[TheClimate.Vote] July 28, 2017 - Daily Global Warming News
Richard Pauli
richard at theclimate.vote
Fri Jul 28 09:40:43 EDT 2017
/July 28, 2017/
*Paris 1.5-2 degrees C target far from safe, say world-leading
scientists
<http://www.climatecodered.org/2017/07/paris-15-2c-target-far-from-safe-say.html>*
by David Spratt, first published at Renew Economy
The Paris climate agreement goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 to 2
degrees Celsius (degreesC) is well above temperatures experienced during
the Holocene - period of human settlement over the last 11,700 years -
and is far from safe because "if such temperature levels are allowed to
long exist they will spur "slow" amplifying feedbacks… which have
potential to run out of humanity's control."
That's the message from some of the world best climate scientists,
including former NASA climate chief, James Hansen, in a newly paper,
"Young people's burden: requirement of negative CO2 emissions",
published in Earth System Dynamics this month.
http://www.climatecodered.org/2017/07/paris-15-2c-target-far-from-safe-say.html
http://reneweconomy.com.au/paris-1-5-2c-target-far-from-safe-say-world-leading-scientists-81532/
http://www.resilience.org/stories/2017-07-26/a-failure-of-imagination-on-climate-risks/
*How the climate crisis could become a food crisis overnight.
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/07/27/how-the-climate-crisis-could-become-a-food-crisis-overnight/?utm_term=.29728850734e>*
By Elizabeth Winkler Washington Post Jul 27
The world's food system is particularly vulnerable to freak weather -
the exact type of event climate change is making more common. more…
Now a new report by Chatham House
<https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/publications/research/2017-06-27-chokepoints-vulnerabilities-global-food-trade-bailey-wellesley.pdf>,
a London-based think tank, details how climate change further threatens
that network, as the type of extreme weather event that knocked out the
Russian harvest becomes all the more common.
Global food security depends on trade in just four crops: maize, wheat,
rice and soybeans. The first three account for 60 percent of the world's
food energy intake. The fourth, soybeans, is the world's largest source
of animal protein feed, making up 65 percent of global protein feed
supply. Their production is concentrated in a handful of exporting
countries, including the United States, Brazil and the Black Sea region,
from which they are flowing at ever-greater volumes. Between 2000 and
2015, global food trade grew by 127 percent to 2.2 billion metric tons -
and growth rates are projected to keep increasing.
But the movement of these crops hinges on just 14 "choke-point"
junctures on transport routes through which exceptional volumes of trade
pass.
Imagine the following frightening-yet-plausible scenario:
/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/07/27/how-the-climate-crisis-could-become-a-food-crisis-overnight//
*Understanding Sea Level Rise
<https://tamino.wordpress.com/2017/07/27/understanding-sea-level-rise/>*
Tamino
Sea level rise is complicated. But some people think its future course
is oh so simple, and the recent visit by a certain Mr. Wakefield showed
just how determined he is to stick with what I call the "simpleton's view."
It started with a post I did about Willis Eschenbach's mistaken claim
about sea level rise at individual tide gauge stations, that they show
steady rise at a constant rate, surely not speeding up (accelerating).
Looking at data from 63 tide gauges around the world, Eschenbach said
"NOT ONE of these 63 full tidal datasets shows statistically significant
acceleration …" I showed that Willis was wrong, using exactly the same
data he had used. To his credit, Willis didn't keep insisting he was
right about that. He still maintains that any acceleration you can find
is unimportant (I disagree), but at least he didn't insist that his
initial analysis was right after it had been shown wrong.
And that's another one of the problems - that people (including voters)
don't take the issue seriously enough unless it hits them in the face in
their own home towns. The sad part is that by the time that happens,
we've already wasted decades when we could have been working to reduce
the damage. Because scientists have been warning us about this, for 30
years now. They say that "forewarned in forearmed," but when early
warning is discredited by know-nothings, too many people take the easy
way out and set the issue aside. Instead of being forearmed, we end up
disarmed, just when we most need to prepare for what's to come.
