[TheClimate.Vote] December 4 , 2019 - Daily Global Warming News Digest
Richard Pauli
richard at theclimate.vote
Wed Dec 4 05:29:26 EST 2019
December 4, 2019
[Washington Post opinion]
*We're losing our climate battle. We have no one but ourselves to blame.*
Eugene Robinson, The Washington Post
"We are losing the battle to save our planet, and we have no one to
blame but ourselves," begins the Washington Post columnist Eugene
Robinson. He continues: "History will condemn a host of villains,
starting with President Trump. The United States, as the globe's leading
economic power, is uniquely positioned to lead the world toward climate
solutions. Instead, Trump is deliberately worsening the problem by
pulling out of the Paris climate accord and actively encouraging the
increased burning of fossil fuels, including coal. Decades from now, we
may well see this as the Trump administration's worst legacy…We of the
boomer cohort will long have returned to dust before climate change
begins to feel like an everyday five-alarm crisis…Our benighted leaders
fail to give us meaningful action on climate change because we fail to
demand it. We can't look to the Madrid conference to save the planet. We
must look within."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/were-losing-our-climate-battle-we-have-no-one-but-ourselves-to-blame/2019/12/02/efe4ce2c-1548-11ea-9110-3b34ce1d92b1_story.html
[Perhaps he should call it "global warming"]
*It's possible that Trump doesn't actually know what climate change is*
At no point has Trump ever indicated that he understands the connection
between emissions and climate change. He came close in a tweet in
September, mentioning emissions reductions in the context of climate --
but then continued on to talk about air pollution.
- - -
Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
1. Which country has the largest carbon emission reduction?
AMERICA!
2. Who has dumped the most carbon into the air?
CHINA!
3. 91% of the world's population are exposed to air pollution above
the World Health Organization's suggested level.
- - -
He has at times bragged about the United States' reduction in greenhouse
gas emissions, as he did in prepared remarks in July, although that's
mostly as a way to defend his record. ("We're doing a very tough job and
not everybody knows it," he said then.) He has never used the term
"greenhouse gas," according to the index of his comments at Factba.se.
He was a signatory to a public statement in support of addressing
emissions back in 2009 -- but that was on behalf of the Trump
Organization. Several months later, he publicly disparaged the fight
against climate change (and somehow again looped in the ozone layer).
So we end where we begin, with uncertainty that Trump knows what climate
change is, what it constitutes and what powers it. There's certainly a
political motive for his not raising the subject; climate change is
viewed through a sharply partisan lens, and many Republicans, like
Trump, simply dismiss it out of hand as a priority.
To be fair, though, we didn't include Trump's full comments about
climate change on Tuesday. Here's how he continued his line of thought
when asked if he thinks about climate change.
"I also see what's happening with our oceans, where certain countries
are dumping unlimited loads of things in and they float," Trump said.
"They tend to float toward the United States. I see that happening and
nobody's ever seen anything like it and it's gotten worse. But, no, it's
very important to me also. But I want clean air and clean water would be
number one and number two."
In other words, no. He doesn't really think about climate change.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/03/its-possible-that-trump-doesnt-actually-know-what-climate-change-is/
[Global campaign]
*John Kerry's New Bipartisan, Star-Studded 'War' on Climate Change*
In an interview, the former secretary of state talks about the climate
news that makes him want to curse, and his new alliance with Arnold
Schwarzenegger and Leonardo DiCaprio.
- - -
This weekend, Kerry returned to the breach, joining with Arnold
Schwarzenegger, the former Republican governor of California, to launch
a new bipartisan group that aims to unify the public behind climate
action. It is named World War Zero, a reference both to its goal of an
American economy with net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, and to the
wartime-style mass mobilization that Kerry says can get us there.
Other than that mid-century goal, though, World War Zero will not
endorse any particular candidate or climate policy. (As The New York
Times noted, its supporters are split on the virtues of fracking.)
