[✔️] February 24, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | Rebecca Solnit, clip French video series The Collapse, William Rees, Baba Brinkman, After Oil Conversation, TED ta; lk disruption,

Richard Pauli Richard at CredoandScreed.com
Fri Feb 24 09:34:17 EST 2023


/*February 24, 2023*/

/[ wise woman of considerable positivism ] /
*Hope Amid Climate Chaos: A Conversation with Rebecca Solnit*
The writer and activist shares her thoughts on the climate movement’s 
wins, the key difference between optimism and hope, and the “clarifying” 
violence climate activists face.
OPINION
ANALYSIS
By Stella Levantesion
Feb 21, 2023

 From throwing soup against paintings, to blocking roads, to striking 
for the climate, to stopping private jets from taking off, activists 
worldwide are pushing harder than ever for action to address global 
warming. And they are delivering a clear and consistent message: What 
has long been accepted as the status quo — expanding fossil fuels, 
investing in polluting industries, oil and gas propaganda, greenwashing, 
climate change denial, governmental delay in climate action — is simply 
not acceptable anymore. The climate movement is working incessantly to 
make this clear to everyone.

When we talk about any movement, including the push for climate action, 
we’re talking about a “zeitgeist, a change in the air,” writer, 
historian, and activist Rebecca Solnit writes in her essay-turned-book 
Hope in the Dark, which focuses on the intersection of activism, social 
change, and hope. It’s this last element, hope, that can become “an 
electrifying force in the present,” Solnit writes, “a sense that there 
might be a door at some point, some way out of the problems of the 
present moment even before it is found or followed.”

As activists and others work towards this door, they do so with the 
belief that there is still time to act and that the climate is worth 
fighting for. These same convictions are at the core of Solnit’s and 
storyteller Thelma Young Lutunatabua’s most recent project, Not Too 
Late, which offers perspectives, resources, and “good paths forward” for 
those who care about the climate. The pair are also transforming the 
project into a book, coming April 2023, with contributions by activists, 
authors, experts, journalists, and others from around the globe.

I published the first Gaslit column a year ago this month. To celebrate 
its one-year anniversary, I wanted to depart from the usual format to 
focus on the essential role of activism and hope in combating the forces 
of delay and denial. I spoke with Solnit about hope and the future of 
climate action in the face of intensifying impacts from global warming, 
oil and gas industry propaganda and greenwashing, violence against 
activists, and inaction by political leaders. The following conversation 
has been edited for length and clarity.

*Stella Levantesi *In Hope in the Dark you wrote that hope requires 
imagination and clarity, and in your latest essay published by the 
Guardian you said that every crisis is a storytelling crisis. The Indian 
writer Amitav Ghosh also said that the climate crisis is a cultural 
crisis, and thus a crisis of imagination. ​​If we cannot imagine it, 
tell it, be culturally immersed in it, how can we face it? How do we 
reconcile these three dimensions: the climate crisis, imagination, and 
hope? And if we succeed in reconciling them what can that lead to?

*Rebecca Solnit*  I always feel it’s very important to clear up the 
distinction between hope and optimism. For me, optimism is a form of 
certainty: everything will be fine, therefore, nothing is required of 
us, which is really the same as cynicism and pessimism and despair. 
Hope, for me, is just recognizing that the future is being decided to 
some extent in the present, and what we do matters because of that reality.

I think the fundamental role of imagination and hope is just the ability 
to imagine a world that’s different from what it is now. [Writer] 
Adrienne Maree Brown once said that all organizing is science fiction 
because you’re imagining something that doesn’t exist yet. But of 
course, it’s like, what is it that you’re imagining? I find that so many 
people around me are very good at imagining everything falling apart, 
everything getting worse; they’re good at dystopia, they’re bad at utopia.

There’s a lot of reasons why people find dystopia very credible and 
utopia or improvements hard to comprehend. I think some of that comes 
from amnesia. If you don’t know how much the world has been changed, to 
some extent for the better, how much the climate movement has achieved, 
then you don’t really have a picture of how change works either.
*LEVANTESI *We imagine hope as something that has to do with the future 
solely, but you’ve underscored it’s not just about the future. What is 
the role of memory in hope?

*SOLNIT *Various people, including the theologian Walter Brueggemann and 
the climate activist and lawyer Julian Aguon, talk about memory as 
crucial to hope. And I share their belief. If you don’t understand the 
past, you don’t understand that people have faced the end of their 
world. Things change powerfully and profoundly over and over again — 
change is the one constant — and then you can narrow in and focus on the 
fact that grassroots movements, citizens organizations, NGOs, activists 
— people who are often considered to be powerless, irrelevant, marginal 
— have changed the world over and over again.

