[TheClimate.Vote] March 7, 2021 - Daily Global Warming News Digest

Richard Pauli richard at theclimate.vote
Sun Mar 7 09:31:55 EST 2021


/*March 7, 2021*/

[Carbon Brief]
*Cancel all planned coal projects globally to end ‘deadly addiction’, 
says UN chief*
https://www.carbonbrief.org/daily-brief/cancel-all-planned-coal-projects-globally-to-end-deadly-addiction-says-un-chief



[NYTimes warns]
*In the Atlantic Ocean, Subtle Shifts Hint at Dramatic Dangers*
The warming atmosphere is causing an arm of the powerful Gulf Stream to 
weaken, some scientists fear.
By MOISES VELASQUEZ-MANOFF and JEREMY WHITE
The Gulf Stream propels the heat of the Caribbean past Cape Hatteras, 
N.C., before bending toward the British Isles.
But now, in the North Atlantic, there is the “cold blob.”

The fear: Melting Greenland ice will tip the delicate balance of hot and 
cold that defines not only the North Atlantic, but life far and wide.

    “We’re all wishing it’s not true,” Peter de Menocal, a
    paleoceanographer and president and director of the Woods Hole
    Oceanographic Institution, said of the changing ocean currents.
    “Because if that happens, it’s just a monstrous change.”

    The consequences could include faster sea level rise along parts of
    the Eastern United States and parts of Europe, stronger hurricanes
    barreling into the Southeastern United States, and perhaps most
    ominously, reduced rainfall across the Sahel, a semi-arid swath of
    land running the width of Africa that is already a geopolitical
    tinderbox...

They’ve also revealed a system of currents that’s far more complex than 
once envisioned.

Dr. Broecker’s old schematics of the AMOC posit a neat warm current 
flowing north along the western edge of the Atlantic and an equally neat 
cold current flowing back south below it. In fact, says Dr. Lozier, that 
deeper current is not confined to the western edge of the Atlantic, but 
rather flows southward via a number of “rivers” that are filled with 
eddies. The network of deep ocean currents is much more complicated than 
once envisioned, in other words, and figuring out how buoyant meltwater 
from Greenland might affect the formation of cold deepwater has become 
more complicated as well.

This is the place scientists currently find themselves in. They suspect 
the AMOC can work like a climate switch. They’re watching it closely. 
Some argue that it’s already changing, others that it’s too soon to tell.

“There’s no consensus on whether it has slowed to date, or if it’s 
currently slowing,” said Dr. Lozier. “But there is a consensus that if 
we continue to warm the atmosphere, it will slow.”
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/03/02/climate/atlantic-ocean-climate-change.html



[ Opinion ]
*The climate crisis can't be solved by carbon accounting tricks*
Simon Lewis
Disaster looms if big finance is allowed to game the carbon offsetting 
markets to achieve ‘net zero’ emissions
Wed 3 Mar 2021 ...
- -
The science of net zero is simple: every sector of every country in the 
world needs to be, on average, zero emissions. We know how to do this 
for electricity, cars, buildings and even a lot of heavy industry. But 
in certain areas, including air travel and some agricultural emissions, 
there is no prospect of getting to zero emissions in the near future. 
For these residual emissions, greenhouse gasses will need to be sucked 
out of the atmosphere at the same rate as they are added, so that, on 
average, there are net zero emissions.

Making this work requires carbon removal, also known as “negative 
emissions”. This can be low-tech, like restoring forests, as this takes 
carbon out of the atmosphere and stores it in trees. Or it can be 
hi-tech, like using chemicals to strip carbon dioxide from the 
atmosphere and then pumping it deep underground into safe geological 
storage. In theory this is all fine, as pragmatically some carbon 
removal is needed to balance hard-to-reduce emissions: but negative 
emissions and offsetting alone are not a route to net zero.

In practice, by believing in the promise of these methods, we are too 
often deceiving ourselves, in three major ways. The first is an 
unrealistic overreliance on carbon removal to preserve the status quo. 
Shell recently published its net zero plan, that actually projects high 
oil and gas production through to 2050 and beyond, which voila, are 
magically removed with negative emissions. Critically, there is far too 
little land to plant enough trees to counter today’s emissions, and 
large-scale hi-tech methods do not yet exist...
- -
What is to be done? Negative emissions and offsets are here to stay. In 
a limited way, they are needed to stabilise the climate as they are the 
only way to tackle the hardest-to-eliminate emissions. Urgent discussion 
is needed about what comprises a “residual emission” that requires 
offsetting. In practical terms, making the carbon accountancy 
trustworthy will require truly independent regulation that is based on 
science. It is the only way to contain the bad actors and release the 
capital of good actors. Solving these carbon deceptions should be a core 
outcome of the Glasgow Cop26 climate summit.

