[TheClimate.Vote] January 8, 2021 - Daily Global Warming News Digest
Richard Pauli
richard at theclimate.vote
Fri Jan 8 10:43:50 EST 2021
/*January 8, 2021*/
[Data into information]
*Research confirms increase in river flooding and droughts in U.S., Canada*
JANUARY 7, 2021
The number of "extreme streamflow" events observed in river systems have
increased significantly across the United States and Canada over the
last century, according to a study from Dartmouth College.
In regions where water runoff from snowmelt is a main contributor to
river streamflow, the study found a rise in extreme events, such as
flooding.
In drought-prone regions in the western and southeastern U.S., the study
found that the frequency of extreme low-flow events has also become more
common, particularly during summer and fall.
The research, published in Science Advances, analyzed records dating
back to 1910 to confirm the effects of recent changes in precipitation
levels on river systems.
"Floods and droughts are extremely expensive and often life-threatening
events," said Evan Dethier, a postdoctoral researcher at Dartmouth and
the lead author of the paper. "It's really important that we have good
estimates of how likely extreme events are to occur and whether that
likelihood is changing."
Although changes in precipitation and extreme streamflows have been
observed in the past, there has been no research consensus on whether
droughts and floods have actually increased in frequency.
Past research efforts have mostly focused on annual peak flows,
potentially missing important seasonal changes to extreme low-flow
events that can be pulled from daily streamflow records. Those efforts
have also been hampered by the mixing of data from regions that have
different precipitation patterns and natural seasonal cycles.
According to the research paper: The results demonstrate that "increases
in the frequency of both high- and low-flow extreme streamflow events
are, in fact, widespread."...
"Previous attempts to analyze regional pattern in streamflow were
usually based on fixed geographical regions that were largely
unsuccessful," said Carl Renshaw, a professor of earth sciences at
Dartmouth. "The novel clustering approach used in this research defines
regions based on the hydrology—not geographical or political
boundaries—to better reveal the significant shifts occurring for both
high and low streamflows."
The Dartmouth study combined 541 rivers in the U.S. and Canada into 15
hydrological regions organized by seasonal streamflow characteristics,
such as whether streams flood due to tropical storms or rain falling on
melting snow. This grouping allowed for more sensitive detection of
trends in extreme flow events on both an annual and seasonal basis.
Out of the 15 "hydro-regions" created, 12 had enough rivers to be
analyzed in the study. The rivers studied were judged to be minimally
affected by human activity and included extensive records that span 60
or more years.
"The shifts toward more extreme events are especially important given
the age of our dams, bridges, and roads. The changes to river flows that
we found are important for those who manage or depend on this type of
infrastructure," said Dethier.
According to the study, in the regions where streamflow changes were
found to be statistically significant, floods and droughts have, on
average, doubled in frequency relative to the period of 1950 to 1969.
Significant changes in the frequency of floods were found to be most
common in the Canadian and northern U.S. regions where annual peak flows
are consistently associated with spring snowmelt runoff.
The increase in flooding has come despite reduction in snowpack caused
by warming winter temperatures. The research team believes that the
increases in extreme precipitation during the high-flow season may make
up for the reduction in snowpack storage.
Changes in drought and extreme low-flow frequency were found to be more
variable.
While floods were found to be more localized, droughts were found to be
"generally reflective of large-scale climatic forcing" and more likely
to be widespread across a region.
https://phys.org/news/2021-01-river-droughts-canada.html
[Opinion Gizmodo]
*The Climate Crisis Will Be Steroids for Fascism*
Brian Kahn - Jan 7, 2021
The Capitol has a police force with a $500 million budget, and yet it
failed at its one job on Wednesday. Members of Congress, among the most
protected people on the planet, were forced to hide in undisclosed
locations as violent extremists overran the Capitol.
The anti-democratic message Wednesday’s insurrection sent is chilling.
Far-right mobs incited by the president over baseless conspiracy
theories and a commitment to white nationalism breached one of the most
secure places in the U.S. and disrupted a basic democratic process of
certifying election results. But what it portends for both the future of
the Republican Party and its response to the climate crisis is even more
chilling.
The ingredients for the toxic soup that stirred extremists to take on
one of the branches of government (as well as numerous coordinated
attacks at the state level) will only grow more plentiful and powerful
as the climate crisis worsens. If elected officials aren’t ready to take
a clear-eyed look at the damage done on Wednesday and what awaits us in
the coming hotter decades, we’ll face even more extreme assaults on
democracy and the most vulnerable among us.
