[TheClimate.Vote] April 29, 2018 - Daily Global Warming News Digest
Richard Pauli
richard at theclimate.vote
Sun Apr 29 09:21:20 EDT 2018
/April 29, 2018/
[LA Times]
*Trump and California are set to collide head-on over fuel standards
<http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-mileage-20180427-story.html>*
EVAN HALPER - APR 27, 2018
The Trump administration is speeding toward all-out war with California
over fuel economy rules for cars and SUVs, proposing to revoke the
state's long-standing authority to enforce its own, tough rules on
tailpipe emissions.
The move forms a key part of a proposal by Trump's environmental and
transportation agencies to roll back the nation's fuel economy
standards. The agencies plan to submit the proposal to the White House
for review within days.
The plan would freeze fuel economy targets at the levels required for
vehicles sold in 2020, and leave those in place through 2026, according
to federal officials who have reviewed it. That would mark a dramatic
retreat from existing law, which aimed to get the nation's fleet of cars
and light trucks to an average fuel economy of 55 miles per gallon by
2025. Instead of average vehicle fuel economy ratcheting up to that
level, it would stall out at 42 miles per gallon...
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-mileage-20180427-story.html
[pleading to the EPA]
*Don't Gut Coal Ash Rules, Communities Beg EPA at Hearing
<https://insideclimatenews.org/news/25042018/toxic-coal-ash-disposal-standards-epa-hearing-ccr-rule-groundwater-power-plant-health-data>*
'We're talking about poisoning groundwater,' one mayor told the agency
at the only public hearing planned on Pruitt's coal ash rule change,
proposed by industry.
Georgina Gustin
It took decades for the Environmental Protection Agency to craft public
safeguards for the disposal of coal ash, the toxic byproduct that
coal-burning power plants generate more than 100 million tons of every year.
Scott Pruitt's EPA is aiming to unravel those standards in a matter of
months.
On Tuesday, in a hotel conference room outside Washington, dozens of
people spoke at the EPA's only planned public hearing on Pruitt's
proposed changes to the coal ash standards. They represented their
communities, many of them poor, seemingly powerless and hundreds of
miles away from the capital.
A pediatrician. A small-town mayor. Tribal members. Girls Scouts.
"Please, do not roll back EPA safeguards," 8-year-old Alivia Hopkins, a
Scout from Pleasant Plains, Illinois, told a panel of agency employees
as she stood on a chair to reach a microphone at the podium. "I'm
counting on you to keep those I love safe."...
- - - -
In 2015, the EPA finalized a rule that calls for utilities to take
certain steps when disposing of coal ash, which can include a number of
toxins, including lead, mercury and arsenic.
The rule, known as the Coal Combustion Residuals, or CCR, rule requires
utilities to close ponds that are leaking, to line the ponds and to
locate them away from waterways. It also requires specific groundwater
monitoring, creates certain allowable thresholds for toxic materials and
mandates public disclosure of data.
- - - - -
Dink NeSmith, a newspaper owner from Jesup, Georgia, waged-and won-a
multi-year fight against the disposal of coal ash in the city's
landfill. Now he worries the changes to the CCR rule could reverse that.
"In five short years, we would have had a toxic mountain of more than 18
million tons of coal ash," NeSmith said Tuesday. "That is still a
possibility. Your proposed anything-goes set of rules will be
devastating to our community and hundreds of others."
moe at:
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/25042018/toxic-coal-ash-disposal-standards-epa-hearing-ccr-rule-groundwater-power-plant-health-data
[video with an important, positive message]
*Humanity's True Purpose <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0P-mE7-kPMc>*
Sailesh Rao - 9 minute video Published on Apr 20, 2018
Is humanity nothing more than a cancer on the planet, consuming its host
until it is gone, guaranteeing its own destruction in the process? A
quick glance at the effects of our behavior might lead us to say yes.
But looks can be deceiving. Nature shows us that what is destructive on
one level can also be part of a larger process of change that creates
new forms of value at another level...
