[✔️] June 28, 2022 - Daily Global Warming News Digest

Richard Pauli Richard at CredoandScreed.com
Tue Jun 28 10:20:55 EDT 2022


/*June  28, 2022*/

/[ maybe should ban all lightning strikes, spontaneous combustion and 
any upwind wildfires  ]/
*California's largest private landowner closes all forestlands to public 
indefinitely due to wildfire, drought danger*
Katie Dowd - - June 26, 2022
- -
Lumber giant Sierra Pacific Industries owns over 2 million acres of 
forestland across California, Washington and Oregon. The company, which 
is headquartered in Anderson, Calif., is one of America's biggest 
private landowners. In areas where SPI is not actively logging, the 
public can usually access the land for hiking, permitted fishing and 
hunting and cross-country skiing. But starting Friday, SPI's extensive 
holdings will be off-limits due to "extreme drought and wildfire 
conditions."...
https://www.sfgate.com/california-wildfires/article/California-largest-private-landowner-closes-forest-17266493.php 




/[  La Nina is the name of a type of climate destabilization -- cooler, 
wetter.. ] /
*Rare ‘triple’ La Niña climate event looks likely — what does the future 
hold?*
Meteorologists are forecasting a third consecutive year of La Niña. Some 
researchers say similar conditions could become more common as the 
planet warms.
Nicola Jones - - 23 June 2022

*Cold-water injection*
England has another possible explanation for why the IPCC models could 
be getting future La Niña-like conditions wrong. As the world warms and 
the Greenland ice sheet melts, its fresh cold water is expected to slow 
down a dominant conveyor belt of ocean currents: the Atlantic Meridional 
Overturning Circulation (AMOC). Scientists mostly agree that the AMOC 
current has slowed down in recent decades4, but don’t agree on why, or 
how much it will slow in future.

In a study published in Nature Climate Change on 6 June5, England and 
his colleagues model how an AMOC collapse would leave an excess of heat 
in the tropical South Atlantic, which would trigger a series of 
air-pressure changes that ultimately strengthen the Pacific trade winds. 
These winds push warm water to the west, thus creating more La Niña-like 
conditions. But England says that the current IPCC models don’t reflect 
this trend because they don’t include the complex interactions between 
ice-sheet melt, freshwater injections, ocean currents and atmospheric 
circulation. “We keep adding bells and whistles to these models. But we 
need to add in the ice sheets,” he says.

Michael Mann, a climatologist at Pennsylvania State University in State 
College, has also argued2 that climate change will both slow the AMOC 
and create more La Niña-like conditions. He says the study shows how 
these two factors can reinforce each other. Getting the models to better 
reflect what’s going on in the ocean, says Seager, “remains a very 
active research topic”.

“We need to better understand what’s going on,” agrees L’Heureux. For 
now, she adds, whether, how and why the ENSO might change “is a very 
interesting mystery”.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-01668-1
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01668-1



/[ Yes we should know about all the others ]/
*CO2 Isn’t the Only Gas Bad for Earth. What Are We Doing About the Rest?*
AATHIRA PERINCHERY - - 6-27-2022
Kochi: While carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions often dominate climate 
talks, we also need to cut emissions of several other climate pollutants 
to be able to meaningfully curb global warming. The reason is simple: 
CO2 is only one half of the problem.

Specifically, a recent study calculated these pollutants that together 
contribute almost as much to global warming as does CO2. And most of 
them last only a (relatively) short time in the atmosphere, so reducing 
their concentration could slow warming faster than any other mitigation 
strategy.

Combined cuts – in both CO2 and these short-lived climate pollutants – 
can in fact slow the rate of warming by a decade or two earlier than 
decarbonisation alone and allow the world to stay below the agreed limit 
of 1.5º C, the study found.

The Wire Science spoke to the study’s authors, Gabrielle Dreyfus and 
Durwood Zaelke, about their work, its implications in the fight against 
the climate crisis and how India can benefit by responding more 
effectively against a wider portfolio of ‘climate pollutants’.
Zaelke is president and Dreyfus is chief scientist – both at the 
Institute for Governance and Sustainable Development in Washington, D.C. 
and Paris.
- -
*Gabrielle Dreyfus:* Over the past decade or so, the debate has been 
framed around the idea of attention to non-CO2 [greenhouse gases] as a 
trade-off or potential distraction from cutting CO2. But this is not the 
right way to think about the issue. We are experiencing the impacts of 
global warming now. We are seeing heatwaves that would have been 
impossible without human-caused climate changes. The severity and 
frequency of extreme events is greater than predicted.

Similar to the debate a decade ago, about whether adaptation was a 
distraction from mitigation, we are at the point where it is obvious 
that we need to do both. The same is true for non-CO2 pollutants like 
methane, tropospheric ozone, HFCs [hydrofluorocarbons] and black carbon.

