[✔️] February 2, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | Yale study of US opinion, Last year was tough, .Attention economy. petro masculinity
Richard Pauli
Richard at CredoandScreed.com
Thu Feb 2 10:28:05 EST 2023
/*February 2, 2023*/
/[ from Yale Climate Change Communication/Press Release/] /
*Change in US state-level public opinion about climate change: 2008-2020 *
- -
We are pleased to announce the publication of a new article, “Change in
US state-level public opinion about climate change: 2008-2020” in the
journal Environmental Research Letters.
Americans' attitudes toward global warming are changing. Our own surveys
in the US, as well as data from other researchers, show that public
understanding that global warming is happening, that humans are
responsible, and that there is a scientific consensus about these facts
have increased over the past decade. We know much less, however, about
how such opinions have changed sub-nationally, such as at the state
level. Understanding state-level opinions is important because many
climate and energy policies have to be enacted by state leaders. Having
information about state-level trends in public opinion can also help
policy- and decision-makers understand how people’s beliefs and
attitudes are changing on climate and energy over time.
We find that public perceptions that global warming is already harming
and will harm the US increased in every state from 2008 to 2020 (see
figure), as did the overall importance of global warming as an issue.
Public support for policies to address global warming was generally
stable in states with a more conservative population, but increased in
states with a more liberal population, like California and New York.
- -
https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/change-in-us-state-level-public-opinion-about-climate-change-2008-2020/
Understanding that there is a consensus among scientists that global
warming is happening increased in every state by about 16 percentage
points on average over the 13-year time period. From 2008 to 2020, more
people in every state also said that global warming is important to them
(+9 percentage points) and that it will harm future generations (+9
percentage points), people in the US (+14 percentage points), and them
personally (+11 percentage points). Some states showed particularly
strong increases -- for example, Utahns increased their understanding of
the scientific consensus by 22 percentage points, and worry among
Idahoans increased by 11 percentage points from 2015 to 2020.
More people said Congress and local officials should do more about
global warming (+4 percentage points and +5 percentage points,
respectively over the 13 years), but there was little change in
state-level views about funding research into renewable energy or
regulating carbon dioxide as a pollutant. The smaller change for these
policies may be due to a ‘ceiling effect’ – strong majorities in every
state have long shown consistent support for these policies.
Perhaps surprisingly, there was virtually no change at the state level
from 2008 to 2020 in how often people reported talking about global
warming with family and friends.
You can find more state-level maps from this study on our website.
https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/change-in-us-state-level-public-opinion-about-climate-change-2008-2020/
https://mailchi.mp/yale/changes-in-us-public-opinion-about-climate-change-at-the-state-level-2008-2020?e=9c7d3ebc85
- -
/[ see the full research paper in the Journal Environmental Research
Letters ]/
*Change in US state-level public opinion about climate change: 2008–2020*
Published 12 December 2022
Environmental Research Letters, Volume 17, Number 12
Citation Jennifer R Marlon et al 2022 Environ. Res. Lett. 17 124046
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aca702
*Abstract*
Public attitudes toward climate change influence climate and energy
policies and guide individual mitigation and adaptation behaviors.
Over the last decade, as scientific certainty about the causes and
impacts of, and solutions to the climate crisis has increased,
cities, states, and regions in the United States have pursued
diverse policy strategies. Yet, our understanding of how Americans'
climate views are changing remains largely limited to national
trends. Here we use a large US survey dataset ($N = 27\,075$) to
estimate dynamic, state-level changes in 16 climate change beliefs,
risk perceptions, and policy preferences over 13 years (2008–2020).
