[✔️] October 19, 2022 - Global Warming News - daily selection

[Richard Pauli]

/*October 19, 2022*/
/
//[ water, water, everywhere, but only desalinated waters may we drink ]/
*California approves desalination plant as historic drought hits water 
supplies*
OCT 14 2022
KEY POINTS

    -- California regulators this week approved a $140 million
    desalination plant that could convert up to 5 million gallons of
    seawater each day into drinking water.

    -- The approval of the plant comes as record temperatures and
    drought conditions have forced states like California to address a
    future with dwindling water supplies.

    -- The Doheny Ocean Desalination Project in Orange County, Southern
    California could be functioning within the next five years and
    supply water for thousands of people in the South Coast Water
    District...

- -
There are 12 existing desalination facilities throughout California, 
according to the state’s Water Resources Control Board, including the 
Carlsbad desalination project in San Diego County, which is the largest 
desalination plant in the western hemisphere and produces three million 
gallons of drinking water each day.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/14/california-approves-desalination-plant-as-drought-hits-water-supplies.html 




/[ from SALON ]/
*Study: Climate anxiety is spreading all over the planet*
The broadest look yet shows it's not just a Western worry
By KATE YODER
OCTOBER 18, 2022
If you're feeling anxious about climate change, the common wisdom goes, 
there's an antidote: Take action. Maybe you can alleviate your worries 
by doing something positive, like going to a protest, becoming an 
advocate for mass transit, or trying to get an environmental champion 
elected.

New research reveals that these anxieties are not just Western concerns 
— they're common among young people on nearly every continent — but that 
the ability to do something about them depends on where you live. "The 
question is whether you have the opportunity or not to engage in those 
behaviors," said Charles Ogunbode, a psychologist at the University of 
Nottingham in the United Kingdom.

The study, recently published in the Journal of Environmental 
Psychology, takes the broadest look yet at climate anxiety around the 
globe. Ogunbode and researchers all over the world surveyed more than 
10,000 university students in 32 countries, asking how climate change 
made them feel. They found that it was hurting people's mental health 
virtually everywhere, from Brazil to Uganda, Portugal to the Philippines. ..
https://www.salon.com/2022/10/18/study-climate-anxiety-is-spreading-all-over-the-planet_partner/ 


- -

/[ Journal of Environmental Psychology -- //Volume 84, December 2022, 
101887 ]/
*Climate anxiety, wellbeing and pro-environmental action: correlates of 
negative emotional responses to climate change in 32 countries*
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101887
*Highlights*

    • This study examines negative emotional responses to climate change
    in 32 countries.

    • Climate anxiety is positively related to pro-environmental
    behaviour and environmental activism.

    • Climate anxiety is inversely related to mental wellbeing.

    • Climate anxiety is more strongly related to pro-environmental
    actions in individualistic and wealthier countries.

*Abstract*

    This study explored the correlates of climate anxiety in a diverse
    range of national contexts. We analysed cross-sectional data
    gathered in 32 countries (N = 12,246). Our results show that climate
    anxiety is positively related to rate of exposure to information
    about climate change impacts, the amount of attention people pay to
    climate change information, and perceived descriptive norms about
    emotional responding to climate change. Climate anxiety was also
    positively linked to pro-environmental behaviours and negatively
    linked to mental wellbeing. Notably, climate anxiety had a
    significant inverse association with mental wellbeing in 31 out of
    32 countries. In contrast, it had a significant association with
    pro-environmental behaviour in 24 countries, and with environmental
    activism in 12 countries. Our findings highlight contextual
    boundaries to engagement in environmental action as an antidote to
    climate anxiety, and the broad international significance of
    considering negative climate-related emotions as a plausible threat
    to wellbeing.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494422001323?via%3Dihub#bib57