To check the facts in the video, please go to
http://www.climatehealers.org/facts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0P-mE7-kPMc
[research paper]
*Integration anxiety: The cognitive isolation of climate change
<http://ses.forestry.ubc.ca/people/postdoctoral-fellows/>*
Please find below a free link to our new paper in Global Environmental
Change seeking to understand how people coordinate (or fail to
coordinate) climate change risks with other decisions.
The study examines South Africa's commercial grain farmers as a uniquely
informative group with the demonstrated capacity, incentive and
willingness to adapt to climate change risks, including their ongoing
adoption of farming practices associated with Conservation Agriculture.
Using mental models analysis, we find that farmers' failure to integrate
climate change with the many other risks they face makes it unlikely
that they will adapt proactively and rationally to this new uncertainty
even when they otherwise appear motivated and well-equipped to do so.
Highlights:
- We evaluate how farmers mainstream climate change adaptation.
- These farmers isolate climate change from weather and other
'normal' risks.
- They are explicitly sensitive to climate risks, expressing concern
for its impacts.
- But the cognitive isolation of climate risks makes them implicitly
insensitive.
- They appear unlikely to adapt proactively and rationally to
climate change.
Using the following link, the paper may be downloaded for free until 8
June 2018:
https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1Wv0q3Q8oPxLaV
Findlater KM, Donner SDD, Satterfield T, Kandlikar M (2018).
Integration anxiety: The cognitive isolation of climate change. Global
Environmental Change, 50:178-189. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.010.
http://ses.forestry.ubc.ca/people/postdoctoral-fellows/
[Water in Arizona]
*Plight of Phoenix: how long can the world's 'least sustainable' city
survive?
<https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2018/mar/20/phoenix-least-sustainable-city-survive-water>*
Phoenix gets less than eight inches of rainfall each year; most of the
water supply for central and southern Arizona is pumped from Lake Mead,
fed by the Colorado river over 300 miles away. Anthem's private
developer paid a local Native American tribe to lease some of its
historic water rights, and pipes its water from the nearby Lake Pleasant
reservoir - also filled by the Colorado.
That river is drying up. This winter, snow in the Rocky Mountains, which
feeds the Colorado, was 70% lower than average. Last month, the US
government calculated that two thirds of Arizona is currently facing
severe to extreme drought; last summer 50 flights were grounded at
Phoenix airport because the heat - which hit 47C (116F) - made the air
too thin to take off safely. The "heat island" effect keeps temperatures
in Phoenix above 37C (98F) at night in summer.
Phoenix and its surrounding area is known as the Valley of the Sun, and
downtown Phoenix - which in 2017 overtook Philadelphia as America's
fifth-largest city - is easily walkable, with restaurants, bars and an
evening buzz. But it is a modern shrine to towering concrete, and gives
way to endless sprawl that stretches up to 35 miles away to places like
Anthem. The area is still growing - and is dangerously overstretched,
experts warn.
"There are plans for substantial further growth and there just isn't the
water to support that," says climate researcher Jonathan Overpeck, who
co-authored a 2017 report that linked declining flows in the Colorado
river to climate change...
- - - -
One of those plans is Bill Gates's new "smart city". The Microsoft
founder recently invested $80m (£57m) in a development firm that aims to
construct80,000 new homes on undeveloped land west of Phoenix,
<In%20his%202011%20book%20Bird%20on%20Fire,+the+New+York+University+sociologist+Andrew+Ross+branded+Phoenix+the+least+sustainable+city+in+the+world.+He+says+he+stands+by+his+assessment+and+warns+of+an+%E2%80%9Ceco-apartheid%E2%80%9D,+whereby+low-income+neighbourhoods+on+the+more+polluted+south+side+of+the+Salt+River+%28which+once+flowed+vigorously+through+the+city+and+is+now+a+trickle%29+are+less+able+to+protect+themselves+from+the+heat+and+drought+than+wealthier+citizens.>
and a new freeway all the way to Las Vegas...
