increasing greenhouse gases.

The new data, along with other ocean measurements collected from 
research vessel RRS James Clark Ross, have revealed a mechanism that 
enables these winds to increase turbulence deep in the ocean, causing 
warm water at mid depths to mix with cold, dense water in the abyss.

The resulting warming of the water on the sea bed is a significant 
contributor to rising sea levels.

The mission was part of a project involving the University of 
Southampton, the National Oceanography Centre, the British Antarctic 
Survey, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and Princeton University.

Research leader Professor Alberto Naveira Garabato from the University 
of Southampton, said: "Our study is an important step in understanding 
how the climate change happening in the remote and inhospitable 
Antarctic waters will impact the warming of the oceans as a whole and 
future sea level rise."

Dr Eleanor Frajka-Williams of the National Oceanography Centre said: 
"The data from Boaty McBoatface gave us a completely new way of looking 
at the deep ocean - the path taken by Boaty created a spatial view of 
the turbulence near the seafloor."


*This Day in Climate History - June 19, 2003 - from D.R. Tucker*
The New York Times reports:

"The Environmental Protection Agency is preparing to publish a draft
report next week on the state of the environment, but after editing
by the White House, a long section describing risks from rising
global temperatures has been whittled to a few noncommittal paragraphs."
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/19/us/report-by-epa-leaves-out-data-on-climate-change.html


The AP reports:

"The chief goal in a White House plan to study global warming is
learning more about natural causes of climate change, drawing
criticism from environmentalists who say reducing industrial carbon
emissions is the real problem.

"The new 10-year, $103 million plan to speed up research in some
high-priority areas was released Thursday by Commerce Secretary Don
Evans and Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham, who pointed to $4.5
billion in government spending on climate change-related programs...

"The first of the 364-page plan's five goals is to study the'natural
variability' in climate change. The second is to find better ways of
measuring climate effects from burning fossil fuels, industrial
production of warming gases and changes in land use.

"Other goals are to reduce uncertainty in climate forecasting; to
better understand how changes in climate affect human, wildlife and
plant communities; and to find more exact ways of calculating the
risks of global warming, according to plan summaries obtained by The
Associated Press.

"But environmentalists said the administration was focusing too much
on natural causes and reopening scientific issues already well studied."

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-climate-plan-draws-heat/

/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/

/Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html> 
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote

/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe 
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request> 
to news digest./

*** Privacy and Security:*This is a text-only mailing that carries no 
images which may originate from remote servers. Text-only messages 
provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for democratic 
and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial purposes.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote 
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, 
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at 
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for 
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct 
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List 
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to 
this mailing list.




More information about the TheClimate.Vote mailing list