/[ Global heating is responsible - fossil fuel feeds the heat  -- video 
report - next comes dust ]/
*Utah's Great Salt Lake shrinks to unsustainable levels amid a 
decades-long megadrought*
924 views  Oct 18, 2022  The Great Salt Lake in Utah is the largest body 
of water in the western hemisphere without an outlet to the sea. Its 
levels fluctuate naturally, but scientists say the record-low water 
levels the lake has seen in recent years are worrying. A megadrought 
means less precipitation, and a growing population is taking more water 
before the lake can refill. Stephanie Sy reports.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsBXpt5RIsQ



/[ Go West Young Man ]/
*Starved of new talent: Young people are steering clear of oil jobs*
Who wants to work for the brands that brought you climate change?
Kate Yoder  Staff Writer Grist
Oct 18, 2022
- -
“I do feel that there’s this big pincer movement coming for the fossil 
fuel industry — you know, they’re going to be pinched in lots of 
different directions,” said Caroline Dennett, a safety consultant who 
publicly quit working for Shell earlier this year because the company 
was expanding oil and gas extraction projects. “And that’s exactly what 
we need.”

‘Retention is a massive, massive problem’
If it weren’t for climate change, now might seem like the perfect time 
to drill for more oil. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine sent oil prices 
soaring this year, driving them up as high as $120 a barrel in June — 
the “boom” of the boom and bust cycle. The price has since dropped to 
$85, but could climb higher since OPEC, the oil cartel that includes 
Russia and Saudi Arabia, recently agreed to cut production by 2 million 
barrels a day.

With prices this high, oil companies would normally begin digging up 
more wells to increase production. But the calculus has changed. After 
years of losses, investors want their dividends. “Now we’re in a 
situation where the oil and gas companies are making a lot of cash flow 
… but the investors who stuck with those companies are basically saying, 
‘Well, I stuck it out with you, give me my money back,’” said Peter 
Tertzakian, an energy and investing analyst, on the podcast Odd Lots 
this summer. Added to that is the growing pressure for financial 
institutions to divest from fossil fuels. All this, along with the “end 
of oil narrative,” has made investors hesitant to back new drilling 
projects, Tertzakian explained.

And even if investors were interested in expanding drilling right away, 
many oil companies don’t have extra drilling equipment lying around 
ready to use, or extra people ready to operate it. Trained and 
knowledgeable workers are retiring or moving to other industries. The 
average oil and gas worker is 44 years old, a recent report from 
Deloitte found. The industry has mostly rehired the 15,000 workers it 
laid off during the 2020 crash, according to data from the U.S. Bureau 
of Statistics. But the workforce numbers have been on a long downward 
trend since 2015, when oil prices took a plunge after a supply glut. The 
volatility of the industry — the cycle of laying off and hiring people — 
is another factor that makes the jobs unappealing, the Deloitte report said.

“Half of oil and gas professionals, I believe, would gladly leave the 
oil and gas industry tomorrow if they could get a renewable energy job,” 
said Dar-Lon Chang, who worked as an engineer at ExxonMobil for 16 years 
before resigning in 2019 over concerns about climate change. A recent 
global survey by AirSwift found that 82 percent of current oil and gas 
workers would consider switching to another energy sector in the next 
three years, up from 79 percent last year and 73 percent in 2020. 
Fifty-four percent of those thinking about leaving picked the renewable 
industry as a preferred destination.

“Retention is a massive, massive problem,” Dennett said. “They’re losing 
their most expert, skilled, and experienced technicians, engineers, 
designers, operators, mechanics … I think they will be starved of new 
talent.”

When Big Oil comes up in the news, it’s usually something bad — oil 
spills, climate lawsuits, or other dirty business. The industry has 
drawn comparisons to Big Tobacco, and this image has started to affect 
workers. “We don’t want to be the bad guys,” said one anonymous 
participant in a study surveying oil workers’ opinions about climate 
change as part of a recent paper in the journal Energy Research and 
Social Science.

Krista Haltunnen, the author of that study and an energy researcher at 
Imperial College London, said that many workers believe they can drive 
change within their company. “A lot of them think that they’re doing the 
best they can for climate change or for a better society, whether 
they’re right or not,” Haltunnen said. Dennett, for example, worked with 
Shell to make oil operations safer; Chang joined ExxonMobil after 
assurances from recruiters that the company was “seriously considering 
transitioning away from oil” and researching cleaner alternatives, and 
that he’d be working with natural gas — sold as the “bridge fuel” to a 
renewable future.