*LEVANTESI *In Hope in the Dark you’ve emphasized how activism can bring 
about change in a non-linear way, how sometimes it is subtle and slow 
but how, within it, we must recognize the importance of victories. What 
are the most significant victories of today’s climate movement?

*SOLNIT *I think the biggest one of all happened in the last couple of 
years, but it’s a matter of consciousness rather than legislation or 
divestment or one of the practical things we aim for: We have captured 
the public imagination.

Five years ago, 10 years ago, a lot of people weren’t worried about the 
climate. They didn’t care about it, they didn’t think about it, they 
didn’t see it as urgent, they weren’t engaged with it, nor were they 
supportive of the need to pursue the solutions. That’s really different now.

There was surely a point where we were more or less starting from 
nothing, but we’ve built strong movements, we’ve achieved a lot of 
victories. The fossil fuel industry is very aware of our power and is 
fighting it with everything they’ve got. A lot of energy transitions are 
underway. The Paris [Agreement] is a huge victory. And in our 
forthcoming book, Not Too Late, [we’re] changing the climate story from 
despair to possibility. The divestment movement has gotten [nearly] $41 
trillion divested.

Each thing I talk about has indirect consequences. The [fight against 
the Keystone] XL pipeline educated so many of us, including me, about 
the Alberta tar sands and the role of pipelines in the fossil fuel 
industry and the volatility of pipelines as a pressure point. The 
divestment movement helped a lot of people recognize this particular 
form of complicity; a lot of us have [recognized] what our money is 
doing, or what our church’s money or university’s money or government’s 
money is doing. We also portrayed the fossil fuel industry the way we 
portrayed apartheid regimes and other things as morally reprehensible.

You’re always making indirect change, even with the most direct change 
you pursue — and sometimes direct change doesn’t yield consequences.

*LEVANTESI *Repression from governments and police today against climate 
activists in movements such as Just Stop Oil in the UK or “Last 
Generation” in Italy to some extent parallels the fossil fuel industry’s 
lies, and the climate deniers and delayers targeting activists through 
propaganda and attacks. What does this violence say to you?

*SOLNIT *The first takeaway that I think is really important and often 
lost is this proves that they’re scared of us. They think we’re 
powerful, they think we’re going to have an impact, because they’re 
desperate to stop it. You don’t use violence unless you are really 
concerned. Propaganda and lies haven’t been good enough.

Violence, I think, is also very clarifying. That is, in a way, almost 
easier to deal with than the other thing that’s happened — decades of 
denying, trivializing the climate crisis, all the greenwashing, the 
pretending that they are doing what the climate requires. When it comes 
to a lot of fossil fuel–related entities and beneficiaries of the 
industry, we see delay, distraction, false promises, which are almost 
harder to fight than violence.

Environmentalists have been attacked [for a long time]. I once read a 
lot of the book reviews of Silent Spring, Rachel Carson’s 1962 book, and 
to see the industry and the mansplainers and the corporate shills attack 
her credibility, her right to speak, her sanity, the facts of the 
situation, to see how many environmentalists, particularly in the global 
south, have been murdered for speaking up since Chico Mendes and Ken 
Saro-Wiwa in the ’80s and ’90s, is to know [that] when there’s huge 
amounts of money and power at stake, the game can be very dangerous — 
and it always has been.

*LEVANTESI *A common strategy of political leaders, as well as the 
fossil fuel industry, is to deny the need for change, sometimes by 
delaying it and stating that another world is impossible, but sometimes, 
as you call it, by promoting “false hope.” Can you tell us about how 
“false hope” works and whether it involves the use of fear?


*SOLNIT *On the one side, I think there’s what I call “naïve hope” which 
is really optimism, the idea that things are going to be fine, that it 
will all work out, et cetera. But “false hope” is usually cynicism 
pursuing a corrupt agenda, because these people don’t actually hope the 
solutions will work. They hope that you’ll believe — the public will 
believe — these solutions will work. They can’t imagine that the world 
could just be very, profoundly different in day-to-day life — how we 
consume, what our values are. False hopes to me are just marketing by 
people who are cynical. And then you see people believing it.

I was really frustrated when the nuclear fusion came out of Lawrence 
Livermore [National Laboratory]. To see the mainstream media jump on it, 
like, “We’re going to have this amazing new energy source” not only gave 
people the false hope that fusion, which has been “just around the 
corner” for decades, is now really, truly just around the corner, but it 
also framed it as though to address the climate we need a solution that 
doesn’t exist. [This] is stupid and dishonest when we already have the 
solutions.

*LEVANTESI *Change is often framed through sacrifice. This idea that to 
stop fossil fuel production and transition to clean energy is to 
renounce something, to sacrifice something — what’s behind this? Has the 
fossil fuel industry succeeded in forcing the perception that oil and 
gas are necessary to the way we live? Are we unable to imagine a 
different world? What is it? And how can we overcome it?