- - - - -
In his 2011 book Bird on Fire, the New York University sociologist
Andrew Ross branded Phoenix the least sustainable city in the world. He
says he stands by his assessment and warns of an "eco-apartheid",
whereby low-income neighbourhoods on the more polluted south side of the
Salt River (which once flowed vigorously through the city and is now a
trickle) are less able to protect themselves from the heat and drought
than wealthier citizens.
https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2018/mar/20/phoenix-least-sustainable-city-survive-water
[2016 data visualization]
*The World Water Atlas <http://www.worldwateratlas.org/about>*
Water represents society's most challenging and complex risk. Too much,
too little, and too dirty water combine in potentially disastrous ways
with climate change and socio-economic development. The High Level Panel
on Water (HLPW) Action Plan points out that we need to understand the
risks and link them to potential solutions to inspire action.
- - - - -
The Action Plan recognizes the need for "a platform where states can
share and exchange lessons and good practices for addressing
water-related disasters and translate them into solutions that can be
promoted globally".
The Kingdom of the Netherlands has developed the "World Water Atlas"
under the patronage of the HLPW, and with support of the Dutch water
sector. The action-inspiring narratives in the Atlas will be developed
along three lines:*too much, too little and too dirty. **Interactive
World Water Atlas <http://www.worldwateratlas.org/themes/too-little/>*
For all people and their leaders who want to understand and address the
multifaceted risk related to water, The World Water Atlas is an
interactive platform that marks water risk 'hotspots,' where challenges
and opportunities collide. The Atlas is presented in compelling
narratives backed by reliable open-source data.
For more information, please contact us at info at worldwateratlas.org
http://www.worldwateratlas.org/about
- - - - -
[subject blog water]
Aguanomics - The political economy of water - and other distractions
David Zetland has worked on water policy for 10+ years. He's an
assistant professor of political-economy at Leiden University College in
the Netherlands...
http://www.aguanomics.com/p/about-david.html
[Serious, deep opinions: distressing interview; grief and then positivism]
*'We're doomed': Mayer Hillman on the climate reality no one else will
dare mention
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/apr/26/were-doomed-mayer-hillman-on-the-climate-reality-no-one-else-will-dare-mention>*
By Patrick Barkham
The 86-year-old social scientist says accepting the impending end of
most life on Earth might be the very thing needed to help us prolong it.
"We're doomed," says Mayer Hillman with such a beaming smile that it
takes a moment for the words to sink in. "The outcome is death, and it's
the end of most life on the planet because we're so dependent on the
burning of fossil fuels. There are no means of reversing the process
which is melting the polar ice caps. And very few appear to be prepared
to say so."
Hillman, an 86-year-old social scientist and senior fellow emeritus of
the Policy Studies Institute, does say so. His bleak forecast of the
consequence of runaway climate change, he says without fanfare, is his
"last will and testament". His last intervention in public life. "I'm
not going to write anymore because there's nothing more that can be
said," he says when I first hear him speak to a stunned audience at the
University of East Anglia late last year.
From Malthus to the Millennium Bug, apocalyptic thinking has a poor
track record. But when it issues from Hillman, it may be worth paying
attention. Over nearly 60 years, his research has used factual data to
challenge policymakers' conventional wisdom. In 1972, he criticised
out-of-town shopping centres more than 20 years before the government
changed planning rules to stop their spread. In 1980, he recommended
halting the closure of branch line railways - only now are some closed
lines reopening. In 1984, he proposed energy ratings for houses -
finally adopted as government policy in 2007. And, more than 40 years
ago, he presciently challenged society's pursuit of economic growth.
When we meet at his converted coach house in London, his classic Dawes
racer still parked hopefully in the hallway (a stroke and a triple heart
bypass mean he is - currently - forbidden from cycling), Hillman is
anxious we are not side-tracked by his best-known research, which
challenged the supremacy of the car.
"With doom ahead, making a case for cycling as the primary mode of
transport is almost irrelevant," he says. "We've got to stop burning
fossil fuels. So many aspects of life depend on fossil fuels, except for
music and love and education and happiness. These things, which hardly
use fossil fuels, are what we must focus on."