The violent assault on the Capitol followed a pattern increasingly
familiar in the Trump era, though it’s been an undercurrent in American
society for much longer. Blatant lies about the election being rigged
were spread over social media and used as cover to convene in
Washington, DC, and storm the Capitol. Extremists clashed with police,
met minimal resistance outside, and were allowed to mill about the
building for hours, trashing offices and posing in the Senate for
Parler-worthy photos.
Then they were allowed to politely file out of the building and only a
few dozen were arrested. That number may rise, but the initial response
pales in comparison to how Black Lives Matter protesters were treated
this summer. Not to mention climate-related protesters like Fire Drill
Fridays where police created a huge perimeter to cordon off press and
onlookers and brought in buses to process protesters who were arrested.
Wednesday’s insurrection and law enforcement’s frail response are eerily
similar to what happened this summer when right-wing militias spread
conspiracies about wildfires in Oregon. In that case, extremists sowed
confusion to assert control over regions engulfed in smoke, setting up
armed checkpoints and threatening journalists. Law enforcement turned a
blind eye, and in the case of one sheriff, even briefed extremists. At
the time, experts told me it was in part an attempt by far-right figures
to see what they could get away with.
The lesson in both cases is that the pushed boundaries didn’t snap back.
The permissive nature of law enforcement and people in power—more than
120 Republican representatives and senators voted to decertify state
election results based on lies after the mob invaded the Capitol
Building—opens the door to further violent probing.
Now, I’m a firm believer that an assault on democracy or unlawful
behavior during a climate-fueled disaster alone should be reason to hold
people to account. But looking at the two events in tandem and seeing
the climate future that awaits us is what really raises my alarm
bells—and should raise those of the people in power. Pretending this
will pass or offering broad platitudes that “we are better than this”
will ensure more terror.
Climate change is chaos by nature. It means more powerful storms, more
intense wildfires, more extreme floods and droughts. It is an assault on
the weakest among us, and decades of the right-wing mindset of small
government have left the country with fewer resources to deal with the
fallout. As the summer’s wildfires show, the far-right will be there to
try to fill the power void. Those fires occurred in a predominantly
white region.
There’s a strong strain of white nationalism and neo-Nazism that ran
through Wednesday’s insurrection, and it’s easy to imagine what will
happen when flames or storms hit places that are predominantly Black,
brown, or Indigenous. In fact, we don’t need to imagine it at all. We’ve
seen it in the gunman who showed up at a Walmart to kill immigrants whom
he falsely blamed for putting strain on the environment. And we saw it
in the white vigilante violence in the vacuum after Hurricane Katrina
hit New Orleans. We’ve seen it so frequently, it even has a name:
ecofascism.
After Wednesday, the boundaries of permissible violence have now
expanded to a distorting degree, at a time of increasing climate
instability. White supremacists, neo-Nazis, and other extremists
literally took over the halls of power and got away with it. When
climate change upends communities with far fewer defenses—communities
that hate groups already scapegoat—the results will be catastrophic.
It’s never been clearer that a large chunk of the nation’s top
Republican leaders will embrace and even fuel this extremism and hate.
The Venn diagram of people who push election denial and climate denial
has near-perfect overlap, but even if these figures deny the climate
crisis, they’ll still look to exploit it. At the end of the day, their
goal is to use easy-to-disprove lies to build and consolidate power.
Fixing a mess like this absolutely has to be part of the process of
addressing climate change. Accountability for those who incited
extremists is a good place to start. Emily Atkin of Heated noted on
Twitter in the wake of the Georgia special election that gave Democrats
the Senate that democracy reform is climate policy, and I have to agree.
Washington, DC, statehood, getting corrosive money out of politics, and
expelling seditionists are all good places to start. A strong federal
response to climate change that both draws down emissions and protects
people from the impacts already in the pipeline is also crucial. Decades
of weakening the federal government and proselytizing about the power of
the individual has left millions exposed to calamity. Rebuilding the
federal response to climate change, and ensuring it also engages
everyone in moving the country forward through good-paying jobs and a
just transition for frontline and fossil fuel communities, are essential
to beating hate groups into the background.
None of this will make the fascism on full display disappear overnight.
But doing nothing or insisting we turn the page opens the door to
something much worse.
Brian Kahn - Managing editor, Earther
https://earther.gizmodo.com/the-climate-crisis-will-be-steroids-for-fascism-1846009446
[Wired]
*Climate Change Is Turning Cities Into Ovens*
A new model estimates that by 2100, cities across the world could warm
as much as 4.4 degrees Celsius. It’s a deadly consequence of the “heat
island” effect.