Instead, it aims to offer a unifying story that can anchor other
efforts, focused on the economic benefits of climate action and the
national-security and public-health risks of climate change...
...it's only by getting people to buy in and recognize the upside
options that you're going to change the other narrative. We're
trapped right now. And so how do you break out of that trap? I
believe you break out of that trap by having conversations with
people and motivating people to activate themselves…so that it
becomes an actionable belief taken into elections and into
boardrooms and into stockholder meetings and into the halls of
Congress...
- - -
The best thing that has happened--beyond the technical component of
it--is the engagement of young people on a global basis, the fact
that they're kicking butt out there, going out there and trying to
hold people accountable. Ultimately, I think that will translate
into the kind of political accountability that existed back in 1970,
when the Dirty Dozen were held accountable.
Meyer: What's the worst thing that's happened?
Kerry: The worst thing is the fact that the largest nations have
reneged on genuine efforts to really get there and are playing a
game--a very dangerous game--with it. The fact that emissions are
going up in the United States, they're going up in Europe, they're
going up in China, they're going up in India, they're going up in
countless countries in the world, that is just--I could use an
expletive, but it's really unacceptable. It's outrageous.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/12/john-kerry-interview-climate-catastrophic-world-war-zero/602833/
[old word, new life]
*'Existential' chosen as Dictionary.com word of the year*
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/existential-dictionarycom-word-of-year-a4303041.html
[in 5 hours, lake drained and a kilometer of ice lifted up half a meter]
*Drone observes Greenland ice sheet fracturing in real time*
Haye Kesteloo - Dec. 3rd 2019
On Monday, scientists said that they had used a drone to observe an ice
sheet in Greenland fracturing in real time. A team of researchers
witnessed the rapid fracturing and draining of a lake on the ice sheet.
It is expected that this phenomenon may become more frequent as climate
change worsens. Greenland's ice sheet is the second largest in the
world, and the single largest contributor to global sea-level rise.
Drone observes Greenland ice sheet fracturing in real time
Greenland's ice sheet is over 3,000 feet high and it is normal for the
surface to melt and form lakes during the summer season. These lakes
tend to drain very quickly, creating massive waterfalls all the way to
the base of the ice sheet.
This draining process is extremely difficult to observe firsthand. But a
team of glaciologists from the Scott Polar Institute at the University
of Cambridge got lucky when they arrived at the Store Glacier in
northwestern Greenland in July 2018. Soon after their arrival,
two-thirds of the lakes disappeared from the surface through a fracture
in the ice sheet. Roughly 1.3 billion gallons of water drained over the
course of five hours.
Photos taken with a drone clearly show the before-and-after as a dark
blue oval shrinks into a smaller, shallower, and lighter blue circle.
The 'thing that drones can do is allow us to take these kind of
high-quality measurements in regions that aren't safe to access for
scientists on the ground,' said Tom Chudley, co-first author of the
study that appeared in the Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, according to Phys.org.
The team was able to create a 3D map by stitching together thousands of
photos that included the GPS coordinates that were attached to the
stills by the drone. The unmanned aircraft have been custom-built at the
Scott Polar Research Institute to withstand the extreme Arctic
conditions. The drones were outfitted with autopilot and navigated
autonomously along pre-programmed flight paths during a mission that
lasted up to one hour.
The Store Glacier, which is basically a river of ice that slowly moves
toward the ocean, moves at around 1,800 feet per year. The sudden
drainage speed of the glacier's movement went from 6 to 15 feet per day,
according to the team of researchers that included scientists from
Aberystwyth and Lancaster universities in the UK. The water that drained
from these lakes effectively worked as a lubricant.
To the team's surprise, the Store Glacier was raised by about 22 inches
as a result of the water rushing underneath it.
Chudley, a doctoral student at Cambridge, said, "That's a kilometer of
ice lifted up half a meter, so you can imagine the kind of pressures
that were involved."