We find increases in global warming issue importance and perceived
harm in every state. Policy support, however, increased in more
liberal states like California and New York, but remained stable
elsewhere. Year-by-year estimates of state-level climate opinions
can be used to support sub-national mitigation and adaptation
efforts that depend on public support and engagement.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aca702/meta#erlaca702s3
/[ Yale Climate Connections report ]/
*Dozens of billion-dollar weather disasters hit Earth in 2022*
The year was the second-costliest on record for drought. It also had
three mega-disasters costing at least $20 billion, plus a heat wave that
killed over 40,000 people in Europe.
by JEFF MASTERS
JANUARY 30, 2023
The planet was besieged by 42 billion-dollar weather disasters in 2022,
and the total damage wrought by weather disasters was $360 billion, with
39% of that total being insured damages, said insurance broker Gallagher
Re in its annual report issued Jan. 30. A separate accounting by
insurance broker Aon, released Jan. 25, cataloged 37 billion-dollar
weather disasters in 2022, with a total economic loss of $313 billion.
This was 4% above the 21st-century annual average.
Global losses were dominated by one event: Hurricane Ian’s catastrophic
impact on Florida and then South Carolina, which generated economic and
insured losses that were 32% and 39%, respectively, of the globe’s
entire annual total...
- -
“The fingerprints of climate change were visible on virtually every
major weather and climate event in 2022, once again highlighting the
urgency to implement proper planning and investment strategies that will
limit the risk to life and property,” noted the Gallagher Re report.
However, it is difficult to quantify how much climate change contributed
to these disaster losses since the dominant cause of increasing damages
in recent years is thought to be because of an increase in wealth and
exposure — in other words, more people with more stuff living in
vulnerable areas...
- -
https://i0.wp.com/yaleclimateconnections.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/0123_disasters-2022-billion-dollar.jpg?w=974&ssl=1
*Three mega-disasters costing over $20 billion*
Three individual weather events in 2022 topped the $20 billion economic
loss threshold: Hurricane Ian ($113-$115 billion), drought in the U.S.
($21-$22 billion), and drought in Europe ($22-$26 billion). This was
just the fifth time on record in which three of more $20+ billion events
had been registered in a calendar year.
*Four nations had their costliest weather disasters on record in 2022*
Based on historical disaster costs at EM-DAT, Pakistan’s $15 billion
2o22 flood catastrophe (9% of GDP) was that nation’s most expensive
weather disaster on record, ahead of the $12.8 billion (2022 USD)
damages from flooding in 2010.
In addition, three nations in Africa — Nigeria, South Africa, and
Somalia — set all-time records for their most costly weather-related
disaster during 2022. According to EM-DAT, the 2022 floods in Nigeria
did $4.2 billion in damage (previous costliest weather disaster:
flooding in 2012 that cost $640 million); the 2022 floods in South
Africa did $3.5 billion in damage (previous costliest disaster: $2.2
billion 2022 USD from a 1990 drought). These are the two most expensive
weather disasters on record in all of Africa (adjusted for inflation).
In Somalia, drought that began in 2021 and continued into late 2022 cost
$1.1 billion, making it that nation’s costliest weather disaster on
record. Neighboring Ethiopia suffered $640 million in drought losses,
which was that nation’s second-costliest weather disaster on record,
behind the $1.7 billion cost of the 2015-2017 drought. Drought costs
were also significant in Kenya in 2022 ($280 million), ranking as that
nation’s second-costliest weather disaster on record. Disaster costs in
Europe from EM-DAT for 2022 were not available at the time of this
writing, but using the 2022 damage stats from Gallagher Re, the droughts
in France and Spain were the second-costliest weather disasters on
record in those nations, when compared to previous disasters logged in
EM-DAT.
For comparison, two nations had their most expensive weather-related
natural disaster in history in the EM-DAT database in 2021, one in 2020,
seven in 2019, two in 2018, three in 2017, four in 2016, and nine in
2015. Note that these tallies will be considerably different using Aon
or Gallagher Re disaster figures, which often differ from EM-DAT’s by a
factor of two. Aon’s database is generally superior to EM-DAT’s but is
not publicly available in full detail.
https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2023/01/dozens-of-billion-dollar-weather-disasters-hit-earth-in-2022/
/[ Net Zero not enough - try less-than-zero. ]/
*Even with emission cuts, 2º heating is likely by 2054*
January 31, 2023
AI system says climate will warm faster than promised by Paris Agreement
A new study has found that emission goals designed to achieve the
world’s most ambitious climate target – 1.5º Celsius above
pre-industrial levels – may in fact be required to avoid more extreme
climate change of 2º.