/https://tamino.wordpress.com/2017/07/27/understanding-sea-level-rise//
*Mammoth Antarctic iceberg is on the move, while the ice shelf it left
behind grieves its loss
<http://mashable.com/2017/07/26/antarctic-iceberg-moves-away-larsen-c-new-cracks/#J9atuDznoOqf>*
The Delaware-sized iceberg that calved off the Larsen C Ice Shelf in
Antarctica sometime between July 10 and July 12 is drifting farther from
its former home, while breaking into smaller pieces.
More importantly, new cracks are appearing in the ice shelf that could
portend the creation of additional icebergs and the possible
destabilization of larger parts of the ice sheet, which holds back
land-based ice from flowing into the sea and raising sea levels.
Satellite imagery from the Landsat 8 satellite as well as the the camera
aboard the European Space Agency's (ESA) Sentinel-1 satellite are
helping scientists keep tabs on the gargantuan iceberg despite the
shroud of darkness during the Antarctic winter season.
http://mashable.com/2017/07/26/antarctic-iceberg-moves-away-larsen-c-new-cracks/#J9atuDznoOqf
*Huge landslide triggered rare Greenland mega-tsunami
<http://www.nature.com/news/huge-landslide-triggered-rare-greenland-mega-tsunami-1.22374>*
By Quirin Schiermeier Nature Jul 27
Scientists hope studying last month's deadly event will improve
modelling of rockslides that could become more frequent with climate change.
One of the tallest tsunamis in recorded history - a 100-metre-high wave
that devastated a remote settlement in Greenland last month - was
caused, unusually, by a massive landslide, researchers report.
Seismologists returning from studying the rare event ... warn that such
events could become more frequent as the climate warms.
The landslide occurred on the evening of 17 June, in the barren Karrat
Fjord on the west coast of Greenland. It caused a sudden surge of
seawater that wreaked havoc in the fishing village of Nuugaatsiaq,
located on an island within the fjord about 20 kilometres away (see
'Greenland tsunami'). The wave washed away eleven houses, and four
people are presumed dead.
The slide was so large that it generated a seismic signal suggestive of
a magnitude-4.1 earthquake, confounding initial efforts to identify its
cause, says Trine Dahl-Jensen, a seismologist at the Geological Survey
of Denmark and Greenland. But more careful examination indicated no
significant tectonic activity just before the landslide.
A research team that visited the site earlier this month found that a
large volume of rock had plunged - probably spontaneously - from one of
the steep sides of the fjord into the water 1,000 metres below, and
shattered chunks of a glacier. That disturbance pushed water levels up
by more than 90 metres along the coastline on the same side as the
slide. And although the tsunami dissipated quickly as it crossed the
deep, six-kilometre-wide fjord, it still had enough energy to send water
50 metres up the hillside opposite. The team also measured an increase
in water levels of about 10 metres on shorelines 30 kilometres away.
"Landslide-generated tsunamis are much more locally limited than
tsunamis produced by sea quakes, but they can be massively tall and
devastating in the vicinity," says Hermann Fritz, an environmental
engineer at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta who led the
research team...
Fritz adds that the Greenland event is reminiscent of a 1958 tsunami -
the tallest ever recorded1 - in Lituya Bay, Alaska. A magnitude-8.3
quake triggered a landslide into a narrow fjord and the bay's shallow
water, causing the water to rise 500 metres above the normal tide level
(a measure known as run-up). By comparison, the 2011 quake-triggered
tsunami in Japan, which killed more than 16,000 people and caused the
Fukushima nuclear disaster, reached only about 40 metres at its maximum
height.
And in 2015, a landslide-generated tsunami in the Taan Fjord in Icy Bay,
Alaska, caused a 300-metre run-up of water, says Synolakis.
"Earlier, we didn't really believe such extremes were possible," he
says. "But with global warming and sea level rise, such landslides are
going to be far more common."
http://www.nature.com/news/huge-landslide-triggered-rare-greenland-mega-tsunami-1.22374
*
Video Captures Moment When Tsunami Hits Greenland's West Coast
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amWshLXe74s>
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZQ6IBa_N7A
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/06/video-shows-greenland-deadly-tsunami-landslide-spd/*
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amWshLXe74s
In pictures: Greenland tsunami aftermath
<http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40347552>
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40347552
*Climate change scientists 'very worried' Greenland ice sheet might
start to melt 'faster and faster'*
<http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change-scientists-greenland-ice-sheet-melt-faster-worried-algae-a7858876.html>
Only a small amount has to melt to threaten millions in coastal
communities around the world'
Scientists are "very worried" that the Greenland ice sheet might start
to melt "faster and faster", a leading scientist has said.