Cutting these short-lived super-climate-pollutants is the only 
mitigation strategy that can slow warming in the near term, slow the 
self-reinforcing feedbacks that are accelerating warming, avoid 
irreversible tipping points, and allow for adaptation.

The distinction between near-term and long-term warming, and the effects 
they have on each other, appears to be an important part of this 
discourse. Could you shed some light on this, and why they both warrant 
different mitigation measures?

*Gabrielle Dreyfus:* Different climate pollutants stay in the atmosphere 
for different periods of time. CO2 continues to warm the planet for 
centuries. In contrast, short-lived climate pollutants like methane, 
hydrofluorocarbons, black carbon and tropospheric ozone only stay in the 
atmosphere for days, to weeks to 15 years or less.

This means cutting emissions of short-lived climate pollutants can 
quickly reduce their concentration in the atmosphere and the warming 
they cause.

Most CO2 emissions come from burning fossil fuels, so transitioning to 
non-fossil renewable sources of energy is key for cutting carbon dioxide 
emissions. This fossil fuel transition will also reduce about a third of 
methane emissions, but not methane from landfills and agriculture, so 
those need separate mitigation strategies.

Similarly, fossil-fuel strategies don’t reduce hydrofluorocarbon 
emissions, so a separate strategy is needed for those. Luckily, we have 
the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol that has established a 
phasedown schedule for HFCs.

The importance of non-CO2 pollutants and their role in climate 
mitigation has been “underappreciated due to misperception arising from 
inconsistencies between IPCC WG I and WG III reports,” your paper says. 
Could you tell us more about this? Would you say that this 
“misperception” has affected our response to climate change?

*Gabrielle Dreyfus: *The contribution of non-CO2 greenhouse gases to 
current and future warming has been underappreciated in part due to 
discrepancies between how the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate 
Change] reports contribution to warming in its science report (by the 
Working Group I, or WG I) and in its mitigation report (WG III).

By choosing to show emissions in terms of CO2 equivalent with a 100-year 
time horizon and ignoring the warming and cooling impacts of some gases 
and aerosols, the WG III report significantly underrepresents the nearly 
equal contribution to current warming from non-CO2 pollutants that 
include non-CO2 greenhouse gases and black carbon.

Excluding these non-CO2 and non-greenhouse-gas climate forces from 
emissions accounting obscures the impact of mitigation policy, 
especially in the near term.

The Netherlands has decided to downscale, relocate or shut farms to cut 
down on nitrogen emissions. Is this a good move? And what happens to 
farmers’ livelihoods – how do we work around that?

*Durwood Zaelke: *Reducing anthropogenic nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions 
must integrate efforts to improve farmers’ livelihoods, such as 
providing subsidy programmes and other incentives.

Existing, cost-effective technology can reduce N2O emissions in the 
agricultural sector by 50% through no-till farming, reducing fertiliser 
application, and applying nitrogen inhibitors to soil and manure. 
Studies have found that applying nitrogen inhibitors can reduce 
emissions at marginal costs, as well as reduce labour costs and other 
incurred costs.

There are other cost-effective solutions, including the [sustainable, 
intensive agriculture], which stimulates nitrogen-uptake in crops and 
inhibits greenhouse-gas emissions from manure.

Reducing anthropogenic N2O emissions is a critical part of a fast 
climate mitigation strategy, as N2O is the third-most damaging 
greenhouse gas after CO2 and methane. It also is the last unregulated 
gas that destroys the stratospheric ozone layer.

The agriculture, forestry, and land-use sectors account for 82% of 
global anthropogenic N2O emissions and are the main drivers of increases 
in atmospheric N2O concentrations, causing up to 71% of the increase in 
emissions.

A global N2O reduction strategy should also include tackling remaining 
industrial emissions, where technical solutions already exist.

As an ozone depleting substance and a climate pollutant, N2O could be 
included in an amendment to the Montreal Protocol, similar to the Kigali 
Amendment that mandates the phase down of the production and consumption 
of HFCs.
https://science.thewire.in/environment/short-lived-climate-pollutants-climate/