While the focus of Hillman's thinking for the last quarter-century has
been on climate change, he is best known for his work on road safety. He
spotted the damaging impact of the car on the freedoms and safety of
those without one - most significantly, children - decades ago. Some of
his policy prescriptions have become commonplace - such as 20mph speed
limits - but we've failed to curb the car's crushing of children's
liberty. In 1971, 80% of British seven- and eight-year-old children went
to school on their own; today it's virtually unthinkable that a
seven-year-old would walk to school without an adult. As Hillman has
pointed out, we've removed children from danger rather than removing
danger from children - and filled roads with polluting cars on school
runs. He calculated that escorting children took 900m adult hours in
1990, costing the economy £20bn each year. It will be even more
expensive today.
Our society's failure to comprehend the true cost of cars has informed
Hillman's view on the difficulty of combatting climate change. But he
insists that I must not present his thinking on climate change as "an
opinion". The data is clear; the climate is warming exponentially. The
UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts that the world on
its current course will warm by 3C by 2100. Recent revised climate
modelling suggested a best estimate of 2.8C but scientists struggle to
predict the full impact of the feedbacks from future events such as
methane being released by the melting of the permafrost.
Hillman believes society has failed to challenge the supremacy of the car.
Hillman is amazed that our thinking rarely stretches beyond 2100. "This
is what I find so extraordinary when scientists warn that the
temperature could rise to 5C or 8C. What, and stop there? What legacies
are we leaving for future generations? In the early 21st century, we did
as good as nothing in response to climate change. Our children and
grandchildren are going to be extraordinarily critical."
Global emissions were static in 2016 but the concentration of carbon
dioxide in the atmosphere was confirmed as beyond 400 parts per million,
the highest level for at least three million years (when sea levels were
up to 20m higher than now). Concentrations can only drop if we emit no
carbon dioxide whatsoever, says Hillman. "Even if the world went
zero-carbon today that would not save us because we've gone past the
point of no return."
Although Hillman has not flown for more than 20 years as part of a
personal commitment to reducing carbon emissions, he is now scornful of
individual action which he describes as "as good as futile". By the same
logic, says Hillman, national action is also irrelevant "because
Britain's contribution is minute. Even if the government were to go to
zero carbon it would make almost no difference."
Instead, says Hillman, the world's population must globally move to zero
emissions across agriculture, air travel, shipping, heating homes -
every aspect of our economy - and reduce our human population too. Can
it be done without a collapse of civilisation? "I don't think so," says
Hillman. "Can you see everyone in a democracy volunteering to give up
flying? Can you see the majority of the population becoming vegan? Can
you see the majority agreeing to restrict the size of their families?"
Hillman doubts that human ingenuity can find a fix and says there is no
evidence that greenhouse gases can be safely buried. But if we adapt to
a future with less - focusing on Hillman's love and music - it might be
good for us. "And who is 'we'?" asks Hillman with a typically impish
smile. "Wealthy people will be better able to adapt but the world's
population will head to regions of the planet such as northern Europe
which will be temporarily spared the extreme effects of climate change.
How are these regions going to respond? We see it now. Migrants will be
prevented from arriving. We will let them drown."
A small band of artists and writers, such as Paul Kingsnorth's Dark
Mountain project, have embraced the idea that "civilisation" will soon
end in environmental catastrophe but only a few scientists - usually
working beyond the patronage of funding bodies, and nearing the end of
their own lives - have suggested as much. Is Hillman's view a
consequence of old age, and ill health? "I was saying these sorts of
things 30 years ago when I was hale and hearty," he says.
Hillman accuses all kinds of leaders - from religious leaders to
scientists to politicians - of failing to honestly discuss what we must
do to move to zero-carbon emissions. "I don't think they can because
society isn't organised to enable them to do so. Political parties'
focus is on jobs and GDP, depending on the burning of fossil fuels."
Without hope, goes the truism, we will give up. And yet optimism about
the future is wishful thinking, says Hillman. He believes that accepting
that our civilisation is doomed could make humanity rather like an
individual who recognises he is terminally ill. Such people rarely go on
a disastrous binge; instead, they do all they can to prolong their lives.