*SOLNIT *I can’t speak globally, but I know that a lot of comfortable 
people in the U.S. perceive most changes as loss. It’s been fascinating 
looking at the recent controversies — of course fueled by the 
[political] right and the fossil gas industry — over gas stoves. They’re 
downplaying the real health hazards of having methane inside your home, 
and they’re also downplaying how well induction cooking works. And so 
many people are kind of like, “If we change this thing, my life will get 
worse.” A lot of it is propaganda, but there is also a lot of fear that 
change is always loss.

I also think the whole climate story, since the Al Gore era, has been 
told as a kind of renunciation story and in fact, I am working on a 
piece [about this] right now. What if we invert that? What if we see all 
the ways our lives are poor now — poor in hope, poor in social 
solidarity, poor in mental and emotional wellbeing and confidence in the 
future, poor in social connectedness, poor in relationship to nature. 
What if we imagine the abundance of doing right the things we’ve done 
wrong, of a world in which [nearly] 9 million people a year don’t die 
from breathing fossil fuel emissions, in which childhood asthma is not 
epidemic in the places where fossil fuels are refined, in which the 
fossil fuel industry doesn’t corrupt global politics. What if 
renunciation was in fact renouncing poison, corruption, deprivation, 
uncertainty, a dismal future, miserable health?

*LEVANTESI *One of your chapters in Hope in the Dark is called 
“Everything’s Coming Together While Everything Falls Apart,” which is 
something activist and Fossil Free Media’s Director Jamie Henn said to 
you during a conversation in 2014. Do you feel like everything’s coming 
together while everything falls apart today?

*SOLNIT *I do. It often feels like we’re in a race. Can the things that 
are coming together — which, of course, for me would be the positive 
things, the climate movement and the changes we’re trying to make — 
outrun the negative things, which are both climate change and its 
catastrophes and destruction?

The forces trying to prevent the measures we need to address the crisis 
have increased greatly. In 2014, people still talked about climate 
change largely as something that was going to happen. Now it’s so in the 
present tense and the climate movement has become so much bigger, more 
powerful. It’s won a lot when you look at how much progress there has 
been around legislation, the buildout of renewables, and the 
technological breakthroughs.

A lot of times you look at something and it doesn’t look better than 
last week or sometimes last year. But you look at where we were 10 years 
or 40 years ago and you see a lot. The long trajectory is part of what 
makes me hopeful.
https://www.altaonline.com/dispatches/a42955294/climate-change-interview-rebecca-solnit-stella-levantesi/
https://www.desmog.com/2023/02/21/rebecca-solnit-interview-climate-crisis-activism-hope/


/[ subtitled video clip from The Collapse - French video series ]/
*The Collapse**
*Just Collapse
440 views  Feb 22, 2023  #collapsology #JustCollapse
A scientist and a minister go head to head on live television in this 
extract from the breakthrough French series "Le' Effrondement" (The 
Collapse), based on the academic discipline of #collapsology.
We collapse if we do, we collapse if we don't. Don't just collapse - 
#JustCollapse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZaOk80HDsQ

- -

/[ small clip with William Rees ]/
*Is this Collapse?*
Just Collapse
1,000 views  Jan 31, 2023
In this two minute excerpt of a worthy conversation between two highly 
respected minds, Bill asks the big question.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1iVJJleLak



/[ here's some Baba Brinkman -- rap artist video from 4 years ago 3:47 
mins ]/
*Confessions of a Skeptic – Baba Brinkman Music Video*
Baba Brinkman
8.86K subscribers
18,178 views  Nov 3, 2018
New album "See From Space" available now:
Bandcamp: https://music.bababrinkman.com/album/...
Apple Music: https://music.apple.com/us/album/see-...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IDUZ1glnes&list=RDMM

- -

/[ his latest video posted 3 weeks ago ]/
*Can't Stop Remix (feat Mariella) – Baba Brinkman Music Video*
Baba Brinkman
1,134 views  Premiered Jan 31, 2023  #neuroscience #philosophy #freewill
Featuring world-renowned philosophers and scientists, "Free Will? A 
Documentary" is an in-depth investigation into the most profound 
philosophical debate of all time: Do we have free will?