- -

/[ just a little bit of science - CO2 is not the only bad chemical - the 
rest are mixed in a "CO2 equivalents" ]/
*Mitigating climate disruption in time: A self-consistent approach for 
avoiding both near-term and long-term global warming*
Contributed by Veerabhadran Ramanathan;
May 23, 2022  - 119 (22) e2123536119
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2123536119
*Significance*
This study clarifies the need for comprehensive CO2 and non-CO2 
mitigation approaches to address both near-term and long-term warming. 
Non-CO2 greenhouse gases (GHGs) are responsible for nearly half of all 
climate forcing from GHG. However, the importance of non-CO2 pollutants, 
in particular short-lived climate pollutants, in climate mitigation has 
been underrepresented. When historical emissions are partitioned into 
fossil fuel (FF)- and non-FF-related sources, we find that nearly half 
of the positive forcing from FF and land-use change sources of CO2 
emissions has been masked by coemission of cooling aerosols. Pairing 
decarbonization with mitigation measures targeting non-CO2 pollutants is 
essential for limiting not only the near-term (next 25 y) warming but 
also the 2100 warming below 2 °C.
*Abstract*
The ongoing and projected impacts from human-induced climate change 
highlight the need for mitigation approaches to limit warming in both 
the near term (<2050) and the long term (>2050). We clarify the role of 
non-CO2 greenhouse gases and aerosols in the context of near-term and 
long-term climate mitigation, as well as the net effect of 
decarbonization strategies targeting fossil fuel (FF) phaseout by 2050. 
Relying on Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change radiative forcing, 
we show that the net historical (2019 to 1750) radiative forcing effect 
of CO2 and non-CO2 climate forcers emitted by FF sources plus the CO2 
emitted by land-use changes is comparable to the net from non-CO2 
climate forcers emitted by non-FF sources. We find that mitigation 
measures that target only decarbonization are essential for strong 
long-term cooling but can result in weak near-term warming (due to 
unmasking the cooling effect of coemitted aerosols) and lead to 
temperatures exceeding 2 °C before 2050. In contrast, pairing 
decarbonization with additional mitigation measures targeting 
short-lived climate pollutants and N2O, slows the rate of warming a 
decade or two earlier than decarbonization alone and avoids the 2 °C 
threshold altogether. These non-CO2 targeted measures when combined with 
decarbonization can provide net cooling by 2030 and reduce the rate of 
warming from 2030 to 2050 by about 50%, roughly half of which comes from 
methane, significantly larger than decarbonization alone over this time 
frame. Our analysis demonstrates the need for a comprehensive CO2 and 
targeted non-CO2 mitigation approach to address both the near-term and 
long-term impacts of climate disruption.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2123536119



/[  you want to know of higher risks ] /
*The disease after tomorrow*
Five illnesses spreading in a hotter world
Zoya Teirstein - Jun 27, 2022

    For a downloadable field guide to emerging climate-charged diseases,
    click here:
    8.5×11
    https://grist.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/field-guide-8-5x11-1.pdf
    11×17
    https://grist.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/field-guide-11x17-1.pdf

*Powassan virus*
Carried by the blacklegged (deer) tick, an arachnid about the size of a 
poppy seed
The virus causes a neuroinvasive disease that has no treatment, vaccine, 
or cure. Early symptoms include headache, fever, nausea, and weakness — 
similar to other tick-borne illnesses. But Powassan is different from 
most tick diseases because it has an extremely high mortality rate: One 
in 10 people who develop the acute form of the illness die. Half of 
those who survive a severe bout of Powassan have long-term health issues 
such as recurring headaches, loss of muscle mass and strength, and 
memory problems...
- -
*Chikungunya fever*
Carried by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes...
Much like ticks, mosquitoes thrive in warm, moist conditions. Climate 
change isn’t just warming the planet, it’s throwing the hydrological 
cycle out of whack, causing periods of extreme wetness in regions all 
over the globe. These conditions may be encouraging the spread of the 
mosquito species that carry chikungunya from California down through the 
southern half of the U.S. and up into the Northeast.

“We are not prepared.”
— Charles Ben Beard, deputy director of the CDC’s division of 
vector-borne diseases
Solutions:
Similar to Powassan virus, chikungunya has no vaccine or cure. Doctors 
can make patients more comfortable with fluids, local anesthetics, and 
aspirin. The most effective tools against chikungunya are preventative.
- -
*Vibriosis*
Carried by uncooked shellfish such as clams, mussels, and oysters
*Climate connection:*
The optimal water temperature for all Vibrio, including Vibrio 
vulnificus, is between 68 and 95 degrees Fahrenheit. Coastal waters 
around large swaths of the U.S. are hitting that temperature threshold 
earlier in the year as the planet warms, giving Vibrio a longer window 
to proliferate in the water and potentially accumulate in shellfish. In 
addition, water that has historically been too chilly for Vibrio 
vulnificus to properly thrive is warming up, allowing the bacteria to 
spread north into new areas like the Northeast and Pacific Northwest..
- -
*Chagas’ disease*
Carried by triatomine insects, commonly known as kissing bugs
Kissing bugs are bloodsucking insects that often attach themselves to 
the soft skin around the mouths of humans, dogs, and other animals. But 
Chagas isn’t spread by the bloodsucking itself. When kissing bugs feed — 
at night when people are sleeping — the bugs defecate. People tend to 
rub the kissing bug’s feces into their mouths by accident either in 
their sleep or when they wake, inadvertently infecting themselves with 
Trypanosoma cruzi, the parasite that causes Chagas.