Can civilisation prolong its life until the end of this century? "It
depends on what we are prepared to do." He fears it will be a long time
before we take proportionate action to stop climatic calamity. "Standing
in the way is capitalism. Can you imagine the global airline industry
being dismantled when hundreds of new runways are being built right now
all over the world? It's almost as if we're deliberately attempting to
defy nature. *We're doing the reverse of what we should be doing, with
everybody's silent acquiescence, and nobody's batting an eyelid."*
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/apr/26/were-doomed-mayer-hillman-on-the-climate-reality-no-one-else-will-dare-mention
- - - -
[Who is]
*Dr Mayer Hillman, Contributing towards a better world
<https://mayerhillman.com/>*
"Our continuing uneconomic growth makes us complicit in a process that
is triggering an ecological catastrophe for our children and generations
beyond them. They will justifiably sit in judgment on our failure to
have prevented its devastating consequences knowing that we chose to
look the other way."
Over the past 40 years, my research has been concerned with the
development of public policy on the areas of transport, road safety,
urban planning, energy conservation, waste avoidance, health promotion,
and the environment. In recent years, I have focused in particular on
the all-embracing implications of global climate change and how we can
limit it.
In all my studies I have aimed to provide evidence that will aid the
process of policy reform. I have repeatedly highlighted the inadequacy
of attention paid to social and environmental issues, to intra- and
inter-generational equity, and to the rights of those groups in the
population with little, if any, public voice. A common theme has been
the failure of successive governments to adopt policies that will
compensate for the fact that few personal and business decisions are
influenced by consideration of their wide impacts on society and the
environment. Progress is further hindered by the unwillingness of
politicians and their advisers to acknowledge the significance of any
new evidence that challenges the status quo in conventional thinking and
practice.
https://mayerhillman.com/
- - - - - -
[Opinion: the way through]
*New Creation News
<https://newcreationews.blogspot.com/2018/04/chaos-and-collapse-part-ii.html>*
News of the planet and the nexus of culture, ecology, justice, and
spirituality.
Chaos and Collapse, Part II
There is no way out of our predicament, but there is a way through it.
So let's look at what experience, our own deep personal experience, is
telling us - when we pay attention to it, when we can work through the
fear of looking at this irresolvable mess that humans have made and
begin to see clearly how dire our situation really is. Let's surface
that stuff and then see what it tells us about how to live now - because
that's where we begin to discover, to perceive the way through.
In the previous post, I embedded a link to this article, Hope and
Mourning in the Anthropocene: Understanding Ecological Grief.
<https://theconversation.com/hope-and-mourning-in-the-anthropocene-understanding-ecological-grief-88630>
It is an important reference for me these day when trying to find
descriptors for our predicament. I, we, many of us use that word
"predicament" because it implies the notion that there is no easy way
out of this, no escape, no solution obvious to us.
One definition of the word '"predicament:" an unpleasantly difficult,
perplexing, or dangerous situation.
And another, even more illuminating: a situation, especially an
unpleasant, troublesome, or trying one, from which extrication is
difficult. Yeah, no kidding...
More at:
https://newcreationews.blogspot.com/2018/04/chaos-and-collapse-part-ii.html
- - - - -
[classic essay]
*Hope and mourning in the Anthropocene: Understanding ecological grief
<https://theconversation.com/hope-and-mourning-in-the-anthropocene-understanding-ecological-grief-88630>*
We are living in a time of extraordinary ecological loss. Not only are
human actions destabilising the very conditions that sustain life, but
it is also increasingly clear that we are pushing the Earth into an
entirely new geological era, often described as the Anthropocene.
Research shows that people increasingly feel the effects of these
planetary changes and associated ecological losses in their daily lives,
and that these changes present significant direct and indirect threats
to mental health and well-being. Climate change, and the associated
impacts to land and environment, for example, have recently been linked
to a range of negative mental health impacts, including depression,
suicidal ideation, post-traumatic stress, as well as feelings of anger,
hopelessness, distress, and despair.
