[TheClimate.Vote] April 3, 2021 - Daily Global Warming News Digest
Richard Pauli
richard at theclimate.vote
Sat Apr 3 10:08:06 EDT 2021
/*April 3, 2021*/
[symptom]
*China sandstorms highlight threat of climate crisis*
Experts say extreme weather including droughts will become more common
as planet heats...
Recent sandstorms that shrouded Beijing in a post-apocalyptic orange
haze and intensive droughts in other parts of the country are bringing
into stark relief the challenges China faces from rising temperatures
induced by the climate crisis.
The widespread sandstorms that pelted the capital and spread as far as
central China for several days in mid-March and again at the end of the
month were brought on by lower than average snow cover and
precipitation, as well as higher than normal temperatures and winds
across Mongolia and northern China.
The combination provides perfect conditions for creating sandstorms and
could signal more frequent dusty weather as temperatures climb in the
region...
- -
According to studies of temperature increases across China, Yunnan is
the province with the most climate-related warming over the past decade
and has been affected by frequent droughts in recent years.
“I was recently in Yunnan to check out the weather, and it’s even more
horrible than in previous years,” Liu said. “On the whole, the
government still doesn’t consider that climate change has a big, big
impact on biodiversity.”
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/apr/03/china-sandstorms-highlight-threat-of-climate-crisis
[courts back down]
*Oil Giants Win Climate Suit*
by Bloomberg|Chris Dolmetsch, Erik Larson|Friday, April 02, 2021
(Bloomberg) -- New York City suffered another setback in its effort to
make Exxon Mobil Corp., BP Plc and other energy companies help cover the
public costs of dealing with climate change, as a federal appeals court
ruled the global problem demands political rather than legal action.
The ruling Thursday by the U.S. Court of Appeals in Manhattan is a
warning sign for those trying to use the courts to hold the industry
responsible for a problem that could cost taxpayers trillions of dollars
in coming years. Chevron Corp., Royal Dutch Shell Plc and ConocoPhillips
were also sued in the case.
The court said global warming “is a uniquely international concern” that
requires the federal government to step in rather than judges. Only the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has the authority to regulate
domestic greenhouse gas emissions, the unanimous three-judge panel held.
New York City “sidestepped” federal procedure with a state-law tort suit
against the energy companies even though their commercial activity of
selling fossil fuel products around the world is “admittedly legal,”
U.S. Circuit Court Judge Richard Sullivan wrote for the court...
- -
“Today’s unanimous opinion by a distinguished panel of judges appointed
by presidents from both parties explains in clear detail why the U.S.
climate tort lawsuits are meritless, applying established law as agreed
upon by the Justice Department under the previous two U.S.
administrations,” Chevron General Counsel R. Hewitt Pate said in a
statement.
About a dozen cities, counties and states across the U.S. have sued
Exxon, Chevron, BP, Royal Dutch Shell and their peers. The suits seek to
reimburse taxpayers for the costs of adapting to climate change — from
building multibillion-dollar sea walls to repairing damage from powerful
storms and, perhaps soon, moving whole communities inland.
The federal appeals court in San Francisco in 2019 rejected a lawsuit
brought on behalf of young people who sought to force the government to
draw up a plan to phase out fossil fuel emissions. The majority in the
case held in a split decision that climate change should be addressed by
Congress and the electorate, not the courts.
Exxon is also fighting a case in Massachusetts, where the state’s
Democratic attorney general last year accused the company of misleading
consumers and investors about the financial impact of climate-change on
its business as well as the “green” value of some of its products. The
company says the suit amounts to illegal punishment for the energy
giant’s views about fossil fuels, and has asked the judge to dismiss it.
Exxon in December 2019 prevailed in a similar but narrower lawsuit filed
by the state of New York, which also accused the energy company of
misleading investors by giving false information about how it accounted
internally for the future cost of climate change on its business.
Minnesota and Baltimore are among the other state and local governments
that are pursuing climate litigation.
