[TheClimate.Vote] June 12, 2020 - Daily Global Warming News Digest
Richard Pauli
richard at theclimate.vote
Fri Jun 12 11:32:29 EDT 2020
/*June 12, 2020*/
[campaigns - Data for Progress]
*MEMO: IN 2020, CLIMATE IS A WINNING ISSUE FOR DEMOCRATS*
By Ethan Winter, Julian Brave NoiseCat, and Marcela Mulholland
*Executive Summary*
- - Voters have a positive impression of an agenda to tackle climate
change. A Green New Deal, for instance, maintains a net favorable
rating of eleven percentage points.
- - Voters trust the Democratic Party more than the Republican Party
when it comes to climate change by an 18 percentage point margin.
- - Firm commitments on the part of former Vice President Joe Biden
provide an avenue for winning increased support - especially with
voters under forty-five.
As part of a May survey, Data for Progress sought to test attitudes
around a series of issues surrounding climate change. We were especially
interested in the way climate change is influencing the ongoing
presidential campaign, general opinions towards climate-related
individuals and organizations, and potential support for a host of
proposals designed to combat climate change.
[Read the full memo]
http://filesforprogress.org/memos/climate-change-winning-issue-2020.pdf
https://www.dataforprogress.org/memos/climate-change-winning-issue-2020
- - -
[Campaign 2020]
*Trump's biggest weakness? The environment, polls show*
Scott Waldman, E&E News reporter -Thursday, June 11, 2020
https://www.eenews.net/stories/1063366837
Recent polling has shown that U.S. voters are more split on
environmental issues -- rather than health care, race relations or the
economy -- when it comes to their impressions of Biden and Trump.
One of the widest gaps in how voters perceive the presidential
candidates is on environmental policy, even as the nation reckons with a
deadly pandemic and an eruption of protests over racial injustice.
Recent polls reveal broad mistrust of President Trump's handling of
environmental issues, suggesting that Joe Biden, the presumptive
Democratic nominee, has a large advantage on those issues less than five
months before the election.
The gulf between Trump and Biden on the environment is larger than their
perceived differences to voters over race relations, the economy and
health care, according to recent polling. Those issues are nevertheless
expected to be central themes of the November election.
"The president has earned his disadvantage on the environment," said
former Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.). "In many ways, the challenge of
climate change is similar to the challenge posed to the world by the
novel coronavirus. Climate change requires international cooperation,
bold action, serious sober leadership, and the president doesn't do well
in those scenarios."
Trump was 20 percentage points behind Biden on the environment, with 46%
of respondents saying the former vice president would do a better job
and 26% saying Trump was better, according to a poll released last week
by Research Co. It was conducted as protests began across the country.
That suggests the candidates are further apart on the environment than
on race relations (17-percentage-point difference), even though the
survey was conducted as protests erupted in cities across the country.
Forty-four percent of likely voters preferred Biden's handling of racial
issues compared with 27% for Trump.
Those findings echo a Morning Consult poll released last month. It found
a 19-percentage-point gap between the candidates on the environment. The
survey said it "dwarfs that of all other issues."
Since Biden became the presumptive Democratic nominee in March, he has
led Trump on environmental issues by 17.2 percentage points on average,
according to Morning Consult. That gap persisted as the biggest
difference between the candidates through five Morning Consult polls
conducted between March and May.
Voters trust Democrats to handle climate change better than Republicans
by an 18-percentage-point margin, according to a memo released Monday by
Data for Progress. The group's polling found that Biden could strengthen
his support among young voters by developing a more aggressive climate
platform.
Activists have been pushing him to be more aggressive in combating
greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and to strengthen his
policies toward helping communities of color grapple with rising
temperatures.
"If we are able to turn the 2020 election into a referendum on President
Trump and the Republican Party's very backwards stance on climate change
... I really like the terms of that debate," said Julian Brave NoiseCat,
vice president of policy and strategy for the progressive think tank
Data for Progress.
The number of protests sparked by the death of George Floyd stands to
increase the gap in voter preference between Trump and Biden on race,
observers said.
That could mean voters who are focused on the environment may shift
their focus to police reform, said Michael Fauntroy, a political science
professor at Howard University and author of "Republicans and the Black
Vote."