Not well represented in the literature, however, is an emotional
response we term 'ecological grief,' which we have defined in a recent
Nature Climate Change article: "The grief felt in relation to
experienced or anticipated ecological losses, including the loss of
species, ecosystems, and meaningful landscapes due to acute or chronic
environmental change."
We believe ecological grief is a natural, though overlooked, response to
ecological loss, and one that is likely to affect more of us into the
future...
- - - - -
We argue that recognising ecological grief as a legitimate response to
ecological loss <http://rdcu.be/KwWz>is an important first step for
humanising climate change and its related impacts, and for expanding our
understanding of what it means to be human in the Anthropocene
<http://www.lesleyhead.com/admin/kcfinder/upload/files/pdf/journal/Head2015GeographicalResearch.pdf>.
How to grieve ecological losses well - particularly when they are
ambiguous, cumulative and ongoing - is a question currently without
answer. However, it is a question that we expect will become more
pressing as further impacts from climate change, including loss, are
experienced.
We do not see ecological grief as submitting to despair, and neither
does it justify 'switching off' from the many environmental problems
that confront humanity. Instead, we find great hope in the responses
ecological grief is likely to invoke. Just as grief over the loss of a
loved person puts into perspective what matters in our lives, collective
experiences of ecological grief may coalesce into a strengthened sense
of love and commitment to the places, ecosystems and species that
inspire, nurture and sustain us. There is much grief work to be done,
and much of it will be hard. However, being open to the pain of
ecological loss may be what is needed to prevent such losses from
occurring in the first place.
https://theconversation.com/hope-and-mourning-in-the-anthropocene-understanding-ecological-grief-88630
- - - - -
[journal Climate Change]
*Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related
loss
<https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0092-2.epdf?author_access_token=UJYCnlw0zZieuYACw3AJQtRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0MZ8cLxe72VDW0esMFb0zEFM26k9KCrjCPa-wqxJcwmMgcIei5y7ci3SN_gtpLunMy-I9r_Qst3A5V3rz96ScHSGy2dP3IB1DKK9qNem8yIrw%3D%3D>*
Ashlee Cunsolo and Neville R. Ellis
Climate change is increasingly understood to impact mental health
through multiple pathways of risk, including intense feelings of grief
as people suffer climate-related losses to valued species, ecosystems
and landscapes. Despite growing research inter-est, ecologically driven
grief, or 'ecological grief', remains an underdeveloped area of inquiry.
We argue that grief is a natural and legitimate response to ecological
loss, and one that may become more common as climate impacts worsen.
Drawing upon our own research in Northern Canada and the Australian
Wheatbelt, combined with a synthesis of the literature, we offer future
research directions for the study of ecological grief.
More at:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0092-2.epdf?author_access_token=UJYCnlw0zZieuYACw3AJQtRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0MZ8cLxe72VDW0esMFb0zEFM26k9KCrjCPa-wqxJcwmMgcIei5y7ci3SN_gtpLunMy-I9r_Qst3A5V3rz96ScHSGy2dP3IB1DKK9qNem8yIrw%3D%3D
*This Day in Climate History - April 29, 1999
<http://cei.org/op-eds-and-articles/warming-diplomacyat-what-cost> -
from D.R. Tucker*
April 29, 1999: The ExxonMobil-funded Competitive Enterprise Institute
names former Rep. Jack Kemp (R-NY) its first "Distinguished Fellow." Two
years later, in a Washington Times op-ed, Kemp asserts that the
scientific evidence pointing to human-caused climate change is inconclusive.
http://cei.org/news-releases/jack-kemp-named-distinguished-fellow-competitive-enterprise-institute
http://cei.org/op-eds-and-articles/warming-diplomacyat-what-cost
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
//Archive of Daily Global Warming News
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html>
//
/https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote//
///
///To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
/to news digest. /
*** Privacy and Security: * This is a text-only mailing that
carries no images which may originate from remote servers.
Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote with subject:
subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe
Also youmay subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Paulifor
http://TheClimate.Vote delivering succinct information for
citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20180429/e500438b/attachment.html>
More information about the TheClimate.Vote
mailing list