Bernard Looney, the CEO of BP, has acknowledged that Big Oil’s 
reputation is causing problems for companies like his. In an interview 
with the Times of London in 2020, Looney said that oil was becoming 
increasingly “socially challenged.” Employees at BP were having doubts 
about their line of work, he said, and some job candidates were 
reluctant to join the company. “There’s a view that this is a bad 
industry, and I understand that,” Looney said at the time.

A ‘permanent black mark’
The generation that’s been striking from school to protest government 
inaction on climate change isn’t exactly itching to join the oil 
workforce. A poll by the consulting firm EY in 2017 found that 62 
percent of 16- to 19-year-olds in the United States found a career in 
oil and gas unappealing. More than two out of every three teenagers 
surveyed said that the industry causes problems instead of solving them. 
Young people tend to view oil careers as “unstable, blue-collar, 
difficult, dangerous and harmful to society,” the report said, 
perceptions that posed a “significant obstacle” toward attracting and 
retaining a highly skilled workforce.

And they’re making their qualms known. Last week, dozens of students at 
Harvard, MIT, and Brown disrupted on-campus recruiting events for 
ExxonMobil, protesting that the company was undermining their future.

College students are also steering clear of petroleum engineering 
programs, creating a gap as oil companies look to replace retiring Baby 
Boomers. Over the last five years, the number of people graduating from 
petroleum engineering programs has dropped from 2,300 to around 400, an 
83 percent plunge, according to statistics from Lloyd Heinze, a Texas 
Tech University professor. Schools in America’s oil patch, such as 
Louisiana State University and the University of Houston, are seeing 
drastic declines in enrollment in petroleum engineering, and others are 
beginning to shut down their programs: The University of Calgary in 
Canada and Imperial College London both pressed pause on their oil and 
gas engineering majors last year.

The trend extends from fieldwork to the front office. From 2006 until 
2020, the number of business school graduates who went into a career in 
the oil and gas industry fell by 40 percent, according to a survey of 
3.5 million MBA students conducted by LinkedIn, while the number of 
students recruited into renewables rose.

Workers on an elevated crane watch a cleaning robot wash large solar panels
Workers use a cleaning robot on solar panels in Huntington Beach, 
California, July 14, 2022. Jeff Gritchen / MediaNews Group / Orange 
County Register via Getty Images
“The dilemma is happening in every company, because if you’re involved 
in projects that you know are detrimental for the environment,” what you 
do every single day may “test your moral values,” said Manuel Salazar, 
an activist in Ireland who is working to help employees push their 
companies to protect the environment.

Oil companies require other services to stay running — and advertisers 
and lawyers may get harder to come by as they turn their backs on the 
industry. About 400 advertising and PR agencies have signed a pledge by 
the group Clean Creatives to cut ties with fossil fuel clients. And as 
oil companies face a mounting pile of climate-related lawsuits, some 
young lawyers may be reluctant to defend them. Two years ago, 600 
lawyers in training signed a letter to the firm Paul Weiss pledging that 
they would not work at the company unless it dropped ExxonMobil as a 
client. (It has not.) An anonymous law student graduating with student 
debt recently wrote in to the New York Times’ ethics column to ask 
whether it was OK to defend polluting companies they were “ethically 
opposed to” in order to pay off their loans, worrying it could create a 
“permanent black mark” on their record.

Chang thinks that his decade-plus as an engineer at ExxonMobil has 
gotten in the way of working in clean energy. He has applied for 
hundreds of clean energy positions since 2015 but has only gotten a few 
interviews. Eventually, he ended up creating his own job, a startup 
that’s trying to get funding to renovate people’s homes to get to 
net-zero emissions.