If such deceptions remain, disaster looms. Big finance, led by Carney, 
is planning to massively expand carbon markets. Conceivably, new 
carbon-based financial products could boom, with little impact on 
emissions. Just like the sub-prime crisis, few will understand what they 
bought, and another globe-spanning crash could sweep the world, 
compounding economic and climate crises causing mass suffering, as we 
realise again that the Earth owes us nothing. Nature doesn’t do bailouts.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/mar/03/climate-crisis-carbon-accounting-tricks-big-finance


[China aspires]
*China aims to be carbon neutral by 2060. Its new 5-year plan won’t cut it.*
The plan could allow for emissions to keep growing through 2025.

    The new plan’s 2025 emissions goals reflect an ongoing contradiction
    between China’s short-term and long-term climate goals.

    In the long run, China has expressed a strong commitment to climate
    action. President Xi Jinping surprised the world last September when
    he announced that China would aim to reach carbon neutrality by
    2060. Climate scientists have called for countries to hit that goal
    by 2050, but it was still a significant step forward for China — the
    first time the country made any formal commitment to zeroing out its
    emissions.

    And yet, even as Xi made that announcement, CO2 emissions in China
    were soaring. Like the rest of the world, the pandemic had initially
    caused economic activity to plummet in China in early 2020. But
    after swiftly bringing the pandemic under control within its
    borders, the Chinese government funneled stimulus dollars into the
    heavily polluting construction and manufacturing sectors, stoking
    steel and cement production. As a result, China’s emissions rose an
    estimated 1.5 percent in 2020, even accounting for the initial drop.

https://www.vox.com/22313871/china-energy-climate-change-five-year-plan-wind-solar-coal-oil-gas



[complex consequences]
*UN Human Rights Experts Condemn Expanding Petrochemical Industry in 
Louisiana’s Cancer Alley as 'Environmental Racism'*
By Julie Dermansky • March 3, 2021
Human rights experts appointed by the United Nations Human Rights 
Council issued a statement on March 2 raising concerns about the further 
industrialization of Louisiana’s “Cancer Alley.” This largely 
Black-populated stretch of the Mississippi River between New Orleans and 
Baton Rouge is lined with more than a hundred refineries and 
petrochemical plants. The experts said additional petrochemical 
development in this region, which U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) data shows has some of the country’s highest cancer risks from air 
pollution, constitutes “environmental racism” that “must end.”

“This form of environmental racism poses serious and disproportionate 
threats to the enjoyment of several human rights of its largely African 
American residents, including the right to equality and 
non-discrimination, the right to life, the right to health, right to an 
adequate standard of living and cultural rights,” the experts said.

The statement calls for U.S. officials to reconsider allowing FG LA LLC, 
a subsidiary of Formosa Plastics Group, to build its proposed “Sunshine 
Project” in St. James Parish, in the middle of the region. That 
development, one of several new petrochemical projects slated for the 
region, would be a massive complex. Its 14 units would produce two types 
of plastic and the petrochemical ethylene glycol, which is used to make 
polyester fabrics and antifreeze.

It is a development that Sharon Lavigne, founder of the faith-based 
grassroots organization RISE St. James, has been trying to stop ever 
since learning in 2018 that the company planned to build its complex 
less than two miles from her home.
If built, “Formosa Plastics' petrochemical complex alone will more than 
double the cancer risks in St. James Parish affecting disproportionately 
African American residents,” the human rights experts wrote. Their 
statement also took government regulators to task for their role. 
“Federal environmental regulations have failed to protect people 
residing in ‘Cancer Alley,’” they said, calling for the U.S. Government 
“to deliver environmental justice in communities all across America, 
starting with St. James Parish,” by stopping the Formosa Plastics 
project...
- -
The UN experts’ statement comes after years of campaigning and protests 
by Louisiana residents, community organizations, and environmental 
advocacy groups. In November last year, Loyola University law students, 
with the support of many of these same groups, sent a letter calling for 
intervention to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on contemporary 
forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related 
intolerance.

In response to the UN statement, FG LA LLC called “protecting health, 
safety, and the environment” a priority for the company and emphasized 
that the Sunshine Project meets all regulatory criteria.

“We are constructing this project with advanced emissions reduction 
mechanisms in place and extensive measures to protect the environment, 
and also plan to keep pace with technological advances that may enable 
the company to further strengthen those measures,” Janile Parks, 
Director of Community and Government Relations for FG LA LLC, told 
DeSmog by email. “As the project continues forward, FG will uphold its 
commitment to operate safely, listen to community concerns, keep the 
community informed, support real needs in the parish, and continue to be 
a responsible corporate citizen.”