'It's possible we've underestimated the effects of these glaciers on the
overall instability of the Greenland Ice Sheet,' said co-first author
Tom Chudley, a PhD student at the Scott Polar Research and the team's
drone pilot. 'It's a rare thing to actually observe these fast-draining
lakes -- we were lucky to be in the right place at the right time.'
In the research paper that was published in the Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, the team of scientists describe in detail
the formation of these vast fractures that in turn create water beds
that speed up the movement of the Store Glacier.
'As we see climate change progressing in Greenland, we're seeing more
lakes, and we're seeing them get larger, and we're seeing them higher up
into the colder section of the ice sheet, and we can see that some of
these lakes are beginning to drain,' said Chudley.
He added, 'Potentially, we're increasing the amount of lakes that are
draining in new places that we haven't previously identified.'
https://dronedj.com/2019/12/03/drone-observes-greenland-ice/
- - -
[source material]
*Supraglacial lake drainage at a fast-flowing Greenlandic outlet glacier*
View ORCID ProfileThomas R. Chudley, View ORCID ProfilePoul
Christoffersen, Samuel H. Doyle, Marion Bougamont, Charlotte M.
Schoonman, Bryn Hubbard, and Mike R. James
*Significance*
We present in situ records of a rapidly draining supraglacial lake in a
fast-flowing sector of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Despite supraglacial
lake drainage influencing ice sheet dynamics at a variety of scales,
existing in situ studies have been conducted exclusively at the slower,
less dynamic land-terminating sector. We describe the scale and extent
of dynamic response in a marine-terminating system, and identify 1)
spatially distributed behavior not previously observed in in situ
studies, and 2) interannual variation unique to fast-flowing glaciers.
We propose that many lakes thought to drain slowly are, in fact,
draining rapidly via hydrofracture. As such, rapid drainage events, and
their net impact on ice sheet dynamics, are being notably underestimated.
*Abstract*
Supraglacial lake drainage events influence Greenland Ice Sheet dynamics
on hourly to interannual timescales. However, direct observations are
rare, and, to date, no in situ studies exist from fast-flowing sectors
of the ice sheet. Here, we present observations of a rapid lake drainage
event at Store Glacier, west Greenland, in 2018. The drainage event
transported 4.8 x 106 m3 of meltwater to the glacier bed in ∼5 h,
reducing the lake to a third of its original volume. During drainage,
the local ice surface rose by 0.55 m, and surface velocity increased
from 2.0 m⋅d-1 to 5.3 m⋅d-1. Dynamic responses were greatest ∼4 km
downstream from the lake, which we interpret as an area of transient
water storage constrained by basal topography. Drainage initiated,
without any precursory trigger, when the lake expanded and reactivated a
preexisting fracture that had been responsible for a drainage event 1 y
earlier. Since formation, this fracture had advected ∼500 m from the
lake's deepest point, meaning the lake did not fully drain. Partial
drainage events have previously been assumed to occur slowly via lake
overtopping, with a comparatively small dynamic influence. In contrast,
our findings show that partial drainage events can be caused by
hydrofracture, producing new hydrological connections that continue to
concentrate the supply of surface meltwater to the bed of the ice sheet
throughout the melt season. Our findings therefore indicate that the
quantity and resultant dynamic influence of rapid lake drainages are
likely being underestimated.
https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/11/26/1913685116
[some science is complex]
CLIMATE MODELLING 2 December 2019
*CMIP6: the next generation of climate models explained*
Climate models are one of the primary means for scientists to understand
how the climate has changed in the past and may change in the future.
These models simulate the physics, chemistry and biology of the
atmosphere, land and oceans in great detail, and require some of the
largest supercomputers in the world to generate their climate projections.
Climate models are constantly being updated, as different modelling
groups around the world incorporate higher spatial resolution, new
physical processes and biogeochemical cycles. These modelling groups
coordinate their updates around the schedule of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment reports, releasing a set of
model results - known as "runs" - in the lead-up to each one.