The case is City of New York v. Chevron, 18-2188, U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Second Circuit (New York).
https://www.rigzone.com/news/wire/oil_giants_win_climate_suit-02-apr-2021-165067-article/
[misinformation battleground ]
*Mike Rowe’s New Discovery+ Show Is Big Oil-Funded Propaganda*
Dharna Noor - April 2, 2021
Reality show host Mike Rowe’s new series Six Degrees, which is currently
streaming on Discovery+ and will soon air on television, begins how I
expected it would: with him on screen in a t-shirt, jeans, and baseball
cap, and smiling wryly. It’s classic Rowe, posturing as an avatar for
the “average” American.
The conceit of the show is to tie seemingly unrelated events together.
In the first episode, Rowe traces the history of the dating app Tinder
back to the invention of the horseshoe. He explains that in the 1700s, a
young blacksmith melted horseshoes to create the first iron plow, and
that decades later, Australian outlaw Ned Kelly used an iron plow to
create the first suit of armor. Kelly then became the subject of the
world’s first feature-length film, which contributed to the rise of the
movie industry. Hollywood made actress and inventor Hedy Lemarr famous.
One of her inventions was a precursor to wifi, which we use to surf
dating apps. Rowe describes this all circuitously, stopping along the
way for jokes and whiskey shots. It’s dumb but seemingly innocuous—until
you get to the end.
“Six Degrees is sponsored by the oil and natural gas industry. Why?
Because oil and natural gas connects everything,” Rowe says at the
episode’s conclusion. He goes on to explain that Lemarr’s inventing
process was funded by the fortune her boyfriend made in the oil fields.
I knew that Big Oil funded Six Degrees—the blog Reality Blurred caught
wind of the sponsorship in January. In fact, I started watching it
because I’d read it was funded by the American Petroleum Institute (the
oil and gas industry’s biggest trade group) and Distribution Contractors
Association (a lobbying group for fossil fuel pipeline contractors).
Still, watching this unfold on screen, I nearly fell out of my chair.
It turns out Rowe shouts out the oil and gas industry in some capacity
in every episode. I couldn’t believe he was so up front about it. But as
jarring as it was to hear him praise the industry that is largely
responsible for frying the planet, this sponsorship makes sense. It fits
right in with the industry’s current favorite media strategy: Reminding
us that their products are used in everything.
“They want to impress upon us that they’re responsible for making a lot
of the cool shit we use, starting with when you wake up in the morning
and you take a hot shower, and then when you fry an egg, and then when
you turn on your iPhone,” said Kert Davies, director of Climate
Investigations Center.
It’s true that across the U.S., water heaters, stoves, and electricity
that keeps your phone charged largely run on fossil fuels. Yet none of
it has to. We have the technology to power each of those things with
clean energy. Delaying that transition would lock in catastrophic
climate damage. That’s what makes Rowe’s show and other fossil fuel PR
campaigns like it so insidious.
“If all you know about this industry, if all you see, is that that they
sponsor a cool show you like, you’ll probably subconsciously think, ‘how
bad could they be?’” said Geoffrey Supran, a Harvard researcher who has
studied the fossil fuel industry’s misinformation campaigns.
Davies was a little more, uh, direct: “The point of the ads is, back
off, don’t fuck with us, you need us. It’s all to do with social license.”
Though the blatant shilling for Big Oil on the show is shocking, it’s
not surprising. Rowe has a history of pro-fossil fuel messaging, and
according to tax forms obtained by Earther, his nonprofit has raked in
six-figure donations from the likes of Koch Industries. (He declined to
comment for this story through Discovery+, and Earther did not receive a
response from his nonprofit.)
Before Six Degrees, Rowe made a name for himself as the host of Dirty
Jobs‚ a show with an obvious—if shallow—appeal as an ode to the American
working class, particularly if you think of the working class as
exclusively white dudes in hard hats. On each episode, he worked in
different thankless and sometimes gross professions, including a
roadkill collector, sewer inspector, and “avian vomitologist,” which is
exactly what it sounds like.