The company also said it included “the remoteness or distance from 
nearest residents” as an important criterion in choosing the location of 
the facility. Its choice of location — a former sugar plantation — has 
also raised concerns after an archeologist hired by a nonprofit law firm 
representing RISE St. James identified the gravesites of former enslaved 
ancestors on the property in 2019.
Diane Wilson, a Texas-based activist who sued Formosa Plastics Corp. USA 
over its plastics water pollution in her state and won, disagrees with 
Parks’s statement. According to Wilson, Formosa is anything but a 
responsible corporate citizen. Despite a $50 million settlement and 
agreement not to release any more plastic into waterways, Wilson 
continues to report instances of the company releasing the nurdles it 
manufactures into local waterways in Point Comfort, Texas.

In addition, Texas state regulators recently fined that same Texas plant 
$333,638 for air quality violations, including for the unauthorized 
release of carcinogens, feeding further skepticism in the mind of Wilson 
about the company’s claims of corporate responsibility.

Parks also pointed out that FG’s air quality permits were approved by 
the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, adding, “Any claim 
that FG will greatly increase 'toxic emissions' in the area is a 
misrepresentation and inaccurate.”

Lavigne finds this claim — that the petrochemical complex won’t further 
pollute the area because it received government permits — laughable. The 
other factories releasing pollution around her were permitted by the 
government too, she pointed out.
At a February 12 press conference, a Louisiana-based community coalition 
known as the Coalition Against Death Alley (CADA) cited federal data 
showing Louisiana has the highest toxic air emissions per square mile of 
any state. That data comes from the EPA’s Toxics Release Inventory, and 
the EPA’s most recent National Air Toxics Assessment (2014) showed that 
parts of Louisiana have high potential cancer risks.

In her response to the UN human rights statement, Parks also took issue 
with the region’s moniker “Cancer Alley,” a moniker that came from 
residents starting in the 1980s. “Simply stated, there is no scientific 
proof that cancer rates in the Industrial Corridor, including St. James 
Parish, or District 5 where The Sunshine Project is located, are higher 
due to industrial activity,” Parks said. “In fact, cancer rates and 
deaths are lower than, or there is no significant difference from, the 
rest of the state.” As evidence, she pointed to reports from the 
Louisiana Tumor Registry, which aggregates data on cancer incidences in 
the state...
- -
“The 1.6 million pounds of toxic air pollutants to be released by 
Formosa’s planned petrochemical complex includes thousands of metric 
tons of known carcinogens, such as ethylene oxide, benzene, 
1,3-butadiene, acetaldehyde and formaldehyde,” Dr. Marcos A. Orellana, 
who is also an adjunct professor at the George Washington University 
School of Law, told DeSmog. “Exposure to these hazardous substances 
poses a clear and grave risk to the right to life and the right to health.”
https://www.desmogblog.com/2021/03/03/un-human-rights-formosa-petrochemical-cancer-alley
- -
[consequences]
*Pennsylvania Families Exposed to Unusually High Levels of Oil and Gas 
Industry Chemicals, Report Finds*
By Sharon Kelly • Wednesday, March 3, 2021
A groundbreaking four-part report by Environmental Health News (EHN) 
offers new scientific evidence that living near oil and gas development 
can expose people to a wide array of hazardous and carcinogenic 
chemicals — not just those living near shale drilling and fracking, but 
also those living near older conventional oil and gas wells.
- -
The researchers discovered striking levels of chemicals associated with 
oil and gas and their “biomarkers,” substances produced when the body 
processes chemicals — like mandelic acid, which can be evidence of 
exposure to ethylbenzene or styrene, or hippuric acid, a biomarker for 
toluene. The compounds they found biomarkers for, which also included 
benzene, can cause irritation of the skin, nose, and eyes, central 
nervous system problems, and liver and kidney damage; some are also 
carcinogens.
https://www.desmogblog.com/2021/03/03/pennsylvania-families-exposed-unusually-high-levels-oil-gas-chemicals
- -
[Study publication]
Mar 01, 2021
*Fractured: The body burden of living near fracking*
EHN.org scientific investigation finds western Pennsylvania families 
near fracking are exposed to harmful chemicals, and regulations fail to 
protect communities' mental, physical, and social health.
It's been 12 years since fracking reshaped the American energy landscape 
and much of the Pennsylvania countryside.

And despite years of damning studies and shocking headlines about the 
industry's impact—primarily on the state's poor and rural 
families—people that live amongst wellpads remain in the dark about what 
this proximity is doing to their health and the health of their 
families. A two-year investigation by EHN set out to close some of those 
gaps by measuring chemical exposures in residents' air, water, and bodies.

In the summer of 2019, we collected air, water, and urine samples from 
five nonsmoking southwestern Pennsylvania households. All of the 
households included at least one child. Three households were in 
Washington County within two miles of numerous fracking wells, 
pipelines, and compressor stations. Two households were in Westmoreland 
County, at least five miles away from the nearest active fracking well.