The study, published January 30 in Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, provides new evidence that global warming is on track to
reach 1.5º C above pre-industrial averages in the early 2030s,
regardless of how much greenhouse gas emissions rise or fall in the
coming decade.
The new “time to threshold” estimate results from an analysis that
employs artificial intelligence to predict climate change using recent
temperature observations from around the world.
“Using an entirely new approach that relies on the current state of the
climate system to make predictions about the future, we confirm that the
world is on the cusp of crossing the 1.5º C threshold,” said the study’s
lead author, Stanford University climate scientist Noah Diffenbaugh.
If emissions remain high over the next few decades, the AI predicts a
one-in-two chance that Earth will become 2 degrees Celsius hotter on
average compared to pre-industrial times by the middle of this century,
and a more than four-in-five chance of reaching that threshold by 2060.
According to the analysis, co-authored by Colorado State University
atmospheric scientist Elizabeth Barnes, the AI predicts the world would
likely reach 2º even in a scenario in which emissions decline in the
coming decades. “Our AI model is quite convinced that there has already
been enough warming that 2º is likely to be exceeded if reaching
net-zero emissions takes another half century,” said Diffenbaugh.
This finding may be controversial among scientists and policymakers
because other authoritative assessments, including the most recent
report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, have
concluded that the 2º mark is unlikely to be reached if emissions
decline to net zero before 2080.
Why does half a degree matter?
Crossing the 1.5º and 2º thresholds would mean failing to achieve the
goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement, in which countries pledged to keep
global warming to “well below” 2º above pre-industrial levels, while
pursuing the more ambitious goal of limiting warming to 1.5º.
Already, the world is 1.1º hotter on average than it was before fossil
fuel combustion took off in the 1800s, and the litany of impacts from
that warming includes more frequent wildfires, more extreme rainfall and
flooding, and longer, more intense heat waves.
Because these impacts are already emerging, every fraction of a degree
of global warming is predicted to intensify the consequences for people
and ecosystems. As average temperatures climb, it becomes more likely
that the world will reach thresholds – sometimes called tipping points –
that cause new consequences, such as melting of large polar ice sheets
or massive forest die-offs. As a result, scientists expect impacts to be
far more severe and widespread beyond 2º.
In working on the new study, Diffenbaugh said he was surprised to find
the AI predicted the world would still be very likely to reach the 2º
threshold even in a scenario where emissions rapidly decline to net zero
by 2076. The AI predicted a one-in-two chance of reaching 2º by 2054 in
this scenario, with a roughly two-in-three chance of crossing the
threshold between 2044 and 2065.
It remains possible, however, to bend the odds away from more extreme
climate change by quickly reducing the amount of carbon dioxide,
methane, and other greenhouse gases being added to the atmosphere. In
the years since the Paris climate pact, many nations have pledged to
reach net-zero emissions more quickly than is reflected in the
low-emissions scenario used in the new study. In particular, Diffenbaugh
points out that many countries have net-zero goals between 2050 and
2070, including China, the European Union, India, and the United States.
“Those net-zero pledges are often framed around achieving the Paris
Agreement 1.5º goal,” said Diffenbaugh. “Our results suggest that those
ambitious pledges might be needed to avoid 2º.”
AI trained to learn from past warming
Previous assessments have used global climate models to simulate future
warming trajectories; statistical techniques to extrapolate recent
warming rates; and carbon budgets to calculate how quickly emissions
will need to decline to stay below the Paris Agreement targets.
For the new estimates, Diffenbaugh and Barnes used a type of artificial
intelligence known as a neural network, which they trained on the vast
archive of outputs from widely used global climate model simulations.
Once the neural network had learned patterns from these simulations, the
researchers asked the AI to predict the number of years until a given
temperature threshold will be reached when given maps of actual annual
temperature anomalies as input – that is, observations of how much
warmer or cooler a place was in a given year compared to the average for
that same place during a reference period, 1951-1980.