“I think that people who go into renewable energy, they tend to be 
suspicious of people who are trying to leave the oil and gas industry,” 
Chang said. While there may be some “bad apples,” he thinks the majority 
of oil and gas employees “are legitimately trying to do the right thing” 
— and would leave if they could.
https://grist.org/energy/young-people-are-steering-clear-of-oil-jobs-retention-hiring/



/[  keep an eye out for this ]/
*Amount of ocean heat found to be accelerating and fueling extreme 
weather events*
The rate of warming in the top 2km has doubled from levels in the 1960s, 
review finds
Graham Readfearn
Tue 18 Oct 2022
The amount of heat accumulating in the ocean is accelerating and 
penetrating ever deeper, with widespread effects on extreme weather 
events and marine life, according to a new scientific review.

One of the report’s authors said the devastating floods in eastern 
Australia had likely been made worse by warming oceans. The risks would 
continue to rise as the ocean took up more heat, the report said.

More than 90% of the heat caused by adding greenhouse gases to the 
atmosphere through burning fossil fuels is taken up by the ocean.

The rate of warming in the top 2km has doubled from levels in the 1960s, 
the article in the journal Nature Reviews: Earth and Environment said.
According to the review the extra heat is accelerating sea level rise, 
intensifying extreme rain events, melting ice, adding energy to cyclones 
and changing where they form, and causing more intense marine heatwaves.

Marine habitats including coral reefs were being threatened and the 
heating meant oceans were less able to take carbon out of the atmosphere.
Even under the most ambitious scenarios for action on greenhouse gas 
emissions, the review said the ocean’s heating will at least double from 
current levels by the end of the century.

“Ocean warming is already causing flooding rains, melting ice and rising 
sea levels, as well as damaging coral reefs and ecosystems,” said Prof 
Matt England, a review co-author and oceanographer at the University of 
New South Wales. “Without emissions reductions, this is only going to 
get much worse.”...

All ocean basins were getting hotter, but heating was most pronounced in 
the southern ocean and the Atlantic, the review found. From the 1990s, 
heating was also detected deeper than two kilometres.

Dr Kevin Trenberth, a co-author and distinguished scholar at the US 
National Center for Atmospheric Research, said: “The best indicator of 
the planet’s warming is the global ocean heat content...
- -
At current rates, Trenberth said, the amount of energy being added to 
the ocean each year in the form of heat was equal to about 80 times the 
total global electricity generation.

“Even if we get to net zero in 2050 the ocean heat content continues to 
go up, and sea levels go up for a couple of centuries beyond that,” he said.

Prof David Schoeman, of the University of the Sunshine Coast, was not 
involved in the review but was a co-ordinating lead author of the oceans 
chapter in the most recent UN climate report.

He said the review was broadly in line with previous UN assessments but 
had reduced the uncertainties and likely ruled out the highest and 
lowest predictions of changes in ocean heat.

Schoeman said marine heatwaves, made worse from global heating, had 
caused mass mortalities of marine plants and animals.

“The estimates in this paper suggest on average we have released energy 
equivalent to around 3.5 Hiroshima atomic bombs into the ocean every 
second over the period 1971-2018,” he said.

“The global ocean contributes in a very real way to almost every aspect 
of our lives, but this is often overlooked in favour of the things that 
we see in front of us.”
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/18/amount-of-ocean-heat-found-to-be-accelerating-and-fuelling-extreme-weather-events