This was an unlikely career path for Rowe, who before the show began was
an opera singer—far from the stereotypical conception of a good ol’
rugged American dude he portrays on TV. But Dirty Jobs gave him a
certain credibility as an advocate for forgotten workers.
In 2008, Rowe launched mikeroweWORKS, a nonprofit promoting vocational
training for blue-collar jobs. The organization provides scholarships
for job training programs in fields including automotive technology,
HVAC, manufacturing, and diesel technology, which in itself isn’t a bad
thing. But the foundation is premised on the idea that the reason people
are struggling to find good-paying work in these sectors is because of a
skills gap for those in blue-collar fields—a thoroughly debunked myth
pushed by industry leaders to make workers feel underqualified for
positions, which research suggests helped companies to put more
conditions on their job listings and offer lower rates of pay.
mikeroweWORKS also fails to grapple with the reality that amid the
worsening climate crisis, many of these fields will have to undergo
major changes (and in the case of diesel, at least, be fully phased out).
“He’s to the oil and gas industry what Ronald Reagan was for General
Electric, a charming pitch man.”
In the years since starting his nonprofit, Rowe started a parallel media
career as a pundit, frequently appearing on Fox News to openly speak out
against regulating oil and gas extraction.
Despite his posturing as a friend of the working class, Rowe doesn’t
have much to say how the industry mercilessly lays off employees while
paying shareholders or that working in the fossil fuel industry comes
with notoriously dangerous conditions for workers and long-term health
risks. (Instead, he suggests safety concerns are overblown). He’s also
failed to show much support for labor organizing in the energy sector,
even though they could desperately use his support. Federal data shows
rates of unionization in the coal, oil, and gas sector is dwindling.
“He’s to the oil and gas industry what Ronald Reagan was for General
Electric, a charming pitch man,” Adam Johnson, the co-host of the
podcast Citations Needed, wrote in an email.
That’s likely no accident. As Johnson’s podcast uncovered on a 2019
episode, Rowe’s foundation is funded by anti-regulation groups including
the Distribution Contractors Association (yes, the same group funding
his new show), auto parts manufacturer Ford-Mogul Motor Parts, a
subsidiary of the British multinational energy firm Centrica, and
perhaps most damning of all, the massive fossil fuel and petrochemical
conglomerate Koch Industries. A document the Climate Investigations
Center found on Guidestar, which is marked “not open to public
inspection,” shows that Koch Industries and the Koch Foundation, both
tied to the massive fortune amassed by the Koch brothers, have together
donated more than $1 million dollars to Rowe’s foundation since it was
founded.
Johnson described Rowe as the “greatest anti-worker avatar money can
buy,” because he’s “someone who a lot of working people genuinely love
... but who is 100% against their interests.”
Rowe’s an especially useful ally to the fossil fuel sector because he
continually perpetuates the age-old conservative myth that environmental
regulation must come at the expense of jobs, despite mountains of
evidence that the opposite is true and that a just transition for fossil
fuel employees is possible (and needed).
“The dirty truth about fossil fuels and the petrochemical industry is
that it is really dangerous dirty work all the way from the frack fields
and wellheads to the refineries and chemical plants,” said Davies.
Workers get sick and die. Fenceline communities get sick and die. There
are cancer clusters, increased asthma and other health problems
associated with petrochemicals, plastics and pesticides.”
In Six Degrees, Rowe doesn’t take an explicitly anti-renewable stance.
In an episode connecting sheep to how we do our taxes, he speaks with a
solar installer and asks him when the energy source will “become not
just an alternative but one of the go-to choices.” But even then, he
doesn’t say anything about why solar might be preferable because oil and
gas have created an existential threat.
“API is hitching its wagon to a show that appears to promote discourses
of fossil fuel essentialism and fossil fuel solutionism,” Supran said.