To test for accuracy, the researchers challenged the model to predict
the current level of global warming, 1.1º, based on temperature anomaly
data for each year from 1980 to 2021. The AI correctly predicted that
the current level of warming would be reached in 2022, with a most
likely range of 2017 to 2027. The model also correctly predicted the
pace of decline in the number of years until 1.1º that has occurred over
the recent decades.
“This was really the ‘acid test’ to see if the AI could predict the
timing that we know has occurred,” Diffenbaugh said. “We were pretty
skeptical that this method would work until we saw that result. The fact
that the AI has such high accuracy increases my confidence in its
predictions of future warming.”
https://climateandcapitalism.com/2023/01/31/even-with-emission-cuts-2o-heating-is-likely-by-2054/
/[ Fires in California - rains make future fuels, drought and heat makes
it ready ]/
*What will those heavy rains mean for wildfire season?*
Storms left California snow-capped and wet, but other factors make
future hard to predict.
By Hayley Smith
It’s something of a Golden State paradox: Dry winters can pave the way
for dangerous fire seasons fueled by dead vegetation, but wet winters —
like the one the state has seen so far — can also spell danger by
spurring heaps of new growth that can later act as fuel for flames.
Experts say it’s too soon to know with certainty what the upcoming
wildfire season has in store. The atmospheric rivers that pounded
California in January have left the state snow-capped and wet, which
could be a fire deterrent if soils stay damp. But if no more rains
arrive — or if other, less predictable factors such as lightning storms
and heat waves develop later in the year — all that progress could go
out the window.
“The dice are loaded for a weak fire season, but there are multiple
things that could cause it to go the other way,” said Park Williams, a
bioclimatologist at UCLA.
There’s no question the recent rains offered some relief. The storms
moved most of California out of the extreme drought categories in which
it has been mired for more than three years, and portions of the Sierra
Nevada are still buried under multiple feet of snow.
But lower-elevation areas could be at risk, Williams said. That includes
the hills around Los Angeles and the foothills of the Sierra Nevada and
northern coastal ranges, which are bursting with new grasses that can
easily dry out.
“This year, we’ve loaded up the ground with a whole bunch of new
vegetation, and so in summertime — as long as the summer is hot and dry
— the probability of grass fires is probably higher this year than
normal,” he said.
Capt. Robert Foxworthy, a spokesman for the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection, said he was so far “optimistic” about the
season in higher-elevation areas, where the month ended wetter than in
recent years. In 2021, dry conditions paved the way for the Dixie and
Caldor fires to become the first to ever burn from one side of the
Sierra to the other .
“Obviously, the more moisture we get, the better we’re going to be,”
Foxworthy said. “The more snowpack we have, the better chance we have of
it being a quieter fire season overall.”
But much depends on whether the rest of the wet season brings more rain,
he said. Seasonal forecasts are inconclusive , pointing to equal chances
of dryness or wetness in much of California through April.
If no more rain falls, and if temperatures rise and strong winds arrive,
“then I think we’ll be in a completely different place come summertime,”
he said.
What’s more, moisture is only one ingredient in how the fire season
develops. Many blazes are triggered by heat, lightning, winds and other
factors that are harder to predict.
“I can’t tell you how many people are going to drive down the road
dragging a chain behind their vehicle that may start a couple of fires.
I can’t tell you if we’re going to get a big lightning outbreak ...
that’s going to drop 15,000 lightning strikes in two days, starting a
bunch of fires,” Foxworthy said.
There are other factors as well. Many of California’s largest fires in
recent years have started during intense heat waves, which are becoming
hotter, longer and more frequent due to global warming, increasing their
likelihood of contributing to conflagrations, Williams said.
Climate change is also contributing to worsening aridification and
evapotranspiration , or the processes by which the state’s atmosphere is
becoming thirstier and sapping more moisture from plants and soil.
“The atmosphere is going to be faster to take the water back, because
the air is warmer and more arid,” Williams said. “And so this spring,
evaporation rates will be higher than they would have been given the
same winter storms in a cooler world.”