/[ video discussion 38 mins ]/
*Saving the EPA From Itself*
Oct 16, 2022  Join special guests Dan Galpern and Donn Viviani of the 
Climate Protection & Restoration Initiative as they discuss the EPA’s 
recent negative response to their petition to phase out greenhouse gas 
emissions with Dr. Peter Carter, Paul Beckwith and Charles Gregoire of 
the Climate Emergency Forum.
- -
This video was recorded on October 5, 2022, and published on October 
16th, 2022.
- -
Some of the topics discussed:
- How the petition is to the EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act, 
abbreviated TSCA or TOSCA, and other U.S. Federal law. It demands a 
phaseout of certain chemical substances and mixtures which are 
greenhouse gas emissions including legacy greenhouse gas emissions. The 
petitioners note these emissions are presenting an unreasonable risk of 
injury to health or the environment and are therefore in conflict with 
section 6 of the Toxic Substance Control Act.
- How the petition was filed with EPA on June 16, with petitioners Donn 
Viviani, the renowned climate scientist James Hansen, the atmospheric 
scientist, John Birks, the well-known climate accountability analyst, 
Richard Heede, and the physician and writer Lisa Van Susteren.
- The three main reasons the EPA responded negatively to the petition 
with their response provided on September 14th.
- Why, in the opinion of our guests, the reasons for a negative response 
from the EPA was not a good one.
- The reasons why the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) to deal with the 
problem are not sufficient.
- The question of whether the EPA is sufficiently informed about the 
risks of climate change to render the correct decision regarding the 
petition.
- In light of the negative response from the EPA, what are some of the 
Climate Protection and Restoration Initiative’s plans moving forward?
- -
Guest Panelists:
Dan Galpern - Attorney at Law, Legal and policy adviser to climate 
scientist James Hansen.
Don Viviani - 35 year EPA Veteran, PHD Organic Chemistry.
Regular Panelists:
Paul Beckwith - Climate Systems Scientist. Professor at the University 
of Ottawa in the Paleoclimatology Laboratory as well as at Carleton 
University
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUy4KfpolH0



/[ TV Review from the Guardian ]/
*Amol Rajan Interviews Greta Thunberg review – she is doomed to the pure 
hell of arguing with people*
Faced with questions both remarkable and daft, the climate crisis 
campaigner calmly sees each one off. But then there’s the one that makes 
her giggle uncontrollably …

A master in knocking back questions we should stop asking … Greta 
Thunberg with Amol Rajan.
Jack Seale - 18 Oct 2022
What must it be like to be Greta Thunberg? To be, at 19 years of age, 
the most recognised climate crisis campaigner in the world, shouldering 
the burden of averting – or at this late stage, merely softening – the 
biggest calamity humanity has ever faced? What can that possibly feel like?

At the end of Amol Rajan Interviews Greta Thunberg (BBC Two), the 
conversation becomes more personal and we get a few answers: how 
Thunberg doesn’t enjoy being stopped in the street and certainly doesn’t 
appreciate threats to her family; how she despairs at being told her 
presence reassures people about the future of the planet, because it 
implies they are outsourcing their individual responsibility to her.
But a fundamental insight into Thunberg’s existence has already been 
provided by the previous half-hour of questions about her advocacy of 
“annual, drastic, immediate emissions cuts, on a scale unlike anything 
the world has ever seen”. Thunberg has sacrificed her youth to tackle 
the climate emergency, having realised that it demands a radical 
reimagining of our whole way of life. Now she is doomed to the pure hell 
of arguing with people who cannot conceive of that way of life changing.

Rajan, who asserts in his introduction that Thunberg’s influence must be 
acknowledged “whether you admire her or despair of her”, spends large 
parts of the interview reflecting mainstream discourse on climate – 
which is to say, he risks sounding ignorant in order to give commonplace 
gotchas and canards an airing. The sport is in how efficiently Thunberg 
can knock down questions we should, by now, have moved beyond asking...
Early on, she is pressed for an opinion on nuclear power and shale gas. 
Aren’t they important components of a strategy to hit net zero by 2050, 
as per the Paris Agreement? Thunberg does say that the former is too 
slow and the latter is, er, a fossil fuel and thus not a cracking idea, 
but stresses that her concern is driving awareness of the extent of the 
problem, not getting bogged down in hot-button issues: arguments about 
which bucket of water to use will dissipate once people agree that the 
house is on fire. Unskewing our priorities is also the rejoinder to 
Rajan’s question, steeped in conservative attitudes towards which 
expenditures are inevitable and which must be interrogated, about how we 
would “pay for” free public transport, a key Thunberg objective, during 
a “cost of living crisis”.