These coordinated efforts are part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison
Projects (CMIP). The 2013 IPCC fifth assessment report (AR5) featured
climate models from CMIP5, while the upcoming 2021 IPCC sixth assessment
report (AR6) will feature new state-of-the-art CMIP6 models...
- - -
The results so far are show large amounts of future warming; the new
SSP1-1.9 scenario - intended to limit warming to 1.5C - has a
multi-model mean warming of 1.6C. Similarly, the SSP1-2.6 scenario -
which is analogous to the "well-below 2C" RCP2.6 of AR5 - shows mean
warming of 2.1C. On the high end, the SSP5-8.5 scenario shows a mean
warming of 5.5C, while the new SSP3-7.0 scenario shows 4.5C of warming.
Some future scenarios have relatively few runs available so far, so the
initial values should be treated with caution (particularly for the
multi-model mean) until more models finish their runs. Even those such
as SSP2-4.5 - with 14 models reporting results - may change notably once
the remaining models finish their runs and are added to the CMIP6 database.
The results so far differ fairly substantially from those found in CMIP5
for similar forcing scenarios...
- - -
CMIP6 is a huge modelling effort, substantially more ambitious than
CMIP5. This has led to some delays, with CMIP6 currently running at
least a year behind schedule. While the IPCC AR6 is currently being
drafted, only a relatively limited set of models are available, and it
seems unlikely that all CMIP6 runs will be completed in time for the
final AR6 draft.
https://www.carbonbrief.org/cmip6-the-next-generation-of-climate-models-explained
[Some art]
*COP25: WWF and Prado Museum use art to show climate change*
Conservation group WWF and the Prado Museum have joined forces to raise
the alarm about the impact of climate change, as political leaders and
diplomats meet at the COP25 climate change summit in the Spanish
capital, Madrid.
Together they selected four masterpieces from the Prado collection to
highlight the environmental consequences of various phenomena attributed
to climate change.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50646625
[amateur archive of live video - Dr James Hansen at COP25]
*Dr. James Hansen - Global Climate Emergency*
Streamed live Dec 3, 2019
UPFSI
Dr. Hansen will discuss the lack of action since change was first
officially recognized.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y65S0eroF4
https://youtu.be/8y65S0eroF4?t=143
[Seems ironic for a navy]
*New Study: Naval Academy May Have to Move Due to Sea Level Rise*
Hurrican Isabel storm damage and flooding at the U.S. Naval Academy.
A FLOODED U.S. NAVAL ACADEMY FACILITY DUE TO HURRICANE ISABEL
By Marc Kodack
The Naval Academy is at risk from sea level rise and more intense storms
that may force it to relocate by 2100, according to the featured article
in the current issue of the U.S. Naval Institute's Proceedings journal.
The Naval Academy has been in Annapolis, Maryland since 1845. It is
surrounded by water on three sides which increases its vulnerability to
flooding. Some structures are no more than three feet above the water
level. In and around Annapolis sea levels have increased by almost a
foot since the 1920s. The sea level is forecast to rise between "0.6 and
3.6 feet by 2050."..
https://climateandsecurity.org/2019/11/26/new-study-naval-academy-may-have-to-move-due-to-sea-level-rise/
*This Day in Climate History - December 4, 2012 - from D.R. Tucker*
Climate scientists Michael Mann, James Hansen and Katharine Hayhoe
discuss the risks of a warming planet at the Commonwealth Club in San
Francisco, California.
http://c-spanvideo.org/program/GlobalClimateChange50
http://c-spanvideo.org/program/JamesHa
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html>
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
*** Privacy and Security:*This is a text-only mailing that carries no
images which may originate from remote servers. Text-only messages
provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for democratic
and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial purposes.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
More information about the TheClimate.Vote
mailing list