Also in the mix is the anticipated arrival of El Niño later this year,
said Paul Pastelok, senior meteorologist and lead long-range forecaster
at Accuweather. El Niño — a warming of sea-surface temperatures in the
tropical Pacific — is often associated with wet conditions in the state,
especially in Southern California.
Pastelok said an El Niño pattern could pull more moisture into Southern
California in fall and winter, potentially holding back the fire season.
But its biggest effect would probably be felt next year as it dampens
soils and spurs new growth again.
The main concern for this year is the timing of the dryness, he said. In
fact, the wet start to January could simply push the beginning of fire
season later.
“What we notice is at higher elevations, these kind of wet, snowy rushes
tend to delay the fire season — it tends to get put off until
later-than-normal time periods, probably toward the fall,” Pastelok
said. “Whereas the lower elevations, it really doesn’t matter much. The
soils will dry out quickly, the dry fuels will come on strong as long as
there’s no interruptions.”
Last year’s season also proved how unpredictable fire in the West can
be. The state started the year with record dryness, and all signs were
pointing to another bad season . Drought-driven fire seasons in 2020 and
2021 broke records, burning 4.4 million and 2.6 million acres, respectively.
That forecast largely failed to manifest in 2022 , with the year
delivering one of the weaker seasons in recent memory, 364,000 acres.
That was thanks largely to some well-timed rains that helped dampen
burgeoning blazes, as well as a lack of “trigger mechanisms” such as
lightning storms and strong wind events, Pastelok said.
Foxworthy, of Cal Fire, said such unpredictability speaks to the
challenges of forecasting, especially so early in the year.
“We’re optimistic because all the fuels are going to have more moisture
in them, but I can’t say one way or the other because we don’t know
what’s going to happen from this point until summer,” he said.
http://enewspaper.latimes.com/infinity/article_share.aspx?guid=bbedd33b-f4b9-4892-a989-ebd73ec88541
/[ Big Ag needs Congress to agree by Oct first ]/
*Oh crop! Hill preps for ag-climate clash.*
By Arianna Skibell
02/01/2023
A climate change battle is brewing in Congress, and it’s not about
electric vehicles or pipelines.
It’s about cows and dirt, writes POLITICO’s E&E News reporter Adam Aton.
The five-year farm bill is scheduled to expire by Oct. 1, making it one
of the few must-pass legislative items in this divided Congress.
The farm bill shapes large swaths of American life, from the crops
farmers grow to the kinds of food low-income families can obtain. But
it’s also becoming a major battleground for the climate crisis.
Agriculture contributes about 11 percent of U.S. planet-warming
pollution, and unlike greenhouse gases from the power sector, that is
not forecast to decline any time soon.
Plus, the impacts of a changing climate for farmers — from historic
drought in the West and increased flooding in the Northeast to shorter
growing periods and shifting crop-planting dates — are increasingly hard
to ignore. That’s why the Inflation Reduction Act allocated about $20
billion to preexisting farm bill programs.
“The farm bill is probably going to be the piece of legislation in the
next two years with the biggest impact on the climate and the
environment,” Peter Lehner, managing attorney for Earthjustice’s
Sustainable Food and Farming Program, told Adam.
That also means lawmakers from both parties will have strong opinions
about how the money is spent (we’re talking roughly half a trillion
dollars here). While Democrats focus on preserving the climate law’s $20
billion funding boost, some GOP lawmakers want to redirect that money to
other programs, such as crop subsidies. And some Republicans want
across-the-board spending cuts.
That has some observers worried the bill could get delayed or derailed
in the House, which happened back in 2012.
But advocates see some inroads with Republicans, who could face pressure
to preserve climate programs that farmers like. The idea is that the
Inflation Reduction Act’s extra climate funding could create a
self-reinforcing cycle of support, creating demand among farmers to keep
those programs going.
Some Biden administration officials are already driving that point home.
“There’s historic money invested in this, and there are some people that
want to take it away,” Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said at this
week’s winter meeting of the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition.
It's Wednesday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm
your host, Arianna Skibell. Power Switch is brought to you by the
journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips,
comments, questions to askibell at eenews.net.