Watch the film now:
https://www.freewilldocumentary.com/watch

Version Without Lyrics:
https://youtu.be/uDfrRUXZ7Ww
​
Remix from the album "See From Space" (2019):
https://music.bababrinkman.com/album/see-from-space

Original track from "The Rap Guide to Consciousness" (2018):
https://music.bababrinkman.com/album/the-rap-guide-to-consciousness
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x07nvxd_Vu0



/[ video opinion from the Conversation - 37 min audio ]/
*After oil: the challenges and promise of getting the world off fossil 
fuels*
The Conversation
12.5K subscribers
Feb 23, 2023
Our dependence on fossil fuels is one of the biggest challenges to 
overcome in the fight against climate change. But production and 
consumption of fossil fuels is on the rise, and expected to peak within 
the next decade. We speak to two researchers who examine the political 
challenges of transitioning to a world after oil, and what it means for 
those states who rely on oil for resources.

Featuring Caleb Wellum, Assistant Professor of U.S. History, at the 
University of Toronto in Canada, and Natalie Koch, Professor of Human 
Geography at the University of Heidelberg, in Germany. 

This episode of The Conversation Weekly was produced and written by Mend 
Mariwany who is also the show's executive producer. Sound design is by 
Eloise Stevens, and our theme music is by Neeta Sarl. Full credits for 
this episode are available here. Sign up here for a free daily 
newsletter from The Conversation.
- -
For developing world to quit coal, rich countries must eliminate oil and 
gas faster – new studyCOP27 flinched on phasing out ‘all fossil fuels’. 
What’s next for the fight to keep them in the ground?Ending the climate 
crisis has one simple solution: Stop using fossil fuels
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMQh4MZwJ6I



/[ TED how to face the age of climate disruptive futures the 
consequences of decarbonization.  Any debate with physical reality 
cannot be resolved with words.    18 min video ]/
*The Blind Spots of the Green Energy Transition | Olivia Lazard | TED*
TED
Aug 19, 2022  #TEDTalks #TEDCountdown #TED
The world needs clean power, but decarbonization calls for a massive 
increase in the mining and extraction of minerals like lithium, graphite 
and cobalt. Environmental peacemaking expert Olivia Lazard sheds light 
on the scramble for these precious mineral resources -- and how the 
countries that control their supply chains (including China and Russia) 
could find themselves at the center of the new global stage. Learn why 
Lazard thinks planetary security depends on our ability to de-escalate 
resource competition and avoid the same mistakes that led to the climate 
crisis.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=za6dE5JrNB0



/[The news archive - looking back at GWBush ]/
/*February 24, 2002*/
February 24, 2002:
In the Denver Post, Bruce Smart of Republicans for Environmental 
Protection rips President George W. Bush's February 14, 2002 speech on 
climate change:

    "...President Bush reaffirmed the nation's commitment to the U.N.
    Framework Convention's 1992 goal 'to stabilize greenhouse gas
    concentrations at a level that will prevent dangerous human
    interference with the climate,' and he outlined an environmental
    path for the nation to follow. A number of the specifics he
    proposed, if forcefully pursued, can be helpful.

    "But the medicine prescribed for the world's greatest environmental
    threat—the malignant growth of atmospheric concentrations of
    greenhouse gases—is only a well-packaged placebo. It is no cure for
    global warming and the hazardous changes in climate that a great
    majority of scientists believe it is likely to cause."...

- -
As the world's leading emitter of carbon dioxide, both in total and on a 
per capita basis, and as the leader of innovative technology, it is our 
nation's responsibility to lead n averting the climate threat the world 
faces. The time for feel-good placebos for voters or candy for 
industrial sweethearts is long past. The nation needs to give the Bush 
plan a prompt reality check and push for our vibrant society to take up 
this most important challenge.

http://web.archive.org/web/20030122161530/http://www.rep.org/opinions/op-eds/19.htm


=======================================
*Mass media is lacking, many daily summariesdeliver global warming news 
- a few are email delivered*

=========================================================
**Inside Climate News*
Newsletters
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day or 
once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top headlines 
deliver the full story, for free.
https://insideclimatenews.org/
---------------------------------------
**Climate Nexus* https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News summarizes the 
most important climate and energy news of the day, delivering an 
unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting. It also provides 
original reporting and commentary on climate denial and pro-polluter 
activity that would otherwise remain largely unexposed.    5 weekday
=================================
*Carbon Brief Daily https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up*
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon Brief 
sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to thousands of 
subscribers around the world. The email is a digest of the past 24 hours 
of media coverage related to climate change and energy, as well as our 
pick of the key studies published in the peer-reviewed journals.
more at https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief
==================================
*T*he Daily Climate *Subscribe https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate impacts, 
solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better than coffee.
Other newsletters  at https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/

/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/ 

/Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/


/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe 
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request> 
to news digest./

Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only.  It does not carry 
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers.  A 
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and 
sender. This is a personal hobby production curated by Richard Pauli
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for commercial 
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote 
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, 
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at 
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for 
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct 
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List 
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to 
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20230224/e9135b1a/attachment.htm>


More information about the theClimate.Vote mailing list