The problem is that the warmer weather is allowing more dark algae to
grow on the ice.
Because ice is white, it reflects much of the sun's energy, but dark
algae absorb the heat, increasing the rate of melting.
The Greenland ice sheet is up to 3km thick and would raise sea levels by
seven metres if it all melted into the sea. The current rate of melting
is adding about 1mm a year to the global average sea level.
Now a team of scientists has begun a new five-year research project,
called Black and Bloom, to discover how algal growth might affect this,
BBC News reported.
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change-scientists-greenland-ice-sheet-melt-faster-worried-algae-a7858876.html
*A profile of award-winning climate scientist Kevin Trenberth
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/jul/27/a-profile-of-award-winning-climate-scientist-kevin-trenberth>*
Kevin Trenberth - recent award winner - is one of the world's foremost
climate scientists
The American Geophysical Union - the pre-eminent organization of Earth
scientists - presents annual awards to celebrate the achievements of
scientists. The awards, which are often named after famous historical
scientists, reflect the contributions to science in the area of the
award namesake. With the 2017 award winners just announced, it's
appropriate to showcase one of the winners here.
The 2017 winner of the Roger Revelle medal is Dr. Kevin E. Trenberth.
One of the most well-known scientists in the world, he is certainly the
person most knowledgeable about climate change that I know.
But perhaps Dr. Trenberth won the award because of the sheer volume and
impact of his scholarship. He is closing in on 70,000 citations to his
work. This puts him near the top of the list worldwide for impact.
Or maybe he won because of his tireless efforts in service to the
scientific community, with leadership roles in the IPCC, the World
Climate Research Programme, NOAA, and other groups. Or lastly, it could
be because he is tireless as both a researcher and a communicator. Dr.
Trenberth can be heard or read almost weekly in major newspapers,
magazine articles, radio and television shows. When reporters need
complex climate science explained, he is a go-to person, and has been
for years....
Why would I write about this aspect of Trenberth's career? Because it
shows that he has suffered slings and arrows for his tireless work. He
has spent his career being honest about the limits of our knowledge of
the Earth's climate but also being clear about our certainty of
human-caused climate change. His reward for this tireless service to
society has been attacks on his research and his person. However, he has
been impeccable in character and scholarship. The ill-advised who tangle
with Trenberth have discovered they are on the short end of the
intellectual battle.
It is my view that the AGU, by granting awards such as these to
scientists, effectively encourage others to reach the highest standards
in their profession.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/jul/27/a-profile-of-award-winning-climate-scientist-kevin-trenberth
*(sarcasm) The Onion Reviews 'An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth To Power'
<http://www.theonion.com/video/onion-reviews-inconvenient-sequel-truth-power-56495>*
The Onion's movie critic Peter K. Rosenthal reviews 'An Inconvenient
Sequel' in this week's Film
/http://www.theonion.com/video/onion-reviews-inconvenient-sequel-truth-power-56495/
*This Day in Climate History July 28, 2012
<http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9453>- from D.R. Tucker*
July 28, 2012: Physicist Richard Muller, long known for accusing climate
scientists of data manipulation, writes an opinion piece for the New
York Times acknowledging that he cannot disprove the monumental evidence
pointing to human activity as the main driver of climate change. Days
later, in an interview with Betsy Rosenberg, Muller continues to smear
acclaimed climate scientist Michael E. Mann.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/opinion/the-conversion-of-a-climate-change-skeptic.html?pagewanted=all
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9453
/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
////You are encouraged to forward this email /
. *** Privacy and Security: * This is a text-only mailing that
carries no images which may originate from remote servers.
Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote with subject:
subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe
Also youmay subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Paulifor
http://TheClimate.Vote delivering succinct information for
citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20170728/78c68f42/attachment.html>
More information about the TheClimate.Vote
mailing list