Thunberg is presented with several versions of the same argument: we 
can’t do that, because it would cost money or be inconvenient in the 
short term. At a time when both main UK political parties have recently 
used the slogan “growth, growth, growth”, Thunberg’s contention that the 
endless pursuit of economic expansion might just be, you know, suicidal 
feels like listening to an intelligent alien who is beamed down to sort 
us out. Rajan’s question on the topic is remarkable: “Economic growth 
creates leisure time, it creates opportunities for new experiences – 
some of which will have a negative impact on the environment, but a lot 
of which people really enjoy. Flying is one of those … do you think 
flying should be illegal?”

More credibly, Rajan asks how Thunberg can call capitalism a failed 
ideology, when life expectancy and infant survival rates in China and 
India have risen as those countries have commercialised. Delicately, 
Thunberg observes that the collapse of life-support systems, wars for 
resources and other likely effects of out-of-control global warming 
might soon cause those graphs to slope back down.
It’s not all such a struggle. Thunberg often has a refreshingly 
unguarded response to daft statements: her reaction to Rajan sincerely 
intoning that “There is one individual looming over this debate – and 
that’s Elon Musk” is untrammelled giggling. And, in this extended 
format, Rajan has time to include more profound questions. An inquiry 
about whether the gap between what we’re doing and what we need to do is 
widening (yes) is valuable, as is a discussion about whether Thunberg 
ought not to encourage blanket cynicism towards politicians, and should 
consider going into politics herself.

She counters that although politicians will ultimately implement the 
required action, public opinion will be what compels them to act, and 
protest is an effective way of amplifying that consensus. The 
politicians themselves then become irrelevant, and we can “reconsider 
what is politically possible” – the payment of reparations to poorer 
countries deeply affected by a changing climate they have done little to 
cause, to take the example Rajan puts forward of a demand that is 
absurdly unrealistic, might well become feasible.

Her main point is that this needs to happen soon. We are desperately 
short of time, and Thunberg has given herself the task of communicating 
that urgency. As this programme shows, it is a terribly difficult job.
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/oct/18/amol-rajan-interviews-greta-thunberg-review-she-is-doomed-to-the-pure-hell-of-arguing-with-people



/[The news archive - looking back at what continues today ]/
/*October 19, 2010*/
October 19, 2010: The New York Times reports,  "A secretive network of 
Republican donors is heading to the Palm Springs area for a long weekend 
in January, but it will not be to relax after a hard-fought election — 
it will be to plan for the next one.

"Koch Industries, the longtime underwriter of libertarian causes from 
the Cato Institute in Washington to the ballot initiative that would 
suspend California’s landmark law capping greenhouse gases, is planning 
a confidential meeting at the Rancho Las Palmas Resort and Spa to, as an 
invitation says, 'develop strategies to counter the most severe threats 
facing our free society and outline a vision of how we can foster a 
renewal of American free enterprise and prosperity.'"

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/us/politics/20koch.html


=======================================
*Mass media is lacking, here are a few daily summariesof global warming 
news - email delivered*

=========================================================
**Inside Climate News*
Newsletters
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day or 
once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top headlines 
deliver the full story, for free.
https://insideclimatenews.org/
---------------------------------------
**Climate Nexus* https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News summarizes the 
most important climate and energy news of the day, delivering an 
unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting. It also provides 
original reporting and commentary on climate denial and pro-polluter 
activity that would otherwise remain largely unexposed.    5 weekday
=================================
*Carbon Brief Daily https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up*
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon Brief 
sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to thousands of 
subscribers around the world. The email is a digest of the past 24 hours 
of media coverage related to climate change and energy, as well as our 
pick of the key studies published in the peer-reviewed journals.
more at https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief
==================================
*T*he Daily Climate *Subscribe https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate impacts, 
solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better than coffee.
Other newsletters  at https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/

/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/ 

/Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/


/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe 
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request> 
to news digest./

   Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only.  It does not carry 
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers.  A 
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and 
sender. This is a hobby production curated by Richard Pauli
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for commercial 
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote 
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, 
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at 
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for 
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct 
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List 
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to 
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20221019/284ee778/attachment.htm>