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/power-switch/2023/02/01/oh-crop-hill-preps-for-ag-climate-clash-00080650
/[ Classic video summary of our predicament video 54 mins ]/
*Everything You Need To Know About Climate Change*
Kurtis Baute
13,160 views Sep 1, 2022
It's real, it's already happening, it's bad, but we can stop it from
getting worse by keeping fossil fuels in the ground. We have the
solutions, we just need to act on them. This video is my best attempt to
answer how we do that, and hopefully help you figure out what role you
can take.
Sources:
https://tinyurl.com/ynfwrfw6
Essay version of this video:
https://medium.com/@kurtisbaute/everything-you-need-to-know-about-climate-change-d54905cf3de3
Podcasts Mentioned:
https://www.fivefourpod.com/
https://www.hottakepod.com/
List of Books Mentioned:
https://tinyurl.com/c9r3kksv
Get Involved:
FridaysForFuture.org
https://rebellion.global/
https://www.sunrisemovement.org/
350.org
DemandJustice.org
Figure out who to vote for:
Leadnow.ca https://voteearthnow.com/
Other Climate YouTubers to Check out:
https://tinyurl.com/fyu59z8x
How to make a go-bag:
https://www.ready.gov/kit
Mental Health Resources:
Suicide Hotlines (international)
https://blog.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines/
Support groups: https://www.goodgriefnetwork.org/
Essay version of this video (Not a direct transcript, but close)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bkM0TQUCFQQNxBPWfOZenYUJaNDtgYdZidwxVSdRI_w/edit
*TIMESTAMPS*
00:00 Part One - Science and History
18:26 Part Two - System Change
38:04 Part Three - Internal Activism
43:26 Part Four - Revolution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Mlj3QxJe4k
[ scary book, terrifying reality ]
*‘The Deluge’ Is a Climate Nightmare—and It’s Based on Reality*
Stephen Markley explains how he wrote a dystopia that feels a little too
real.
https://gizmodo.com/the-deluge-is-a-climate-nightmare-and-it-s-based-on-r-1850053112
/[The news archive - looking back]/
/*February 2, 2017*/
February 2, 2017:
The New York Times reports:
“Republicans took one of their first steps on Thursday to officially
dismantle Obama-era environmental regulations by easing restrictions
on coal mining, bolstering an industry that President Trump has made
a symbol of America’s neglected heartland.
“Using an obscure law that allows Congress to review regulations
before they take effect, the Senate voted to reverse the Stream
Protection Rule, which seeks to protect the nation’s waterways from
debris generated by a practice called surface mining. The Interior
Department had said the rule would protect 6,000 miles of streams
and 52,000 acres of forests by keeping coal mining debris away from
nearby waters.
“The Senate vote was 54 to 45.
“The Obama administration had finalized the rule in its final days,
putting it in the cross hairs of the Republican-controlled Congress,
together with other last-minute Obama regulations. The House voted
Wednesday to repeal it. The bill now goes to Mr. Trump, who has
vowed to peel back regulations, for his signature.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/02/business/energy-environment/senate-coal-regulations.html?mwrsm=Email&_r=0
=======================================
*Mass media is lacking, many daily summariesdeliver global warming news
- a few are email delivered*
=========================================================
**Inside Climate News*
Newsletters
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day or
once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top headlines
deliver the full story, for free.
https://insideclimatenews.org/
---------------------------------------
**Climate Nexus* https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News summarizes the
most important climate and energy news of the day, delivering an
unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting. It also provides
original reporting and commentary on climate denial and pro-polluter
activity that would otherwise remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday
=================================
*Carbon Brief Daily https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up*
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon Brief
sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to thousands of
subscribers around the world. The email is a digest of the past 24 hours
of media coverage related to climate change and energy, as well as our
pick of the key studies published in the peer-reviewed journals.
more at https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief
==================================
*T*he Daily Climate *Subscribe https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate impacts,
solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better than coffee.
Other newsletters at https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not carry
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers. A
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender. This is a personal hobby production curated by Richard Pauli
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for commercial
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20230202/cac72854/attachment.htm>
More information about the theClimate.Vote
mailing list