MATT SIMON - 1.07.2021
- -
Cities are but a blip. Researchers are more interested in the dynamics
of things like the ocean, ice, and air currents. “We're closing this
kind of gap,” says Lei Zhao, a climate scientist at the University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and lead author on a recent paper published
in Nature Climate Change describing the modeling. “We provide
urban-specific projections for the future.”...
His team’s model suggests that hotter cities could be catastrophic for
urban public health, which is already suffering from the effects of
increasing heat. Between 2000 and 2016, according to the World Health
Organization, the number of people exposed to heat waves jumped by 125
million, and extreme heat claimed more than 166,000 lives between 1998
and 2017. And while at the moment half the world’s population lives in
urban areas, that proportion is expected to rise to 70 percent by 2050,
according to the authors of this new paper. People in search of economic
opportunity are unknowingly rushing into peril.
“When I read these papers, I just don't know what's wrong with humanity,
to be honest with you. Because this is like the same song being sung by
different people,” says climate scientist Camilo Mora of the University
of Hawaii at Manoa, who wasn’t involved in the work. “Come on, man! When
are we going to get serious about this problem? This is another person
ringing the bell. We just for some reason refuse to hear this thing.”
To calculate how much city temperatures might rise, Zhao and his
colleagues from a number of institutions, including Princeton University
and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, built a statistical model for
the climate of urban regions, focusing on changing temperatures and
humidities. These two factors are the conspiring menaces of extreme
heat: Our bodies respond to high temperatures by perspiring, which is
more fancily known as evaporative cooling. But humidity makes this
process less efficient, because the more moist the air is, the less
readily it accepts evaporating sweat from our bodies. That’s why humid
heat feels so much more uncomfortable than dry heat.
Heat and humidity are not only uncomfortable; they can be dangerous.
Mora has identified 27 different ways heat can kill a person. When your
body detects that it’s overheating, it redirects blood from the organs
at your core to your skin, thus dissipating more heat into the air
around you. (This is why your skin turns red when you’re hot.) In
extreme heat, this can spiral out of control, resulting in ischemia, or
the critically low flow of blood to the organs. This can damage crucial
organs like the brain or heart. In addition, a high body temperature can
cause cell death, known as heat cytotoxity. Humidity compounds the risk
of overheating and organ failure, since you can’t sweat as efficiently
to cool down.
- -
To model how these two forces might affect cities, Zhao and his team
turned their statistical model into an “emulator,” which mimics complex
climate models, but focuses on urban areas. They could then apply the
emulator to results from over two dozen global climate models, assuming
either intermediate or high emission levels going forward, to translate
coarse climate model outputs to the city level. When they assumed an
intermediate level of emissions, they found that, on average, the
planet’s urban regions could warm 1.9 degrees C over the next 80 years;
when they assumed a high level, the figure became an astonishing 4.4
degrees C...
https://www.wired.com/story/climate-change-is-turning-cities-into-ovens/
[Digging back into the internet news archive]
*On this day in the history of global warming - January 8, 2003 *
Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) introduce the
bipartisan Climate Stewardship Act of 2003, which would establish a
federal cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. (The
bill would be defeated in the Senate in October 2003.)...
Senator James M. Inhofe, the Oklahoma Republican who is chairman of
the Environment and Public Works Committee, said the causes of
global warming were still open to question. He indicated that he had
a fundamental difference with the McCain-Lieberman approach by
noting that the Congressional Budget Office had found that
cap-and-trade programs amounted to ''an energy tax on consumers.''
Many people at the hearing rejected the idea that the White House
was doing something serious about global warming and criticized the
administration for saying it needed to do more research.
Mr. Lieberman, the first witness, said the administration's approach
would ''allow greenhouse-gas emissions to keep increasing
indefinitely, presenting this country and the world with a bigger
and bigger environmental crisis to tackle down the road,'' hurting
the economy and America's stature in the world.
Of his bill, he said, ''we do less than is explicitly called for
under the Kyoto agreement, but we sure do a lot more than nothing.''
Speaking for the administration at the hearing was James R. Mahoney,
assistant commerce secretary and deputy administrator of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Dr. Mahoney said, ''We do have evidence of global change,'' but he
added, ''There are substantial uncertainties about causes, and
because of that uncertainty about causes, there's also substantial
uncertainty about mitigation methods that might be effective.''...
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/09/us/politics-economy-environment-mccain-lieberman-offer-bill-require-cuts-gases.html
http://www.edf.org/news/environmental-defense-praises-new-mccain-lieberman-climate-bill
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html>
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
*** Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not carry
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers. A
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for democratic
and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial purposes.
Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20210108/8a48ab85/attachment.html>
More information about the TheClimate.Vote
mailing list