"There's a very limited capacity for the public in even calm times to
pay attention to a lot of things at once, and so I'm worried from an
environmental policy perspective that the issues that need to be
considered in that regard, that candidates need to address, won't be
called on to address because of these more important issues," he said.
Likely voters who tend to be involved in the protests -- younger people
and people of color -- also tend to be involved in climate issues,
according to researchers. And the prevalence of the environment as a
wedge issue between the candidates has likely been reinforced by the
pandemic, said Nathaniel Stinnett, executive director of the nonpartisan
Environmental Voter Project.
As the country reveals divisions over following health experts with
regard to self-quarantines versus reopening the economy, voters are more
likely to see Biden and Trump in starkly different terms.
"It almost seems that the pandemic is actually further clarifying
people's views on the climate crisis and environment issues because
their struggle is similar in many ways," Stinnett said. "The pandemic is
throwing into sharp relief what it means to create a society that can
deal with these enormous public health challenges and accept scientific
solutions."
There are still younger voters who can be persuaded to vote in the fall,
since neither candidate has won over the younger-than-45 age group,
observers said. And while progressives may be motivated to vote for
Biden if he strengthens his climate platform, he could also pick up some
Republicans, particularly in key states like Florida, where
environmental issues are bipartisan, said Curbelo, who was among the
most vocal Republican lawmakers on climate issues.
"The issue could make the difference among moderate Republicans, younger
Republicans who feel strongly about the need for the government to
address climate change meaningfully," he said. "So it's not just that
this is a top issue, it could be the deciding issue in certain states."
Twitter: @scottpwaldmanEmail: swaldman at eenews.net
https://www.eenews.net/stories/1063366837
[One more thing changing]
JUNE 11, 2020
*Extreme waves set to get bigger and more frequent due to climate change*
A warming planet will cause stronger storm winds triggering larger and
more frequent extreme waves over the next 80 years, with largest
increases shown in the Southern Ocean, according to new research.
Researchers at the University of Melbourne have simulated Earth's
changing climate under different wind conditions, recreating thousands
of simulated storms to evaluate the magnitude and frequency of extreme
events.
The study found that if global emissions are not curbed there will be an
increase of up to 10 percent in the frequency and magnitude of extreme
waves in extensive ocean regions.
In contrast, researchers found there would be a significantly lower
increase where effective steps are taken to reduce emissions and
dependence on fossil fuels. In both scenarios, the largest increase in
magnitude and frequency of extreme waves is in the Southern Ocean..
https://phys.org/news/2020-06-extreme-bigger-frequent-due-climate.html
[One candidate listening - video 3 mins]
*Town Hall: Candidate Jen Richardson (MI-6) and Peter Sinclair on
Renewable Energy*
Selected Transcript:
"It worries me to have two private monopolies taking all the money..."
Here's the interesting thing about renewable energy -- by its nature
it is distributed.
and if history teaches us anything, is that political power follows
money -- no big surprise there
And the way you're generating electricity which is fundamental to
your economy
One of the fundamental pieces is based on big central power plants
-- if I live in a small town or rural Michigan I turn on a light
switch the money is
going in a way -- it's going God knows where eventually -- I suppose
to some bank in New York
But if there are wind turbines in my community then every time I
turn on the light, revenue is coming to my community
It's going into the pockets of farmers, it's going into the tax
rolls of townships and counties -- who are then spending it on
things like schools and roads and teachers and sheriff's deputies
and fire departments and libraries.
It is creating, it is giving the opportunity for more political
power, more political impetus
for these bodies right down to the township level right that they
that had been hollowed out that there had been
These communities have been left behind but now they have the
potential to see wind turbines, to see
solar fields -- they have the potential for anybody with a
good-sized flat roof or a parking lot is going to have the potential
to put solar.
Michigan state has a parking lot solar ten megawatt solar array that
is fantastically successful they're going to triple it in size so
we're gonna see
the the devolution of power to the periphery to to to from states
down to counties down to townships down to communities down to small
businesses and
farmers and individuals yes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pn-3J2bEkec
[terrible, but not surprising]
*'Exceptionally Troubling': Researchers Show Hack-for-Hire Operation
Targeted Groups Fighting for Climate Action and Net Neutrality*
"If the investigation demonstrates that Exxon is behind these attacks,
it only shows how far the fossil fuel industry will go to silence critics."
by Julia Conley, staff writer
The Canadian digital watchdog group Citizen Lab reported Tuesday that a
hack-for-hire group targeted thousands of organizations around the
world, including climate advocacy groups involved in the #ExxonKnew
campaign.