Over a 9-week period we collected a total of 59 urine samples, 39 air 
samples, and 13 water samples. Scientists at the University of Missouri 
analyzed the samples using the best available technology to look for 40 
of the chemicals most commonly found in emissions from fracking sites 
(based on other air and water monitoring studies).
https://www.ehn.org/fractured-series-on-fracking-pollution-2650624600/far-reaching-impacts
- -
[Frequently Asked Questions - what to do about it, learning more]
Feb 25, 2021
*Fractured: FAQs page*
We found alarming exposures to likely fracking pollution. But that's 
just the beginning of the story.
https://www.ehn.org/fractured-faqs-page-2650790584/scientific-studies-on-fracking-and-exposures
- -
[State by state information]
*State Oil and Gas Boards*
State Oil and Gas Board and Commission sites are related to oil and gas 
production, well sites, and any other relevant data and information. The 
Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission is a multi-state government 
agency that promotes the quality of life for all Americans. This list is 
where information for OpenEI pages is held, and also, in most cases, 
where oil and gas data can be derived, open to the public. In many 
cases, EIA may hold the data related to Oil and Gas. Also, some datasets 
may only contain a state report pdf, in which case the data would need 
to be pulled out of the pdf and put into an excel or xml. Here are the 
states:
https://openei.org/wiki/State_Oil_and_Gas_Boards



[Two Paul Beckwith lectures]
*Science Behind a Completely FRESH Arctic Ocean Under a Kilometer Thick 
Ice Shelf Cap: Part 1 of 2*
Mar 5, 2021
Paul Beckwith
Part 1 of 2
I delve into the details of the science behind the remarkable new 
finding that the entire Arctic Ocean was essentially fresh water trapped 
beneath kilometer thick ice shelves that extended from Arctic coastlines 
to essentially create a thick ice cap over the entire Arctic Ocean, 
extending from the landlocked Bering Strait region all the way across 
the Arctic region to the Greenland-Scotland Ridge.

The scientific evidence behind this incredible finding is very strong. 
Within salty sea water, there is naturally occurring dissolved uranium, 
with concentrations proportional to the dissolved salt content. This 
uranium decays to Thorium-230 which then goes into the seafloor 
sediments close to the site of production. There is also Calcium, and 
Manganese, and Sulphur in the salts. During the time periods when the 
Arctic Ocean was fresh water, with no salt content, these components 
drop to near zero levels.

How could this happen? With global sea levels 130 meters lower, and a 
sea ice shelf cap over the Arctic nearly 1 km thick, connections to the 
other oceans were basically closed off. Over thousands of years, the 
freshwater discharge into the Arctic Ocean, estimated at 1,200 cubic 
kilometers per year (20% of Amazon River discharge) filled the Arctic 
volume under the ice shelf cap, forcing out all the salt water.

Amazing stuff. Not only that, but as the glacial periods ended and the 
ice shelves receded, the 9 million cubic kilometers of fresh water under 
the Arctic cap was rapidly released to the Atlantic Ocean and then later 
the Pacific Ocean, causing abrupt global climate system lurches.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dbGzwNTjEg
- -
[follow-up video]
*Science of a Completely FRESH Arctic Ocean — Thorium-230, Calcium, 
Beryllium-10: Part 2 of 2*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPoAvJWfiaw


[information warfare - history documentary video]
*How We All Became Richard Nixon by Adam Curtis*
Premiered March 5, 2021
Adam Curtis Documentary
This short film uses the story of Richard Nixon’s paranoia to explore 
how a similar outlook has been perpetuated on the larger social scale by 
the new media age. Skimming through the evolution of the mainstream 
media via television and newspapers, this short film comments on how 
politics has been paralysed by a media that has taken serious threats 
and sensationalised them, resulting in political cynicism and 
disengagement, which in-turn feeds a viscous cycle of nihilism and 
further sensationalist politics and media.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6-IuHtthcM


[Digging back into the internet news archive]
*On this day in the history of global warming - March 7, 2013 *

Kate Sheppard of Mother Jones reports:

"Despite record heat and extreme weather disasters in recent years, 
insurers aren't adequately planning for climate change, according to a 
report issued Thursday. Only 13 percent of insurance companies have a 
'specific, comprehensive strategy' to deal with global warming."

http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2013/03/report-insurers-still-ignoring-climate-change 



/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/

/Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html> 
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote

/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe 
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request> 
to news digest./

*** Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only.  It does not carry 
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers.  A 
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for democratic 
and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial purposes. 
Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote 
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, 
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at 
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for 
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct 
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List 
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to 
this mailing list.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20210307/392f6f5b/attachment.html>


More information about the TheClimate.Vote mailing list