In another episode of the show, for instance, Rowe says electricity is
“made possible by spinning turbines—turbines powered by wind and solar,
but mostly by oil and gas.”
“In other words, the audience is not-so-subtly indoctrinated with the
idea that fossil fuels will inevitably be essential for the foreseeable
future, which is a political judgement, not a scientific necessity, and
a recipe for climate disaster,” said Supran.
In an email, a spokesperson for Discovery+ said that Six Degrees is the
only program on the network that is funded by advocacy or trade groups.
Though he said he could not disclose exactly how much money the American
Petroleum Institute or Distribution Contractors Association contributed
to the production of Six Degrees, he said that the groups didn’t
influence the show’s content.
“This sponsorship was simply to get production started,” he said. “There
was no creative input or influence on the series.”
But it’s clear why the industry itself would want to sponsor this kind
of endeavor now. Public concern about the climate crisis is growing. The
Biden administration has imposed new regulations limiting extraction,
and organizers who correctly state these moves are insufficient are
pressuring officials to do far more. There’s also the reality that
climate change poses an existential threat if left unchecked. And the
fastest way to reduce carbon emissions is to wind down the fossil fuel
industry while simultaneously protecting the workers Rowe says he stands
in support of. From Six Degrees, though, you’d never know that phasing
out fossil fuels is a necessary step to securing working people a
livable future.
“As the stakes around climate change continue to get higher—and more
people point toward fossil fuels as the main culprit to the warming of
our planet—Big Oil’s sponsorship of Mike Rowe’s new show on Discovery+
is concerning,” said Allison Fisher, climate and energy program director
at Media Matters for America. “Unlike the conservative audience that
tunes in when Rowe talks about the oil and gas industry on Fox News and
Fox Business News, Discovery+ is reaching a new and unwitting audience
who may not have an opinion on Big Oil one way or another, but could be
persuaded by Rowe.”
Six Degrees is right—currently, fossil fuels do provide the foundation
of society and are connected to nearly everything. But that’s not an
immutable truth, it’s a problem to be solved by creating a just, green
economy. It’s precisely because of the interconnectivity of everything,
the premise on which the show is built, that we need to forge that new
world. Rowe’s new show is a roadblock to do just that, and that’s
exactly the way the Six Degrees’ sponsors want it.
https://earther.gizmodo.com/mike-rowe-s-new-discovery-show-is-big-oil-funded-propa-1846585716
[Cosmological conjecture: Intelligent life originated on Mars - audio
interview]
*Where Did the Laws of the Universe Come From? With Paul Davies*
Mar 25, 2021
Event Horizon
Where Did the Laws of Physics Come From?
Why is the universe just right for life?
Paul Davies joins John Michael Godier to discuss why the universe seems
to be fine-tuned for life. How did the universe begin and how will it end?
Paul Davies Books
Affiliate Links
_The Demon in the Machine: How Hidden Webs of Information Are Solving
the Mystery of Life _
https://amzn.to/3vXPiOH
_The Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World_
https://amzn.to/3d6DLUC
_The Goldilocks Enigma: Why Is the Universe Just Right for Life?_
https://amzn.to/2QrgWTV
_God and the New Physics_
https://amzn.to/3fc6IRV
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3qo1moPQOs
[Digging back into the internet news archive]
*On this day in the history of global warming - April 3, 1980 *
April 3, 1980: "The CBS Evening News with Walter Cronkite" reports on
the role coal plays in fueling global warming.
*1980: Walter Cronkite on Climate Change*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU9s0XyEctI
Perhaps if the late Senator Paul Tsongas had lived, more progress could
have been made by now.
http://climatecrocks.com/2013/01/23/1980-cronkite-on-climate/
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html>
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
*** Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not carry
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers. A
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for democratic
and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial purposes.
Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20210403/1f0dda01/attachment.html>
More information about the TheClimate.Vote
mailing list