Groups that have asserted ExxonMobil knew about and hid data linking
fossil fuel extraction to the climate crisis for years were among those
that faced phishing attempts by a group dubbed "Dark Basin" by Citizen
Lab. According to the research, numerous progressive groups--including
Public Citizen, Greenpeace, 350.org, and Oil Change International--were
among those targeted.
After an extensive multi-year investigation, Citizen Lab reported that
it has linked Dark Basin "with high confidence" to BellTroX InfoTech
Services, a technology company based in India which has publicly stated
its hacking capabilities.
In 2017 when Citizen Lab began its investigation, the group believed
Dark Basin could be state-sponsored, but soon determined it was likely a
hack-for-hire operation. Its targets--which also included journalists,
elected officials, and digital rights groups that have lobbied for net
neutrality--"were often on only one side of a contested legal
proceeding, advocacy issue, or business deal."
The watchdog has not been able to definitively link Dark Basin's
phishing efforts to particular entities which would have an interest in
threatening the #ExxonKnew campaign and net neutrality advocates.
"That said, the extensive targeting of American nonprofits exercising
their First Amendment rights is exceptionally troubling," wrote Citizen
Lab in its report...
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/06/10/exceptionally-troubling-researchers-show-hack-hire-operation-targeted-groups
[Yale Climate Connections audio 1:30]
*Retreat from rising seas may require more than moving homes*
When people relocate, they will also need jobs, schools, community
centers, hospitals - and each other.
Rising seas and erosion are putting many low-lying coastal communities
in jeopardy.
"Some of the places become essentially uninhabitable after a while. Some
of the islands in the South Pacific, off the Coast of Alaska, and other
places … really don't have a chance of existing 50 years from now," says
Andrew Dannenberg of the University of Washington.
He says the risks are forcing some small communities to relocate, which
can be traumatic.
"Many of these communities are indigenous communities they have lived
there for centuries," he says. "And the idea of abandoning your land and
moving is culturally and socially and mentally very difficult."
So he says to support vulnerable people, relocation may need to include
more than moving homes. To thrive, people also need jobs, schools,
community centers, hospitals, and each other.
"It's the culture and resources around you," Dannenberg says. "It's
everything from having transportation systems, having sanitation
systems, it's having the social support of people in the community."
Making this all part of a community's relocation plan can be
challenging, and funding is often scarce. But Dannenberg says that a
holistic approach is important to people's health and wellbeing.
https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2020/06/retreat-from-rising-seas-may-require-more-than-moving-homes/
[leaving Weather Underground now to Yale]
*Jeff Masters, Bob Henson to post regularly for YCC*
Two respected meteorologists to provide regular analyses, commentary,
insights on extreme weather and climate change issues.
https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2020/06/jeff-masters-bob-henson-to-post-regularly-for-ycc/
https://www.wunderground.com/cat6/end-of-an-era-category-6-to-close-shop-this-month
[Digging back into the internet news archive - this is an important mark
in history]
*On this day in the history of global warming - June 12, 1996 *
Unrepentant professional climate-change denialist Frederick Seitz
wrongfully accuses climate scientist Ben Santer of fraud in a Wall
Street Journal op-ed. Seitz's claims are quickly debunked, but the op-ed
forms the centerpiece of a years-long effort by the fossil fuel industry
to destroy Santer's life, reputation and career.
http://www.odlt.org/dcd/docs/Seitz%20-%20A%20Major%20Deception%20on%20Global%20Warming.pdf
http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu/Publications/PDF_Papers/WSJ_June25.pdf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Py2XVILHUjQ *32000 Scientists *[This such
an important video]
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html>
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
*** Privacy and Security:*This is a text-only mailing that carries no
images which may originate from remote servers. Text-only messages
provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for democratic
and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial purposes.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20200612/b8093cf7/attachment.html>
More information about the TheClimate.Vote
mailing list