In the weeks and months after infection, symptoms can include fever or 
swelling. If Chagas is left untreated, it becomes chronic. An estimated 
20 to 30 percent of people with chronic Chagas develop life-threatening 
complications such as a dilated heart that can’t pump enough blood, 
life-threatening gastrointestinal issues, and cardiac arrest...
- -
*Valley fever*
Carried by soil containing the fungus Coccidioides
When Coccidioides spores living in dirt circulate in the air — kicked up 
by wind, construction, farming, or possibly wildfire smoke — humans and 
other animals can breathe the spores in. Most individuals with healthy 
immune systems can fight off the fungus by themselves, but in people 
with compromised immune systems, the spores are more likely to survive 
and extend their fungal filaments throughout the lungs and sometimes the 
rest of the body...
- -
https://grist.org/health/the-disease-after-tomorrow/




/[The news archive - looking back]/

/*June  28, 2015
*/June 28, 2015:
*In the Washington Post, Columbia University Law Professor Michael B. 
Gerrard observes:*

    "Toward the end of this century, if current trends are not reversed,
    large parts of Bangladesh, the Philippines, Indonesia, Pakistan,
    Egypt and Vietnam, among other countries, will be under water. Some
    small island nations, such as Kiribati and the Marshall Islands,
    will be close to disappearing entirely. Swaths of Africa from Sierra
    Leone to Ethiopia will be turning into desert. Glaciers in the
    Himalayas and the Andes, on which entire regions depend for drinking
    water, will be melting away. Many habitable parts of the world will
    no longer be able to support agriculture or produce clean water.

    "The people who live there will not sit passively by while they and
    their children starve to death. Tens or hundreds of millions of
    people will try very hard to go somewhere they can survive. They
    will be hungry, thirsty, hot — and desperate. If the search for
    safety involves piling into perilous boats and enduring miserable
    and dangerous journeys, they will do it. They will cross borders,
    regardless of whether they are welcome. And in their desperation,
    they could become violent: Forced migration can exacerbate ethnic
    and political tensions. Studies show that more heat tends to
    increase violence.

    "The United Nations says the maximum tolerable increase in global
    average temperatures is 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit above pre-industrial
    conditions. (Small island nations argued for a much lower figure; at
    3.6 degrees, they’ll be gone.) But the promises that nations are
    making ahead of the U.N. climate summit in Paris in December would
    still, according to the International Energy Agency, lead the
    average temperature to rise by about 4.7 degrees before the end of
    the century. Those promises are voluntary and nonbinding, and if
    they aren’t kept, the thermometer could go much higher. Which means
    our children and grandchildren will be confronting a humanitarian
    crisis unlike anything the world has ever faced.

    "Absent the political will to prevent it, the least we can do is to
    start planning for it.

    "Rather than leaving vast numbers of victims of a warmer world
    stranded, without any place allowing them in, industrialized
    countries ought to pledge to take on a share of the displaced
    population equal to how much each nation has historically
    contributed to emissions of the greenhouse gases that are causing
    this crisis."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/america-is-the-worst-polluter-in-the-history-of-the-world-we-should-let-climate-change-refugees-resettle-here/2015/06/25/28a55238-1a9c-11e5-ab92-c75ae6ab94b5_story.html 



=======================================

*Mass media is lacking, here are a few daily summariesof global warming 
news - email delivered*

=========================================================
**Inside Climate News*
Newsletters
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day or 
once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top headlines 
deliver the full story, for free.
https://insideclimatenews.org/
---------------------------------------
**Climate Nexus* https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News summarizes the 
most important climate and energy news of the day, delivering an 
unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting. It also provides 
original reporting and commentary on climate denial and pro-polluter 
activity that would otherwise remain largely unexposed.    5 weekday
=================================
*Carbon Brief Daily https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up*
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon Brief 
sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to thousands of 
subscribers around the world. The email is a digest of the past 24 hours 
of media coverage related to climate change and energy, as well as our 
pick of the key studies published in the peer-reviewed journals.
more at https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief
==================================
*T*he Daily Climate *Subscribe https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate impacts, 
solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better than coffee.
Other newsletters  at https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/

/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/ 

/Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html> 
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote

/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe 
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request> 
to news digest./

   Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only.  It does not carry 
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers.  A 
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and 
sender. This is a hobby production curated by Richard Pauli
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for commercial 
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote 
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, 
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at 
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for 
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct 
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List 
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to 
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20220628/0df4b3ae/attachment.htm>


More information about the TheClimate.Vote mailing list